With The Andy Warhol Foundation’s recent letter to G. Wayne Clough, the head of the Smithsonian, threatening to reject future grant requests unless the Smithsonian returns “A Fire in My Belly” to the current “Hide/Seek” exhibition, it seems that everyone is weighing in on the Worjnarowicz/Smithsonian controversy–a controversy which has quickly resurrected the culture wars. Those in the right wing media attest that the 11 second image of ants running along a cross is “hate speech.” So, the use of a religious symbol in an unconventional method equates to hate speech? From the viewpoint of this author, commentary using religious symbols is a simple tool of expression that has been commonly, and in many cases expected to be, employed. When using heavy terms, such as “hate speech,” which carry the baggage of R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (505 U.S. 377(1992)), one wonders if the term is being used to promote public discussion or simply to disrespect and disregard an entire area of artwork.
But I say, Hide/Seek for yourself. Warjnarowicz’s work is currently exhibited in the lobby of the New Museum here in New York. The work will be exhibited through January 23, 2011. (http://www.newmuseum.org/). What do you think? Hate speech or art?
Will you help us advance our work further?Knowledge is power: the Center for Art Law offers you both.
Thank you for stopping by the Center for Art Law. Our website comprises over 1,000 articles, case summaries, and numerous resources that benefit the entire arts and law community. Your generous contribution this holiday season benefits you and others in providing vital art law research and education.
All gifts this season, whether you give $5 or $500, will make a world of difference to the Center and our community.