• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review: “Museum Administration: Law and Practice” by Walter Lehmann (2022)
Back

Book Review: “Museum Administration: Law and Practice” by Walter Lehmann (2022)

July 24, 2024

By Helen Boone

According to Walter Lehmann, out of the 35,000 museums in the United States, only 50 maintain in-house counsel.[1] For those institutions without a lawyer on staff, it can be difficult to determine when a problem requires legal attention. Walter G. Lehmann’s Museum Administration: Law and Practice, already in its second edition, offers a thorough introduction for museum professionals trying to comply with both legal and ethical guidelines. In his textbook, Lehmann addresses a wide range of topics, from employment agreements to deaccessioning work, and provides a deeper dive into some major issues, such as corporate sponsorship and fair use. The book includes sample forms for some commonly needed contracts and compiles relevant cases to illustrate how courts review relevant litigation. Acknowledging that not every museum problem has a solution in the law, Lehmann supplements his legal advice by pointing to guidelines published by associations like the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) and the Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD). Practical and comprehensible, Museum Administration: Law and Practice successfully gives students, attorneys, and museum administrators a uniquely specialized look into many legal aspects of museum operations.

With over two decades of experience in museum law and business administration, Walter G. Lehmann stands out as an expert in his field. Lehmann earned his bachelor’s degree in English Literature from Williams College before attending William Mitchel College of Law. Additionally, he earned a Masters in Museum Studies from George Washington University.[2] Lehmann currently acts as managing partner of Lehmann PLC where he works with creative professionals, cultural institutions, and nonprofit organizations on a range of legal topics.[3] He has served on several boards of directors for museums such as the Landis Valley Museum (Lancaster, PA), The M (St. Paul, MN), and the North Museum of Natural History and Science (Lancaster, PA), where he acted as interim Curator of Collections.[4] Lehman, formerly on the Collections Committee at the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore, Maryland, is a candidate for associate member of the American Association of Appraisers. He is an adjunct professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law and Mitchell Hamline School of Law teaching Art Law and Museum Law. Before publishing Museum Administration: Law and Practice, Lehmann co-authored Rights and Reproductions: The Handbook for Cultural Institutions (2018) edited by Anne M. Young.[5]

This review of Museum Administration: Law and Practice, 2nd. ed. provides a content overview of each of the book’s six chapters: Museum Organization and Governance, Museum Personnel, Museum Facilities, Museum Intellectual Property, Museum Collections, and Museum Collections. It will highlight some of the key subjects addressed. However, given the wide range of topics explored, each reader will likely have their own favorite takeaways from the book.

Museum Organization and Governance

The first chapter sets out to define the museum on both a theoretical and practical level. Lehmann gives readers a brief history of museums, beginning with the Mouseion at Alexandria. He then encourages readers to examine their own understanding of these entities through thoughtful study questions. He proceeds to define the museum practically by referencing the eligibility criteria employed by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) for grants and the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) for their Accreditation Program. The criteria include being “organized on a permanent basis for essentially educational or aesthetic purposes” and having “a formal and appropriate program of documentation, care, and use of collections or objects.”[6] Lehmann goes on to explain how decision-making authority can be delegated to museum staff, but the trustees are responsible for oversight and have a duty to “exercise good faith” and manage the museum based on a “prudent person” standard of care.[7] The first chapter of this casebook lays a conceptual foundation for museum management and prepares the reader for the more practical guidance to come.

Museum Personnel

Here, Lehmann tackles both general staffing matters every employer manages and museum-specific concerns most employment lawyers would not consider. Lehmann provides an in-depth look at critical topics such as types of employment contracts, best practices for hiring, and IRS requirements regarding employees.[8] He goes beyond the basics to address unions and workplace discrimination laws.[9] Specifically tailored to museums, Lehmann provides guidance on immigration issues, like the O1B visa for artists, and encourages museum professionals to clarify the responsibilities of contracted staff, interns, and volunteers, ensuring clear roles to avoid salary misunderstandings. The author’s expertise working with museums is demonstrated when he recommends employers consider OSHA compliance issues when their employees handle taxidermied specimens, as they might contain hazardous preservation chemicals.[10]

Museum Facilities

Chapter three focuses on the responsibility of museum administrators to foster a safe and peaceful environment. Lehmann not only delves into the intricate details of personal injury and ADA compliance laws, stressing the pivotal nature of accessibility within museum settings but also navigates the complexities of the First Amendment as it applies to government-funded entities.[11] For museums housed in historic buildings, Lehmann includes advice for registering structures under the National Historic Preservation Act.[12]

This chapter also sheds light on when and how museums can regulate speech, both on-site and online. Lehmann emphasizes how important it is for museum staff to be aware of limitations placed on tax-exempt entities when hosting political events.[13] Additionally, Lehman includes the 2019 Georgia Supreme Court case GeorogiaCarry.org v. Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc., where a gun-rights organization challenged a botanical garden’s prohibition of weapons on its premises, which were leased from a city. The court’s decision hinged on whether the leased premises constituted private property under Georgia law, impacting the garden’s authority to enforce such prohibitions. This is just one of many cases Lehmann adds throughout his chapters to illustrate the types of litigation museums might face and the way courts make their decisions in these matters.

By blending legal insights with practical advice, this engaging chapter equips museum professionals with effective strategies for managing their facilities amidst regulatory landscapes, ensuring they meet both legal standards and community needs.

An Overview of GeorogiaCarry.org v. Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc. (2019)

In GeorgiaCarry.org v. Atlanta Botanical Garden, Inc., the Supreme Court of Georgia heard arguments from a non-profit gun-rights organization challenging a public botanical garden’s prohibition of weapons on its premises, which were leased from the city. The court’s decision hinged on whether the leased premises constituted private property under Georgia law, impacting the garden’s authority to enforce such prohibitions. The GeorogiaCarry.org case involves a museum’s ability to prohibit certain types of activities on its property. The court’s ruling turns on whether a Georgia law permits a private organization that leases property from a government entity to prohibit the carrying of firearms on the leased premises. The court makes clear at the outset that its decision is not based on federal or state constitutional questions, even though the impetus behind bringing the cases is the constitutional right to bear arms and, tangentially, the right to freedom of expression. The Court held, therefore, that if the city, a public entity, was the holder of the present estate under the lease, the leased premises were not private property within the meaning of § 16-11-127(c), thus, the garden would have no right to exclude the carrying of firearms on the leased premises because it was not in legal control of private property through a lease; [3]-However, because the lease was not in the record on appeal and it was necessary to examine its provisions to determine whether the garden was granted an estate, summary judgment should not have been granted in favor of the garden.

Museum Intellectual Property

In chapter four, Lehmann introduces readers to the intricacies of intellectual property within the museum world. The chapter starts with a comprehensive primer on intellectual property rights in general before thoroughly exploring five key forms of IP essential to museum operations; Patents, Trademarks, Personal Rights, Copyrights, and Fair Use. Lehmann quickly dismisses patent law as not very pertinent in the museum setting before describing the importance of registering and maintaining trademarks to safeguard museum logos against unauthorized use.[14] The subject of personal rights follows. Here Lehmann addresses the delicate process of sharing information about donors, visitors, and subjects of artworks on display. He advises museum staff to investigate their state privacy laws as each jurisdiction is unique.[15]

The chapter then provides practical guidance on copyright law, explaining how to determine a piece of art’s copyright status, how to mitigate infringement risk, and how to interpret key provisions of the US Copyright Act.[16] Finally, Lehman explores the major exception to copyright, fair use.[17] He goes over Section 7 of the U.S. Copyright Act’s four-factor balancing test and highlights the elements the courts typically find most relevant through expertly selected case studies.[18] screen grab of guidelines for the use of copyrighted materials and works of art by art museumsCode of best practices for fair use for the Visual Arts cover of a CAA reportAcknowledging the law here is vague, Lehmann points to the AAMD’s Guidelines for the Use of Copyrighted Material and the College Art Association (CAA)’s Code of Best Practices for Fair Use in the Visual Arts for clarification.[19] With its depth of coverage and practical insights, this chapter encourages museum professionals to foster creativity while complying with dynamic intellectual property laws designed to protect creatives as well as employers.

Museum Collections

Lehman studies the management of cultural and scientific treasures protected by museums around the country in chapter five. Most importantly, the chapter emphasizes the necessity for each museum to craft a tailored policy that dictates the care and preservation standards for their collections, underlining the potential legal repercussions for failing to meet those standards.[20] Lehmann guides readers through the complexities of accepting gifts, stressing the importance of clear documentation and ethical considerations to avoid malpractice such as tax fraud.[21] Lehmann touches on ethical considerations in deaccessioning, restitution claims, and international cultural heritage preservation laws.[22] The book even provides an example commission agreement form.[23] The chapter also sheds light on the processes involved in ensuring proper title, offering legal insights into ownership disputes.[24] Lehmann’s advice about securing title demonstrates just how thorough Lehmann’s approach to each topic is. He suggests museums should always request a completed provenance questionnaire from the previous owner of each work they acquire “in addition to committing their own individual research into the transaction history of the piece.”[25] Then, he discusses what evidence courts consider when deciding title disputes.[26] After this, he reminds readers that museums will also have self-enforced ethical guidelines for stolen art. This chapter informs and inspires a deeper appreciation for the legal and ethical complexities inherent in museum collection management.

Museum Funding

The final chapter offers advice for navigating the complex regulatory frameworks at both state and federal levels. Acknowledging the difficulty in developing expertise in this constantly evolving area of law, Lehman manages to include useful information about ongoing topics, such as which income is taxable based on IRS criteria, as well as more contemporary topics, such as when an internet fundraiser mandates registration.[27] Lehman goes on to highlight the diverse sources of government funding available to museums, even including a list of local and national organizations providing funding for museums.[28] This chapter is quite technical, but still manages to remain accessible and informative.

Conclusion

Museum Administration: Law and Practice by Walter G. Lehmann offers a comprehensive and practical guide to navigating the complex legal landscape of museum management. Each chapter provides a thorough exploration of crucial topics, from organizational governance to intellectual property rights and funding strategies. Lehmann’s adept handling of museum-specific legal issues, coupled with his extensive experience in both law and museum administration, lends a unique perspective that enriches the text with practical insights. The cases selected offer a helpful representation of how courts approach these issues, and the inclusion of study questions at the end of each topic encourages deeper engagement and critical thinking, encouraging readers to grapple with complex legal issues in museum administration. Lehmann skillfully integrates advice on when to seek external legal counsel and refers readers to best practices outlined by the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) and the Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD), ensuring a holistic approach to museum governance beyond mere legal compliance. The book’s organization and clarity make it accessible to a broad audience. It can function as a key resource for museum professionals, a helpful toolbook for attorneys entering the field, or a textbook for art law or museum studies programs. Ultimately, Museum Administration: Law and Practice stands as a testament to Lehmann’s commitment to empowering cultural institutions with the knowledge to thrive in a complex regulatory environment while preserving and promoting cultural and scientific exploration.

To learn more on this topic and about the book:

Find Museum Administration: Law and Practice on Amazon HERE.

Learn more about museum association resources with the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) and the Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD).

About the Author:

Helen Boone is a rising second-year student at the University of Colorado School of Law and a legal intern at the Center for Art Law.

Select Sources:

  1. WALTER G. LEHMANN, MUSEUM ADMINISTRATION xi-xii (2nd ed., Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2022). ↑
  2. Lehmann PLC, About Me, https://lehmannplc.com/about-me/ (last visited July 15, 2024). ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. ​​Id. ↑
  5. Id. ↑
  6. Lehmann, Supra note 1, at 5-7 ↑
  7. Id. at 10 ↑
  8. Id. at 62-63 ↑
  9. Id. at 75, 77 ↑
  10. Id. at 76 ↑
  11. Id. at 140, 155, 181 ↑
  12. Id. at 199 ↑
  13. Id. at 157 ↑
  14. Id. at 202-205 ↑
  15. Id. at 204 ↑
  16. Id. at 255-290 ↑
  17. Id. at 292 ↑
  18. Id. at 293-294 ↑
  19. Id. at 294 ↑
  20. Id. at 413 ↑
  21. Id. at 417-419 ↑
  22. Id. at 508-511 & 534 ↑
  23. Id. at 421 ↑
  24. Id. at 495 ↑
  25. Id. at 460 ↑
  26. Id. at 461 ↑
  27. Id. at 583 ↑
  28. Id. at 606 ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Book Review: “Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market,” Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, eds. (2022)
Next Book Review: “Art & Crime” (2022) by Stefan Koldenhoff & Tobias Timm, eng. ed.

Related Posts

cover of the book

Book Review: “Art and Business: Transactions in Art & Cultural Property” (2016)

March 15, 2017
book cover for Posthumous

Book Review: “Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market,” Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, eds. (2022)

May 20, 2024

Federal Court Dismisses Forfeiture Suit Over 3,200-year-old Mask of Ka-Nefer-Nefer

April 9, 2012
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.