• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet How Two Artists are Challenging the SEC’s Role in Shaping the NFT Art Market
Back

How Two Artists are Challenging the SEC’s Role in Shaping the NFT Art Market

November 23, 2024

SEC No-Action Letter Request 2: The #NFT

By Allie Wiley

As of the Summer of 2024, Brian L. Frye is suing the Securities and Exchange Commission along with Jonathan Mann to confront the agency’s ability to regulate non-fungible tokens head on. The SEC has taken charge of regulating art that is sold as NFTs despite being created to protect investors.[1] The issue with the SEC regulating the NFT art market is two-fold. First, the definition of securities is too broad so it can easily incorporate NFTs under the wide net.[2] As it is presently, the definition includes anything that could be understood as an investment, wrapping the art world in with it. Now that NFTs are gaining popularity within the art community, the SEC has taken aim. Secondly, the new regulations of this corner of the art market are limiting artist’s abilities to make a living. For example, Mann, sells a daily song NFT as part of his livelihood.[3] Art is critical for society so hindering the ability to make money for artists will eventually lead to less people pursuing art. NFTs are just a new medium for artists to sell their art.

How the SEC Started Regulating NFTs

NFTs are typically exchanged using cryptocurrency where you can purchase a block on a blockchain.[4] When you purchase an NFT, you own a digital asset with software specific to your NFT.[5] If you categorize NFTs as a security like the SEC has, the Securities Act of 1933 requires sellers to perform a mandatory registration process for any sale of securities.[6] Under the broad definition of “security”, any type of art could be argued as this type of investment. NFTs offer a unique way to make money in the art market that was previously untappable before 2014.[7] With the way viral content has taken over our society, selling a song a day as a NFT has helped Jonathan Mann maintain the exclusivity of his work and has allowed him, along with other artists, to continue to prosper. While there is risk involved in the NFT market, that does not mean it requires regulations from the SEC. There is risk involved in any type of “investment” you make —from your house to your car— and the SEC does not regulate those. Due to the newness of NFTs, which first emerged in 2014, there has not been a lot of time to determine if NFT art is somewhat of a fad or if it will be commonplace in art collections in the future.[8] This case will bring NFTs one step closer to becoming a permanent medium artists can rely on.

Setting SEC-NFT Precedent: The Stoner Cats Lawsuit

Stoner Cats, an animated web series starring Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher, sold NFTs of the animated cats to help raise money for the web series.[9] According to the SEC, Stoner Cats 2 LLC sold 10,000 NFTs for $800, each making $8 million dollars in investments for the show, while also putting on a 2.5 percent royalty for each transaction after the original was sold.[10] Crypto currency assets have to be registered to help protect investors from fraud and other risks involved in investing.[11] This resulted in a settlement between the SEC and Stoner Cats 2 LLC.[12] This settlement sparked outrage in artists Brian Frye and Jonathan Mann.

The 2024 lawsuit is not the first time that Brian Frye has tried to elicit a response from the SEC. Frye had made an NFT titled SEC No-Action Letter Request to request an SEC no-action letter to demonstrate that digital art does not violate the securities laws that they have mandated.[13] Frye and Mann’s lawsuit has been filed in Louisiana federal court.[14] A preemptive federal lawsuit like this one can happen if you have a reasonable belief that the government is going to prejudice you or your interests in some way in the future.[15] This case filing is the much needed advocacy against government agency intervention and proves the effects when an agency oversteps its administrative bounds.

The Legal Implications of Frye and Mann’s Lawsuit

So the question begs, what do Brian Frye and Jonathan Mann want to accomplish with their pending lawsuit? As it stands now, the precedent set by the Stoner Cats case is that NFTs are unregistered securities. This case is truly about redefining securities and putting the SEC back into the lane from which it strayed to protect artistic freedom as art changes with new technology. The SEC was never meant to regulate the art market and hinders a buyer’s ability to invest in an artist’s career.[16] If Congress wanted the SEC to control the art market, Congress would have included that responsibility within the scope of the SEC’s duties.[17] After all, the art market has been around for thousands of years and NFTs are just another outlet for artistic expression. Frye and Mann are calling this government agency to explain what it is doing, hoping the courts will determine the breadth of the SEC’s role in the NFT art market. With the SEC’s current stance on NFTs, Jonathan Mann has been actively breaking the law since 2022.[18] Preemptively suing the SEC seems to be the best course of action since the SEC’s targets of NFT violations have no obvious correlation.[19] When anyone could be next, it is extremely valuable for every artist to pay attention as this lawsuit unfolds.

It could be argued that the popularity in NFT regulation is from the sudden uptick in major sales of works such as Everydays: The First 5000 Days in 2021 which sold for millions of dollars.[20] The SEC, so far, has been strategic in who it sues, choosing companies that have incentives to settle due to project deadlines or other reasons.[21] This has allowed the SEC to get away with not arguing their cases in front of judges to decide what their capacity of regulating NFTs is.[22]

If the SEC wins against Frye and Mann’s lawsuit, the art market could drastically change outside of the NFT corner. It would require artists to disclose any risks associated with purchasing their work, but does not offer what disclosing risks for art means or how that differs from risk associated with stocks.[23]

Artists, legal scholars, and NFT patrons are eagerly awaiting to learn about the outcome of this lawsuit and see if the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or Brian L. Frye and Jonathan Mann come out ahead.

About the Author:

Allie Wiley is an undergraduate student at Indiana University Bloomington where she is preparing for law school. She has an interest in cultural heritage law and intellectual property rights.

Suggested Readings

  • I’m Suing The SEC, Song Day, available at https://songaday.world/sec
  • Robyn Conti, What Is An NFT? Non-Fungible Tokens Explained, Forbes, available at ihttps://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/nft-non-fungible-token/#:~:text=NFT%20stands%20for%20non%2Dfungible,or%20exchanged%20for%20one%20another

Bibliography:

  1. Mission, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Aug 9. 2023). ↑
  2. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  3. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  4. Conti, Robyn, What Is An NFT? Non-Fungible Tokens Explained, Forbes Advisor (May 10,2024). ↑
  5. Klein, Jessica, ‘Should Art Be Regulated by the SEC?’: NFT Artists’ New Lawsuit Seeks Answers, Wired (Aug 26, 2024). ↑
  6. Legal Information Institute, Securities Act of 1933, Cornell Law School (Oct, 2023). ↑
  7. Manoylov, MK, A brief history of NFTs: From CryptoPunk to Bored Apes, The Block (Oct 18, 2023). ↑
  8. Id. ↑
  9. SEC Charges Creator of Stoner Cats Web Series for Unregistered Offering of NFTs, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Sep 13, 2023). ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Kinsella, Eileen, NFT Artists Sue SEC, Disputing Its Regulation of Digital Art Sales, Artnet (Jul 31, 2024). ↑
  14. Jonathan Mann and Brian L. Frye v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Eric I. Bustillo, Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizárrage, Hester M. Peirce, and Mark T. Uyeda, in their official capacities, No. 2:24-cv-01881 (E.D. La. Jul 29, 2024). ↑
  15. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  16. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Mann, Jonathan, I’m Suing the SEC, songaday (Aug 6,2024). ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  21. Id. ↑
  22. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  23. Kinsella, Eileen, NFT Artists Sue SEC, Disputing Its Regulation of Digital Art Sales, Artnet (Jul 31, 2024). ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The U.S. Copyright Office: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Challenges
Next Can a Duct-taped Banana be a Copyrightable Work of Art?

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law Canada Pledges Resale Royalty
Art lawCanadaresale royalty

Canada pledges an artist’s resale royalty—can the United States follow “suite”?

April 9, 2026
Abraham and Isaac Returned Home Center for Art Law
Art law

Abraham and Isaac: Sculptures returned home after Spanish Supreme Court decision

April 8, 2026
Charities Act 2022 Screenshot
Art law

Changes in U.S. and U.K. Restitution Laws are Afoot, Museums are Worried, Claimants are Cautiously Optimistic, ADR Practitioners are Attentive – Where Does This Leave us?

April 6, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective, scheduled at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in D.C., after a curatorial controversy over the potential removal of her recent work, "Trans Forming Liberty" (2024). Sherald denounced the attempt to remove this work as a blatant and intentional erasure of trans lives. 

This is one of the best examples and the most illustrative examples of the current administration's growing efforts to control the Smithsonian Institution's programming. In this climate of political tension, how do cultural institutions defend themselves against censorship and keep their curatorial independence?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artcuration #curatorialindependance #censorship
Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Arti Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!! 

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

Get 15% off using the code: Final15 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia se On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia sent hundreds of drones and missiles on sleeping cities across Ukraine, killing and injuring dozens of civilians. War is funded in part by individuals who have important artworks in their personal collections. This full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fifth year, daily exacts a grave toll on Ukrainian lives and cultural heritage, while fundamentally disrupting European commerce. In response, art market participants have adapted their practices, most have accepted, if not always embraced, the need to scrutinize the source of funds and the ultimate beneficiaries of their transactions. Yet there is a growing sense that parts of the trade are holding their breath, waiting to see when they might safely return to dealing with the oligarchs who continue to fund the Russian war machine.

For art market participants operating in the UK, compliance is no longer a peripheral concern, it is a legal imperative. Regulators are watching, the consequences of non-compliance increasingly extend beyond administrative penalties into criminal liability, and private-public partnerships offer the most credible path toward a more resilient and trustworthy market. 

Join us on April 24th for a panel discussion in London on the current state of AML enforcement and sanctions.

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artcrime #london #artissues #museumissues
Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zb Sotheby's sold Modigliani’s Portrait de Leopold Zborowski to Cahn in 2003 for the low price of about $1.55 million. In 2016, Cahn claimed he was verbally informed about authenticity issues with the painting by Sotheby's. The parties did make an agreement regarding Cahn reselling with Sotheby's for a guaranteed price in exchange for releasing the auction house from all claims related to the painting. Cahn claims that he attempted to set this process in motion in June 2025, but he received no response. Cahn now seeks damages totaling $2.67 million, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, for breach of contract. 

Through this dispute, Vivianne Diaz's article highlights a bigger issue in the art market by explaining how forgeries negatively affect both collectors and auction houses, and how auction houses need to be more careful, but most importantly, proactive in their authentication determinations.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #art #Modigliani #LeopoldZborowski #sothebys
Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Art Don't miss our upcoming April 20th bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!!

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normand The historic Bayeux Tapestry, conserved in Normandy, France, is scheduled to be loaned from the Bayeux Museum to the British Museum for ten months beginning in the fall of 2026. This is the first time the tapestry will have returned to the UK in over 900 years. 

This loan, authorized by France, has raised multiple controversies, particularly over conservation concerns. Nevertheless, it has been made possible through a combination of factors, including improved conservation techniques, enhanced transport precautions, comprehensive loan agreements, insurance, and the application of relevant protective laws. 

Check out our recent article by Josie Goettel to read more about this historic loan regarding not only in its symbolic significance, but also in its technical complexity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #legal #museumissues #bayeuxtapisserie #bayeuxtapestry #britishmuseum #bayeuxmuseum
Due to decreasing government funding and increasin Due to decreasing government funding and increasing operational costs, philanthropic giving is more essential than ever. Since the current administration took office, one-third of museums nationwide have lost government grants and contracts. These losses have set off a domino effect of difficult decisions, including laying off staff, cancelling public programming, and delaying maintenance and repairs. 

Many art museums are also still recovering from financial losses incurred during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This recent article by Kamée Payton explores how noncash charitable donation alternatives are used by cultural institutions as financing, and how noncash charitable donations can prove mutually beneficial for both donors and recipients—particularly in terms of tax treatment.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #museumissues #taxes #donations #taxtreatment
Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviation Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviations and dates (here is looking at you, AML and KYC, London, NY, Rome). A laconic message that as days are getting longer and we are charmed by sunshine, blooms, and prospects of holidays, the man-made world does not fail to disappoint (don’t believe me? put aside art law and read world news), and all that during the springtime.

On a high note, we are grateful to our Spring Interns who are finishing up their stint with the Center in a couple of weeks, well done! Together we invite you to the upcoming events in person and online. Come FY2027 (a.k.a. June), we will introduce you to the Summer Class and new Advisors. Hang in there through April and May, take notes, don’t forget – we are living in the best of times and the worst of times. Again. 

🔗 Check out our April newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #april #legalresearch
When we take a holiday from talking about art law When we take a holiday from talking about art law in New York City, we talk about art law in other places. Recently our Judith Bresler Fellow, Kamée Payton attended the London Art Fair. Below is a snippet of her experience:

"I had the wonderful opportunity to attend the London Art Fair this past weekend where I met many incredible artists and art market participants. I was proud to represent the Center for Art Law in conversations with other attendees. It was an absolute delight to see what contemporary artists are contributing to the art world."

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #london #artfair #londonartfair #uk #nyc #artlawyer #legalresearch
Check out our recent article by Lauren Stein revie Check out our recent article by Lauren Stein reviewing Amy Werbel’s "Lust on Trial: Censorship and the Rise of American Obscenity in the Age of Anthony Comstock." Werbel's book showcases a portrait of Anthony Comstock, America’s first professional censor, a man obsessed with purity and self-control who regarded masturbation as a sign of moral corruption. 

Read more about this public figure and Werbel's telling of his life including the impact he had on the US's early attempts to curtail desire in the decades before World War I, in Lauren's review. 

 📚 Click the link in our bio to read more! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #bookreview #censorship #artistissues
One of our interns, Jacqueline, stopped by the Mor One of our interns, Jacqueline, stopped by the Morgan after the blizzard to catch their exhibition, “Caravaggio’s Boy with a Basket of Fruit in Focus." In partnership with the Foundation for Italian Art and Culture (FIAC) and on loan from the Galleria Borghese in Rome, this is the first time in decades that Caravaggio's early masterpiece has come to the United States. 

"The Morgan is just two blocks away from my university, the Graduate Center. The library and museum have been a rich resource for me, representing an institution that honors the rich legacy of its collector, while also maintaining exciting rotating exhibitions," Jacqueline said. 

The painting is in conversation with other works by those who influenced Caravaggio and those he subsequently inspired. The exhibition's sparkling 3-month run comes to a close April 19.

📚 Check out more information on the exhibition using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artmuseum #caravaggio #themorgan #nyc #artlawyer #legalresearch
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law