• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art Donations 101: a Guide for Artists, Collectors, and Nonprofits
Back

Art Donations 101: a Guide for Artists, Collectors, and Nonprofits

September 18, 2019

By Hannah Tager

In the Summer 2019, the Center for Art Law hosted its first charitable auction, during which it considered: how can artists and donors receive tax benefits for donating artworks to a non-profit organization? As it turns out, the answer is a bit lengthier than one might expect.

The Current Legal Landscape

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017[1] brought about large changes to all areas of taxation, deductibles included—as a reminder, if something is tax deductible it means that its value can be subtracted from the taxpayer’s legally taxable income. Due to this broad reform, publications pertaining to tax code are now outdated if not obsolete (including this previous publication by the Center on the topic). For a recent guide on the subject of art donations as deductibles please see IRS Publication 526 (2018), Charitable Contributions, which summarizes the Internal Revenue Code Section 170: Charitable, etc., contributions and gifts. Intended as a general guide (and not as a checklist), this article focuses on these IRS publications, highlighting pertinent sections of the tax code for artists, collectors, and donors interested in giving charitable donations of artworks.

Condition 1: Artists Excluded

Professional artists—i.e. artists who can demonstrate having gained a profit from their artworks—can generally deduct the cost of materials used to create an artwork from their taxable income as a business expense rather than a charitable donation. Since the IRS considers this artwork to be a self-created asset, artists can claim materials needed to produce their original creative work, such as paints, brushes, canvases and frames, as business-related expenses on their federal tax returns (IRS Form 1040 Schedule C). It should be noted that nontraditional materials, whether they be bottle caps or barbed wire, can also be deducted, although the time and physical labor put into constructing an artwork cannot be; for a charcoal sketch that took hours to make, an artist can only deduct the charcoal and paper costs. With these provisions, artists only pay taxes on their profit, not their total revenue. However, the IRS does not allow “double-dipping,”. Therefore, if an artist has already deducted materials under Schedule C, they cannot list them again as a charitable expense for a donated artwork.

In short, an artist, if donating directly to a foundation, cannot receive a tax deduction for an artwork he or she has created. According to the Internal Revenue Code Section 170 titled “Charitable, etc., contributions and gifts”,[2] where property is donated, the deduction must exclude the “amount of gain which would not have been long-term capital gain.” That is to say, one can only deduct a contribution that is a long-term capital gain, for example, property that has been owned for over a year and is then donated. In the case of professional artists, however, donations of their artwork constitute neither a short nor long-term gain. Instead, artwork is thought of as the professional artist’s trade, and it is thus treated as income by the IRS. The IRC thus prohibits artists from donating their own work for tax deductions.

In the case of a collector donating artwork to a nonprofit, if the artwork and the receiving organization fulfill the requirements, the work’s former owner may be able to deduct the fair market value of the artwork from their taxable income. This introduces a further condition.

Condition 2: Determining the Fair Market Value

When filing for deduction, the donor must determine the “fair market value” of the artwork. This requirement introduces a new set of guidelines and terms related to the appraisal of the piece. As per the IRS definition, the fair market value is the price that the artwork would sell for on the open market on the date of its contribution.[3] The value must reflect the price that would be agreed upon by a willing buyer and a willing seller, with neither being required to act and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. For works valued at $5,000 or more, a written appraisal by a qualified appraiser is required. To be a qualified appraiser, one must have earned appraisal designation from a recognized organization and met education and experience requirements, i.e. is certified for the property in question or has completed college or professional-level coursework relevant to the property being valued. Also, the appraiser must work regularly and cannot have been prohibited from practicing before the IRS under section 330(c) of title 31 of the United States Code. The Official Museum Directory of the American Association of Museums has a list of qualified appraisers for reference.

Appraisers can be expensive, and generally, appraisal fees cannot be deducted. In select cases, however, appraiser fees can qualify as a miscellaneous deduction, subject to a 2% limit, on Schedule A (Form 1040) if they were paid to determine the amount allowable as a charitable contribution. The selected appraiser must write an appraisal that meets the relevant requirements of Regulations section 1.170A-13(c)(3) and Notice 2006-96, 2006-46 I.R.B. 902 and attach Form 8283, Section B, Part II to the former owner’s tax returns.

Condition 3: Related Use Requirement*

Before one can deduct the now appraised fair market value of the artwork, a collector must make sure that the donation itself fulfills some requirements. As the IRS outlines, a donor cannot deduct the artwork as a charitable contribution if the piece is a contribution to a specific individual, nor can the contribution benefit the donor directly.

The most specific requirement, and the most taxing to fulfill, is the “related use” condition. A donor of art can deduct the fair market value of the artwork from their taxable income if the donation was put to a “related use” by the nonprofit (e.g. if the art was received by an art institution and is used an educational tool, then it’s “related use”). However, if the use if “unrelated” to the nonprofit’s mission, the donor must deduct the lesser of either the fair market value or the original value of the work. 
Therefore, the IRS mandates that one cannot deduct the fair market value of a piece of property if the donated work is then put to “unrelated use” and its original value is less than the fair market value.  

Within the related use clause, it is also underscored that the artwork must be put to relevant use for at least one year before the receiving organization sells, trades, or otherwise disposes of the property. Likewise, for works over $5,000, the donee must retain it for three years; otherwise, the donor must recapture part of his or her charitable contribution deduction by including it in income. For the Center’s purposes, this means that the artists and collectors that donated artworks to our auction are unfortunately not eligible to receive a tax deduction for the fair market value of their pieces since the Center sold the artworks within a year of receiving them for “unrelated use” to the Center’s mission.

Condition 4: Donation to a Fully Qualified 501(c)(3) Organization

In addition to fulfilling these requirements, the donated artwork must also have been a contribution to a fully qualified organization before it can be deducted. A fully qualified organization must be a 501(c)3 as determined by the government– you can check the exempt organization database to see a charity’s 501(c)3 status. All charities that have received 501(c)3 status are non-profit groups that are religious, charitable, educational, scientific, or literary in purpose, or that work to prevent cruelty to children or animals.[5] Once the donor has ascertained that the receiving organization is a qualified non-profit, the charity must issue the donor a statement that declares that it did not exchange any goods or services for the donation. 

Effect and Deduction

If the charity and donation meet all these requirements, in most cases the donor can deduct the fair market value of the property at the time of the contribution. For the most part, the deduction for charitable contributions generally cannot be more than 60% of the donor’s adjusted gross income (which is the gross income minus adjustments and deductions to that income). From there, collectors must file a Schedule A (Form 1040) with their tax forms to deduct donations. If the donor wants to deduct a non-cash donation, as is the case with art, form 8283 is also required. All filings must be done within the year the contribution was made.

By following these steps, a successful deduction can be possible, yet the strict regulations with which collectors must comply may deter these donors from giving to charities. The best approach as a collector would be to make a contract with the selected organization to guarantee that they will fulfill the conditions set by the IRS. Otherwise, count on cash donations to non-profit organizations for easy deductions and be very selective in choosing charities to which you donate your artwork. Many charities, and the ones that may need art donations the most, will not be able to meet the prerequisites for a deduction. In this case, make sure to set a budget for how many artworks you will donate and remember that donating a non-deductible piece of artwork could be a small loss for you but a massive gain for an organization.

Reminder: The Center for Art Law is a qualified 501(c)(3) which will gladly accept your donation!


Footnotes:

  1. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 115-97, (2017) 26 U.S.C.(2017). ↑
  2. 26 U.S. Code § 170 (2018). ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. DEP’T OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERV., PUB. 526 CAT. NO 15050A, CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS: FOR USE IN PREPARING 2018 RETURNS 11-12 (2019). ↑
  5. Id., 1. ↑

Additional Readings:

  • IRC § 170.1.6
  • Hannah Cole, How the New Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Impact the Art World, Hyperallergic (Sept. 24, 2018).
  • IRS Publication 561 (4/2007): Determining the Value of Donated Property, April 2007.
  • IRS Publication 526. Cat. No 15050A: Charitable Contributions: For use in preparing 2018 Returns, Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service, IRS CC, 12.
  • https://www.usa.gov/donate-to-charity

Acknowledgments:

The author would like to thank Jason Kleinman for his thoughtful advice during the preparation of this article.

About the Author:

Hannah Tager was a Summer 2019 intern at the Center for Art Law and a rising Senior at Williams College in Williamstown, MA, where she also works at the Clark Art Institute and serves on the board of the town’s radio station, WCFM 91.9.

* On September 15, 2020, this article was edited to correct the section on the “related use” requirement.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Deconstructing “Orphan Works”
Next The Art of Bankruptcy: Consigned Artworks and Bankrupt Galleries

Related Posts

winter scene with Brooklyn Bridge in the style of Roy Lichtenstein image generators generated by artificial intelligence

AI and Artists’ IP: Exploring Copyright Infringement Allegations in Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.

February 26, 2024

“Shhhhhh”: Kat Von D and Tattoo Fan Art – Sedlik v. Von Drachenberg (2021)

April 16, 2024
stock photo of a pen

Why Estate Planning is Important for Artists and Art Collectors

September 13, 2023
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law