FBI with New Information on the 1990 Gardner Museum Heist?
March 25, 2013


The Gardner Museum Heist is labeled the “largest property crime in U.S. history.” Indeed, it is on the FBI top ten art crimes list and it involves the disappearance of the works by the great masters Vermeer, Rembrandt, Degas and others. Apparently now, the FBI knows identities of the two thieves responsible for the art’s taking. Richard DesLaurier, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Boston office is quoted as saying “The FBI believes with a high degree of confidence that in the years after the theft, the art was transported to Connecticut and the Philadelphia region, and some of the art was taken to Philadelphia, where it was offered for sale by those responsible for the theft… With that same confidence, we have identified the thieves, who are members of a criminal organization with a base in the Mid-Atlantic states and New England.”
The names of these thieves were not released nor details about an attempted sale of the art that dates back to the early 2000s, as it would have been “imprudent”. The reward for the return of the artworks in good condition is at $5 million. FBI admitted that they do not know where the art is at present nor that they are looking exclusively in the Connecticut and Philadelphia areas. So, agent DesLauriers, what was the purpose of your press release promising break news and the new FBI webpage on the Gardner Museum Heist? “With this announcement, we want to widen the ‘aperture of awareness’ of this crime to the reach the American public and others around the world,” said DesLauriers. The reaction in various news and social media sources is as ground breaking “they came, they spoke, they said nothing new.” May the wishful thinking of the Federal Bureau of Investigations feeds our wishful thinking that the art will be recovered in good condition before another decade passes.
The United States Attorney Carmen Ortiz stated that her office may offer immunity to those who come forward and provide details about their involvement in the crime, but that statute of limitation on the specific act of theft has run. Usually the statute of limitation starts running from the time the crime is committed but it may be tolled depending on the circumstances.
Sources: WSJ; WVCB News; Boston Globe; FBI Newsletter.