• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Assets to Auctions: The Role of Art in Bankruptcy Proceedings
Back

Assets to Auctions: The Role of Art in Bankruptcy Proceedings

March 19, 2024

Fragment: Debtor's Prison, 1840 Paul Gavarni, French, 1804-1866 Lithograph printed in black ink on wove paper Image: 8 1/2 × 7 7/8 inches (21.6 × 20 cm) Sheet: 14 × 10 3/4 inches (35.6 × 27.3 cm) Gift of Mrs. Virginia Booth Vogel

Debtor's Prison, 1840 Paul Gavarni, French, 1804-1866 Lithograph printed in black ink on wove paper Image: 8 1/2 × 7 7/8 inches (21.6 × 20 cm) Sheet: 14 × 10 3/4 inches (35.6 × 27.3 cm) Gift of Mrs. Virginia Booth Vogel

By Iris Ziwei Che

In the world of financial instability, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code serves as a source of hope, offering structured pathways for recovery and solvency. Navigating the complexities of bankruptcy law reveals a multifaceted system carefully crafted to address the financial troubles of individuals, businesses, cities, and non-profits alike. This article explores the role of law in balancing debt resolution with economic value preservation, through an analysis of significant bankruptcy cases. These include the financial failure of Lehman Brothers, Paddle8, Detroit, and New York City Opera, as well as Salander-O’Reilly Galleries’ legal disputes, and controversies involving art dealer Lisa Schiff. Through these cases, this article dissects how bankruptcy law acts both as a lifeline for those facing severe financial difficulties and as a way to redistribute assets while ensuring creditors are treated fairly.

Bankruptcy Basics

The Federal U.S. Bankruptcy Code offers a legal framework for addressing financial distress for both individuals and entities. Key chapters of this code include Chapter 7 (governing individual liquidation) and Chapter 11 (governing individual and corporate reorganization) tailored to different options for entities facing bankruptcy.

Chapter 7, often referred to as ‘liquidation bankruptcy’, is designed primarily for individuals and businesses that do not have the means to pay off their debts. Under this chapter, a trustee is appointed to liquidate the debtor’s non-exempt assets and distribute the proceeds to creditors, effectively discharging the debtor from most debts.

Chapter 11, alternatively known as ‘reorganization bankruptcy’, primarily caters to businesses, allowing them to restructure their debts while continuing their operations. This chapter is notable for its flexibility, enabling companies to reorganize their financial structure and operations to return to profitability while maintaining control over their assets by allowing for a three to five-year plan to pay previously-acquired debts. .

Additionally, the Bankruptcy Code encompasses a special provision for municipalities, known as Chapter 9. This chapter enables financially distressed municipalities to reorganize their debts while considering the unique nature of public entities and their obligations to constituents. A critical component within these frameworks is Section 363, which guides the sale of assets in bankruptcy. It allows the debtor to sell property “free and clear” of liens, claims, and encumbrances, often leading to more efficient and profitable asset liquidation.

Local bankruptcy rules, such as New York’s Rule 1007, supplement the federal bankruptcy provisions by addressing specific procedural requirements within their jurisdiction. For instance, Rule 1007 in New York outlines detailed procedures for filing lists of creditors and requirements for debtor’s statements, ensuring compliance with both local and federal bankruptcy laws. These local rules play a vital role not only in smoothing the functioning of bankruptcy proceedings but also by tailoring the federal framework to the specific needs and legal nuances of each jurisdiction.

The Bankruptcy of a Corporation – The Case of Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers, once the fourth-largest U.S. investment bank, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 15, 2008.[1] At the time, the company reported $639 billion in assets.[2] A later reorganization plan estimated that about $50 billion in assets could be recovered.[3] Among these assets, a significant amount of corporate-owned artwork was among the assets pending auction. In early November 2009, Freeman’s auctioned the first group of about 280 corporate-owned artworks.[4] The auction raised approximately $1.3 million, twice the expected amount.[5] Later in 2009 and in February 2010, Freeman’s hosted two more auctions of Lehman’s collection, featuring paintings, sculptures, and prints. In the fall of 2010, Sotheby’s sold more than 400 works from Lehman’s collection, raising over $12 million.[6] The sale featured pieces like Richard Prince’s 2003 Joke Painting on gatorboard, a turquoise cabinet by Damien Hirst, a painting by famous Chinese artist Liu Ye, among others.[7] The money raised was used to pay off the corporation’s debt to secured creditors.

The liquidation of the Lehman Brothers brokerage unit concluded on September 28, 2022. All 111,000 of Lehman’s customers were fully repaid the $106 billion owed to them, and secured creditors received full payouts. Unsecured creditors recovered $9.4 billion.[8]

The Bankruptcy of a “Consignee” – Paddle8

Paddle8, founded in May 2011, aimed to be a leading online marketplace for contemporary art auctions, focusing on the middle market with artworks priced between $10,000 and $100,000.[9] By 2016, it had raised $44 million in funding over three rounds.[10] Despite its rapid annual growth, Paddle8 had never turned a profit and relied on debt financing for its operating expenses.

In 2020, Paddle8 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection amid allegations of misusing funds from auctions. Its creditors included non-profit organizations and celebrities.[11] Notably, Anthology Film Archives, founded by Jonas Mekas, sued Paddle8 for withholding funds from a benefit auction held in November 2019.[12] Other creditors were the Bieber couple, Jay Z’s Shawn Carter Foundation, and the Rema Hort Mann Foundation.[13] After the resignation of almost the entire management team, the court appointed an independent trustee, and the company was liquidated, including the sale of its intellectual property assets.

A significant legal issue in such situations is the risk of “secret liens.”[14] Secret liens occur when a consignor (the owner of the goods) provides items to a consignee (the seller) but where the ownership rights are not properly disclosed. If this happens, goods that are still owned by the cosigner might be incorrectly included in the consignee’s bankruptcy estate and used to pay off the latter’s creditors. Consignors’ actual knowledge of the consignment arrangement can preclude the consignee from claiming a superior interest in the consigned goods. Fortunately in Paddle8’s case, there was no technical evidence suggesting that such a “secret lien” was created.

The Bankruptcy of a City – Detroit

Detroit’s filing for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in July 2013 marked the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history. This brought attention to the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA), which was owned by the city since 1919 and possessed a valuable art collection. DIA considered selling some of its collection to help cover part of the city’s $18 billion debt.[15]

A pivotal debate arose: whether the city could legally sell its artworks or if it was obliged to preserve them for its citizens, who could potentially be deemed co-owners. Fortunately, this dilemma was avoided as DIA raised over $800 million, including $330 million from philanthropic foundations and $200 million from the state of Michigan, thus preventing the sale of its artworks.[16] DIA’s operations were later transitioned to an independent charitable trust. The city’s bankruptcy plan was eventually approved in November 2014, eliminating $7 billion worth of debt.[17]

Bankruptcy of a Not-Profit – The New York City Opera

The New York City Opera, founded in 1943 and known as “The People’s Opera,” aimed to offer innovative and affordable opera experiences. Besides ticket sales, its income relied on an endowment and contributions.[18] The Opera filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2013 after an unsuccessful fundraising effort and an accumulated $44 million deficit.[19] Significant losses included a structural deficit since 2003 and endowment losses in 2008.[20] Creditors ranged from the New York City Ballet to former chorus members to ticket holders for canceled shows.[21]

In October 2013, the general manager filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition.[22] There was no request for a trustee or examiner, and no official committee was appointed. The Opera’s assets included a $4.5 million endowment and expected bequests.[23] Plans included selling all its inventory and its thrift shop to a not-profit organization and transferring archives to Columbia University.[24]

Roy Niederhoffer, founder of NYCO Renaissance, won the bid.[25] The New York City Opera’s assets included its patent rights, such as the right to its name.[26] These patent assets were of significant interest to potential buyers. This situation is common in bankruptcy auctions, where companies, including notable examples like Enron and Kodak, have sold the rights to their names and logos.

Niederhoffer stepped down in 2019, when the board had shrunk, and the endowment continued to decrease.[27] Financial reports reveal a trend of decreasing revenue and endowment each year.[28] In 2022, revenue was reported at $2.21 million, a stark contrast to the figure from 2011, which was about eleven times higher.[29] The total assets now are worth roughly one-tenth of their value before bankruptcy.[30] Both net income and assets have shown instability over the years.[31] Additionally, its social media presence is less active than that of its main competitors in the city. The path to reviving the City Opera remains long and filled with challenges.

Bankruptcy of a Gallery – Salander-O’Reilly Galleries

The first Salander-O’Reilly gallery location opened on Madison Avenue in New York in 1976 and moved to the famous neoclassical townhouse on East 79th Street in 1989, showcasing modern and contemporary art. Later, a more luxurious location, focusing on Renaissance to 19th century art, opened on East 71st Street. By the early 2000s, they were among New York City’s most established and cherished art galleries, even being named the best gallery worldwide by The Robb Report in 2003.[32] The rent alone cost over $200,000 a month.[33]

In 2007, the Salander-O’Reilly Galleries filed for bankruptcy after it was discovered that they had sold over 90 artworks without proper authorization. In the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, a list of about 560 artworks was submitted for claims, with the Elaine de Kooning estate being a major creditor. Claimants had to provide detailed information to support their interests in the artworks.[34] Additionally, there were thousands more pieces with disputed ownership. Several plaintiffs, including Carol Cohen, the widow of former Madison Square Garden CEO Alan Cohen; Nella Longari, the Milan-based gallery; Monty and Sarag Diamond, art collectors, and others argued that Mr. Salander’s debts should not be dismissed by the bankruptcy court because they were incurred as a result of fraud.[35]

Some creditors struggled to recover their losses even years later. In 2015, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case involving claims against insurer AXA Art by the investor group Renaissance Art Investors (RAI), who were attempting to recover $21.6 million for about 155 artworks involved in the scandal. However, the insurer argued that the gallery’s failure to return art or sales proceeds was not covered by their policy.[36]

Bankruptcy of a Dealer – Lisa Schiff

The scandal involving New York art advisor Lisa Schiff has stood out prominently in the art world since May, 2023. Schiff, once a top dealer, faced allegations when Candace Carmel Barasch, a long-time client, discovered the disappearance of a Ghenie painting and other concerning financial transactions. Barasch, along with other plaintiffs, took legal action to restrain Schiff’s assets, partially granted by Judge Lucy Billings. Schiff allegedly owes significant amounts, including $1.8 million for a Ghenie painting sale and $2.5 million for art acquisitions.[37][38] Other major creditors include American Express.

Schiff filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, revealing nearly $7 million in claims, over $1 million owed to the IRS, and additional state and city debts. By late 2023, discussions about selling Schiff’s 231 artworks, including pieces by artists like Anicka Yi and Ivy Haldeman, were underway. The collection, expected to be sold in eight auctions at Phillips starting February 2024, could raise up to $1.5 million.[39]

Conclusion

These landmark cases reveal bankruptcy law’s critical function in addressing financial crises. Whether through liquidating assets or reorganizing debts, bankruptcy proceedings aim to provide a fair resolution for both debtors and creditors. The experiences of entities like Detroit and Paddle8, as well as the legal battles of Salander-O’Reilly Galleries, underscore the complexities and the essential nature of bankruptcy law in facilitating fresh starts and preserving economic value. Through these cases, we gain insight into how the law not only helps those facing severe financial difficulties but also ensures a level of creditor satisfaction, underscoring its importance in maintaining economic stability.

(For more information, see Center for Art Law’s 2014 article looking at the function of bankruptcy law and some landmark cases: Muses in Bankruptcy Court: a look at US arts and cultural institutions finding themselves in bankruptcy and out).

About the Author

Iris Ziwei Che is currently a first-year JD student at the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign-Urbana. She holds a Master’s degree in Art History from Boston University and has experience working in museums and at Christie’s prior to her law school journey. Her main areas of interest are Art Law, Bankruptcy Law, Trust and Estate Planning, and Business Law. She can be reached at zche3@illinois.edu

Select Sources:

  1. Graeme Wearden, David Teather, and Jill Treanor, Banking Crisis: Lehman Brothers Files for Bankruptcy Protection, The Guardian (2008), available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/sep/15/lehmanbrothers.creditcrunch ↑
  2. Andrew Clark, Lehman Brothers’ Art Collection Goes Under the Hammer, The Guardian (2009), available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/oct/30/lehman-brothers-art-collection-sale ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. Candace Jackson, Wall Street’s Orphaned Art, The Wall Street Journal (2009), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703574604574501793038152958 ↑
  5. Id. ↑
  6. Ramin Talaie, Art Auction Raises $12M against Lehman Debt, Bloomberg News (2010), available at https://www.nj.com/business/2010/09/art_auction_raises_12m_against.html ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Jonathan Stempel, After 14 Years, Lehman Brothers’ Brokerage Ends Liquidation, Reuters (2022), available at https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/after-14-years-lehman-brothers-brokerage-ends-liquidation-2022-09-28/ ↑
  9. Case Conference at 14, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2020) (Doc. No. 102). ↑
  10. Paddle8 Raises $34 Million in Series C Funding, GlobalNewswire (2015), available at https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/10/28/1201947/0/en/Paddle8-Raises-34-Million-in-Series-C-Funding.html ↑
  11. Eileen Kinsella, Paddle8 is Filing for Bankruptcy — and It Owes Tens of Thousands of Dollars to Justin Bieber, Jay Z’s Foundation, and Others, Artnet (2020), available at https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-bankruptcy-1806951 ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Id. ↑
  14. A “secret lien” is a statutory or equitable lien that arises without any notice to the public and requires no perfection. ↑
  15. Jordan Weissmann, Detroit Exists Bankruptcy, Thanks to Its Art Museum, Slate (2014), available at https://slate.com/business/2014/11/detroit-exits-bankruptcy-city-s-pensions-saved-in-part-thanks-to-detroit-institute-of-art.html ↑
  16. Id. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. In re New York City Opera, Inc., Case No. 13-13240 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 03, 2013) (Doc. No. 2) ↑
  19. Michael Cooper, New York City Opera Files for Bankruptcy, The New York Times (2013), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/arts/music/new-york-city-opera-files-for-bankruptcy.html ↑
  20. In re New York City Opera, Inc., Case No. 13-13240 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 03, 2013) (Doc. No. 2) ↑
  21. Michael Cooper, New York City Opera Files for Bankruptcy, The New York Times (2013), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/arts/music/new-york-city-opera-files-for-bankruptcy.html ↑
  22. In re New York City Opera, Inc., Case No. 13-13240 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 03, 2013) (Doc. No. 2) ↑
  23. Id. ↑
  24. Id. ↑
  25. Jennifer Smith, Rival Visions to Reboot New York City Opera Detailed, The Wall Street Journal (2015), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/rival-visions-to-reboot-new-york-city-opera-detailed-1446417707 ↑
  26. Jennifer Smith, New York City Opera Suitors Prepare Bids, The Wall Street Journal (2015), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-city-opera-suitors-prepare-bids-1421448468 ↑
  27. Michael Cooper, City Opera Faces Its Biggest Challenge Since Bankruptcy, The New York Times (2019), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/arts/music/city-opera-bankruptcy-challenge.html ↑
  28. Profile of New York City Opera Inc., PROPUBLICA, available at https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/132974347 ↑
  29. Id. ↑
  30. Id. ↑
  31. Id. ↑
  32. Roger Kimball, A Commercial Art Gallery That Feels Like A Museum, The Wall Street Journal (2005), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB112777388125952580 ↑
  33. James Panero, An Old Master in Ruins, New York Magazine (2008), available at https://nymag.com/news/features/45324/ ↑
  34. Eileen Kinsella, Artists and Heirs Claim Hundreds of Works from Salander-O’Reilly, ARTnews (2008), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/artists-and-heirs-claim-hundreds-of-works-from-salander-oreilly-1290/ ↑
  35. Id. ↑
  36. Eileen Kinsella, Supreme Court Declines Investor Claim for $21.6 Million from Salander-O’Reilly Swindle, Artnet (2015), available at https://news.artnet.com/market/supreme-court-declines-salander-fraud-280749 ↑
  37. Eileen Kinsella, Collector Candace Barasch Lays Out More on Dethroned Art Advisor Lisa Schiff’s Lavish Lifestyle in a Blistering New Court Filing, Artnet (2023), available at https://news.artnet.com/art-world/candace-barasch-lisa-schiff-ongoing-legal-feud-2340249 ↑
  38. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, Phillips to Bring Lisa Schiff’s Artwork to Auction, Observer (2023), available at https://observer.com/2023/12/phillips-lisa-schiff-artwork-auction/ ↑
  39. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, Phillips to Bring Lisa Schiff’s Artwork to Auction, Observer (2023), available at https://observer.com/2023/12/phillips-lisa-schiff-artwork-auction/ ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Interview with Apsara Iyer on Getting into the Art Law Space
Next Case Review: RF and Bulatov v. Tsvetkova and other charges against an artist

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
Fleurs en Pot
Art law

The Dorville Case: A Judicial Turn Facilitating the Restitution of Artworks Acquired During the French Occupation

May 7, 2026
The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Yesterday marked the launch of our Art Law Film Se Yesterday marked the launch of our Art Law Film Series! 🎥

The first screening was warmly hosted as part of CineLöwenbraukunst at @lowenbraukunst.zurich, and made possible with the generous support of @prohelvetia and @migros_culture_funding. 

We were thrilled to screen the powerful documentary “Elephants & Squirrels” by director Gregor Brändli @gregor_braendli_3000, which follows Sri Lankan artist @deneth_piumakshi_vedaarachchig Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige on her journey advocating for the restitution of cultural heritage from Swiss museums back to the Wanniyala-Aetto indigenous community in Sri Lanka.

The evening offered insightful discussions, highlighting thoughtful approaches to the complex multi-perspective issues of restitution and colonial legacies.

A big thank you to everyone who joined us in Zurich ❤️
Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion on th Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion on the current state of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, and how recent and upcoming changes affect art market participants and transactions.

The speakers will offer an update on the regulatory landscape in the United States, issues with enforcement of the AML provisions as well as discuss considerations for private sector on how to stay compliant and prevent money laundering. Finally, we will share the very latest insights we have gained about regulations and enforcement in the UK as they concern  art market participants.

This is your opportunity to learn about the new edition of the Center's AML study of regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, brush up on the upcoming changes in the UK and the US to the due diligence requirements, and to ask questions.

The event is offered in conjunction with the 2026 Art Law Summer School. 

This event is in-person at Steptoe, New York @ 1114 Avenue of the Americas AND Online.

🎟️ Click the link in our bio to grab your tickets!

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #aml #artcrime #internationallaw
We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Confere We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 on May 27, 2026. You can join in-person at Brooklyn Law School or online via Zoom.

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with a keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees.

The opening panel will examine the current state of copyright law in the visual arts and the practical challenges facing artists, galleries, institutions, and practitioners. Subsequent panels will address artificial intelligence, recent legislative and regulatory developments, the role of the U.S. Copyright Office, and emerging questions around licensing, enforcement, and appropriation in a contemporary digital environment.

The conference convenes artists, attorneys, scholars, collectors, arts administrators, students, and policy professionals for in-depth and timely discussion, and will be accompanied by a silent auction and exhibitor networking opportunities. 

Closing Remarks by Lindsay Korotkin, Partner, ArentFox Schiff
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 3: Registration Is Dead? Long Live Licensing?

As copyright enforcement becomes more complex, this panel explores the evolving role of registration and the growing importance of licensing agreements in protecting creative works. Panelists will discuss how artists, rights holders, and legal practitioners navigate enforcement today, examining when registration still matters, how licensing structures are being used strategically, and what effective rights management looks like in a shifting legal and art market landscape.

Moderator: Carol J. Steinberg, Art, Copyright & Entertainment Law Attorney, Faculty, School of Visual Arts

Speakers: Janet Hicks, Vice President and Director of Licensing, Artists Rights Society; Yayoi Shionoiri, art lawyer and Vice President of External Affairs and General Counsel at Powerhouse Arts; Martin Cribbs, Intellectual Property Licensing Strategist

You can join us in-person or online! Grab your tickets using the link in our bio! 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightregistration #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your passport and tickets on your way to Venice, or floating toward the Most Serene City on the waves of your imagination? Yes, this newsletter is inspired by the 61st Venice Biennale, entitled In Minor Keys, and by the May flurry of activities. For us the month of May closes books on FY 2026 (thanks to you and our programming, we are ending this year strong and ready for the 2026-2027 encore), and it makes our heads spin with final preparations for the Summer School and Annual Conference, punctuated by the arrival of the summer interns (final count is still a mystery). Please share with us your art law stories and experiences as we strive to do the same in New York, Zurich, London, Venice…

The eyes of the art and law world are on La Serenissima because the world needs serenity instead of sirens and because people love art, it imitates life, art that allows us to experiment with real feelings and overcome the drama. From lessons in artistic advocacy with the “Invisible Pavilion” (2026) to historical echoes of the Biennale del Dissenso [Biennial of Dissent] (1977), this Biennale is giving us a lot to process. Hope and joy, loss and disappointment, reunions and new encounters, memorialization and belonging, realization that different motivations drive us to take to the road. Don’t lose your moral compass or your keys, and remember: even minor movements can lead to major reverberations. 

🔗 Check out our May newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #may #legalresearch
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 2: The Copyright Office Weighs In — Three Reports on AI and the Law

This panel examines the U.S. Copyright Office’s three recent reports on artificial intelligence and copyright, unpacking what they clarify, and what they leave unresolved about authorship, ownership, and protection in the age of AI. Panelists will also situate these reports within the broader legal landscape, touching on emerging litigation and contested issues shaping how AI‑generated and AI‑assisted works are treated under current copyright law.

Moderator: Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research, Center for Art Law

Speakers: Miriam Lord, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Public Information and Education; Ben Zhao, Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at University of Chicago and Founder, Nightshade & Glaze; Katherine Wilson-Milne, Partner, Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP 

Reserve your tickets today! 🎟️ 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel wit Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel… Case law is fascinating, and litigation is often the only path when disputes over valuable art cannot be resolved through negotiation or ADR. 

As news of the renewed HEAR Act spreads through the restitution community, we invite you to read a case review by two of our legal interns, Donyea James (Fordham Law, JD Candidate 2026) and Lauren Stein (Wake Forest University School of Law, JD Candidate 2027), who spent this semester immersed in the facts and law of "Bennigson et al. v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation."

$1,552. That is what a Picasso sold for in 1938 by a Jewish businessman fleeing Nazi Germany. Roughly one-tenth of what he sought just six years earlier. The heirs went to court and two courts said the claim came too late. HEAR Act might very well challenge that conclusion. The case is now pending before New York's highest court. 

🔗 Link in bio.

#ArtLaw #Restitution #HolocaustArt #HEARAct #Guggenheim #Picasso #ProvenanceResearch
Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens wh Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens when the present confronts colonial memory? Join us in Zurich for a special screening of "Elephants & Squirrels," a documentary following Sri Lankan artist Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige as she traces looted artifacts and human remains of the indigenous Wanniyala-Aetto people, held in Swiss museum collections for over a century, and fights for their return home.

Film director Gregor Brändli and the artist will open the evening with reflections on colonial collecting, cultural heritage, and the ethics of museum stewardship.

📅 May 12, 2026 | 18:00 – 21:00
📍 schwarzescafé | Luma Westbau, Limmatstrasse 270, Zurich

This event is free to attend and is offered as part of the CineLöwenbräukunst series. Link in bio for more information.

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #Restitution #Repatriation #Zurich #FilmScreening #ColonialHistory #MuseumEthics 

#MuseumEthics
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for, Panel 1: So Inappropriate — Lessons About Copyright Law and Art: First There Was Art, Then Copyright, Then Fair Use… and Now AI?

From early copyright doctrines to contemporary fair use debates, this panel examines how artists and lawyers have navigated questions of ownership, appropriation, and originality in visual art. Panelists will explore key developments in copyright law affecting traditional artistic practices, from borrowing and remixing to transformative use, while also considering how emerging technologies, including AI, are beginning to reshape long‑standing legal frameworks and artistic norms.

Moderator: Irina Tarsis, Founder, Center for Art Law
Speakers: Vivek Jayaram, Founder, Jayaram Law; Vincent Wilcke, Pace Gallery; Greg Allen, Artist and writer 

Reserve your tickets using the link in our bio or by visiting our website itsartlaw.org 🎟️ 
See you soon!
Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been maki Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been making waves and headlines for weeks and the doors have not even opened yet. The jury refused to award prizes and resigned nine days before the opening over geopolitical controversies. Some artists boycott while others show up even if unwelcome. Some pavilions will be empty, some will not be open to the public… Sources of funds, sources of inspiration, so many questions, so much on display for critical eyes. Meanwhile the boats are waiting for anyone lucky enough to find themselves in the floating world.

Help us reflect on the Biennale by sharing your art law stories.

#ArtLaw #Venice #Biennale2026 #ArtWorld #BiennaleofDissent #LaSerenissima #GoldenLion #SeeArtThinkArtLaw
Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law