• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Wish You Were Here image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Navigating the Intersection of Art and Copyright: Insights from the Inaugural Art & Copyright Law Clinic
Back

Navigating the Intersection of Art and Copyright: Insights from the Inaugural Art & Copyright Law Clinic

May 31, 2024

Cover for the event, "Navigating the Intersection of Art and Copyright."

By Atreya Mathur and Patrick K. Lin

Introduction and Objectives of the Art & Copyright Copyright Clinic

In the ever-evolving landscape of artistic expression, the intersection of art and copyright law has become increasingly complex. From traditional mediums to emerging technologies, artists face a myriad of challenges in protecting their creative works. To address these challenges, the Center for Art Law hosted its inaugural Art & Copyright Law Clinic on April 10, 2024, offering a platform for artists to navigate copyright regulations and emerging issues such as generative AI.

The Art & Copyright Law Clinic serves as a vital resource for both emerging and established artists, providing them with the necessary tools and knowledge to safeguard their intellectual property rights. In an era where digital technologies have revolutionized the way art is created, shared, and consumed, understanding copyright law is paramount for artists to protect their creations from unauthorized use and exploitation. At the heart of the Art & Copyright Law Clinic is the mission to empower artists with the knowledge and resources needed to navigate the complexities of copyright law. Through a keynote presentation followed by one-on-one confidential consultations with volunteer attorneys, artists gain insights into the legal frameworks governing their work, including the rights afforded to them under copyright law and strategies for protecting their creations in an increasingly digital world. Artists have the opportunity to ask questions about copyright in relation to their work directly to attorneys in an affordable and accessible manner.

Issues and Challenges Discussed during the Clinic

One of the pressing issues discussed during the inaugural session of the clinic was the proliferation of generative AI and its implications for artists’ copyright. With the advent of AI-driven technologies like Midjourney and Stable Diffusion among many others, artists are confronted with new questions regarding ownership, licensing, and the boundaries of artistic expression. The Clinic looked into these issues, exploring whether generative AI represents a tool for artistic creation or a potential threat to artists’ rights.

While digital artists face unique challenges with generative AI, many of these issues echo longstanding concerns in traditional copyright cases. Unauthorized use and reproduction of artwork have long plagued traditional artists, with instances of their work being used without permission for commercial purposes or copied by others. Digital artists using generative AI face similar issues, as their AI-generated creations can be easily replicated and disseminated without proper attribution or compensation. Additionally, the ease of creating derivative works using AI poses challenges in identifying and enforcing copyright infringement. Plagiarism and unauthorized copying are common concerns for traditional artists, who may find their original creations reproduced or imitated without credit or acknowledgment. Digital artists using generative AI may encounter instances where their AI-generated works are copied or replicated by others, blurring the lines of authorship and ownership. This raises questions about the originality and uniqueness of AI-generated creations and the rights of the artists who use such technology.

Enforcing copyright and addressing infringements can be challenging for traditional artists, particularly when dealing with infringers operating in different jurisdictions or countries. Digital artists using generative AI may face similar jurisdictional challenges in enforcing their copyright, especially when infringing activities occur across borders or on decentralized platforms. The global nature of digital content distribution complicates efforts to monitor and address copyright violations effectively.

Traditional artists may struggle with monitoring and tracking instances of copyright infringement, particularly in offline contexts where unauthorized use may go unnoticed. Digital artists using generative AI may encounter challenges in monitoring and tracking unauthorized reproductions and alterations of their AI-generated works online. The rapid proliferation of digital content and the anonymity of online platforms make it difficult to identify and address instances of infringement in real-time.

Third-party exploitation of artwork is a common concern for traditional artists, who may face unfair contracts, deceptive practices, or misrepresentation of their rights by galleries, agents, or publishers. Digital artists using generative AI may also be vulnerable to exploitation by third parties seeking to profit from their AI-generated creations without adequately compensating or crediting the artists. Issues such as unfair licensing agreements or unauthorized commercial use of AI-generated content can undermine the rights and interests of digital artists.

In summary, while digital artists using generative AI face unique challenges related to the nature of AI-generated content, many of these issues parallel longstanding concerns in traditional copyright cases which the Art & Copyright Clinic focuses on. By recognizing these similarities and understanding the evolving landscape of copyright law in the digital age, artists can better navigate the complexities of protecting their creative works and asserting their rights in an increasingly interconnected world.

Keynote Presentation by Juyoun Han,partner at Eisenberg & Baum LLP

Another highlight of the Art & Copyright Law Clinic was the keynote presentation by Juyoun Han, a partner at Eisenberg & Baum LLP. Drawing on her expertise, Han provided insights into cases involving artists and the evolving landscape of copyright law in the digital age. Her work in challenging bias and discrimination in automated decision systems underscores the importance of addressing ethical considerations in the intersection of art and technology.

As technology continues to reshape the artistic landscape, the need for artists to navigate copyright law with confidence and clarity has never been greater. The Art & Copyright Law Clinic stands to support artists, offering them the guidance and expertise needed to protect their creative endeavors and navigate the complexities of the digital age. By fostering dialogue, providing resources, and offering expert guidance, the Clinic reaffirms the Center for Art Law’s commitment to supporting artists and upholding the integrity of artistic expression in all its forms.

Upcoming Art & Copyright Law Programming

The Afterlife of Art: Posthumous Moral Rights & Copyrights

June 11, 2024 at 12:00 PM EDT

Following an artist’s death, it is their works that live on and preserve their legacy. At first glance, posthumous moral rights and dead-hand control over a deceased artist’s work may safeguard that artist’s work and legacy. However, the variability of posthumous moral rights and restrictions placed on reproducing artwork after the artist’s death can run counter to both the artist’s interests and the goal of copyright law. How should legal systems balance the artist’s interests with societal interests? What approach should artists take with respect to their copyright after their death?

Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion that grapples with these important questions, featuring the co-editors of Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market, Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, as well as two of the authors of the book, Eva E. Subotnik and Guy A. Rub. The panel discussion will be moderated by Patrick K. Lin, the Center for Art Law’s 2023 – 2024 Judith Bresler Fellow.

Workshop: Exploring Copyright Ownership, Work for Hire & Generative AI

June 18, 2024 at 12:00 PM EDT

A work for hire refers to works whose ownership belongs to a third party, usually an employer, rather than the original creator. What rights do artists have when a work of theirs is designated a work for hire? How does the use of generative AI in the art and creator market impact this copyright issue?

Join the Center for Art Law and Max Hass, an entertainment, intellectual property, and business attorney and founder of Holon Law Partners, for a workshop discussing copyright law basics as well as legal considerations artists should be mindful of with respect to work for hire and generative AI.

Additional Reading Resources

Articles

  • Atreya Mathur, Patrick K. Lin, Irina Tarsis, U.S. Copyright Office, Comment from Center for Art Law (Nov.1, 2023)
  • Atreya Mathur, A MSCHF-ious Take on Copyright, Fair Use and Appropriation (Center for
  • Art Law, Mar. 14, 2024)
  • Olivia Zinzi, Appropriation or Art? Court Orders Richard Prince to Pay Damages in Highly Anticipated Copyright Lawsuit (Center for Art Law, Feb. 28, 2024)
  • Paul C. Rapp, An Introduction to Copyright Law (Graphic Artists Guild, Sept. 27, 2023)
  • Atreya Mathur, Copyright Registration for AI Generated Works: Zarya of the Dawn and the Dawn of a New Creator (Center for Art Law, July 6, 2023)
  • Gordon Firemark, Understanding Copyright Law: What You Should Know About Using Artwork Found Online (Apparelist, June 27, 2023)
  • Atreya Mathur, Art-istic or Art-ificial? Ownership and Copyright Concerns in AI-generated Artwork (Center for Art Law, Nov. 21, 2022)
  • Azmina Jasani and Emelyne Peticca, The Tension Between Copyright Law and Appropriation Art: Where is the Line Between Artistic Innovation and Stealing? (The Art Newspaper, Sept. 29, 2021)
  • Holland Gormley, What I Wish They Taught Me About Copyright in Art School (Library of Congress Blog, Sept. 1, 2020)
  • Isaac Kaplan, Art Copyright, Explained (Artsy, Aug. 4, 2016)
  • Atreya Mathur, The Intersection of AI Art & Law: Protecting Artists while Promoting Innovation (Art and Museum Magazine, Apr. 9, 2024)

Guides

  • Copyright Basics (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office)
  • Registration Tutorials (U.S. Copyright Office)
  • What Visual and Graphic Artists Should Know About Copyright (U.S. Copyright Office)
  • Artists Rights 101 (Artists Rights Society)
  • U.S. Copyright Office Fair Use Index (U.S. Copyright Office)

Sample Agreements

  • Copyright License Agreement (Rocket Lawyer)
  • Copyright License Agreement Template (Aura League)
  • Copyright Assignment Agreement (eForms)

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous WYWH: “Restitution of Nazi-Looted Art: The Next 25 Years”
Next WYWH: 2024 CPAL Conference

Related Posts

WYWH: Lawyers’ Committee on Cultural Heritage Protection 10th Annual Conference

April 23, 2019

Spotlight on Art Fraud and the Law in Australia

March 12, 2018

WYWH: A Primer on Artist Trusts

January 24, 2023
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.