• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet 200 years later: Damien Hirst plans to “create” art posthumously DOT DOT DOT
Back

200 years later: Damien Hirst plans to “create” art posthumously DOT DOT DOT

August 4, 2025

article about Damien Hirst

By Alexa Donovan

In late May 2025, Damien Hirst, born 1965, revealed estate plans that provide for the “creation” of art from beyond the grave.[1]

Hirst, the famed leading figure of the Young British Artists,[2] is undoubtedly one of the most prolific contemporary creatives of our time.[3] He is best known for his unconventional artworks, such as the infamous sculptures of sharks preserved in formaldehyde and mandalas made of dead butterflies.[4] He has also taken on plenty of experimental projects, often bending the boundaries of traditional artistry.

Primarily represented by Gagosian and White Cube,[5] Hirst’s plans for his legacy follow the same peculiar trajectory as his artistic projects. In an interview[6] with the London Times in late May, Hirst told reporter Kirsty Lang that he intends to create posthumous artworks.[7]

To execute this plan, Hirst will “fill up” 200 notebooks, each corresponding to a year after his death. [8] These books will contain designs that are similar to instructions. Buyers can create and sell the designs in the notebooks under Hirst’s name,[9] and his heirs will sign those artworks.[10] The number of the notebook will determine the year in which the artwork can be produced.[11] For example, the designs in notebook 197 are meant to be executed 197 years after Hirst’s death, which could be well into the 2200s.

“The idea is to have a certificate that says ‘Year One after Damien Dies: you’ve got the right to make this sculpture…’” Hirst said in the interview.[12]

The idea is not entirely surprising coming from Hirst. From sculptures using animal carcasses as material to diamond-encrusted human skulls, much of his art explores the theme of death.[13] It’s also not exactly a surprise that Hirst, who is incredibly well-known and one of the wealthiest artists of today, wants to live on. Interviewers have noted his large ego [14] and critics have called him out for being “gimmicky.”[15] Perhaps this foray into the future is a way to keep up the sensation behind his name even after he is long gone.

Legal implications

According to Kate Lucas, Special Counsel at Grossman LLP, this legacy plan can be understood from a copyright lens.

“It sounds to me like part of what’s happening here is he’s giving a buyer essentially… a copyright license to produce an artwork for a limited period of time,” she said in a phone interview to this author.[16] She explains that this license may allow “a reproduction or derivative work based on his original work.” [17]

This, eventually, could be made difficult to enforce though, since in the United Kingdom, where Hirst is a citizen, copyright protections only last for 70 years after an artist’s death.[18] It additionally has not been revealed who will carry out these instructions, which will be a difficult task, given that all of Hirst’s advisors will certainly not live for 200 years after his death. There may not even be a market for Hirst’s art by then — there are certainly plenty of legal questions, but not too many answers quite yet, since it seems only time will tell how this scheme plays out.

While it is helpful to understand this idea from a legal standpoint, it is also interesting to observe the plan against the broader picture of posthumous art in the market.

Posthumous Art

The release of posthumous art is certainly not unprecedented.[19] Plenty of artists of all kinds have had work released after death. From musicians like Johnny Cash (1932-2003) and Tupac (1971-1996)[20] to writers like Joan Didion (1934-2021) and Sylvia Plath (1932-1963),[21] it’s not unusual for at least some previously unreleased work to bloom out a dead creative’s estate.

As for the visual arts, it is a bit more rare, but certainly still happens quite often. [22] The posthumous visual arts are “defined as works created from an artist’s original molds, negatives or plans after an artist’s death.” [23]

For example, French sculptor Auguste Rodin detailed in his estate plan that his executors could use already-made molds to cast new works,[24] which has some similarities to Hirst’s plan, in that it outlines permission for others to execute an already-completed design.

Moreover, minimalist artist Sol Lewitt, known for his wall drawings, similarly left behind instructions for his estate to continue creating his artworks after his death in 2007.[25] A retrospective exhibition of his work entitled “Sol Lewitt: A Wall Drawing Retrospective,” opened at the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art in 2008, and will run until 2043.[26] Other similar exhibitions of his wall drawings have been shown around the world, with teams of people executing his original instructions within the new spaces.[27]

There is no way to be completely certain of how Hirst’s “posthumous paintings” will play out on the art market when the time comes, but there are some indicators of how it could go.

Market implications

Loretta Wurtenberger, in her book The Artist’s Estate, explains that many posthumous editions of artworks tend to sell, on average, for 30% less than original artworks.[28] The percentage can deviate from the average for individual artists based on various factors, such as the amount of works created while the artists were alive. Gallerist Eric Gleason concurs with Wurtenberger that “there is always a distinction in market value between [lifetime and posthumous works].”[29]

A great example of this value gap is exemplified in the work of famed Romanian sculptor Constantin Brâncuși.[30] Brâncuși died in 1957, and after his death, the Paul Kasmin Gallery, executor of the estate, has sold posthumous bronzes designed by the artist and cast by others later on, but these bronzes have vast price differences from sculptures he cast himself. In 2018, Brâncuși’s sculpture “La jeune fille sophistiquée,” designed in 1928 and cast in 1932, sold for $71 million at auction.[31] Meanwhile, Paul Kasmin Gallery put the sculpture “Torse de jeune Homme,” designed in 1924 and cast in 2017, for sale at Art Basel Hong Kong for only $4.5 million.[32]

Aside from the difference in market value between the lifetime and posthumous works by Brâncuși, questions of authenticity also took center stage.[33] In 2014, Paul Kasmin Gallery put on an exhibition of these newly-cast sculptures.[34] The show ignited controversy, with critics claiming that the works were merely “replicas” of Brâncuși, even though the works were created legally and with permission from the estate.[35] Brâncuși experts have said that every work of the artist is one-of-a-kind, so it would be impossible to create an authentic sculpture without the touch of the artist’s hand. [36]

Oftentimes, posthumous works raise questions and disagreements about authenticity. [37] The authenticity of posthumous artworks is essentially impossible to define, and opinions will vary from person-to-person about how extensively an artist’s hand must touch the posthumous artwork to consider it an “original.”[38]

As for Hirst’s posthumous works, the public’s reactions cannot yet be known, but it is possible to consider issues that may come up. Hirst’s work, first of all, differs from artists like Brâncuși because he is more of a conceptual artist by nature. With conceptual art, the actual idea of the artwork is considered more important than its physical manifestation. [39]

Other conceptual artists have released posthumous artworks, and according to Artsy, the question of the touch of the artist “is moot.” [40] Instead, concerns may revolve around the actual materials of the work, and what role the artist played in selecting them.[41]

For example, in the London Times interview, Hirst mentioned an idea for a sculpture of a pig in formaldehyde, which could be included in these notebooks.[42] Joy Glidden, the Founding Director of the Center for the Preservation of Artists’ Legacies, explained that issues could come up regarding the selection of the pig itself once Hirst passes away.[43] How does the selection of the pig impact how ‘authentic’ the sculpture is deemed?

Another issue that may come up is how Hirst’s foundation may classify these posthumous artworks within his oeuvre. According to Lucas, it is probable that the original designs in the notebooks might be part of Hirst’s official catalogue raisonne, which is currently being created.[44] Moreover, “to the extent that there are … permissions to fabricate the work … the catalogue is going to have to kind of account what that process looks like,” she said.[45] The foundation will likely pay close attention to the posthumous works that come out of these designs and be sure to account for the authorized editions. [46]

Conclusion

All of these questions are speculative, though, and only time will tell how the public will react to Hirst’s posthumous artwork. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of this whole plan is the legal questions such a project can bring on. Lucas explains that many of today’s conceptual artists are questioning what “creation” even means, which makes Hirst’s idea of posthumous artworks particularly illuminating.[47] All those in the art law community should keep their eyes peeled for what’s to come as today’s most explorative artists begin to age.

“The artist is really exploring some basic questions about creation,” Lucas said. “They don’t always fit nearly into the legal schemes that the law has developed.” [48]

Suggested Readings and Videos:

  • Albert Tait, Damien Hirst accused of plagiarism in breakthrough artwork (2025).
  • Carolyn Wimbly Martin and Isabel Jonson, Legal and Ethical Issues in Posthumous Art and Artificial Intelligence (2024).
  • Sondra Bacharach and Deborah Tollefsen, You Complete Me: Posthumous Works and Secondary Agency (2015).
  • Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market (2022).

About the Author

Alexa Donovan is a senior at NYU studying Art History and Journalism. She is a recipient of the H.W. Janson Scholarship Award for her studies, which include extensive research on museum ethics, deaccessioning, and female representation in contemporary painting. Additionally, she served as the Arts Editor for NYU’s student newspaper, where she wrote about art censorship issues.

Select References:

  1. Brian Boucher, Damien Hirst Says He Will Keep Making Artworks 200 Years After He Dies, Art Net, May 28, 2025, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/damien-hirst-will-keep-making-artworks-after-dies-2650250. ↑
  2. Young British Artists (YBAs), Tate, https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/y/young-british-artists-ybas ↑
  3. A Guide to the Life and Work of Damien Hirst, Christie’s, February 25 2022, https://www.christies.com/en/stories/the-art-of-damien-hirst-64ac637ddd424e70a5d66239674027ad ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Damien Hirst, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damien_Hirst ↑
  6. Kirsty Lang, Damien Hirst at 60: My plan to make art for 200 years after I die, The London Times, May 24, 2025 https://www.thetimes.com/culture/art/article/damien-hirst-money-death-therapy-a-yba-turns-60-78v9x2mwn ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Brian Boucher, supra note 1. ↑
  9. Kirsty Lang, supra note 7. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Brian Boucher, supra note 1. ↑
  12. Kirsty Lang, supra note 7. ↑
  13. Isabella de Souza, Damien Hirst: Art, Death, & Decay, My Art Broker, May 30, 2024. https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-damien-hirst/articles/damien-hirst-art-death-decay ↑
  14. Anthony Haden-Guest, Damien Hirst, Interview Magazine, Nov. 23, 2008, https://www.interviewmagazine.com/art/damien-hirst ↑
  15. Essie King, The King of Controversial Art, My Art Broker, Jan 18, 2024. https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-damien-hirst/articles/the-king-of-controversial-art ↑
  16. Kate Lucas, Esq., Telephone conversation (June 26, 2025) ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. U.K. Intellectual Prop. Off., How Long Copyright Lasts, GOV.UK, https://www.gov.uk/copyright/how-long-copyright-lasts (last visited July 8, 2025). ↑
  19. Anna Louie Sussman, How Dead Artists Continue Producing Art, Artsy June 7, 2018, https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-dead-artists-continue-producing-work ↑
  20. Roisin O’Connor et. al., The 15 greatest posthumous albums, ranked. The Independent, September 27 2024 https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/music/features/posthumous-albums-nirvana-biggie-johnny-cash-b2617557.html ↑
  21. Emily Temple, 10 Authors Whose Best Work Was Published Posthumously, Lit Hub March 12, 2018 https://lithub.com/10-authors-whose-best-work-was-published-posthumously/ ↑
  22. Posthumous Artworks, Art Quest, https://artquest.org.uk/artlaw-article/posthumous-artworks-2/ ↑
  23. Carolyn Wimbly Martin and Isabel Jonson, Legal and Ethical Issues in Posthumous Art and Artificial Intelligence , Lutzker & Lutzker LLP, July 12, 2024 https://www.lutzker.com/legal-and-ethical-issues-in-posthumous-art-and-artificial-intelligence/ ↑
  24. Louie Sussman, supra note 25. ↑
  25. Jonathan Bender, Conceptual Artist Sol LeWitt Didn’t Paint. He Imagined., Floyd, October 10, 2021 https://floydhome.com/blogs/livedin/conceptual-artist-sol-lewitt-didn-t-paint-he-imagined ↑
  26. Id. ↑
  27. Sol Lewitt’s Wall Drawings Live Forever, Sleek Photography, July 21, 2015, https://www.sleek-mag.com/article/sol-lewitts-wall-drawings-live-forever/ ↑
  28. Louie Sussman, supra note 25. ↑
  29. Id. ↑
  30. Id. ↑
  31. Id. ↑
  32. Id. ↑
  33. Ellen Gamerman, Growing Furor over Brancusi Show in New York, Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/growing-furor-over-brancusi-show-in-new-york-1389928895?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAjc4HMvKn90tXVqnfjy18wsLPmCRfwjdsSIqbyQKvEWqME3-ITvJTA7h5WL6V0%3D&gaa_ts=6866ce5d&gaa_sig=0NU0m6udq9c3t6J_m7KIK_4vBCq0Xy5GECvafd175939jlxj3txPR-LQkdohvZ9LHPpCT10W0JO8hA7u7RLhGA%3D%3D ↑
  34. Id. ↑
  35. Id. ↑
  36. Id. ↑
  37. Id. ↑
  38. Louie Sussman, supra note 25. ↑
  39. Conceptual Art, Tate, https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/c/conceptual-art ↑
  40. Louie Sussman, supra note 25.. ↑
  41. Id. ↑
  42. Kirsty Lang, supra note 7. ↑
  43. Joy Glidden, Telephone conversation (June 20, 2025). ↑
  44. Damien Hirst, www.damienhirst.com (last visit July 3,2025). ↑
  45. Kate Lucas, supra note 14 ↑
  46. Id. ↑
  47. Id. ↑
  48. Id. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Booked and Sentenced: Rare Books, Real Heists, and Really Short Sentences
Next How to Catch a Criminal in the 21st Century and Why AI Might be Able to Help

Related Art Law Articles

event screenshot estate planning
Wish You Were Hereestate planning

WYWH: “Artist Legacy and Estate Planning” Clinic

June 17, 2025
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law