• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Getting over Cash: A Guide to Noncash Charitable Donations
Back

Getting over Cash: A Guide to Noncash Charitable Donations

December 15, 2025

cold hard cash cool ideas smooth navigating copy

By Kamée Payton

Charitable donations are integral to sustaining and expanding nonprofits, arts organizations, and cultural heritage institutions. With government funding decreasing and operational costs increasing, philanthropic giving is essential, now more than ever.[1] Since the current administration took office, one-third of museums nationwide have lost government grants and contracts.[2] These losses have set off a domino effect of difficult decisions, including laying off staff, cancelling public programming, and delaying maintenance and repairs.[3]Many art museums are also still recovering from financial losses incurred during the Covid-19 Pandemic.

According to Elizabeth Merritt writing for the American Alliance of Museums, on average, 30% of museums’ incomes comes from charitable gifts, with 67% of gifts being from individual donors and 33% from foundations.[4] Many institutions already rely on philanthropic gifts for one-third of their funding and now must absorb the losses of government funding. Accordingly, these institutions are looking for new ways to encourage giving. Noncash (and non-art) donations may be the solution.

Noncash Donations

Cold Hard Cash Or Not Center for Art Law 12 15 25

When considering how to support a nonprofit, donors typically think of cash contributions such as bills (banknotes) placed in a donation box, a check or a bequest in a will or trust. However, donations do not have to be cash. The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recognizes the giving of assets such as art, intellectual property, cryptocurrency, or stock as “noncash charitable contributions.”[5] While noncash donations may seem untraditional, they are becoming increasingly common, and many major arts organizations now offer such options. The Metropolitan Museum of Art accepts donations of cryptocurrency, the Museum of Modern Art New York City accepts appreciated securities, and the Philadelphia Museum of Art accepts donations of real estate. All three, along with others like the Guggenheim, accept donations of stocks.

Mutual Benefits

There are significant tax benefits to donating appreciated securities and stocks, making these gifts particularly advantageous, not only to the donee (the receiver of the gift), but also to the donor (the one giving). Donors who gift appreciated property may benefit from an income tax deduction. These gifts may qualify as an itemized deduction, based on the donor’s adjusted taxable income, or may qualify for a deduction equal to the fair market value (FMV) of the asset. According to the IRS the FMV is, “the price a willing, knowledgeable buyer would pay a willing, knowledgeable seller when neither has to buy or sell.”[6]

Donors of appreciated stocks also avoid long-term federal capital gains tax (a tax that arises upon the disposal of an asset that has increased in value) which can be as high as 20%.[7] For example, if an investor wishes to sell their shares in a certain stock and donate the money to an art museum, and over several years the original investment of $5,000 has grown to $5,800, then the investor would be subject to capital gains tax once the shares were sold. However, if the shares were instead transferred to the museum, the capital gains tax would be eliminated.[8]

Ultimately, both parties benefit through noncash charitable donations. The donor receives significant tax relief, including a deduction of the FMV and the avoidance of capital gains tax. The donee receives the full value of the appreciated asset, which is greater than what the donor might have given in cash.[9]

Considerations when Giving

For those thinking of making a donation, there are several considerations to keep in mind when planning to make a charitable gift. First, a donation to qualify as a charitable contribution eligible for an income tax deduction, the donee must be a “qualifying organization”. These include certain, “nonprofit groups that are religious, charitable, educational, scientific, or literary in purpose, or that work to prevent cruelty to children or animals”[10] which have 501(c)3 status.[11]

Second, many institutions have development teams that work directly with donors and can guide them through the process of making either a traditional or noncash gift. For higher value, complex, noncash gifts it is recommended to consult a tax professional specifically trained in estate planning. Trained professionals will be familiar with which types of taxes are due, at the federal, state and local levels, and what types of gifts qualify for certain deductions.

Third, when planning to donate, it is noteworthy that contributions do not need to be made by check. Exploring noncash donation options may be advantageous for both the donor and the receiving institution.

Going Forward

These alternative ways (noncash) of giving have the potential to boost charitable donations and provide much needed support to nonprofits, arts organizations, and cultural heritage institutions. For nonprofits, the tax advantages of noncash donations broaden the pool of potential donors and may encourage greater philanthropic engagement. As museums and cultural organizations continue to navigate financial uncertainty, noncash donations present a promising and sustainable avenue for strengthening the institutions that play a vital role in the community. A prediction for 2026: noncash donations will be on the rise, donors willing.

About the Author

Kamée Payton is the Judith Bresler Fellow at the Center for Art Law where she coordinates the Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics, including Estate Planning for Artists, and the accompanying programming. She earned her Master of Laws in Art law from the University of York, where she was an editor for the York Law Review and completed a legal dissertation comparing tax law in the United States and United Kingdom. Kamée has a Bachelor of Arts in Art History from Utah Valley University and has worked in various roles in the arts since 2020.

Suggested Readings

An Introduction to Legacy Planning and Charitable Giving Workshop, Handout, Center for Art Law (2025).

Elizabeth Merrit, EO Impacts and the Next Era of Museum Funding Part 3: Charitable Contributions and Investment Income, American Alliance of Museums (2025).

Francesca Aton, Trump ordered Funding Cuts Hit US Museums Hard, New Report Shows, Art News, (2025).

Office of Philanthropy, Giving Stock instead of Cash, University of Maryland Baltimore, (December 15th 2025 at 11 am EST), https://www.umaryland.edu/philanthropy/ways-to-give/giving-stock-instead-of-cash/

Visual Artists’ Legal Clinic: Legacy and Estate Planning, Handout, Center for Art Law, (2025).

American Alliance of Museums, Annual National Snapshots of United States Museums, (2025).

Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Publication No. 526, Charitable Contributions, (2025).

Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Publication No. 8283, Noncash Charitable Donations, (2024).

Elizabeth Merrit, EO Impacts and the Next Era of Museum Funding Part 3: Charitable Contributions and Investment Income, American Alliance of Museums (2025).

Gifts of Appreciated Securities, Philadelphia Museum of Art, (December 15th 2025 at 10 am EST), https://plannedgiving.philamuseum.org/appreciated-securities

Julia Halperian, The hangover after the museum party: institutions in the US are facing a funding crisis, The Art Newspaper January 4th 2024.

Office of Philanthropy, Giving Stock instead of Cash, University of Maryland Baltimore, (December 15th 2025 at 11 am EST), https://www.umaryland.edu/philanthropy/ways-to-give/giving-stock-instead-of-cash/

Select References

  1. Julia Halperian, The hangover after the museum party: institutions in the US are facing a funding crisis, The Art Newspaper January 4th 2024. ↑
  2. American Alliance of Museums, Annual National Snapshots of United States Museums, (2025). ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. Elizabeth Merrit, EO Impacts and the Next Era of Museum Funding Part 3: Charitable Contributions and Investment Income, American Alliance of Museums (2025). ↑
  5. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Form No. 8283, Noncash Charitable Donations, (2024). ↑
  6. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Form No. 8283, Noncash Charitable Donations, (2024). ↑
  7. Gifts of Appreciated Securities, Philadelphia Museum of Art, (December 15th 2025 at 10 am EST), https://plannedgiving.philamuseum.org/appreciated-securities ↑
  8. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Form No. 8283, Noncash Charitable Donations, (2024). ↑
  9. Office of Philanthropy, Giving Stock instead of Cash, University of Maryland Baltimore, (December 15th 2025 at 11 am EST), https://www.umaryland.edu/philanthropy/ways-to-give/giving-stock-instead-of-cash/ ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Publication No. 526, Charitable Contributions, (2025). ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Against the Illusion: The Limits of Digital Repatriation in Restitution Debates
Next The Modigliani Forgery Epidemic Strikes Again?

Related Posts

Klimt Stolen by Gestapo Returned to Victims’ Heir

April 26, 2011

“Legs”: Art Law Issues Stand Out in a New Documentary

December 22, 2016

31 Years of NAGPRA: Evaluating the Restitution of Native American Ancestral Remains and Belongings

May 18, 2021
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.