• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet AL Clippings image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet SHEPARD FAIREY V. ASSOCIATED PRESS (PICTURE’S WORTH SOMETHING)
Back

SHEPARD FAIREY V. ASSOCIATED PRESS (PICTURE’S WORTH SOMETHING)

October 19, 2009

STATEMENT BY SHEPARD FAIREY ON ASSOCIATED PRESS FAIR USE CASE
OCTOBER 16, 2009

“In an effort to keep everyone up to date on my legal battle to uphold the principle of fair use in copyright laws, I wanted to notify you of a recent development in my case against The Associated Press (AP). On October 9, 2009, my lawyers sent a letter to the AP and to the photographer Mannie Garcia, through their lawyers, notifying them that I intend to amend my court pleadings. Throughout the case, there has been a question as to which Mannie Garcia photo I used as a reference to design the HOPE image. The AP claimed it was one photo, and I claimed it was another. The new filings state for the record that the AP is correct about which photo I used as a reference and that I was mistaken. While I initially believed that the photo I referenced was a different one, I discovered early on in the case that I was wrong. In an attempt to conceal my mistake I submitted false images and deleted other images. I sincerely apologize for my lapse in judgment and I take full responsibility for my actions which were mine alone. I am taking every step to correct the information and I regret I did not come forward sooner.

“I am very sorry to have hurt and disappointed colleagues, friends, and family who have supported me in this difficult case and trying time in my life. I am also sorry because my actions may distract from what should be the real focus of my case – the right to fair use so that all artists can create freely. Regardless of which of the two images was used, the fair use issue should be the same.”

 

By APL: Statement from Srinandan R. Kasi, VP and General Counsel, The Associated Press

Striking at the heart of his fair use case against the AP, Shepard Fairey has now been forced to admit that he sued the AP under false pretenses by lying about which AP photograph he used to make the Hope and Progress posters. Mr. Fairey has also now admitted to the AP that he fabricated and attempted to destroy other evidence in an effort to bolster his fair use case and cover up his previous lies and omissions.

In his Feb. 9, 2009 complaint for a declaratory judgment against the AP, Fairey falsely claimed to have used an AP photograph of George Clooney sitting next to then-Sen. Barack Obama as the source of the artist’s Hope and Progress posters. However, as the AP correctly alleged in its March 11, 2009 response, Fairey had instead used a close-up photograph of Obama from the same press event, which is an exact match for Fairey’s posters. In its response, the AP also correctly surmised that Fairey had attempted to hide the true identity of the source photo in order to help his case by arguing that he had to make more changes to the source photo than he actually did, i.e., that he at least had to crop it.

After filing the complaint, Fairey went on to make several public statements in which he insisted that the photo with George Clooney was the source image and that “The AP is showing the wrong photo.” It appears that these statements were also false, as were statements that Fairey made describing how he cropped Clooney out of the photo and made other changes to create the posters.

Fairey’s lies about which photo was the source image were discovered after the AP had spent months asking Fairey’s counsel for documents regarding the creation of the posters, including copies of any source images that Fairey used. Fairey’s counsel has now admitted that Fairey tried to destroy documents that would have revealed which image he actually used. Fairey’s counsel has also admitted that he created fake documents as part of his effort to conceal which photo was the source image, including hard copy printouts of an altered version of the Clooney Photo and fake stencil patterns of the Hope and Progress posters. Most recently, on Oct. 15, Fairey’s counsel informed the AP that they intended to seek the Court’s permission to withdraw as counsel for Fairey and his related entities.

The AP intends to vigorously pursue its countersuit alleging that Fairey willfully infringed the AP’s copyright in the close-up photo of then-Sen. Obama by using it without permission to create the Hope and Progress posters and related products, including T-shirts and sweatshirts that have led to substantial revenue. According to the AP’s in-house counsel, Laura Malone, “Fairey has licensed AP photos in the past for similar uses and should have done so in this case. As a not-for-profit news organization, the AP depends on licensing revenue to stay in business.” Proceeds received for past use of the photo will be contributed by the AP to The AP Emergency Relief Fund, which assists staffers and their families around the world who are victims of natural disasters and conflicts.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous GLOBAL PIRACY WATCH: AUSTRALIA’S ISP LIABILITY TEST CASE
Next Arts v. Ads — something light in this part of the city

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law Vivianne Diaz Article Portrait of Zborowski
Art lawCase Review

The Modigliani Forgery Epidemic Strikes Again?

January 13, 2026
Image Source: Public court documents filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. building burning
Case ReviewOpinionappraisalart insuranceart litigation

Perelman’s Art Damage Case Continued to Burn Through Court Last Week

June 23, 2025
A Recent Entrance to Paradise, Creativity Machine (Source: opinion letter)
Case ReviewAI and copyrightcopyright lawLitigation

Case Review Update: Thaler v. Perlmutter (2025)

June 20, 2025
Center for Art Law
Summer School Promo

2026 Art Law Summer School

Applications Now Open

Want to learn MORE about art law? Join us for an unforgettable week of art law in NYC!

 

Apply Now
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

September of 2025 stuck a potential death blow to September of 2025 stuck a potential death blow to the NFT market: Christie's announced the closing of their digital art department. It had only lasted 3 years. NFTs experienced a incredibly  fast tracked rise and fall in popularity, leaving behind questions as to their continuing value and ownership rights. And yet, there could be some lasting change on how digital ownership will continue moving foward. 

📚 To learn more about this niche and potentially, completely, disappearing market read Shaila Gray's recently published article using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #nfts #blockchain #digitalart #artmarket #artistissues
ONLY 5 DAYS LEFT to apply for the Second Edition ONLY 5 DAYS LEFT to apply  for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School!! Deadline to apply is  March 15th! Check out these memories from our 2025 Summer School. Don't miss your chance to participate in a whirlwind adventure exploring art law in NYC. 🗽

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field.

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio!
After many years of hard work we’ve officially cro After many years of hard work we’ve officially crossed the 1,000 cases mark in our case law database!! Let us know what your favorites are below!
Join us on March 12 for Charitable Contributions: Join us on March 12 for Charitable Contributions: Tax Considerations for Artists and Collectors. For this event we are pleased to be hearing from Attorney Karin Gross. With over 30 years of experience, Ms. Gross is an expert in the area of tax law and specializes in the area of tax aspects for charitable giving. She served in the Office of Legislative Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives, drafting legislation on behalf of Members of Congress and committee and has worked at the IRS Office of Chief Council. Ms. Gross will guide participants through important tax considerations for artists, collectors and art market participants. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #tax #taxlaw #artist #irs #artandtaxlaw
On March 2nd, SCOTUS ended the saga of "The Recent On March 2nd, SCOTUS ended the saga of "The Recent Enteance to Paradise ", having denied writ of certiorari in Thaler v. Perlmutter. The question posed to the Court was if a work with a nonhuman author could receive copyright protections. The Court of Appeals for D.C. (2025) and the District Court (2023) have already answered 'no' to this issue, citing prior case law human requirements, statute interpretation of the word human artist, and other arguments. Check out our coverage discussing both lower court opinions using the link in bio. Human authorship remains a must for copyright registration. 

📚 Read more about the Supreme Court petition and outcome using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #copyright #artlaw #artlawyer #copyrightlaw #ailaw #aiart #artissues #artandai
Deadline Extended!! We are still accepting applica Deadline Extended!! We are still accepting applications for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School until March 15th! Don't miss this opportunity to explore art law NYC style 🗽

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field.

Applications Extended till March 15th!

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawsummerschool #newyork #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #lawyer #art
Have you seen the 2024 documentary "The Spoils"? O Have you seen the 2024 documentary "The Spoils"? Our latest review covers Jamie Kastner's film that follows the Max Stern Foundation's restitution efforts and asks hard questions about who holds power in the art world. Savannah Weiler reviews it and we want to hear your take. Read it via the link in bio and drop your thoughts in the comments! 👇 

#centerforartlaw #FILMREVIEW #nazieralootedart #maxsternfoundation
Smile — you're at the Center for Art Law! 🌷 Meet o Smile — you're at the Center for Art Law! 🌷 Meet our Spring 2026 intern team, joining us from schools and graduate programs across the country! 🎓 

Our Spring 2026 Interns have been learning and working hard starting January! We are pleased to introduce to you Donyea James (Legal Intern, Fordham Law, 3L), Alexandra Kharchenko (Legal Intern, French LLM Grad of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law), Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis (Graduate Intern, with MA in Classics and BA in Art History), Halle O’Hern (Legal Intern, Brooklyn Law, 2L), Marina Rastorfer (Legal Intern, Cardozo Law, LLM), and Savannah Weiler (Graduate Intern, MA in History of Art). 

From legal research to event planning, our interns are doing it all — under careful supervision!

Interested in joining our team? Fall 2026 internships begin the 2nd week of September — visit the link in our bio to learn more!
📌 We are looking for interns who can commit to working with us the entire academic year. 

#ArtLaw #LegalInterns #SpringInterns #InternSpotlight #ArtAndLaw #LawSchool #Internship BrooklynLawSchool #FordhamLaw #CardozoLaw #Northwestern #UTAustin #ClassicsAndArt #ArtHistory #NextGenLawyers
🏒 🎨⚖️ Thank you to all the applicants interested 🏒 🎨⚖️

Thank you to all the applicants interested in our 2026 summer internship program. We are humbled by the talent and volume of applications received. We only wish we could offer placement to all of you. If we cannot accommodate your interest this summer, please consider joining us as guest writers, volunteers and students at the upcoming summer school.
Grab an Early Bird Discount for our new CLE progra Grab an Early Bird Discount for our new CLE program to train lawyers to assist visual artists and dealers in the unique aspects of their relationship.

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

The event will take place at DLA Piper, 1251 6th Avenue, New York, NY. 9am -5pm.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
A recent report by the World Jewish Restitution Or A recent report by the World Jewish Restitution Organization (WRJO) states that most American museums provide inadequate provenance information for potentially Nazi-looted objects held in their collections. This is an ongoing problem, as emphasized by the closure of the Nazi-Era Provenance Internet Portal last year. Established in 2003, the portal was intended to act as a public registry of potentially looted art held in museum collections across the United States. However, over its 21-year lifespan, the portal's practitioners struggled to secure ongoing funding and it ultimately became outdated. 

The WJRO report highlights this failure, noting that museums themselves have done little to make provenance information easily accessible. This lack of transparency is a serious blow to the efforts of Holocaust survivors and their descendants to secure the repatriation of seized artworks. WJRO President Gideon Taylor urged American museums to make more tangible efforts to cooperate with Holocaust survivors and their families in their pursuit of justice.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #museumissues #nazilootedart #wwii #artlawyer #legalresearch
Join us for the Second Edition of Center for Art L Join us for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School! An immersive five-day educational program designed for individuals interested in the dynamic and ever-evolving field of art law. 

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field. 

Applications are open now through March 1st!

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlawsummerschool #newyork #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #lawyer #art
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law