• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art History image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review: “All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art” (2024)
Back

Book Review: “All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art” (2024)

November 13, 2025

center for art law all that glitters book review

By Guest Writer

All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art by Orlando Whitfield is a compelling and thoroughly engaging recollection of the author’s former friendship with one of America’s most notorious art fraudsters, Inigo Philbrick. Although written as a memoir, it reads like a modern-day thriller because of the extraordinary behind the scenes details of Philbrick’s dishonorable practices. In addition, this book offers an account of the inner workings of the contemporary art market. This story is less a tale about the love of art and aesthetics, and more a cautionary warning about endless greed that plagues the contemporary art market. Unfortunately, cases such as the Philbrick’s are not anomalies in the industry.[1]

Background of the Book and Philbrick’s Fraud

All That Glitters was based on a series of documents and saved communication presented to the author by Philbrick. By handing over his documents to someone he considered a friend, perhaps Philbrick was falsely hoping for a flattering or at least decent depiction of his character. Instead, the author showed immense vulnerability and courage and chose to recount his former friend’s story based on facts.

Inigo defrauded collectors that were his clients, business partners, and most significantly personal friends. The book showcases how Philbricks’s crimes damaged his victims not only financially, but also sentimentally, leaving behind a wake of both emotional and economic destruction.

Philbrick’s fraudulent actions took place worldwide, from London to New York. He was eventually captured in 2020 by the Federal Bureau of Investigations on the Pacific island of Vanuatu, and returned to Manhattan in handcuffs to be tried in court by the Southern District of New York. The value of the initial charges brought against Philbrick exceeded $20 million dollars.[2] In 2022, the United States government sentenced Philbrick to seven years in jail for committing wire fraud and ordered him to forfeit $86 million dollars of unlawfully gained funds. He is said to have committed one of America’s largest art frauds, and All That Glitters sheds light on his unforgiving craving for money regardless of who he was scamming.[3]

Philbrick’s schemes included crimes such as selling works of art he did not have rightful ownership over, and selling overlying shares of the same works of art to different people.[4] He accomplished this by taking advantage of the lack of concise oversight and preference for “discretion” within the art market, in order to conceal his deviant practices.[5]

Whitfield successfully illustrates the pathological nature of Philbrick’s character. Just fifty pages into the book, Philbrick’s moral red flags are clear as day. An interesting addition to the book would be a further analysis of Philbrick’s mental state and personal history, offering the reader a wider understanding of his crimes and deviant personality type.

The author clearly outlines Philbrick’s lack of moral integrity and antics, eventually accumulating into excessive, deceitful manipulation. Whitfield describes Philbrick’s villainous acts as an overall “devious practice.” [6] In terms of damage, a financial amount is not enough to summarize the additional sentimental, moral and reputational damage Philbricks’s antics caused the victims as well as the contemporary art market.

Philbrick’s Fraud and the Wider Art Market

Cases such as Philbrick’s paint the art market as shady and disreputable, giving it a reputation for untrustworthiness and insecurity for buyers. Artworks are some of the greatest visual treasures of the world, from possessing tremendous aesthetic power, to serving as objects of joy for those that love art with a genuine passion. The fraud committed by Philbrick cast a dark cloud over the industry and has been widely covered by the public media, even gaining a British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) documentary called “The Great Art Fraud.”[7] One can only hope that the extensive publications written about it will encourage members of the art-market ecosystem to uphold ethical and just business practices.

On page fifty the author depicts one of Philbrick’s immoral acts with the following sentence: “Thinking about it now, it wasn’t deceit – not exactly – but rather an economy of truth that left me bemused and hurt.”[8] This quote exemplifies how small omissions of the truth erode at the trust established between humans, and how Philbrick’s crimes weren’t just financial but moral as well. The author had a friendship with the culprit, which eventually evolved into a business partnership, making Philbrick’s deceit hurt twofold. This is a clear reflection on how difficult it is to establish trust within the modern contemporary art world, both personally and professionally. High-stakes deals create a high-level need for morality, integrity and trust. Trust, once eroded, is almost impossible to fully restore. In an opinion piece for Art News, Kenny Schachter writes that, “The art world has its own relationship to the truth, and it is not a very strong bond” portraying how prolific illegal dealings have become in the sector.[9]
Another notable quote of Whitfield is one used to describe the opaque nature of the art world, stating that “The art market is like a stock market where all the shares and their owners are kept secret”.[10] Here the author is referring to how Philbrick operated on the secondary market, reselling works of art as well as overselling “shares” of a work of art without properly informing the buyers.[11] To define the meaning of owning “shares” of a piece, Whitfield cleverly describes it as: “no longer dealing in abstract art, it’s dealing in abstractions of art.”

The End of the Book and Conclusion

The ending of the book reveals just how deep Inigo’s greed ran. When asked by a Judge in a court of law to describe the reason behind “why” he had committed acts of deception and devious commercial practices, Philbrick’s response was the following sentence: “For money, Your Honor”.[12] Philbrick’s response demonstrates just how deep excessive greed can run within the commercial art market, sometimes even taking precedence over the value of the works of art.

Artist and writer Kenny Schachter describes the art market as easy to follow as a spectator, but much more difficult to embrace as a participant.[13] The case of Inigo Philbrick showcases a man who went to excessive deviant means in order to facilitate his participation in a market that is well-known to be closed in front of outsiders. A number of art-world participants may not even know that they dealt with Philbrick, since he often arranged for others to do bidding on his behalf.[14]
While not the child of collectors, Philbrick still came from an art-world background that was more privileged and connected than most. He was born to a curator father and an artist mother, and had the chance to study at the prestigious Goldsmiths Institute in London, and intern at White Cube Gallery. The opportunities that Philbrick was given are scarce, and almost inaccessible for outsiders. All That Glitters details how even someone with a background as privileged as Philbrick’s can get caught up in excessive competition between wealth, class and privilege within the art world. Writer Kenny Schachter refers to Inigo as a “mini-Madoff,” referencing Bernie Madoff, the disgraced New York financier who committed a Ponzi-scheme worth approximately $65 billion dollars.[15] In a statement issued for the press, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Damian Williams describes Inigo’s fraudulent practices as: “built on brazen lies, concealed ownership interests, fake documents and even an invented art collector.”[16]

In conclusion, All That Glitters offers a clear and compelling account of Philbrick’s greed, deviant practices, and eventual downfall.

Select References:

  1. Oliver Franklin-Wallis, “In search of Inigo Philbrick, the disappearing art dealer”, GQ Magazine UK, May 6, 2020, accessed September 24, 2025, https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/culture/article/inigo-philbrick. ↑
  2. David Jenkins, “The Inigo Philbrick Saga: From Wunderkind To Art Fraudster”, The Center For Art Law, August 11, 2020, accessed September 25, 2025, https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/the-inigo-philbrick-saga-from-wunderkind-to-art-fraudster/. ↑
  3. Charlotte Edwardes, “The money is not real – it’s a feckless level of wealth’: the inside story of the biggest art fraud in American history”, The Guardian, April 17, 2024, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2024/apr/17/inside-story-of-the-biggest-art-fraud-in-american-history-orlando-whitfield. ↑
  4. David Jenkins, “The Inigo Philbrick Saga: From Wunderkind To Art Fraudster”, The Center For Art Law, August 11, 2020, accessed September 25, 2025, https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/the-inigo-philbrick-saga-from-wunderkind-to-art-fraudster/. ↑
  5. David Jenkins, “The Inigo Philbrick Saga: From Wunderkind To Art Fraudster”, The Center For Art Law, August 11, 2020, accessed September 25, 2025, https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/the-inigo-philbrick-saga-from-wunderkind-to-art-fraudster/. ↑
  6. Orlando Whitfield, “All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art”, (London: Profile Books, 2024), p. 267. ↑
  7. “The Great Art Fraud, Series 1, Episode 1”, BBC Two, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001zprw. ↑
  8. Orlando Whitfield, “All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art”, (London: Profile Books, 2024), p. 50. ↑
  9. Kenny Schachter, “Kenny Schachter on Kindness and Cruelty at Art Basel, and Why He’s a Fan of the Great Crypto Disappearing Act”, USA Art News, July 6, 2022, accessed September 25, 2025, https://usaartnews.com/news/kenny-schachter-on-kindness-and-cruelty-at-art-basel-and-why-hes-a-fan-of-the-great-crypto-disappearing-act. ↑
  10. Orlando Whitfield, “All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art,” (London: Profile Books, 2024), p. 51. ↑
  11. David Jenkins, “The Inigo Philbrick Saga: From Wunderkind To Art Fraudster,” The Center For Art Law, August 11, 2020, accessed September 25, 2025, https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/the-inigo-philbrick-saga-from-wunderkind-to-art-fraudster/. ↑
  12. Orlando Whitfield, “All That Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud and Fine Art,” (London: Profile Books, 2024), p. 313. ↑
  13. Kenny Schachter, “The Art World’s Mini-Madoff and Me Boozy nights and high-stakes art trades with Inigo Philbrick.”, Kenny Schachter Art, March 16, 2020, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.kennyschachter.art/2020/03/the-art-worlds-mini-madoff-and-me-boozy-nights-and-high-stakes-art-trades-with-inigo-philbrick/. ↑
  14. Kenny Schachter, “Where’s Inigo? As a Furious Art World Searches for the Disappeared Dealer, Kenny Schachter Finds Him… on Instagram”, Art Net News, December 10, 2019, accessed September 25, 2025, https://news.artnet.com/art-world/kenny-schacter-on-inigo-philbrick-1727460. ↑
  15. Terry Gross, “’Madoff’ takes account of the biggest financial Ponzi scheme in history”, July 10, 2024, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.npr.org/2024/07/10/g-s1-9114/madoff-takes-account-of-the-biggest-financial-ponzi-scheme-in-history. ↑
  16. “Art Dealer Sentenced to 7 Years in $86 Million Fraud Scheme”, The New York Times”, May 23, 2022, accessed September 25, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/23/arts/inigo-philbrick-art-dealer-sentenced-prison.html. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Don’t Blame Me: How the Art Market Battles Forgeries
Next Can AI Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth? The Courts Aren’t Sure

Related Posts

Screen capture of Christie's page mobile post hack.

Ransomware Attack on Christie’s: A Wake-Up Call for Art World Cybersecurity?

June 24, 2024
Three men in business attire and glasses seated and speaking at a panel.

Art As Investment: Buyer beware

April 12, 2012

Larry Gagosian Withdraws Suit Against Billionaire Ronald Perelman

October 25, 2012
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law