• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet “A Melting Ice Cube:” The Bankruptcy of Paddle8
Back

“A Melting Ice Cube:” The Bankruptcy of Paddle8

June 30, 2023

logo and photos from Paddle8 business

By Joseph Gergel

On March 15, 2020, Paddle8, an online art auction marketplace, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.[1] For a promising start-up company that was once hailed as a revolutionary disruptor of the art market, the bankruptcy came as a shock to many art world insiders.[2] Over the course of the proceedings, it became apparent that Paddle8 engaged in misappropriating client funds for operating expenses, and it was unable to pay their seller-consignors who were owed money for the proceeds of the sales of artworks at auction.[3] Most of these unpaid clients were non-profit organizations that held charity auctions with Paddle8 and relied on the proceeds for their fundraising efforts.[4] After the CEO and the entire board of directors resigned, there was no one left to run the company.[5] An independent trustee was appointed by the court and the company was liquidated, selling off its remaining intellectual property assets during the proceeding.[6] Complaints were filed against the former CEO, board members, and investors over breach of fiduciary duties, and legal issues arose concerning secured versus unsecured creditors.[7] By examining the company as it was taken apart piece by piece in liquidation, the bankruptcy of Paddle8 offers cautionary lessons for entrepreneurs in order to avoid the path that one lawyer referred to as “a melting ice cube.”[8]

The Concept

In May 2011, Paddle8 was founded as an innovative online marketplace for contemporary art auctions, specializing in the “middle market” range of artworks between $10,000-$100,000.[9] Referred to in the press as the “eBay” of the art market, Paddle8 was a pioneer in the online sale of contemporary art, posed to disrupt the art industry..[10] The company aimed to streamline the auction experience by combining the excitement and expertise of an auction house with intuitive 21st-century technology.”[11] Similarly, it sought to democratize the art market by opening access to new audiences previously ignored by traditional auction houses.[12] Furthermore, the model eliminated physical brick and mortar expenses, allowing the company to expand its reach to over 500,000 users in diverse geographic markets.[13] As part of its strategy, Paddle8 prioritized charity auctions, which generated brand goodwill and credibility.[14]

Paddle8 was co-founded by three partners, each of whom brought their own unique expertise to the company: Alexander Gilkes was a former chief auctioneer at Phillips auction house and an LVMH executive; Aditya Julia – an entrepreneur and Harvard Business School Baker Scholar, and Osman Khan – a banker with prior experience at Goldman Sachs and Harvard ties.[15] The combination of art, entrepreneurship, and banking expertise was considered a perfect match, and the founders positioned themselves and the company as representing a new generation of Internet start-ups that received major press attention.[16]

Paddle8 secured significant capital from investors through three rounds of funding.[17] The first started in February 2012, when Paddle8 raised $4,000,000 from venture capital firms Founder Collective and Mousse Partners.[18] Then, in June 2013, Paddle8 raised $6,000,000 from private investors during the Series B round. Finally, the company’s most significant round of funding occurred in October 2015, when it raised $34,000,000.[19] Noteworthy, some of the individual investors during these rounds included prominent figures in the art, media, and technology industries, such as Damien Hirst, Rolf Sachs, Jay Jopling, David Zwirner, Edgar Berger, Matthew Mellon, Prince Alexander von Fürstenberg, Eric Fellner, and Stavros Niarchos.[20]

In its early years, Paddle8 experienced success, expanding to major art market cities like New York, Los Angeles, and London.[21] In 2014, the company reported selling more than $35.8 million of art on its platform, a 146% increase from the previous year.[22] In addition, Paddle8 also gained recognition for its philanthropic collaborations, raising more than $33 million for non-profit organizations by January 2015.[23] The company made headlines with its unique auction sales, including an unreleased Wu Tang Clan album sold to “pharma bro” Martin Shkreli for $2,000,000.[24] Over the remaining years, Paddle8 continued to report remarkable growth, with a 21% increase compared to the previous year in 2018.[25]

Paddle8 was competing in a growing market against such established giants as eBay and other auction houses (Sotheby’s, Phillips, Christie’s), as well as against other online marketplaces for luxury goods. Its unique marketing positioned itself on the cutting edge of contemporary art, tailored to emerging collectors at an affordable price range that could bypass the gatekeeping tactics of traditional auction houses while maintaining the exclusivity of a niche platform.

The Downfall

Despite impressive reported sales and investments, Paddle8 never generated a profit and relied on debt financing to cover operating expenses.[26] The company prioritized expansion over developing its identity, acquiring Blacklots, an internet software and services company, in 2012, and obtaining an option of a stake in Artnet, a competing art auction platform. [27] In May 2016, Paddle8 merged with Auctionata, a German online auction house that specialized in luxury goods.[28] However, the company’s expansion efforts suffered a major setback when Auctionata declared insolvency in February 2017 amid accusations of violating trade regulations.[29] This led to dozens of layoffs, reportedly “gutting” the staff, and Paddle8 being in need of an investor to save the company.[30] Lightyear Collective, a multi-family office incorporated by hedge fund manager Christopher Hsu, provided a $5 MIllion loan, allowing it to become an independent company again.[31]

Over the course of the next two years, Paddle8 went through several changes of ownership. First, the company merged with The Native S.A., a Swiss-listed international technology and media company focused on e-commerce.[32] This merger, which was influenced by Paddle8 advisors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss (of Facebook notoriety), emphasized Paddle8’s new focus on blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies.[33] Its first auction as a merged company accepted Bitcoin for the first time, and The Native founder Izabela Depczyk took on the role of CEO.[34] However, in 2019, Facebank AG acquired a majority interest in Paddle8, and a few months later, Pulse Evolution group acquired Facebank AG.[35] In addition, a new CEO, former head of f Culture, Fashion Partnership and Events at Tumblr, Valentine Uhovski, was appointed in November 2019, just a few months before the filing of bankruptcy.[36] Uhovski abruptly resigned in February 2020 after arguments with the board.[37] Bankruptcy was announced on March 15, 2020.

The Bankruptcy

By the time of the bankruptcy, it became clear that Paddle8 had been using client funds to cover operating expenses, instead of segregating the funds owed from art sales.[38] The extent and duration of this practice remain unclear. Peter Rich, the former head of the Board of Directors, stated that Paddle8 timely paid its clients in the previous years and was “current” in substantially all payables at the time of the resignation of the prior CEO, Valentine Uhovski, in November 2019.[39]

The issue escalated when New American Cinema Group, a non-profit film organization founded by famed experimental filmmaker Jonas Mekas, filed a lawsuit alleging misappropriation of funds.[40] This lawsuit sparked a wave of similar complaints from other non-profits, including high-profile charities of celebrities like Jay Z and Justin Bieber, the California College of The Arts, the Rema Hort Mann Foundation, The Hepatitis C Trust, UN Women UK, and Penumbra Foundation.[41]

Following its bankruptcy filing, Paddle8 attempted to reassure consignors that it was not shutting down.[42] In a letter dated March 27, 2020, addressed to the California Institute of The Arts, a Paddle8 employee stated that “[w]e are not shuttering the business” and that the bankruptcy filing was made to “protect our partners and preserve the business.”[43] Paddle8’s landlord filed a motion stating Paddle8 intended to remain in business and continue its lease of its offices in New York..[44] However, while Paddle8 positioned itself as reorganizing by registering for a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the filing revealed that the company had over 100 debtors and estimated assets of $0-$50,000, with $10,000,000-$50,000,000 in estimated liabilities.[45]

Following the bankruptcy filing, Paddle8’s transition from an operating company to liquidation was swift. The resignation of the CEO was followed by the resignation of the entire Board of Directors, leaving only Peter Rich to oversee the company.[46] Rich, a Certified Public Accountant, served as the sole remaining board member until he also resigned on April 29, 2020, after the bankruptcy had commenced.[47] At a court status conference, the judge was left to ask: “[s]o who’s running the company?”[48] Rich’s departure left Paddle8 without any leadership, prompting the court to appoint Megan Noh, an independent trustee. [49] Noh, an attorney specializing in art law at Pryor Cashman LLP, determined that the company had made no sales since filing for bankruptcy.[50] Noh recommended to dissolve the company and sell its remaining assets, describing the situation to the court as “dire.”[51]

Melting the Ice

The dismantling of Paddle8’s corporate assets posed several challenges. Paddle8 did not own any real estate, which would have been the first assets sold, and their basic office furniture and supplies were considered worthless and therefore not sold.[52] On the other hand, the contemporary art installations in their abandoned New York office posed a problem under the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA).[53] Prior to vacating the leased property, said art had to be removed. Under VARA, artists must be given notice of the destruction of art installations and an opportunity to remove them.[54] Following this regulation, Noh notified the landlord, who was also listed as an unpaid creditor, of their obligations pursuant to VARA.[55] The only valuable assets left were Paddle8’s intellectual property, which were auctioned off to the public through Nevium LLC. The auctioned assets included its trademark, domain name, social media accounts, website, iOS applications, and various client databases, collectively selling for just under $500,000.[56]

Secured versus Unsecured Creditors

In its initial bankruptcy filing on March 16, 2020, Paddle8 listed its top twenty creditors who have the largest unsecured claims, including the entity who loaned money to the company, lease holders for property, consignors, and contractors. In total, the debt was estimated at $10-50 million.[57] In its Summary of Assets and Liabilities submitted to the court on April 8, 2020, the total debt was listed at $18,948,645.51.[58] However, by the time of this filing, the loan entity, Stock Access Holdings, was described as a secured creditor by Paddle8.[59] Such a distinction between secured and unsecured creditors are of vital importance in bankruptcy. In bankruptcy, secured creditors have a higher priority and are paid before unsecured creditors, who are left to divide any remaining funds.

While Paddle8 insisted that Stock Access Holdings was the only secured creditor, many of the seller-consignors argued that proceeds from sale of their property were in fact “secured” under the New York Arts and Cultural Affairs Law (“NY ACAL”).[60] NY ACAL states that consigned artworks from artists and/or their heirs are to be held as trust property and should not be subordinated to any other claims.[61] Section 12.01(1) establishes a consignor/consignee relationship when the art merchant accepts the consigned artwork, and the consignee is thereafter deemed to be the agent of the consignor.[62] The auctioneer never obtains title to the proceeds, which is exempt from the company’s estate in bankruptcy.[63]

New York case law also supports the auctioneer’s fiduciary duty as an agent of the consignor that extends to all consignors.[64] In a lawsuit against Christie’s brought by the consigner Cristallina S.A., a Panamanian corporation, in 1986, the New York Supreme Court found that the auction house “had a fiduciary duty to act in the utmost good faith and in the interest of [consignor],” specifying that “[w]hen a breach of that duty occurs, the agent is liable for damages caused to the principal.”[65] Several seller-consignors raised the NY ACAL law, including the Rema Hort Mann Foundation, Penumbra Foundation, The New American Cinema Group, Inc., The Shawn Carter Foundation, the UN Women National Committee UK, and Counseling In Schools, Inc.[66] The court ordered the segregation of the funds of parties who filed complaints citing NY ACAL.[67]

The status of the Stock Access Holdings loan also became a subject of dispute, as the Trustee argued that the loan was not legally secured.[68] FBNK Finance S.à.r.l, a corporation based in Luxembourg controlled by Mr. Sergey Skaterschikov, failed to submit a UCC Filing Statement with the appropriate recording officer in Delaware to declare the loan as secured.[69] Although the Convertible Loan Agreement of December 12, 2017 referred to the loan as a “SECURED LOAN AGREEMENT” in bold and capital letters, and a subsequent March 2019 letter also referred to the loan as secured, it was still alleged to be improperly filed by the Trustee.[70] It is important to note that at the time of the loan, FBNK became the indirect controlling shareholder of Paddle8.[71]

Allegations of Breach of Fiduciary Duties

On May 1, 2020, The Committee for Unsecured Creditors and the Trustee initiated adversary proceedings against the former CEO, as well as several board members and investors, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties of due care, loyalty, and candor.[72] The allegations centered around an insurance policy for $1 million that covered directors’ and officers’ liability.[73] The Committee, made up of Marcel Katz Art, The Little Black Gallery, and the VentureDevs, Inc. claimed that these insiders had been grossly negligent in their use and preservation of property and assets.[74] Attorney Paul Cossu, who represented several non-profit organizations, filed a declaration stating that “it is hard to imagine a more egregious breach of an auction house’s fiduciary duty than misdirecting the sale proceeds of a consignor to the auction house itself.”[75]

In a complaint against former CEO Valentine Uhovsky, the Committee alleged that he had knowingly and culpably violated his fiduciary obligations to Paddle8 and its stakeholders by acting in bad faith and showing reckless disregard for his duties.[76] According to the complaint, Uhovsky had been instructed by the Board to scale back business operations, cut expenses, and conduct reductions in force in January 2020.[77] He was also instructed to present budgets at a planned meeting in Florida.[78] However, Uhovsky never attended the meeting and subsequently resigned.[79] Peter Rich blamed the financial issues on Uhovsky’s “mistakes or mismanagement” and his reliance on auction receipts to cover operating expenses.[80] Rich went on to explain that after Uhovsky’s resignation, he “distributed self-serving emails to employees, vendors, and non-profit organizations that assigned blame to others for the actions that only he controlled as CEO.”[81] In his defense, Uhovsky pointed the finger at the Board and the investors, stating that he left the company “after months of deceit and misinformation.”[82] On August 28, 2020, the Committee filed an amended complaint, adding new defendants Isabela Depczyk, Norman Hanson, Christopher Hsu, Peter Rich, and Sergey Skaterschikov, all of whom had served as officers, directors, or investors in the company.[83] Additionally, the Trustee initiated an adversary proceeding on February 18, 2021 against FBNK and its CEO, John Textor.[84]

The Settlement

None of the allegations were ultimately pursued because the parties went to mediation and settled.[85] As part of the settlement, FBNK, the majority investor, paid $1.25 Million to Paddle8, and the insurance policy paid $150,000.[86] However, the Trustee found that the bank loan was an unsecured claim and the loan was subordinated to the rights and distribution of all other general unsecured claims.[87] This meant that the seller-consignor claims and all other general claims would be settled before addressing the loan. This was a complete reversal of the initial filing of creditors. Parties were to be paid based on a pro rata distribution of the remaining assets after other administrative fees, including attorney’s fees, were paid.[88] At the end of the liquidation process, the group of unsecured claims was only paid $184,763, which was only 7% of the total allowed claims amounting to $2,538,503.[89]

The Aftermath

With the bankruptcy finalized, is Paddle8 set to re-emerge? The original website for Paddle8 is live, advertising Paddle8 as an “NFT charity marketplace.”[90] However, the website does not yet appear to be operational in facilitating NFT sales. Paddle8’s trademark and domain name were ultimately acquired by Facebank, the former majority shareholder, who may be the force behind Paddle8’s potential reinvention.[91] The entire story of Paddle8’s collapse has not been widely reported, perhaps due to the fact that it folded amidst thousands of other companies during the pandemic. Also, the complications of going through bankruptcy and emerging on the other side is not a common story. If Paddle8 is to re-emerge successfully, what can it learn from its past failures?

Paddle8 was hailed as a revolutionary model for the art world and received the funding, press, and brand recognition that would point to a successful investment. Ultimately, not only did the seller-consignors lose most of their commissions, but a large group of seasoned investors lost $44,000,000 in equity due to its collapse. Paddle8’s attempt at rapid expansion, through the acquisition of other auction platforms, put undue pressure on the company’s finances, leading to a cycle of loans on top of loans. This highlights the importance of prioritizing a sustainable business model and finding a pathway to profitability. It remains to be seen whether Paddle8 will rise again and what lessons investors will derive from this endeavor.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Joseph Gergel is a J.D. Candidate at Fordham University of School of Law. He received a Masters Degree in Modern Art: Critical and Curatorial Studies from Columbia University and a B.A. in Individualized Study from NYU’s Gallatin School. He currently serves as director of kó, a contemporary art gallery based in Lagos, Nigeria. He was a Spring 2023 Intern at the Center for Art Law.

Suggested Readings 

  • Eileen Kinsella, Paddle8 is Filing for Bankruptcy – and it Owes Tens of Thousands of Dollars to Justin Bieber, Jay Z’s Foundation, and Others, ARTNET (March 17, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-bankruptcy-1806951.
  • Nicholas O’Donnell, Paddle8 Bankruptcy a Harbinger in the Time of COVID19 and The Coming Art World Crisis, JDSUPRA (March 25, 2020), https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/paddle-8-bankruptcy-a-harbinger-in-the-18837/.
  • Margaret Carrigan and Claire Voon, Former Paddle8 Chief Executive Sued for $1M, THE ART NEWSPAPER (May 11, 2020), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2020/05/11/former-paddle8-chief-executive-sued-for-dollar1m
  • Paddle8 Bankruptcy Trustee Launchs $6 Million Suit Against Former Member of Board of Directors, ARTFORUM (Sept. 25, 2020), https://www.artforum.com/news/paddle8-bankruptcy-trustee-launches-6-million-suit-against-former-member-of-board-of-directors-84004.
  • Maximiliano Duron, Paddle8 Trustee Sues John Textor for $6M, ARTNEWS (Sept. 25, 2020), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/paddle8-bankruptcy-trustee-lawsuit-john-textor-1234571761/
  • Art Industry News: Paddle8 Bankruptcy Proceedings Take a Heated Turn With Allegations of ‘Reckless’ Leadership and ‘Disloyalty’, ARTNET (Sept. 28, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/art-industry-news-september-28-2020-1911204.

Select Resources:

  1. Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing Bankruptcy, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2020) (Doc. No. 1). ↑
  2. See generally Zachary Weiss, See Meet Paddle8’s Alexander Gilkes, Art auction Disruptor, OBSERVER (Mar. 3, 3026), https://observer.com/2016/03/meet-paddle8s-alex-gilkes-art-auction-disruptor/. ↑
  3. See Eileen Kinsella, Paddle8 Is Filing for Bankruptcy — and it Owes Tens of Thousands of Dollars to Justin Bieber, Jay Z’s Foundation, and Others, ARTNET (Mar. 17, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-bankruptcy-1806951. ↑
  4. See Id. ↑
  5. Case Conference at 6, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2020) (Doc. No. 102). ↑
  6. Paddle8 – Intellectual Property and Intangible Asset Sale, NEVIUM (July 6, 2020), https://nevium.com/paddle8/. ↑
  7. See Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation at 70, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 237). ↑
  8. Case Conference at 14, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2020) (Doc. No. 102). ↑
  9. Declaration of Peter Rich at 1, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  10. See Rip Empson, With Big-Name Backing and Some eBay Flavor, These Startups Are Looking to Shake Up The Art Market, TECHCRUNCH (June 14, 2013), https://techcrunch.com/2013/06/14/with-big-name-backing-and-some-ebay-flavor-these-startups-are-looking-shake-up-the-art-market/. ↑
  11. The Merging of Two Giants: Paddle8 and The Native, USA ART NEWS (Jan. 25, 2018), https://usaartnews.com/art-market/the-merging-of-two-giants-paddle8-and-the-native. ↑
  12. See Katy Donoghue, Izabela Depczyk on How Paddle8 is Changing the Game. Again., WHITEWALL (Nov. 1, 2018), https://whitewall.art/art/izabela-depczyk-paddle8-changing-game. ↑
  13. See Paddle8 Raises $34 Million in Series C Funding, GLOBENEWSWIRE (Oct. 28, 2015), https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/10/28/1201947/0/en/Paddle8-Raises-34-Million-in-Series-C-Funding.html. ↑
  14. Kimberly Chou, Art Site Takes Charitable Turn, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Dec. 13, 2012), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324481204578177391210355294. ↑
  15. See generally Anthony Noto, Sotheby’s and Christie’s may soon feel the sting of star-studded startup competition, N.Y. BUS J. (Oct. 30, 2015, https://www.bizjournals.com/newyork/news/2015/10/28/sothebys-and-christies-may-soon-feel-the-sting-of.html. ↑
  16. See generally Jacob Bernstein, He Knows His Royalty, And His Art, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Oct. 29, 2014), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/30/fashion/meet-alexander-gilkes-co-founder-of-paddle8-an-online-auction-house.html. ↑
  17. Declaration of Peter Rich at 1, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  18. Online Art Market Paddle8 Secures Series A Funding of c.$4MM Led by Prominent Technology Investors Founder Collective with Luxury Investors Mousse Partners, PR NEWSWIRE (Feb. 9, 2012), https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/online-art-market-paddle8-secures-series-a-funding-of-c4mm-led-by-prominent-technology-investors-founder-collective-with-luxury-investors-mousse-partners-139010189.html. ↑
  19. See Paddle8 Raises $34 Million in Series C Funding, GLOBENEWSWIRE (Oct. 28, 2015), https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/10/28/1201947/0/en/Paddle8-Raises-34-Million-in-Series-C-Funding.html. ↑
  20. Id. ↑
  21. Paddle8 headquarters and office locations, CRAFT, https://craft.co/paddle8/locations. ↑
  22. See Paddle8 Raises $34 Million in Series C Funding, GLOBENEWSWIRE (Oct. 28, 2015), https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/10/28/1201947/0/en/Paddle8-Raises-34-Million-in-Series-C-Funding.html. ↑
  23. Kimberly Chou, Art Site Takes Charitable Turn, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL (Dec. 13, 2012), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324481204578177391210355294. ↑
  24. Devin Leonard and Annmarie Hordern, Pharma’s Bad Boy Exec Martin Shkreli Paid $2 Million for Wu-Tang Clan’s New Record, BLOOMBERG (Dec. 9, 2015), https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2015-martin-shkreli-wu-tang-clan-album/. ↑
  25. Declaration of Peter Rich at 1, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  26. Proposed Disclosure Statement to Accompany Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation at 15, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 238). ↑
  27. Paddle8 Acquires Blacklots, MERGR, https://mergr.com/paddle8-acquires-blacklots.; Paddle8 Seeks Stake in ARTNET, ARTOBSERVED (May 20, 2013), http://artobserved.com/2013/05/paddle8-seeks-stake-in-artnet/. ↑
  28. Karsten Strauss, A Tale of Two Auction Houses: Auctionata and Paddle8 Join Forces, FORBES (May 12, 2016), https://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2016/05/12/a-tale-of-two-auction-houses-auctionata-and-paddle8-join-forces/?sh=1908a19711b0. ↑
  29. Alyssa Buffenstein, Auctionata Files for Insolvency, ARTNET (Jan. 19, 2017), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/auctionata-insolvency-proceedings-822965. ↑
  30. Nate Freeman, Paddle8 Staff “Gutted” Following Split with Auctionata; Co-Founder Has Departed Company, ARTNEWS (Feb. 14, 2017), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/paddle8-staff-gutted-following-split-with-auctionata-as-co-founder-departs-company-7779/. ↑
  31. Proposed Disclosure Statement to Accompany Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation at 15, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 238). ↑
  32. Michael J. de la Merced, Paddle8, Online Art Auctioneer, Is Merging with Swiss Tech Company, THE NEW YORK TIMES (Jan. 23, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/23/business/dealbook/paddle8-bitcoin-blockchain.html. ↑
  33. Paddle8 Merges with The Native, And Bets Everything on Cryptocurrencies, HAPPENING (Jan. 24, 2018), https://www.happening.media/category/magazine/en/news/3173/paddle8-merges-with-the-native-and-bets-everything-on-cryptocurrencies. ↑
  34. Id.; Angela M.H. Schuster, Paddle8’s Izabela Depczyk on the Auction House of the Future, ROBB REPORT (Dec. 21, 2018), https://robbreport.com/muse/discoveries/paddle8s-izabela-depczyk-auction-house-of-the-future-2836237/. ↑
  35. Proposed Disclosure Statement to Accompany Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation at 15, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 238). ↑
  36. Eileen Kinsella, Creditors Are Chasing Bankrupt Auction House Paddle8’s Former CEO for Allegedly Mishandling Funds to the Tune of $1 Million, ARTNET (May 12, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-creditors-target-former-ceo-1859673. ↑
  37. Id. ↑
  38. See Eileen Kinsella, Paddle8 Is Filing for Bankruptcy — and it Owes Tens of Thousands of Dollars to Justin Bieber, Jay Z’s Foundation, and Others, ARTNET (Mar. 17, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-bankruptcy-1806951. ↑
  39. Declaration of Peter Rich at 2, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  40. The New American Cinema Group, Inc. v. P8H, Inc., Index No. 651595/2020 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Mar. 10, 2020). ↑
  41. Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing Bankruptcy, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2020) (Doc. No. 1). ↑
  42. Declaration of Peter Rich at 2, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  43. Declaration of John Jenkins at 4, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 8, 2020) (Doc. No. 46). ↑
  44. Motion of Creditor Lisa Cooley LLC at 2, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2020) (Doc. No. 115). ↑
  45. Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing Bankruptcy, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2020) (Doc. No. 1). ↑
  46. Declaration of Peter Rich at 1, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  47. Declaration of Peter Rich at 5, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2020) (Doc. No. 8). ↑
  48. Id. ↑
  49. Notice of Appointment of Trustee at 1, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 8, 2020) (Doc. No. 41). ↑
  50. Application of Chapter 11 Trustee at 4, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2020) (Doc. No. 60). ↑
  51. Id. ↑
  52. Chapter II Trustee’s Notice of Abandonment of Certain Property of the Estate at 2, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2020) (Doc. No. 71). ↑
  53. Id. ↑
  54. Id. ↑
  55. Id. ↑
  56. Declaration of Megan E. Noh at 12, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2020) (Doc. No. 130). ↑
  57. Voluntary Petition for Non-Individuals Filing Bankruptcy, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2020) (Doc. No. 1). ↑
  58. Summary of Assets and LIabilities for Non-Individuals, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2020) (Doc. No. 20). ↑
  59. Id. ↑
  60. Declaration in Opposition to Application for an Order Authorizing the Retention of Kirby Aisner & Curley as Attorneys for the Debtor at 4, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2020) (Doc. No. 5). ↑
  61. New York Consolidated Laws, Arts and Cultural Affairs Law – ACA § 12.01. ↑
  62. Id. ↑
  63. Id. ↑
  64. Declaration in Opposition to Application for an Order Authorizing the Retention of Kirby Aisner & Curley as Attorneys for the Debtor at 3, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2020) (Doc. No. 5). ↑
  65. Cristallina, SA v. Christie, Manson & Woods Intl., Inc., 117 A.D.2d 284, 292, 502 N.Y.S.2d 165 (1986). ↑
  66. Proposed Disclosure Statement to Accompany Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 238). ↑
  67. Intern Order Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral at 4, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2020) (Doc. No. 19). ↑
  68. Complaint, Megan E. Noh. v. FBNK Finance S.à.r.l., In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2020) (Doc. No. 141). ↑
  69. Id. ↑
  70. Exhibit A, Motion for Hearing, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2020) (Doc. No. 9). ↑
  71. Proposed Disclosure Statement to Accompany Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 238). ↑
  72. Complaint, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Estate of P8H, Inc. v. Valentine Uhovsky, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2020) (Doc. No. 38). ↑
  73. Case Conference at 6, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2020) (Doc. No. 102). ↑
  74. Complaint, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Estate of P8H, Inc. v. Valentine Uhovsky, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2020) (Doc. No. 38). ↑
  75. Declaration in Opposition to Application for an Order Authorizing the Retention of Kirby Aisner & Curley as Attorneys for the Debtor at 3, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2020) (Doc. No. 5). ↑
  76. Complaint, Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Estate of P8H, Inc. v. Valentine Uhovsky at 3-4, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2020) (Doc. No. 38). ↑
  77. Id. ↑
  78. Id. ↑
  79. Id. ↑
  80. Id. ↑
  81. Id. ↑
  82. Eileen Kinsella, Creditors Are Chasing Bankrupt Auction House Paddle8’s Former CEO for Allegedly Mishandling Funds to the Tune of $1 Million, ARTNET (May 12, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-creditors-target-former-ceo-1859673. ↑
  83. Joint Motion for Entry of An Order Assigning Adversary Proceedings to Mediation at 4, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Feb. 18, 2021) (Doc. No. 180). ↑
  84. Id. ↑
  85. Id. ↑
  86. Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation at 70, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2021) (Doc. No. 237). ↑
  87. Id. at 16. ↑
  88. Id. at 19. ↑
  89. Post-Confirmation Report at 7, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2023) (Doc. No. 352). ↑
  90. PADDLE8, https://paddle8.com/ (last visited May 5, 2023). ↑
  91. Declaration of Megan E. Noh at 12, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−smb (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. July 31, 2020) (Doc. No. 130). ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Out of Court and Onto the Auction Block: Norman Rockwell’s Saccharine Works Enter the Art Market’s Blood Stream
Next Art as an Office Asset: Motivations and Collection Practices in Corporate Settings

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law
August 2026 Summer Promo (2)

Get your leg up on art law

Just in time for 2026-2027

Become a member and access unlimited articles, our Case Law Database, event archives, and exclusive member pricing on all upcoming events.

Learn MORE
Immigration Guide for Artists 2026 Cover Page

Immigration Guide for Artists

Check out the 2026 overview of U.S. immigration pathways available to artists.

Learn MORE
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
For centuries, copying has been an integral part o For centuries, copying has been an integral part of Chinese artistic practice, blurring the line between homage and forgery. Many museums are at a loss for how to evaluate works that challenge Western notions of authenticity.

Through the ongoing debate over the MET’s Riverbank painting, our recent article examines how institutional interests and market value continue to shape perceptions of authenticity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lena Rohde!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #chineseart #zhangdaqian #changdaichien #artforgery #authenticity #museumlaw #arthistory #provenance #artmarket
The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has trans The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has transformed how cultural heritage is documented and preserved, particularly in regions affected by conflict. As 3D models and digital archives become more common, they also raise questions about ownership and cultural self-determination.

In her article, Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis examines the preservation of Syria's cultural heritage. More specifically, how digital reconstructions can both protect endangered sites and act as a tool for erasure when local communities are excluded from the process.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #digitalheritage #3Dreconstruction #provenance #archaeology #culturalproperty #digitization #palmyra #museumlaw
Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go t Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go to the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in New Brunswick. This gallery was included in a law suit between Lord Beaverbrook's Estate and a foundation he had established during his life. 

📚 See more about this case using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artresearch #estates #artist #foundation #gallery
Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago d Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago de Compostela after seventy-two years.

Our recent article examines the Spanish Supreme Court's decision to return the Abraham and Isaac sculptures to Santiago de Compostela, and the pivotal role that object identification played in resolving the dispute.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lucas Güimil Valdés!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalheritage #restitution #provenanceresearch #spain #culturalproperty
Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Wel Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Weller's presentation introducing Germany's new Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property. It explores how the new tribunal differs from the former Limbach Commission and what its procedures, jurisdiction, and binding decisions could mean for future restitution claims.

📚 Read the full article by Savannah Weiler and Amanda Buonaiuto at the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalproperty #nazilootedart #restitution #provenanceresearch #culturalheritage #alternativedisputeresolution
It’s August 🔥 Think Art Law. World Cap 2026 is ove It’s August 🔥 Think Art Law. World Cap 2026 is over. For us it will be remembered for Haaland Memes and $25 MILLION lawsuit filed by environmental artist Robert Wyland against FIFA for painting over the iconic 1999 downtown Dallas mural, Whaling Wall 82.* Summer Internships at the Center are winding down. Oh the places we have been together (from UN to MoMA across the US, Canada and the UK). The 2025-2026 Judith Bresler Fellowship is complete and how! and our new fellow is eager to hit the ground running.

As we move into the final stretch of summer, the reality sets in: little and big fires are everywhere and juggling so many balls or making sense of the everyday is getting increasingly impossible. But before we collapse into off-season, we want to thank you for being part of our community. Whether you were here in person, joining us online, or thinking about art and the law from afar, we can’t wait to see what you’ll create, challenge, and defend come fall. Our complements and heartfelt thanks to our Summer Team for everything they’ve accomplished over these months and invested in our future: for staying on track, for research and rigorous work on articles and databases, for genuine team building, and for pushing all of us to grow. And here’s what we’ve learned: when the real world gets too much, look at art. Play ball. Have a hydration break. These are necessities that keep us sane and running overtime. 

📚 Read the full newsletter and become a subscriber using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #legal artlawyer
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law