• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Cryptocurrencies and the Art Market
Back

Cryptocurrencies and the Art Market

October 17, 2018

By Jennie Nadel

Following up on Center for Art Law’s popular article on Blockchain and the Visual Arts, let us dive into the topic of cryptocurrencies and their potential applications in the art world.

Reminder: What is a Blockchain?

Blockchains are described as decentralized digital ledgers, or, in simpler terms, a digitized record of transactions. Don and Alex Trapscott, authors of Blockchain Revolution (2016), define the blockchain as “an incorruptible digital ledger of economic transactions that can be programmed to record not just financial transactions but virtually everything of value.” The ledger is also “append only”, meaning that past entries in this online ledger can never be erased. If an earlier transaction does need to be changed, then the change is made but the entry shows the alteration made, similar to changing words in a Google Drive spreadsheet owned by many different people. The alteration is made, but the record of the alteration is apparent. Thus, the ledger can only ever get longer or “higher”. All of these transactions grouped in a set time period are then labeled a “block.” Once a block is properly verified a new block can be added on top to create a chain of blocks, or  “blockchain”. Blockchains can have many different applications depending on the type of data it stores. This video helps to visually understand the concept of blockchain technology. dB, chief technology officer at Artsy posts about the latest happenings at the intersection of blockchain technology and the art world on his website.

What is a Cryptocurrency?

Cryptocurrency is one of the applications of the Blockchain technology, resulting in the creation of new but unofficial currencies. Currency is a record of debt, for example the U.S. dollar. Cryptocurrencies work similarly to traditional currencies, and the blockchain associated with each cryptocurrency tracks debts. Cryptocurrencies begin when a founder writes a “white paper” or a business plan for a blockchain. The founder must lay out the purpose of the cryptocurrency and its importance. There is also a total quantity of that certain cryptocurrency that will ever exist. For example, Bitcoin has 21 million tokens, in existence. Coins exist as independent transaction ledgers while tokens uses the existing structure of the blockchain. By owning tokens you can trade and transfer different items. Lastly, there when a cryptocurrency is created, there is no specific amount of dollars put down in relation to the amount of a cryptocurrency being generated, we give cryptocurrency value because someone is willing to pay dollars to own it. If you are interested in learning more about cryptocurrencies, Tim Schneider has a three part breakdown of cryptocurrencies available here. Learn more about tokens here and here and learn more about the difference between coins and tokens as well as how to create a cryptocurrency here.

Cryptocurrencies? Cryptocollectibles?

CryptoKitties? CryptoPunks? What are these? How do you use them? Both are marketed as one-of-a-kind and completely owned by the user. They can never be replicated, taken away, or destroyed, yet what is their main function? They serve as a good introduction to someone who is unfamiliar with blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. CryptoKitties markets itself as one of the world’s first games to be built using blockchain technology like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Unlike a cryptocurrency, CryptoPunks and CryptoKitties are cryptocollectibles. On CryptoKitties’ website you can buy, sell, or trade your virtual kitty as if it was a traditional collectible; however, with the added knowledge that the blockchain will securely track ownership. Even camera company Kodak has their own cryptocurrency called KodaCoin.

Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 13.47.41
Photo taken from the cryptokitties.co website

What now, art world?

What do cryptocurrencies have to do with the art world? Jason Bailey, founder of Artnome and self-professed “art nerd”, believes there are great incentives for the art world to start embracing blockchain technology. He states at least four major areas where blockchain technology can be utilized in the art market: (1) Driving digital art sales through digital scarcity, or introducing a limited amount of copies and providing unique blocks for ownership, (2) Democratizing fine art investment, (3) Improving provenance and reducing forgery, and (4) Creating a more ethical way to pay artists. So can blockchain improve upon the art world? Will primary and secondary markets allow for buyers to pay for works in cryptocurrencies?

Real Art vs. Digital Art: Paying for Electronic Art with Electronic Currency

Not only is there a digital market for real art, the emergency of websites like DADA.ny and others have created a market for digital art paid for using digital currency and tradeable online as an exchange network all backed through blockchain technology. There now exist websites dedicated to the buying and selling of completely online works of art. DADA.nyc provides a decentralized marketplaces that highlights limited-edition digital works of art. The work have their own IP protection and proof of ownership. DADA art is embedded in the blockchain and therefore cannot be modified, thus ensuring the ownership to the individual. Read more about the experience of digital art, with artist, Moxarra on DADA’s website here.

Galleries embracing Cryptocurrencies

On June 14, 2018,  Āto Gallery founded by Carrie Eldridge in 2016, sold a painting for 150 Bitcoin – equivalent to around $1.25 million. The painting, Chasing Hearts/Northern Lights was by a New York-based mixed media artist, Benjamin Katz. At the time of sale it was a record price in cryptocurrency for a work of art. The purchaser of the work communicated to Eldridge via social media before switching over to Signal, an encrypted messaging service. At first, Eldridge was ensure how much to price the work, knowing it was more complex than some of the artist’s previous works, which usually sold for around $5,000-$10,000. Before the gallery owner proposed a price, the collector offered her 150 Bitcoin. The mysterious buyer remains anonymous but could this sale be a precedent for more outrageously high sales in art through cryptocurrencies? The previous record for the most expensive artwork paid in cryptocurrency was in February of 2018. The work sold was Kevin Abosch’s Forever Rose for $1 million. However, unlike Katz’s painting, Forever Rose is an online digital artwork and a token called ROSE on the Ethereum blockchain. The work was purchased by 10 different investment funds, advisory firms,  and tech-savvy collectors, each owning a share of the dematerialized work. Āto Gallery plans to launch its own currency and raise $10 million with Initial Coin Offering (ICO). Investors can buy a certain amount of tokens which they can then use to buy token for the gallery’s artists. Each artist would have their own assigned value based on their resume and past sales history.

Screen Shot 2018-10-16 at 13.47.59
Benjamin Katz, Chasing Hearts/Northern Lights (2018) sold for around 1.25 Million in Bitcoin in June 2018.

Reservations and Concluding Thoughts

There still exist a number of reservations in implementing blockchain technology into the notoriously slow-to-change art world. In one of Jason Bailey’s many articles surrounding blockchain technology, he and Marion Maneker, owner of Art Market Monitor, make a point that the blockchain can not solve all the issues surrounding opacity that the art market faces. Many of these issues surrounding transparency do not transpire from insufficient technology. For example, how can one ensure that the blockchain associated to a physical artwork remains connected with that same physical artwork? How can we be assured that it is regulated and not used for illegal or shady practices? Perhaps the first implementation of blockchain technology is the use of cryptocurrencies to buy work whether digital or real before addressing other issues existing in the art market.

On October 11th, On October 11th, Christie’s announced that their sale of the Barney A. Ebsworth Collection in November will the first auction to incorporate blockchain technology. They are collaborating with Artory to produce digitally encrypted certifications for each artwork up for auction. The blockchain technology will be used to store information about the works. This marks a huge shift towards the application of blockchain technology given the influence Christie’s has as a major auction house.

In summary, the blockchain might be most useful to new and emerging works where there does not already exist a complicated past of ownership. This might be especially helpful to digital works of art that allows them to contain a unique code and provide a sense of ownership through the internet. The art world is slow to change, especially to a concept as difficult to grasp as new terminology like cryptocurrencies, tokens, coins, blockchain, etc, but we will surely see more examples of digital currencies permeating the art world as well as new applications for blockchain technology.


Works Cited: 

  • Bagley, Judd. “What Is Blockchain Technology.” Blockgeeks. https://blockgeeks.com/guides/what-is-blockchain-technology/.
  • Bailey, Jason. “Blockchain Artists Wanted.” Artnome, February 4, 2018. https://www.artnome.com/news/2018/2/2/blockchain-artists-wanted.
  • Bailey, Jason. “What Use Blockchain Provenance For Art?” Artnome, January 29, 2018. https://www.artnome.com/news/2018/1/26/why-use-blockchain-provenance-for-art.
  • Bailey, Jason. “Jess Houlgrave And The Codex Protocol.” Artnome, January 30, 2018. https://www.artnome.com/news/2018/1/29/jess-houlgrave-and-the-codex-protocol.
  • Bailey, Jason. “The Blockchain Art Market Is Here.” Artnome(blog), December 27, 2017. https://www.artnome.com/news/2017/12/22/the-blockchain-art-market-is-here.
  • Bandella, Wassim. “Blockchain To Change World of Fine Art As We Know It.” Cointelegraph, June 8, 2017. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/galleries-china-caochangdi-evicted-1322069?utm_content=from_artnetnews2&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=US newsletter for 7/26/18&utm_term=New US Newsletter List (30 Day Engaged Only).
  • Bandella, Wassim. “Blockchain To Change World of Fine Art As We Know It.” Cointelegraph, June 8, 2017. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/galleries-china-caochangdi-evicted-1322069?utm_content=from_artnetnews2&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=US newsletter for 7/26/18&utm_term=New US Newsletter List (30 Day Engaged Only).
  • Butcher, Mike. “Verisart Brings Blockchain Certification to the Global Art Auction Market.” Techcrunch, May 3, 2018. https://techcrunch.com/2018/05/03/verisart-brings-blockchain-certification-to-the-global-art-auction-market/.
  • Cascone, Sarah. “This Gallery Believes Cryptocurrency Is the Future – and It Just Sold a Piece Worth Nearly $1.3 Million in Bitcoin to Prove It.” Artnet News, June 14, 2018. https://news.artnet.com/market/ato-gallery-cryptocurrency-bitcoin-1297832.
  • Chun, Rene. “These Four Technologies May Finally Put an End to Art Forgery.” Artsy, July 18, 2016. https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-1989-artwork-asked-viewers-step-flag-ignited-firestorm-raging.
  • Freyaldenhoven, Kaesha. “Interview With Artist Moxarra Gonzalez.” Artnome, February 7, 2018. https://www.artnome.com/news/2018/2/5/interview-with-artist-moxarra-gonzalez.
  • Schneider, Tim. “Cryptocurrencies, Explained: How Blockchain Technology Could Solve 3 Big Problems Plaguing the Art Industry.” Artnet News, March 22, 2018. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/cryptocurrencies-explained-part-three-1248863.
  • Schneider, Tim. “Cryptocurrencies, Explained: The Beginner’s Guide the Art World Neds Right Now.” Artnet News, January 18, 2018. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/art-cryptocurrencies-explained-1200383.
  • Schneider, Tim. “Cryptocurrencies, Explained: Why Artists Are Already Leaving Bitcoin Behind for Something Bigger.” Artnet News, February 6, 2018. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/cryptocurrencies-artwork-explainer-part-two-1215707.
  • Stephens, Leah Stella. “Could Slothicorn Become The Ultimate Funding Solution For Creative Commons Crypto Artists.” Hackernoon, December 17, 2017. https://hackernoon.com/could-slothicorn-become-the-ultimate-funding-solution-for-creative-commons-crypto-artists-6ff7dbd6d44e.

About the Author: Jennie Nadel was a 2018 Summer intern and a current remote contributor at the Center for Art Law. She graduated from Johns Hopkins University majoring in History of Art with a double minor in Museums & Society and Visual Arts. She is currently pursuing her M.A. in Art Business at Sotheby’s Institute. She can be reached at jennierebeccanadel@gmail.com.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Framing Provenance with Pissarro’s “Pea Harvest”
Next Dance and Copyright: Legal “Steps” for Performers

Related Posts

Meme-ing the Warhol Foundation: Ceci N’est Pas Un Warhol

March 3, 2009
logo

Metropolitan and Egypt Announce Initiative to Recognize Egypt’s Title to Objects from Tut’s Tomb

November 12, 2010

Case Review: Takeaways from Mary Boone’s Day in Court

June 21, 2019
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice, one that the art market must depend upon. Although, auction houses don't have to guarantee  authenticity, they have legal duties related to contract law, tort law, and industry customs. The impact of the Old Master cases, sparked change in the industry including Sotheby's acquisition of Orion Analytical. 

📚 To read more about the liabilities of auction houses and the change in forensic tools, read Vivianne Diaz's published article using the link in our bio!
Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro b Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro bono consultations on legacy and estate planning for visual artists.

Calling all visual artists: join the Center for Art Law's Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic for an evening of low-cost consultations with attorneys, tax experts, and other arts professionals with experience in estate and legacy planning.

After a short lecture on a legacy and estate planning topic, attendees with consultation tickets artist will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer professionals (attorneys, appraisers and financial advisors) for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions.

Please be sure to read the entire event description using the LinkedIn event below.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC). This law increases transparency requirements and consumer rights, including reforming subscription contracts. It grants consumers cancellation periods during cooling-off times. 

Charitable organizations, including museums and other cultural institutions, have concerns regarding consumer abuse of this option. 

🔗 Read more about this new law and it's implications in Lauren Stein's published article, including a discussion on how other jurisdictions have approached the issue, using the link in our bio!
Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.