• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Assets to Auctions: The Role of Art in Bankruptcy Proceedings
Back

Assets to Auctions: The Role of Art in Bankruptcy Proceedings

March 19, 2024

Fragment: Debtor's Prison, 1840 Paul Gavarni, French, 1804-1866 Lithograph printed in black ink on wove paper Image: 8 1/2 × 7 7/8 inches (21.6 × 20 cm) Sheet: 14 × 10 3/4 inches (35.6 × 27.3 cm) Gift of Mrs. Virginia Booth Vogel

Debtor's Prison, 1840 Paul Gavarni, French, 1804-1866 Lithograph printed in black ink on wove paper Image: 8 1/2 × 7 7/8 inches (21.6 × 20 cm) Sheet: 14 × 10 3/4 inches (35.6 × 27.3 cm) Gift of Mrs. Virginia Booth Vogel

By Iris Ziwei Che

In the world of financial instability, the U.S. Bankruptcy Code serves as a source of hope, offering structured pathways for recovery and solvency. Navigating the complexities of bankruptcy law reveals a multifaceted system carefully crafted to address the financial troubles of individuals, businesses, cities, and non-profits alike. This article explores the role of law in balancing debt resolution with economic value preservation, through an analysis of significant bankruptcy cases. These include the financial failure of Lehman Brothers, Paddle8, Detroit, and New York City Opera, as well as Salander-O’Reilly Galleries’ legal disputes, and controversies involving art dealer Lisa Schiff. Through these cases, this article dissects how bankruptcy law acts both as a lifeline for those facing severe financial difficulties and as a way to redistribute assets while ensuring creditors are treated fairly.

Bankruptcy Basics

The Federal U.S. Bankruptcy Code offers a legal framework for addressing financial distress for both individuals and entities. Key chapters of this code include Chapter 7 (governing individual liquidation) and Chapter 11 (governing individual and corporate reorganization) tailored to different options for entities facing bankruptcy.

Chapter 7, often referred to as ‘liquidation bankruptcy’, is designed primarily for individuals and businesses that do not have the means to pay off their debts. Under this chapter, a trustee is appointed to liquidate the debtor’s non-exempt assets and distribute the proceeds to creditors, effectively discharging the debtor from most debts.

Chapter 11, alternatively known as ‘reorganization bankruptcy’, primarily caters to businesses, allowing them to restructure their debts while continuing their operations. This chapter is notable for its flexibility, enabling companies to reorganize their financial structure and operations to return to profitability while maintaining control over their assets by allowing for a three to five-year plan to pay previously-acquired debts. .

Additionally, the Bankruptcy Code encompasses a special provision for municipalities, known as Chapter 9. This chapter enables financially distressed municipalities to reorganize their debts while considering the unique nature of public entities and their obligations to constituents. A critical component within these frameworks is Section 363, which guides the sale of assets in bankruptcy. It allows the debtor to sell property “free and clear” of liens, claims, and encumbrances, often leading to more efficient and profitable asset liquidation.

Local bankruptcy rules, such as New York’s Rule 1007, supplement the federal bankruptcy provisions by addressing specific procedural requirements within their jurisdiction. For instance, Rule 1007 in New York outlines detailed procedures for filing lists of creditors and requirements for debtor’s statements, ensuring compliance with both local and federal bankruptcy laws. These local rules play a vital role not only in smoothing the functioning of bankruptcy proceedings but also by tailoring the federal framework to the specific needs and legal nuances of each jurisdiction.

The Bankruptcy of a Corporation – The Case of Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers, once the fourth-largest U.S. investment bank, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 15, 2008.[1] At the time, the company reported $639 billion in assets.[2] A later reorganization plan estimated that about $50 billion in assets could be recovered.[3] Among these assets, a significant amount of corporate-owned artwork was among the assets pending auction. In early November 2009, Freeman’s auctioned the first group of about 280 corporate-owned artworks.[4] The auction raised approximately $1.3 million, twice the expected amount.[5] Later in 2009 and in February 2010, Freeman’s hosted two more auctions of Lehman’s collection, featuring paintings, sculptures, and prints. In the fall of 2010, Sotheby’s sold more than 400 works from Lehman’s collection, raising over $12 million.[6] The sale featured pieces like Richard Prince’s 2003 Joke Painting on gatorboard, a turquoise cabinet by Damien Hirst, a painting by famous Chinese artist Liu Ye, among others.[7] The money raised was used to pay off the corporation’s debt to secured creditors.

The liquidation of the Lehman Brothers brokerage unit concluded on September 28, 2022. All 111,000 of Lehman’s customers were fully repaid the $106 billion owed to them, and secured creditors received full payouts. Unsecured creditors recovered $9.4 billion.[8]

The Bankruptcy of a “Consignee” – Paddle8

Paddle8, founded in May 2011, aimed to be a leading online marketplace for contemporary art auctions, focusing on the middle market with artworks priced between $10,000 and $100,000.[9] By 2016, it had raised $44 million in funding over three rounds.[10] Despite its rapid annual growth, Paddle8 had never turned a profit and relied on debt financing for its operating expenses.

In 2020, Paddle8 filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection amid allegations of misusing funds from auctions. Its creditors included non-profit organizations and celebrities.[11] Notably, Anthology Film Archives, founded by Jonas Mekas, sued Paddle8 for withholding funds from a benefit auction held in November 2019.[12] Other creditors were the Bieber couple, Jay Z’s Shawn Carter Foundation, and the Rema Hort Mann Foundation.[13] After the resignation of almost the entire management team, the court appointed an independent trustee, and the company was liquidated, including the sale of its intellectual property assets.

A significant legal issue in such situations is the risk of “secret liens.”[14] Secret liens occur when a consignor (the owner of the goods) provides items to a consignee (the seller) but where the ownership rights are not properly disclosed. If this happens, goods that are still owned by the cosigner might be incorrectly included in the consignee’s bankruptcy estate and used to pay off the latter’s creditors. Consignors’ actual knowledge of the consignment arrangement can preclude the consignee from claiming a superior interest in the consigned goods. Fortunately in Paddle8’s case, there was no technical evidence suggesting that such a “secret lien” was created.

The Bankruptcy of a City – Detroit

Detroit’s filing for Chapter 9 bankruptcy protection in July 2013 marked the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history. This brought attention to the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA), which was owned by the city since 1919 and possessed a valuable art collection. DIA considered selling some of its collection to help cover part of the city’s $18 billion debt.[15]

A pivotal debate arose: whether the city could legally sell its artworks or if it was obliged to preserve them for its citizens, who could potentially be deemed co-owners. Fortunately, this dilemma was avoided as DIA raised over $800 million, including $330 million from philanthropic foundations and $200 million from the state of Michigan, thus preventing the sale of its artworks.[16] DIA’s operations were later transitioned to an independent charitable trust. The city’s bankruptcy plan was eventually approved in November 2014, eliminating $7 billion worth of debt.[17]

Bankruptcy of a Not-Profit – The New York City Opera

The New York City Opera, founded in 1943 and known as “The People’s Opera,” aimed to offer innovative and affordable opera experiences. Besides ticket sales, its income relied on an endowment and contributions.[18] The Opera filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2013 after an unsuccessful fundraising effort and an accumulated $44 million deficit.[19] Significant losses included a structural deficit since 2003 and endowment losses in 2008.[20] Creditors ranged from the New York City Ballet to former chorus members to ticket holders for canceled shows.[21]

In October 2013, the general manager filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition.[22] There was no request for a trustee or examiner, and no official committee was appointed. The Opera’s assets included a $4.5 million endowment and expected bequests.[23] Plans included selling all its inventory and its thrift shop to a not-profit organization and transferring archives to Columbia University.[24]

Roy Niederhoffer, founder of NYCO Renaissance, won the bid.[25] The New York City Opera’s assets included its patent rights, such as the right to its name.[26] These patent assets were of significant interest to potential buyers. This situation is common in bankruptcy auctions, where companies, including notable examples like Enron and Kodak, have sold the rights to their names and logos.

Niederhoffer stepped down in 2019, when the board had shrunk, and the endowment continued to decrease.[27] Financial reports reveal a trend of decreasing revenue and endowment each year.[28] In 2022, revenue was reported at $2.21 million, a stark contrast to the figure from 2011, which was about eleven times higher.[29] The total assets now are worth roughly one-tenth of their value before bankruptcy.[30] Both net income and assets have shown instability over the years.[31] Additionally, its social media presence is less active than that of its main competitors in the city. The path to reviving the City Opera remains long and filled with challenges.

Bankruptcy of a Gallery – Salander-O’Reilly Galleries

The first Salander-O’Reilly gallery location opened on Madison Avenue in New York in 1976 and moved to the famous neoclassical townhouse on East 79th Street in 1989, showcasing modern and contemporary art. Later, a more luxurious location, focusing on Renaissance to 19th century art, opened on East 71st Street. By the early 2000s, they were among New York City’s most established and cherished art galleries, even being named the best gallery worldwide by The Robb Report in 2003.[32] The rent alone cost over $200,000 a month.[33]

In 2007, the Salander-O’Reilly Galleries filed for bankruptcy after it was discovered that they had sold over 90 artworks without proper authorization. In the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, a list of about 560 artworks was submitted for claims, with the Elaine de Kooning estate being a major creditor. Claimants had to provide detailed information to support their interests in the artworks.[34] Additionally, there were thousands more pieces with disputed ownership. Several plaintiffs, including Carol Cohen, the widow of former Madison Square Garden CEO Alan Cohen; Nella Longari, the Milan-based gallery; Monty and Sarag Diamond, art collectors, and others argued that Mr. Salander’s debts should not be dismissed by the bankruptcy court because they were incurred as a result of fraud.[35]

Some creditors struggled to recover their losses even years later. In 2015, the Supreme Court declined to hear a case involving claims against insurer AXA Art by the investor group Renaissance Art Investors (RAI), who were attempting to recover $21.6 million for about 155 artworks involved in the scandal. However, the insurer argued that the gallery’s failure to return art or sales proceeds was not covered by their policy.[36]

Bankruptcy of a Dealer – Lisa Schiff

The scandal involving New York art advisor Lisa Schiff has stood out prominently in the art world since May, 2023. Schiff, once a top dealer, faced allegations when Candace Carmel Barasch, a long-time client, discovered the disappearance of a Ghenie painting and other concerning financial transactions. Barasch, along with other plaintiffs, took legal action to restrain Schiff’s assets, partially granted by Judge Lucy Billings. Schiff allegedly owes significant amounts, including $1.8 million for a Ghenie painting sale and $2.5 million for art acquisitions.[37][38] Other major creditors include American Express.

Schiff filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, revealing nearly $7 million in claims, over $1 million owed to the IRS, and additional state and city debts. By late 2023, discussions about selling Schiff’s 231 artworks, including pieces by artists like Anicka Yi and Ivy Haldeman, were underway. The collection, expected to be sold in eight auctions at Phillips starting February 2024, could raise up to $1.5 million.[39]

Conclusion

These landmark cases reveal bankruptcy law’s critical function in addressing financial crises. Whether through liquidating assets or reorganizing debts, bankruptcy proceedings aim to provide a fair resolution for both debtors and creditors. The experiences of entities like Detroit and Paddle8, as well as the legal battles of Salander-O’Reilly Galleries, underscore the complexities and the essential nature of bankruptcy law in facilitating fresh starts and preserving economic value. Through these cases, we gain insight into how the law not only helps those facing severe financial difficulties but also ensures a level of creditor satisfaction, underscoring its importance in maintaining economic stability.

(For more information, see Center for Art Law’s 2014 article looking at the function of bankruptcy law and some landmark cases: Muses in Bankruptcy Court: a look at US arts and cultural institutions finding themselves in bankruptcy and out).

About the Author

Iris Ziwei Che is currently a first-year JD student at the University of Illinois College of Law in Champaign-Urbana. She holds a Master’s degree in Art History from Boston University and has experience working in museums and at Christie’s prior to her law school journey. Her main areas of interest are Art Law, Bankruptcy Law, Trust and Estate Planning, and Business Law. She can be reached at zche3@illinois.edu

Select Sources:

  1. Graeme Wearden, David Teather, and Jill Treanor, Banking Crisis: Lehman Brothers Files for Bankruptcy Protection, The Guardian (2008), available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2008/sep/15/lehmanbrothers.creditcrunch ↑
  2. Andrew Clark, Lehman Brothers’ Art Collection Goes Under the Hammer, The Guardian (2009), available at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/oct/30/lehman-brothers-art-collection-sale ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. Candace Jackson, Wall Street’s Orphaned Art, The Wall Street Journal (2009), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703574604574501793038152958 ↑
  5. Id. ↑
  6. Ramin Talaie, Art Auction Raises $12M against Lehman Debt, Bloomberg News (2010), available at https://www.nj.com/business/2010/09/art_auction_raises_12m_against.html ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Jonathan Stempel, After 14 Years, Lehman Brothers’ Brokerage Ends Liquidation, Reuters (2022), available at https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/after-14-years-lehman-brothers-brokerage-ends-liquidation-2022-09-28/ ↑
  9. Case Conference at 14, In re P8H, Inc., Case No. 20−10809−dsj (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2020) (Doc. No. 102). ↑
  10. Paddle8 Raises $34 Million in Series C Funding, GlobalNewswire (2015), available at https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/10/28/1201947/0/en/Paddle8-Raises-34-Million-in-Series-C-Funding.html ↑
  11. Eileen Kinsella, Paddle8 is Filing for Bankruptcy — and It Owes Tens of Thousands of Dollars to Justin Bieber, Jay Z’s Foundation, and Others, Artnet (2020), available at https://news.artnet.com/art-world/paddle8-bankruptcy-1806951 ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Id. ↑
  14. A “secret lien” is a statutory or equitable lien that arises without any notice to the public and requires no perfection. ↑
  15. Jordan Weissmann, Detroit Exists Bankruptcy, Thanks to Its Art Museum, Slate (2014), available at https://slate.com/business/2014/11/detroit-exits-bankruptcy-city-s-pensions-saved-in-part-thanks-to-detroit-institute-of-art.html ↑
  16. Id. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. In re New York City Opera, Inc., Case No. 13-13240 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 03, 2013) (Doc. No. 2) ↑
  19. Michael Cooper, New York City Opera Files for Bankruptcy, The New York Times (2013), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/arts/music/new-york-city-opera-files-for-bankruptcy.html ↑
  20. In re New York City Opera, Inc., Case No. 13-13240 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 03, 2013) (Doc. No. 2) ↑
  21. Michael Cooper, New York City Opera Files for Bankruptcy, The New York Times (2013), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/04/arts/music/new-york-city-opera-files-for-bankruptcy.html ↑
  22. In re New York City Opera, Inc., Case No. 13-13240 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. October 03, 2013) (Doc. No. 2) ↑
  23. Id. ↑
  24. Id. ↑
  25. Jennifer Smith, Rival Visions to Reboot New York City Opera Detailed, The Wall Street Journal (2015), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/rival-visions-to-reboot-new-york-city-opera-detailed-1446417707 ↑
  26. Jennifer Smith, New York City Opera Suitors Prepare Bids, The Wall Street Journal (2015), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-york-city-opera-suitors-prepare-bids-1421448468 ↑
  27. Michael Cooper, City Opera Faces Its Biggest Challenge Since Bankruptcy, The New York Times (2019), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/15/arts/music/city-opera-bankruptcy-challenge.html ↑
  28. Profile of New York City Opera Inc., PROPUBLICA, available at https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/132974347 ↑
  29. Id. ↑
  30. Id. ↑
  31. Id. ↑
  32. Roger Kimball, A Commercial Art Gallery That Feels Like A Museum, The Wall Street Journal (2005), available at https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB112777388125952580 ↑
  33. James Panero, An Old Master in Ruins, New York Magazine (2008), available at https://nymag.com/news/features/45324/ ↑
  34. Eileen Kinsella, Artists and Heirs Claim Hundreds of Works from Salander-O’Reilly, ARTnews (2008), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/artists-and-heirs-claim-hundreds-of-works-from-salander-oreilly-1290/ ↑
  35. Id. ↑
  36. Eileen Kinsella, Supreme Court Declines Investor Claim for $21.6 Million from Salander-O’Reilly Swindle, Artnet (2015), available at https://news.artnet.com/market/supreme-court-declines-salander-fraud-280749 ↑
  37. Eileen Kinsella, Collector Candace Barasch Lays Out More on Dethroned Art Advisor Lisa Schiff’s Lavish Lifestyle in a Blistering New Court Filing, Artnet (2023), available at https://news.artnet.com/art-world/candace-barasch-lisa-schiff-ongoing-legal-feud-2340249 ↑
  38. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, Phillips to Bring Lisa Schiff’s Artwork to Auction, Observer (2023), available at https://observer.com/2023/12/phillips-lisa-schiff-artwork-auction/ ↑
  39. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, Phillips to Bring Lisa Schiff’s Artwork to Auction, Observer (2023), available at https://observer.com/2023/12/phillips-lisa-schiff-artwork-auction/ ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: RF and Bulatov v. Tsvetkova and other charges against an artist
Next Interview with Apsara Iyer on Getting into the Art Law Space

Related Art Law Articles

A New Type of Varnish Nightshade Glaze and Artists Battle with AI Image
Art law

A New Type of Varnish: Nightshade, Glaze, and Artists’ Battle with AI

September 12, 2026
Sam Brady Myerov Folk Modern and Facade Images
Art law

Folk, Modern, and Facade: MoMA and the Afterlife of the American Folk Art Museum Building

September 8, 2026
Center for Art Law Corporate Art
Art law

Art as an Office Asset: Motivations and Collection Practices in Corporate Settings

August 31, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law