• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet DAOs in the Art World: From the U.S. Constitution to NFTs
Back

DAOs in the Art World: From the U.S. Constitution to NFTs

May 9, 2023

Zhou Dongqing, The Pleasures of Fishes (1291)

Zhou Dongqing, The Pleasures of Fishes (1291)

By Laura Dowdy

Overview

A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) refers to a group of people who come together without a central leader or company dictating any of the decisions. They are built on a blockchain using smart contracts. One of the most noteworthy early DAOs was the ConstitutionDAO. This DAO was formed in November 2021 with the singular purpose of generating enough money (in the form of payment tokens cryptocurrency) to purchase, at auction, one of the 13 known-to-exist original, physical copies of the United States Constitution.[1] Although ConstitutionDAO raised roughly $47 million in Ethereum in roughly a week, the DAO was outbid by hedge fund CEO, Kenneth Griffin, at an auction hosted by Soetheby’s for a winning bid of $43.2 million, according to CNBC.[2] The seller was New York–based philanthropist Dorothy Tapper Goldman, who inherited the copy in 1997 from her late husband, Harry Goldman[3]. Because the ConstitutionDAO did not secure the bid at auction, investing members of the DAO are still entitled, if they have yet to manually request a refund, to get a refund of their investment, minus “gas” fees, which the blockchain server, Ethereum charges for each transaction[4]. Alternatively, those seeking refunds can opt to receive $People tokens, transferred immediately to their digital wallets.

The ConstitutionDAO was an early riser in the dawn of digital art-collecting communities. Since that record-breaking Sotheby’s auction in 2021, DAOs have continued to take ground in the art market.

This article aims to provide an overview of how DAOs work, broadly defined, including their organizational structure and transactional frameworks, as well as examples of real DAOs focusing on the art and antiquities markets.

What is a DAO?

Definition

DAO stands for Decentralized Autonomous Organization. DAOs are created by people with a shared vision, mission, or goal who come together to form a type of legal structure that does not have a traditional governing body.[5] These organizations have a horizontal, rather than a vertical or hierarchical structure, which enables participating members to make decisions regarding the organization collaboratively, traditionally by casting votes.

Purpose

Why do DAOs exist?

While there are many reasons someone may decide to participate in or create a DAO, the primary function that sets DAOs apart from other legal entities, such as corporations, is that DAOs do not have a centralized governing authority, and therefore, the members collectively make all decisions according to the distribution of voting power, often determined by the number of tokens each member has, and do not require the approval of a board of directors or other authoritative figures[6]. This structure enables members of the DAO to take more ownership of the decision-making process and the ultimate success of the DAO.

Benefits and Purposes for Artists

For artists, DAOs often serve as a means of participating in a marketplace where artists can sell their work in the form of NFTs. The DAO structure allows creators to be a part of a larger, borderless community, participating and selling their works in an open marketplace, and contributing to the organization’s decision-making process.[7] The benefits of DAOs for artists are that the artist may have voting power to determine policies, procedures, core values upon which the DAO operates, and more.[8]

For example, the DAO, Teia, is a “non-profit, open-source online platform for trading digital assets as OBJKT NFTs.”[9] Teia was formed after one of the most popular initial NFT DAOs using Tezos blockchain, Hic Et Nunc, abruptly shut down in November 2021. Members of the Hic Et Nunc community quickly responded to the shutdown by creating Teia.art[10]. One such member is artist, Merchant Coppola, who has been one of the most active members throughout the Hic Et Nunc-to-Teia transition. Because Teia is owned, managed, governed, and continuously being built and improved upon by its community members, it is able to serve as a malleable platform for collectors and creators of digital art to come together for collaboration, artistic expression, and monetary gain.[11]

Benefits and Purposes for Investors and Collectors

For investors and collectors of NFTs, DAOs can be an ideal marketplace to participate in because, unlike traditional corporate entities, DAOs’ decentralized structure allows for people all over the world, at varying levels of investment, and without formal titles, to participate in the governing body and decision-making processes.[12] Another key benefit of DAOs is that they provide transparency for investors and collectors. For instance, DAOs operate on blockchain, which means that records from sales and transactions are kept in a digital ledger format.[13] The blockchain captures each transaction, thereby providing a transparent method of record-keeping in which those with financial interest can have access to any discrepancies and records, at any time.

How to Start a Digital Art DAO

There are several things to consider before creating a DAO. At the forefront, a DAO must be created by a community that determines and agrees upon the primary goals that the DAO will achieve. For instance, some DAOs focus on creating a marketplace for digital art in the form of NFTs or entertainment, while others may focus specifically on a socially-driven goal, such as social impact or philanthropy, or may act as more generalized financial marketplaces.

Once the initial purpose, goals, and problems the DAO will attempt to solve are agreed upon by the founding members of the community, there are still other considerations, such as how community members will meet the technical and developer needs of the DAO. For DAOs focused on a creative or artistic goal, such as creating a marketplace for NFTs, the community must establish the type of blockchain and relevant tools to run the DAO. Additionally, to establish a marketplace where NFTs can be sold, the founding community must select a particular token ISO supply and allocation method. ISO stands for the International Organization for Standardization, which is a global, non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Geneva, Switzerland.[14] The ISO develops international standards for, among many other industries, cryptocurrencies. When the ISO determines a standard for currencies, they assign a code to the currency. These codes allow financial institutions around the world to recognize transactions and codes as valid currency values. Currently, there are few established codes for cryptocurrencies, however, some cryptocurrencies will become compliant with the new ISO 20022 list, as of March 2023[15]. In addition to selecting the currency, the community decides on how to set up the treasury, including the method of receiving funds from sales and transactions.

How Do Art DAOs Work?

NFT marketplaces, such as SuperRare[16] and Teia,[17] are DAOs that focus specifically on building a community of artists and creatives, digital art collections, and collectors who want to invest in digital art. Once the DAO is established, transactions for NFT sales are recorded on a blockchain, such as Tezos,[18] which powers Teia, while the community manages and maintains the process of uploading artworks onto the marketplace to sell. To participate in selling or purchasing an NFT, you must create a virtual wallet that is compatible with dApp, which is a distributed open-source software application[19] that runs on a peer-to-peer (P2P) blockchain network (instead of on a single computer). Users must also buy liquid proof-of-stake currency[20] (LPoS), such as Tezos to “fill” their wallet and then use it for transactions.

How are they Run/Managed/Governed/Funded

Typically, the number of tokens a member of the DAO has correlates to their share of votes; however, some DAOs have rules against allowing the member with the most tokens to have the majority voting power, and instead, rely on different voting mechanisms, such as quadratic voting or simple majority voting,[21] to maintain fairness. While each DAO has its own guidelines for voting, most require a demonstrated activity within the community in addition to owning tokens, in order to participate in the governance and management of the DAO.

Who Owns the Art

Members of the DAO also act as its managers. When the DAO provides a marketplace for transactions or sales involving intellectual property, such as NFTs that are copyrightable, or are capable of being registered as a trademark through the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), the creator of the NFT retains the intellectual property rights in the work.[22] However, in certain circumstances, the intellectual property right to a work may be assigned away to the purchaser,[23] as contractual agreements provide.

When a DAO’s members create physical and digital components funded by cryptocurrency, smart contracts typically dictate the rights and obligations that coincide with each transaction. For instance, the DAO, “Plantoids” fosters a community of creators who raise cryptocurrency to fund the creation of physical artworks, paired with a digital form of the work captured on a blockchain. Humans play a role in the Plantoid lifeform’s procreation by funding it through cryptocurrency. When a Plantoid obtains enough funding, it is able to be “reproduced” and therefore, is built in the physical world; its “body” is created in the form of a metal sculpture, while its “soul” manifests in blockchain.[24] Anyone can play a role in the lifecycle of a Plantoid by investing in the DAO, and therefore, can assist in procreating the art in physical and digital spaces. Those who invest in a new Plantoid can own a part or a whole of the work, as well as intellectual property rights, such as copyrights if established in each smart contract transaction.

Ultimately, DAOs can be a platform that fosters limitless creativity and intellectual property, and anyone can participate in the creative process either by funding it or by creating the art themselves (both digitally and physically).

What Legal Issues Might Exist for DAOs?

There are many potential legal issues[25] that could arise for community members of a DAO. For instance, most DAOs run on smart contracts,[26] which are contracts in the form of computer codes stored on a blockchain that automatically execute pre-determined agreements when certain conditions are met. For example, the contract can be as simple as an “if, then” condition, such as a sales transaction, when the conditions are met, the money is transferred to the seller’s account. On the legal side, smart contracts can also serve as legally binding agreements; however, only certain states, including Arizona and California, allow certain types of agreements to be binding via smart contracts. Many potential legal issues exist when a non-lawyer creates a legally binding smart contract in code on blockchain technology.

This format allows community members to save time by not having to negotiate the conditions of a contract and by not having to manually implement contractual considerations, such as NTF sales transactions.[27] Because smart contracts are computer code-operated, contractual liability issues could arise if there are issues with the code itself, or if bugs are found in the code. This could, for example, present liabilities for those involved in the transaction, such as the purchaser or seller of the NFT, as well as the members of the DAO itself.

Another potential legal issue for DAOs relates to jurisdiction. For instance, because DAOs are not associated with a specific physical location, as a traditional company would be legally registered in, it can be difficult to determine the governing jurisdiction for any legal issues that could arise.[28]

Recent lawsuits have also arisen on issues related to complying with regulatory oversight. In particular, in 2022, The Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed a complaint[29] against Ooki DAO (formerly doing business as bZx DAO), for engaging in activities that could only lawfully be performed by a registered designated contract market (“DCM”). Additionally, the DAO engaged in activities requiring registration with the futures commission merchant, when the DAO had not acquired such registration.[30] Thus, the DAO violated both the Commodity Exchange Act (the “Act”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1-26, and the Commission Regulations (“Regulations”), 17 C.F.R. pts. 1-190 (2021). The settlement order[31] found that the founding members of bZeroX, Kyle Kistner and Tom Bean, were liable for the Ooki DAO’s activities which violated the CEA and CFTC regulations because they transferred control of the bZx Protocol to the bZx DAO. When they renamed the bZx DAO the current Ooki DAO, they attempted to create an organization immune from suit while continuing to operate the DAO with the same activities that violated the original regulations of the bZx Protocol. This case presented an important precedent in ensuring that even members of decentralized autonomous organizations can be held liable for violating regulatory requirements.

In summary, because of their decentralized structure, DAOs allow creators from all around the world to unite around a singular goal within a borderless community. Whether the goal is to create and sell digital artworks, as with Teia.art, or to collect rare artifacts, as with ConstitutionDAO, the options for what a DAO can achieve are only limited by the imagination and input of its community members. For most DAOs, those who are most active within the community reap the greatest rewards in terms of voting shares, input into the organizational structure, and achieving investment goals. In other words, the potential benefits and rewards of being involved in a DAO are typically closely related to the level of one’s investment.

Some Like It Digital, and now DAO

This article examines DAOs at a high level and is a supplementary resource to the Center’s “Some Like it Digital” series. As a part of the series, the Center explores the topic of DAOs in a conversation on May 9, 2023, with Alex Liu, attorney and Director of Operations at Tezos Commons, and Merchant Coppola, visual poet, artist, and founder of Teia DAO LLC. Join us for the event or watch the program’s recording to learn more about the laws that govern DAOs and how they interact with the crypto and art world, along with the intricacies of complexities of building a DAO are discussed. About the event HERE.

About the Author

Laura Dowdy, Spring 2023 Legal Intern with the Center for Art Law, is a second-year law student at New England Law | Boston, concentrating on Intellectual Property law, especially art, copyright, and trademark law. She can be reached at laura.dowdy@nesl.edu.

Reference Sources

  1. Bill Chappell, A rare copy of the first printing of the U.S. Constitution is going up for auction, NPR (Nov. 2021) available at https://www.npr.org/2022/11/01/1133144637/constitution-sothebys-auction-rare ↑
  2. Li Yun, et al., Citadel CEO Ken Griffin pays $43.2 million for Constitution copy, outbidding crypto group, CNBC (Nov. 2021) available at https://www.cnbc.com/2021/11/19/citadel-ceo-ken-griffin-pays-43point2-million-for-constitution-copy-outbidding-crypto-group.html ↑
  3. Angelica Villa, Philanthropist to Sell Rare Copy of Constitution for $15 M. at Auction, ARTnews (Sep. 2021) available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/market/constitution-auction-sothebys-1234604170/ ↑
  4. ConstitutionDAO, available at https://www.constitutiondao.com/ ↑
  5. Graves, Stephen et al., What Is a Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO)?, Decrypt 9Dec. 2021) available at https://decrypt.co/resources/decentralized-autonomous-organization-dao ↑
  6. Oberheiden, Nick, 5 Things to Consider When Creating a DAO, JD Supra (Feb. 2022) available at https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/5-things-to-consider-when-creating-a-dao-5888423/ ↑
  7. Teia DAO LLC., available at https://teia.art/about ↑
  8. Id. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. The History of Teia.art: A Marketplace Salvaged by the Community, Tezos Ukraine (Aug. 2022) available at https://tezos.org.ua/en/blog/history-of-hic-et-nunc-teia-ressurection ↑
  11. Teia DAO LLC., available at https://teia.art/about ↑
  12. Bhalla, Anshika, A Beginner’s Guide To Understanding DAO Governance Models (Nov. 2022) available at https://www.blockchain-council.org/dao/dao-governance-models/ ↑
  13. Hayes, Adam, et al., Blockchain Facts: What Is It, How It Works, and How It Can Be Used (Apr. 2023) available at https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp ↑
  14. About Us, International Organization for Standardization, available at https://www.iso.org/about-us.html ↑
  15. Koome, Brian, ISO 20022 Compliant Crypto Coins: Implementation Slated for March 2023 (Feb. 2023) available at https://www.cryptopolitan.com/iso-20022-compliant-crypto-list/ ↑
  16. SuperRare DAO, available at https://superrare.notion.site/SuperRare-Network-Hub-fcb9174476514c7b893de5c40faf83fb ↑
  17. Teia DAO, available at https://superrare.notion.site/SuperRare-Network-Hub-fcb9174476514c7b893de5c40faf83fb ↑
  18. Tezos, available at https://tezos.com/ ↑
  19. Gillis, Alexander, blockchain dApp, TechTarget, available at https://www.techtarget.com/iotagenda/definition/blockchain-dApp#:~:text=A%20decentralized%20application%20(dApp)%20is,than%20on%20a%20single%20computer ↑
  20. What is Proof of Stake, Tezos, available at https://tezos.com/proof-of-stake/#:~:text=The%20liquid%2Dproof%2Dof%2D,that%20has%20similar%20voting%20preferences. ↑
  21. Ruane, Jonathan, et al., What a DAO Can — and Can’t — Do, Harvard Business Review (May 2022) available at https://hbr.org/2022/05/what-a-dao-can-and-cant-do ↑
  22. Ferrill, Elizabeth, et al., Demystifying NFTs and intellectual property: what you need to know, Reuters (May 2022) available at https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/demystifying-nfts-intellectual-property-what-you-need-know-2022-05-10/ ↑
  23. Mukaddam, Farah, NFTs and Intellectual Property Rights, Norton Rose Fulbright (Oct. 2021) available at https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/1a1abb9f/nfts-and-intellectual-property-rights ↑
  24. De Filippi, Primavera, History of the Project, Plantoid DAO, available at https://plantoid.org/#love ↑
  25. Montague, John, DAO Governance and Ancillary Legal Issues, JDSupra (Feb. 2023) available at https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/dao-governance-and-ancillary-legal-3993656/#:~:text=In%20conclusion%2C%20DAO%20governance%20presents,member%20rights%2C%20and%20dispute%20resolution. ↑
  26. Levi, Stuart, et al., An Introduction to Smart Contracts and Their Potential and Inherent Limitations, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance (May 2018) available at https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/05/26/an-introduction-to-smart-contracts-and-their-potential-and-inherent-limitations/ ↑
  27. Stelzner, Michael, NFTs and DAOs: How They Work Together, Social Media Examiner (Apr. 2022) available at https://www.socialmediaexaminer.com/nfts-and-daos-how-they-work-together/#:~:text=You%20can%20code%20the%20smart,other%20smart%20contracts%20in%20place. ↑
  28. Montague, John, DAO Governance and Ancillary Legal Issues, JDSupra (Feb. 2023) available at https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/dao-governance-and-ancillary-legal-3993656/#:~:text=In%20conclusion%2C%20DAO%20governance%20presents,member%20rights%2C%20and%20dispute%20resolution. ↑
  29. See Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Ooki DAO, No. 05416, District Court, N.D., California ↑
  30. CFTC Imposes $250,000 Penalty Against bZeroX, LLC and Its Founders and Charges Successor Ooki DAO for Offering Illegal, Off-Exchange Digital-Asset Trading, Registration Violations, and Failing to Comply with Bank Secrecy Act, CFTC (Sept. 2022) available at https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8590-22 ↑
  31. Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Summer K. Mersinger Regarding Enforcement Actions Against: 1) bZeroX, LLC, Tom Bean, and Kyle Kistner; and 2) Ooki DAO, CFTC (Sept. 2022) available at https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/mersingerstatement092222 ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Innovations in Protecting Art and Design: Placing Mexico’s recent ban on cultural appropriation in greater context
Next Labeling Misappropriated Nazi-Era Art: Issues with Compelling Signage at New York Museums

Related Art Law Articles

The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law Canada Pledges Resale Royalty
Art lawCanadaresale royalty

Canada pledges an artist’s resale royalty—can the United States follow “suite”?

April 9, 2026
Abraham and Isaac Returned Home Center for Art Law
Art law

Abraham and Isaac: Sculptures returned home after Spanish Supreme Court decision

April 8, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for, Panel 1: So Inappropriate — Lessons About Copyright Law and Art: First There Was Art, Then Copyright, Then Fair Use… and Now AI?

From early copyright doctrines to contemporary fair use debates, this panel examines how artists and lawyers have navigated questions of ownership, appropriation, and originality in visual art. Panelists will explore key developments in copyright law affecting traditional artistic practices, from borrowing and remixing to transformative use, while also considering how emerging technologies, including AI, are beginning to reshape long‑standing legal frameworks and artistic norms.

Moderator: Irina Tarsis, Founder, Center for Art Law
Speakers: Vivek Jayaram, Founder, Jayaram Law; Vincent Wilcke, Pace Gallery; Greg Allen, Artist and writer 

Reserve your tickets using the link in our bio or by visiting our website itsartlaw.org 🎟️ 
See you soon!
Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been maki Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been making waves and headlines for weeks and the doors have not even opened yet. The jury refused to award prizes and resigned nine days before the opening over geopolitical controversies. Some artists boycott while others show up even if unwelcome. Some pavilions will be empty, some will not be open to the public… Sources of funds, sources of inspiration, so many questions, so much on display for critical eyes. Meanwhile the boats are waiting for anyone lucky enough to find themselves in the floating world.

Help us reflect on the Biennale by sharing your art law stories.

#ArtLaw #Venice #Biennale2026 #ArtWorld #BiennaleofDissent #LaSerenissima #GoldenLion #SeeArtThinkArtLaw
Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective, scheduled at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in D.C., after a curatorial controversy over the potential removal of her recent work, "Trans Forming Liberty" (2024). Sherald denounced the attempt to remove this work as a blatant and intentional erasure of trans lives. 

This is one of the best examples and the most illustrative examples of the current administration's growing efforts to control the Smithsonian Institution's programming. In this climate of political tension, how do cultural institutions defend themselves against censorship and keep their curatorial independence?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artcuration #curatorialindependance #censorship
Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Arti Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!! 

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

Get 15% off using the code: Final15 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia se On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia sent hundreds of drones and missiles on sleeping cities across Ukraine, killing and injuring dozens of civilians. War is funded in part by individuals who have important artworks in their personal collections. This full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fifth year, daily exacts a grave toll on Ukrainian lives and cultural heritage, while fundamentally disrupting European commerce. In response, art market participants have adapted their practices, most have accepted, if not always embraced, the need to scrutinize the source of funds and the ultimate beneficiaries of their transactions. Yet there is a growing sense that parts of the trade are holding their breath, waiting to see when they might safely return to dealing with the oligarchs who continue to fund the Russian war machine.

For art market participants operating in the UK, compliance is no longer a peripheral concern, it is a legal imperative. Regulators are watching, the consequences of non-compliance increasingly extend beyond administrative penalties into criminal liability, and private-public partnerships offer the most credible path toward a more resilient and trustworthy market. 

Join us on April 24th for a panel discussion in London on the current state of AML enforcement and sanctions.

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artcrime #london #artissues #museumissues
Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zb Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zborowski to Cahn in 2003 for the low price of about $1.55 million. In 2016, Cahn claimed he was verbally informed about authenticity issues with the painting by Sotheby's. The parties did make an agreement regarding Cahn reselling with Sotheby's for a guaranteed price in exchange for releasing the auction house from all claims related to the painting. Cahn claims that he attempted to set this process in motion in June 2025, but he received no response. Cahn now seeks damages totaling $2.67 million, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, for breach of contract. 

Through this dispute, Vivianne Diaz's article highlights a bigger issue in the art market by explaining how forgeries negatively affect both collectors and auction houses, and how auction houses need to be more careful, but most importantly, proactive in their authentication determinations.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #art #Modigliani #LeopoldZborowski #sothebys
Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Art Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!!

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normand The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normandy, France, is scheduled to be loaned from the Bayeux Museum to the British Museum for ten months beginning in the fall of 2026. This is the first time the tapestry will have returned to the UK in over 900 years. 

This loan, authorized by France, has raised multiple controversies, particularly over conservation concerns. Nevertheless, it has been made possible through a combination of factors, including improved conservation techniques, enhanced transport precautions, comprehensive loan agreements, insurance, and the application of relevant protective laws. 

Check out our recent article by Josie Goettel to read more about this historic loan regarding not only in its symbolic significance, but also in its technical complexity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #legal #museumissues #bayeuxtapisserie #bayeuxtapestry #britishmuseum #bayeuxmuseum
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law