• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet 200 years later: Damien Hirst plans to “create” art posthumously DOT DOT DOT
Back

200 years later: Damien Hirst plans to “create” art posthumously DOT DOT DOT

August 4, 2025

article about Damien Hirst

By Alexa Donovan

In late May 2025, Damien Hirst, born 1965, revealed estate plans that provide for the “creation” of art from beyond the grave.[1]

Hirst, the famed leading figure of the Young British Artists,[2] is undoubtedly one of the most prolific contemporary creatives of our time.[3] He is best known for his unconventional artworks, such as the infamous sculptures of sharks preserved in formaldehyde and mandalas made of dead butterflies.[4] He has also taken on plenty of experimental projects, often bending the boundaries of traditional artistry.

Primarily represented by Gagosian and White Cube,[5] Hirst’s plans for his legacy follow the same peculiar trajectory as his artistic projects. In an interview[6] with the London Times in late May, Hirst told reporter Kirsty Lang that he intends to create posthumous artworks.[7]

To execute this plan, Hirst will “fill up” 200 notebooks, each corresponding to a year after his death. [8] These books will contain designs that are similar to instructions. Buyers can create and sell the designs in the notebooks under Hirst’s name,[9] and his heirs will sign those artworks.[10] The number of the notebook will determine the year in which the artwork can be produced.[11] For example, the designs in notebook 197 are meant to be executed 197 years after Hirst’s death, which could be well into the 2200s.

“The idea is to have a certificate that says ‘Year One after Damien Dies: you’ve got the right to make this sculpture…’” Hirst said in the interview.[12]

The idea is not entirely surprising coming from Hirst. From sculptures using animal carcasses as material to diamond-encrusted human skulls, much of his art explores the theme of death.[13] It’s also not exactly a surprise that Hirst, who is incredibly well-known and one of the wealthiest artists of today, wants to live on. Interviewers have noted his large ego [14] and critics have called him out for being “gimmicky.”[15] Perhaps this foray into the future is a way to keep up the sensation behind his name even after he is long gone.

Legal implications

According to Kate Lucas, Special Counsel at Grossman LLP, this legacy plan can be understood from a copyright lens.

“It sounds to me like part of what’s happening here is he’s giving a buyer essentially… a copyright license to produce an artwork for a limited period of time,” she said in a phone interview to this author.[16] She explains that this license may allow “a reproduction or derivative work based on his original work.” [17]

This, eventually, could be made difficult to enforce though, since in the United Kingdom, where Hirst is a citizen, copyright protections only last for 70 years after an artist’s death.[18] It additionally has not been revealed who will carry out these instructions, which will be a difficult task, given that all of Hirst’s advisors will certainly not live for 200 years after his death. There may not even be a market for Hirst’s art by then — there are certainly plenty of legal questions, but not too many answers quite yet, since it seems only time will tell how this scheme plays out.

While it is helpful to understand this idea from a legal standpoint, it is also interesting to observe the plan against the broader picture of posthumous art in the market.

Posthumous Art

The release of posthumous art is certainly not unprecedented.[19] Plenty of artists of all kinds have had work released after death. From musicians like Johnny Cash (1932-2003) and Tupac (1971-1996)[20] to writers like Joan Didion (1934-2021) and Sylvia Plath (1932-1963),[21] it’s not unusual for at least some previously unreleased work to bloom out a dead creative’s estate.

As for the visual arts, it is a bit more rare, but certainly still happens quite often. [22] The posthumous visual arts are “defined as works created from an artist’s original molds, negatives or plans after an artist’s death.” [23]

For example, French sculptor Auguste Rodin detailed in his estate plan that his executors could use already-made molds to cast new works,[24] which has some similarities to Hirst’s plan, in that it outlines permission for others to execute an already-completed design.

Moreover, minimalist artist Sol Lewitt, known for his wall drawings, similarly left behind instructions for his estate to continue creating his artworks after his death in 2007.[25] A retrospective exhibition of his work entitled “Sol Lewitt: A Wall Drawing Retrospective,” opened at the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art in 2008, and will run until 2043.[26] Other similar exhibitions of his wall drawings have been shown around the world, with teams of people executing his original instructions within the new spaces.[27]

There is no way to be completely certain of how Hirst’s “posthumous paintings” will play out on the art market when the time comes, but there are some indicators of how it could go.

Market implications

Loretta Wurtenberger, in her book The Artist’s Estate, explains that many posthumous editions of artworks tend to sell, on average, for 30% less than original artworks.[28] The percentage can deviate from the average for individual artists based on various factors, such as the amount of works created while the artists were alive. Gallerist Eric Gleason concurs with Wurtenberger that “there is always a distinction in market value between [lifetime and posthumous works].”[29]

A great example of this value gap is exemplified in the work of famed Romanian sculptor Constantin Brâncuși.[30] Brâncuși died in 1957, and after his death, the Paul Kasmin Gallery, executor of the estate, has sold posthumous bronzes designed by the artist and cast by others later on, but these bronzes have vast price differences from sculptures he cast himself. In 2018, Brâncuși’s sculpture “La jeune fille sophistiquée,” designed in 1928 and cast in 1932, sold for $71 million at auction.[31] Meanwhile, Paul Kasmin Gallery put the sculpture “Torse de jeune Homme,” designed in 1924 and cast in 2017, for sale at Art Basel Hong Kong for only $4.5 million.[32]

Aside from the difference in market value between the lifetime and posthumous works by Brâncuși, questions of authenticity also took center stage.[33] In 2014, Paul Kasmin Gallery put on an exhibition of these newly-cast sculptures.[34] The show ignited controversy, with critics claiming that the works were merely “replicas” of Brâncuși, even though the works were created legally and with permission from the estate.[35] Brâncuși experts have said that every work of the artist is one-of-a-kind, so it would be impossible to create an authentic sculpture without the touch of the artist’s hand. [36]

Oftentimes, posthumous works raise questions and disagreements about authenticity. [37] The authenticity of posthumous artworks is essentially impossible to define, and opinions will vary from person-to-person about how extensively an artist’s hand must touch the posthumous artwork to consider it an “original.”[38]

As for Hirst’s posthumous works, the public’s reactions cannot yet be known, but it is possible to consider issues that may come up. Hirst’s work, first of all, differs from artists like Brâncuși because he is more of a conceptual artist by nature. With conceptual art, the actual idea of the artwork is considered more important than its physical manifestation. [39]

Other conceptual artists have released posthumous artworks, and according to Artsy, the question of the touch of the artist “is moot.” [40] Instead, concerns may revolve around the actual materials of the work, and what role the artist played in selecting them.[41]

For example, in the London Times interview, Hirst mentioned an idea for a sculpture of a pig in formaldehyde, which could be included in these notebooks.[42] Joy Glidden, the Founding Director of the Center for the Preservation of Artists’ Legacies, explained that issues could come up regarding the selection of the pig itself once Hirst passes away.[43] How does the selection of the pig impact how ‘authentic’ the sculpture is deemed?

Another issue that may come up is how Hirst’s foundation may classify these posthumous artworks within his oeuvre. According to Lucas, it is probable that the original designs in the notebooks might be part of Hirst’s official catalogue raisonne, which is currently being created.[44] Moreover, “to the extent that there are … permissions to fabricate the work … the catalogue is going to have to kind of account what that process looks like,” she said.[45] The foundation will likely pay close attention to the posthumous works that come out of these designs and be sure to account for the authorized editions. [46]

Conclusion

All of these questions are speculative, though, and only time will tell how the public will react to Hirst’s posthumous artwork. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of this whole plan is the legal questions such a project can bring on. Lucas explains that many of today’s conceptual artists are questioning what “creation” even means, which makes Hirst’s idea of posthumous artworks particularly illuminating.[47] All those in the art law community should keep their eyes peeled for what’s to come as today’s most explorative artists begin to age.

“The artist is really exploring some basic questions about creation,” Lucas said. “They don’t always fit nearly into the legal schemes that the law has developed.” [48]

Suggested Readings and Videos:

  • Albert Tait, Damien Hirst accused of plagiarism in breakthrough artwork (2025).
  • Carolyn Wimbly Martin and Isabel Jonson, Legal and Ethical Issues in Posthumous Art and Artificial Intelligence (2024).
  • Sondra Bacharach and Deborah Tollefsen, You Complete Me: Posthumous Works and Secondary Agency (2015).
  • Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market (2022).

About the Author

Alexa Donovan is a senior at NYU studying Art History and Journalism. She is a recipient of the H.W. Janson Scholarship Award for her studies, which include extensive research on museum ethics, deaccessioning, and female representation in contemporary painting. Additionally, she served as the Arts Editor for NYU’s student newspaper, where she wrote about art censorship issues.

Select References:

  1. Brian Boucher, Damien Hirst Says He Will Keep Making Artworks 200 Years After He Dies, Art Net, May 28, 2025, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/damien-hirst-will-keep-making-artworks-after-dies-2650250. ↑
  2. Young British Artists (YBAs), Tate, https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/y/young-british-artists-ybas ↑
  3. A Guide to the Life and Work of Damien Hirst, Christie’s, February 25 2022, https://www.christies.com/en/stories/the-art-of-damien-hirst-64ac637ddd424e70a5d66239674027ad ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Damien Hirst, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damien_Hirst ↑
  6. Kirsty Lang, Damien Hirst at 60: My plan to make art for 200 years after I die, The London Times, May 24, 2025 https://www.thetimes.com/culture/art/article/damien-hirst-money-death-therapy-a-yba-turns-60-78v9x2mwn ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Brian Boucher, supra note 1. ↑
  9. Kirsty Lang, supra note 7. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Brian Boucher, supra note 1. ↑
  12. Kirsty Lang, supra note 7. ↑
  13. Isabella de Souza, Damien Hirst: Art, Death, & Decay, My Art Broker, May 30, 2024. https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-damien-hirst/articles/damien-hirst-art-death-decay ↑
  14. Anthony Haden-Guest, Damien Hirst, Interview Magazine, Nov. 23, 2008, https://www.interviewmagazine.com/art/damien-hirst ↑
  15. Essie King, The King of Controversial Art, My Art Broker, Jan 18, 2024. https://www.myartbroker.com/artist-damien-hirst/articles/the-king-of-controversial-art ↑
  16. Kate Lucas, Esq., Telephone conversation (June 26, 2025) ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. U.K. Intellectual Prop. Off., How Long Copyright Lasts, GOV.UK, https://www.gov.uk/copyright/how-long-copyright-lasts (last visited July 8, 2025). ↑
  19. Anna Louie Sussman, How Dead Artists Continue Producing Art, Artsy June 7, 2018, https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-dead-artists-continue-producing-work ↑
  20. Roisin O’Connor et. al., The 15 greatest posthumous albums, ranked. The Independent, September 27 2024 https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/music/features/posthumous-albums-nirvana-biggie-johnny-cash-b2617557.html ↑
  21. Emily Temple, 10 Authors Whose Best Work Was Published Posthumously, Lit Hub March 12, 2018 https://lithub.com/10-authors-whose-best-work-was-published-posthumously/ ↑
  22. Posthumous Artworks, Art Quest, https://artquest.org.uk/artlaw-article/posthumous-artworks-2/ ↑
  23. Carolyn Wimbly Martin and Isabel Jonson, Legal and Ethical Issues in Posthumous Art and Artificial Intelligence , Lutzker & Lutzker LLP, July 12, 2024 https://www.lutzker.com/legal-and-ethical-issues-in-posthumous-art-and-artificial-intelligence/ ↑
  24. Louie Sussman, supra note 25. ↑
  25. Jonathan Bender, Conceptual Artist Sol LeWitt Didn’t Paint. He Imagined., Floyd, October 10, 2021 https://floydhome.com/blogs/livedin/conceptual-artist-sol-lewitt-didn-t-paint-he-imagined ↑
  26. Id. ↑
  27. Sol Lewitt’s Wall Drawings Live Forever, Sleek Photography, July 21, 2015, https://www.sleek-mag.com/article/sol-lewitts-wall-drawings-live-forever/ ↑
  28. Louie Sussman, supra note 25. ↑
  29. Id. ↑
  30. Id. ↑
  31. Id. ↑
  32. Id. ↑
  33. Ellen Gamerman, Growing Furor over Brancusi Show in New York, Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2021, https://www.wsj.com/articles/growing-furor-over-brancusi-show-in-new-york-1389928895?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAjc4HMvKn90tXVqnfjy18wsLPmCRfwjdsSIqbyQKvEWqME3-ITvJTA7h5WL6V0%3D&gaa_ts=6866ce5d&gaa_sig=0NU0m6udq9c3t6J_m7KIK_4vBCq0Xy5GECvafd175939jlxj3txPR-LQkdohvZ9LHPpCT10W0JO8hA7u7RLhGA%3D%3D ↑
  34. Id. ↑
  35. Id. ↑
  36. Id. ↑
  37. Id. ↑
  38. Louie Sussman, supra note 25. ↑
  39. Conceptual Art, Tate, https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/c/conceptual-art ↑
  40. Louie Sussman, supra note 25.. ↑
  41. Id. ↑
  42. Kirsty Lang, supra note 7. ↑
  43. Joy Glidden, Telephone conversation (June 20, 2025). ↑
  44. Damien Hirst, www.damienhirst.com (last visit July 3,2025). ↑
  45. Kate Lucas, supra note 14 ↑
  46. Id. ↑
  47. Id. ↑
  48. Id. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous How to Catch a Criminal in the 21st Century and Why AI Might be Able to Help
Next Booked and Sentenced: Rare Books, Real Heists, and Really Short Sentences

Related Art Law Articles

event screenshot estate planning
Wish You Were Hereestate planning

WYWH: “Artist Legacy and Estate Planning” Clinic

June 17, 2025
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective, scheduled at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in D.C., after a curatorial controversy over the potential removal of her recent work, "Trans Forming Liberty" (2024). Sherald denounced the attempt to remove this work as a blatant and intentional erasure of trans lives. 

This is one of the best examples and the most illustrative examples of the current administration's growing efforts to control the Smithsonian Institution's programming. In this climate of political tension, how do cultural institutions defend themselves against censorship and keep their curatorial independence?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artcuration #curatorialindependance #censorship
Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Arti Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!! 

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

Get 15% off using the code: Final15 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia se On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia sent hundreds of drones and missiles on sleeping cities across Ukraine, killing and injuring dozens of civilians. War is funded in part by individuals who have important artworks in their personal collections. This full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fifth year, daily exacts a grave toll on Ukrainian lives and cultural heritage, while fundamentally disrupting European commerce. In response, art market participants have adapted their practices, most have accepted, if not always embraced, the need to scrutinize the source of funds and the ultimate beneficiaries of their transactions. Yet there is a growing sense that parts of the trade are holding their breath, waiting to see when they might safely return to dealing with the oligarchs who continue to fund the Russian war machine.

For art market participants operating in the UK, compliance is no longer a peripheral concern, it is a legal imperative. Regulators are watching, the consequences of non-compliance increasingly extend beyond administrative penalties into criminal liability, and private-public partnerships offer the most credible path toward a more resilient and trustworthy market. 

Join us on April 24th for a panel discussion in London on the current state of AML enforcement and sanctions.

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artcrime #london #artissues #museumissues
Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zb Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zborowski to Cahn in 2003 for the low price of about $1.55 million. In 2016, Cahn claimed he was verbally informed about authenticity issues with the painting by Sotheby's. The parties did make an agreement regarding Cahn reselling with Sotheby's for a guaranteed price in exchange for releasing the auction house from all claims related to the painting. Cahn claims that he attempted to set this process in motion in June 2025, but he received no response. Cahn now seeks damages totaling $2.67 million, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, for breach of contract. 

Through this dispute, Vivianne Diaz's article highlights a bigger issue in the art market by explaining how forgeries negatively affect both collectors and auction houses, and how auction houses need to be more careful, but most importantly, proactive in their authentication determinations.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #art #Modigliani #LeopoldZborowski #sothebys
Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Art Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!!

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normand The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normandy, France, is scheduled to be loaned from the Bayeux Museum to the British Museum for ten months beginning in the fall of 2026. This is the first time the tapestry will have returned to the UK in over 900 years. 

This loan, authorized by France, has raised multiple controversies, particularly over conservation concerns. Nevertheless, it has been made possible through a combination of factors, including improved conservation techniques, enhanced transport precautions, comprehensive loan agreements, insurance, and the application of relevant protective laws. 

Check out our recent article by Josie Goettel to read more about this historic loan regarding not only in its symbolic significance, but also in its technical complexity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #legal #museumissues #bayeuxtapisserie #bayeuxtapestry #britishmuseum #bayeuxmuseum
Due to decreasing government funding and increasin Due to decreasing government funding and increasing operational costs, philanthropic giving is more essential than ever. Since the current administration took office, one-third of museums nationwide have lost government grants and contracts. These losses have set off a domino effect of difficult decisions, including laying off staff, cancelling public programming, and delaying maintenance and repairs. 

Many art museums are also still recovering from financial losses incurred during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This recent article by Kamée Payton explores how noncash charitable donation alternatives are used by cultural institutions as financing, and how noncash charitable donations can prove mutually beneficial for both donors and recipients—particularly in terms of tax treatment.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #museumissues #taxes #donations #taxtreatment
Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviation Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviations and dates (here is looking at you, AML and KYC, London, NY, Rome). A laconic message that as days are getting longer and we are charmed by sunshine, blooms, and prospects of holidays, the man-made world does not fail to disappoint (don’t believe me? put aside art law and read world news), and all that during the springtime.

On a high note, we are grateful to our Spring Interns who are finishing up their stint with the Center in a couple of weeks, well done! Together we invite you to the upcoming events in person and online. Come FY2027 (a.k.a. June), we will introduce you to the Summer Class and new Advisors. Hang in there through April and May, take notes, don’t forget – we are living in the best of times and the worst of times. Again. 

🔗 Check out our April newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #april #legalresearch
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law