With The Andy Warhol Foundation’s recent letter to G. Wayne Clough, the head of the Smithsonian, threatening to reject future grant requests unless the Smithsonian returns “A Fire in My Belly” to the current “Hide/Seek” exhibition, it seems that everyone is weighing in on the Worjnarowicz/Smithsonian controversy–a controversy which has quickly resurrected the culture wars. Those in the right wing media attest that the 11 second image of ants running along a cross is “hate speech.” So, the use of a religious symbol in an unconventional method equates to hate speech? From the viewpoint of this author, commentary using religious symbols is a simple tool of expression that has been commonly, and in many cases expected to be, employed. When using heavy terms, such as “hate speech,” which carry the baggage of R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (505 U.S. 377(1992)), one wonders if the term is being used to promote public discussion or simply to disrespect and disregard an entire area of artwork.
But I say, Hide/Seek for yourself. Warjnarowicz’s work is currently exhibited in the lobby of the New Museum here in New York. The work will be exhibited through January 23, 2011. (http://www.newmuseum.org/). What do you think? Hate speech or art?
Since 2009, the Center for Art Law has organized hundreds of events and published over 1,000 relevant, accessible, and editorially independent articles. As a nonprofit working with artists and students, the Center for Art Law relies on your support to fund our work. Become a premium subscriber and gain access to discounts on events and archives of articles and/or hundreds of case summaries, intended for a worldwide audience of legal professionals, artists, researchers, and students
Thaler v. Perlmutter, Civil Action No. 22-1564 (BAH) (D.C. Aug. 18, 2023).
$70/per year
Case Law Corner
See All Benefits
Read case law summaries and enjoy unlimited access to our legendary Case Law Corner. Stay tuned to the new and improved Database in 2024.
