• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet How Two Artists are Challenging the SEC’s Role in Shaping the NFT Art Market
Back

How Two Artists are Challenging the SEC’s Role in Shaping the NFT Art Market

November 23, 2024

SEC No-Action Letter Request 2: The #NFT

By Allie Wiley

As of the Summer of 2024, Brian L. Frye is suing the Securities and Exchange Commission along with Jonathan Mann to confront the agency’s ability to regulate non-fungible tokens head on. The SEC has taken charge of regulating art that is sold as NFTs despite being created to protect investors.[1] The issue with the SEC regulating the NFT art market is two-fold. First, the definition of securities is too broad so it can easily incorporate NFTs under the wide net.[2] As it is presently, the definition includes anything that could be understood as an investment, wrapping the art world in with it. Now that NFTs are gaining popularity within the art community, the SEC has taken aim. Secondly, the new regulations of this corner of the art market are limiting artist’s abilities to make a living. For example, Mann, sells a daily song NFT as part of his livelihood.[3] Art is critical for society so hindering the ability to make money for artists will eventually lead to less people pursuing art. NFTs are just a new medium for artists to sell their art.

How the SEC Started Regulating NFTs

NFTs are typically exchanged using cryptocurrency where you can purchase a block on a blockchain.[4] When you purchase an NFT, you own a digital asset with software specific to your NFT.[5] If you categorize NFTs as a security like the SEC has, the Securities Act of 1933 requires sellers to perform a mandatory registration process for any sale of securities.[6] Under the broad definition of “security”, any type of art could be argued as this type of investment. NFTs offer a unique way to make money in the art market that was previously untappable before 2014.[7] With the way viral content has taken over our society, selling a song a day as a NFT has helped Jonathan Mann maintain the exclusivity of his work and has allowed him, along with other artists, to continue to prosper. While there is risk involved in the NFT market, that does not mean it requires regulations from the SEC. There is risk involved in any type of “investment” you make —from your house to your car— and the SEC does not regulate those. Due to the newness of NFTs, which first emerged in 2014, there has not been a lot of time to determine if NFT art is somewhat of a fad or if it will be commonplace in art collections in the future.[8] This case will bring NFTs one step closer to becoming a permanent medium artists can rely on.

Setting SEC-NFT Precedent: The Stoner Cats Lawsuit

Stoner Cats, an animated web series starring Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher, sold NFTs of the animated cats to help raise money for the web series.[9] According to the SEC, Stoner Cats 2 LLC sold 10,000 NFTs for $800, each making $8 million dollars in investments for the show, while also putting on a 2.5 percent royalty for each transaction after the original was sold.[10] Crypto currency assets have to be registered to help protect investors from fraud and other risks involved in investing.[11] This resulted in a settlement between the SEC and Stoner Cats 2 LLC.[12] This settlement sparked outrage in artists Brian Frye and Jonathan Mann.

The 2024 lawsuit is not the first time that Brian Frye has tried to elicit a response from the SEC. Frye had made an NFT titled SEC No-Action Letter Request to request an SEC no-action letter to demonstrate that digital art does not violate the securities laws that they have mandated.[13] Frye and Mann’s lawsuit has been filed in Louisiana federal court.[14] A preemptive federal lawsuit like this one can happen if you have a reasonable belief that the government is going to prejudice you or your interests in some way in the future.[15] This case filing is the much needed advocacy against government agency intervention and proves the effects when an agency oversteps its administrative bounds.

The Legal Implications of Frye and Mann’s Lawsuit

So the question begs, what do Brian Frye and Jonathan Mann want to accomplish with their pending lawsuit? As it stands now, the precedent set by the Stoner Cats case is that NFTs are unregistered securities. This case is truly about redefining securities and putting the SEC back into the lane from which it strayed to protect artistic freedom as art changes with new technology. The SEC was never meant to regulate the art market and hinders a buyer’s ability to invest in an artist’s career.[16] If Congress wanted the SEC to control the art market, Congress would have included that responsibility within the scope of the SEC’s duties.[17] After all, the art market has been around for thousands of years and NFTs are just another outlet for artistic expression. Frye and Mann are calling this government agency to explain what it is doing, hoping the courts will determine the breadth of the SEC’s role in the NFT art market. With the SEC’s current stance on NFTs, Jonathan Mann has been actively breaking the law since 2022.[18] Preemptively suing the SEC seems to be the best course of action since the SEC’s targets of NFT violations have no obvious correlation.[19] When anyone could be next, it is extremely valuable for every artist to pay attention as this lawsuit unfolds.

It could be argued that the popularity in NFT regulation is from the sudden uptick in major sales of works such as Everydays: The First 5000 Days in 2021 which sold for millions of dollars.[20] The SEC, so far, has been strategic in who it sues, choosing companies that have incentives to settle due to project deadlines or other reasons.[21] This has allowed the SEC to get away with not arguing their cases in front of judges to decide what their capacity of regulating NFTs is.[22]

If the SEC wins against Frye and Mann’s lawsuit, the art market could drastically change outside of the NFT corner. It would require artists to disclose any risks associated with purchasing their work, but does not offer what disclosing risks for art means or how that differs from risk associated with stocks.[23]

Artists, legal scholars, and NFT patrons are eagerly awaiting to learn about the outcome of this lawsuit and see if the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or Brian L. Frye and Jonathan Mann come out ahead.

About the Author:

Allie Wiley is an undergraduate student at Indiana University Bloomington where she is preparing for law school. She has an interest in cultural heritage law and intellectual property rights.

Suggested Readings

  • I’m Suing The SEC, Song Day, available at https://songaday.world/sec
  • Robyn Conti, What Is An NFT? Non-Fungible Tokens Explained, Forbes, available at ihttps://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/nft-non-fungible-token/#:~:text=NFT%20stands%20for%20non%2Dfungible,or%20exchanged%20for%20one%20another

Bibliography:

  1. Mission, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Aug 9. 2023). ↑
  2. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  3. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  4. Conti, Robyn, What Is An NFT? Non-Fungible Tokens Explained, Forbes Advisor (May 10,2024). ↑
  5. Klein, Jessica, ‘Should Art Be Regulated by the SEC?’: NFT Artists’ New Lawsuit Seeks Answers, Wired (Aug 26, 2024). ↑
  6. Legal Information Institute, Securities Act of 1933, Cornell Law School (Oct, 2023). ↑
  7. Manoylov, MK, A brief history of NFTs: From CryptoPunk to Bored Apes, The Block (Oct 18, 2023). ↑
  8. Id. ↑
  9. SEC Charges Creator of Stoner Cats Web Series for Unregistered Offering of NFTs, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Sep 13, 2023). ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Kinsella, Eileen, NFT Artists Sue SEC, Disputing Its Regulation of Digital Art Sales, Artnet (Jul 31, 2024). ↑
  14. Jonathan Mann and Brian L. Frye v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Eric I. Bustillo, Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizárrage, Hester M. Peirce, and Mark T. Uyeda, in their official capacities, No. 2:24-cv-01881 (E.D. La. Jul 29, 2024). ↑
  15. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  16. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Mann, Jonathan, I’m Suing the SEC, songaday (Aug 6,2024). ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  21. Id. ↑
  22. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  23. Kinsella, Eileen, NFT Artists Sue SEC, Disputing Its Regulation of Digital Art Sales, Artnet (Jul 31, 2024). ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Can a Duct-taped Banana be a Copyrightable Work of Art?
Next The U.S. Copyright Office: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Challenges

Related Art Law Articles

CfAL photo from Rietberg Museum
Art law

Inspiration and Investment: The Benin Bronzes in Western Art and the Market

September 21, 2026
Italy's Bill 2834 A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish Owned Art
Art lawItalylegislative historyNazi-era looted art

Italy’s Bill 2834: A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish-Owned Art

September 17, 2026
#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation
Art law

#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende: Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation

September 13, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant collections of modern Mexican art, is at the center of an ongoing legal and financial controversy. With works by Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, María Izquierdo, and others, the collection raises complex questions about the protections afforded to National Artistic Monuments under Mexican law. 

Paula Gutierrez de Villasante examines what the collection's uncertain future could mean for Mexico’s cultural heritage. 

📚Read the full article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #MexicanArt #FridaKahlo #ArtFinance
Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what t Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what they are, how they work, and the legal and practical considerations for artists!

Please note, this is a hybrid event. Participants are welcome to attend either in person or online via Zoom..

Join the Center for Art Law for Artist Corporations: A New Legal Framework for Creative Practice, a conversation exploring the Colorado Artist Companies Act and what it could mean for artists, lawyers, policymakers, and the broader creative economy.

In 2025, Colorado enacted Senate Bill 133, creating the Artist Corporation (A-Corp); a first-of-its-kind legal business structure designed specifically to recognize and support artists and creative professionals. The legislation offers a new model for balancing artistic practice with sustainable business and legal protections, raising important questions about how the law can better serve creative communities.

Join us for a discussion featuring Lindsay Korotkin, Yancey Strickler, and Sarah Darlene, who will examine the origins of the Artist Corporation, the legislative process behind its creation, and its practical implications for working artists. Drawing on their respective backgrounds in law, advocacy, entrepreneurship, and artistic practice, the panelists will discuss how this innovative legal framework came to fruition, how artists may benefit from it, and whether similar legislation could shape the future of creative industries beyond Colorado.

Following the panel discussion, attendees will have the opportunity to participate in a live audience Q&A as well as a Networking Reception. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #colorado #artistissues
For more than two decades, thousands of counterfei For more than two decades, thousands of counterfeit works attributed to Canadian Anishinaabe artist Norval Morrisseau circulated through galleries, auctions, and private collections. The resulting forgery scandal has made authenticating Morrisseau’s work increasingly difficult and raised larger questions about protecting artists' legacies and the integrity of the art market. 

In her article, Victoria Cook examines the history of the Morrisseau forgery ring and how emerging technologies could help distinguish genuine works from fakes. 

📚 Read the full article at the link in our bio!

1st 📷: Norval Morrisseau, Observations of the Astral World (c. 1994), acrylic on canvas, 236 x 514 cm, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

#ArtLaw #ArtForgery #NorvalMorrisseau #IndigenousArt #CanadianArt
Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Collo Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Colloquium with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. 

Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law