• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet How Two Artists are Challenging the SEC’s Role in Shaping the NFT Art Market
Back

How Two Artists are Challenging the SEC’s Role in Shaping the NFT Art Market

November 23, 2024

SEC No-Action Letter Request 2: The #NFT

By Allie Wiley

As of the Summer of 2024, Brian L. Frye is suing the Securities and Exchange Commission along with Jonathan Mann to confront the agency’s ability to regulate non-fungible tokens head on. The SEC has taken charge of regulating art that is sold as NFTs despite being created to protect investors.[1] The issue with the SEC regulating the NFT art market is two-fold. First, the definition of securities is too broad so it can easily incorporate NFTs under the wide net.[2] As it is presently, the definition includes anything that could be understood as an investment, wrapping the art world in with it. Now that NFTs are gaining popularity within the art community, the SEC has taken aim. Secondly, the new regulations of this corner of the art market are limiting artist’s abilities to make a living. For example, Mann, sells a daily song NFT as part of his livelihood.[3] Art is critical for society so hindering the ability to make money for artists will eventually lead to less people pursuing art. NFTs are just a new medium for artists to sell their art.

How the SEC Started Regulating NFTs

NFTs are typically exchanged using cryptocurrency where you can purchase a block on a blockchain.[4] When you purchase an NFT, you own a digital asset with software specific to your NFT.[5] If you categorize NFTs as a security like the SEC has, the Securities Act of 1933 requires sellers to perform a mandatory registration process for any sale of securities.[6] Under the broad definition of “security”, any type of art could be argued as this type of investment. NFTs offer a unique way to make money in the art market that was previously untappable before 2014.[7] With the way viral content has taken over our society, selling a song a day as a NFT has helped Jonathan Mann maintain the exclusivity of his work and has allowed him, along with other artists, to continue to prosper. While there is risk involved in the NFT market, that does not mean it requires regulations from the SEC. There is risk involved in any type of “investment” you make —from your house to your car— and the SEC does not regulate those. Due to the newness of NFTs, which first emerged in 2014, there has not been a lot of time to determine if NFT art is somewhat of a fad or if it will be commonplace in art collections in the future.[8] This case will bring NFTs one step closer to becoming a permanent medium artists can rely on.

Setting SEC-NFT Precedent: The Stoner Cats Lawsuit

Stoner Cats, an animated web series starring Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher, sold NFTs of the animated cats to help raise money for the web series.[9] According to the SEC, Stoner Cats 2 LLC sold 10,000 NFTs for $800, each making $8 million dollars in investments for the show, while also putting on a 2.5 percent royalty for each transaction after the original was sold.[10] Crypto currency assets have to be registered to help protect investors from fraud and other risks involved in investing.[11] This resulted in a settlement between the SEC and Stoner Cats 2 LLC.[12] This settlement sparked outrage in artists Brian Frye and Jonathan Mann.

The 2024 lawsuit is not the first time that Brian Frye has tried to elicit a response from the SEC. Frye had made an NFT titled SEC No-Action Letter Request to request an SEC no-action letter to demonstrate that digital art does not violate the securities laws that they have mandated.[13] Frye and Mann’s lawsuit has been filed in Louisiana federal court.[14] A preemptive federal lawsuit like this one can happen if you have a reasonable belief that the government is going to prejudice you or your interests in some way in the future.[15] This case filing is the much needed advocacy against government agency intervention and proves the effects when an agency oversteps its administrative bounds.

The Legal Implications of Frye and Mann’s Lawsuit

So the question begs, what do Brian Frye and Jonathan Mann want to accomplish with their pending lawsuit? As it stands now, the precedent set by the Stoner Cats case is that NFTs are unregistered securities. This case is truly about redefining securities and putting the SEC back into the lane from which it strayed to protect artistic freedom as art changes with new technology. The SEC was never meant to regulate the art market and hinders a buyer’s ability to invest in an artist’s career.[16] If Congress wanted the SEC to control the art market, Congress would have included that responsibility within the scope of the SEC’s duties.[17] After all, the art market has been around for thousands of years and NFTs are just another outlet for artistic expression. Frye and Mann are calling this government agency to explain what it is doing, hoping the courts will determine the breadth of the SEC’s role in the NFT art market. With the SEC’s current stance on NFTs, Jonathan Mann has been actively breaking the law since 2022.[18] Preemptively suing the SEC seems to be the best course of action since the SEC’s targets of NFT violations have no obvious correlation.[19] When anyone could be next, it is extremely valuable for every artist to pay attention as this lawsuit unfolds.

It could be argued that the popularity in NFT regulation is from the sudden uptick in major sales of works such as Everydays: The First 5000 Days in 2021 which sold for millions of dollars.[20] The SEC, so far, has been strategic in who it sues, choosing companies that have incentives to settle due to project deadlines or other reasons.[21] This has allowed the SEC to get away with not arguing their cases in front of judges to decide what their capacity of regulating NFTs is.[22]

If the SEC wins against Frye and Mann’s lawsuit, the art market could drastically change outside of the NFT corner. It would require artists to disclose any risks associated with purchasing their work, but does not offer what disclosing risks for art means or how that differs from risk associated with stocks.[23]

Artists, legal scholars, and NFT patrons are eagerly awaiting to learn about the outcome of this lawsuit and see if the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or Brian L. Frye and Jonathan Mann come out ahead.

About the Author:

Allie Wiley is an undergraduate student at Indiana University Bloomington where she is preparing for law school. She has an interest in cultural heritage law and intellectual property rights.

Suggested Readings

  • I’m Suing The SEC, Song Day, available at https://songaday.world/sec
  • Robyn Conti, What Is An NFT? Non-Fungible Tokens Explained, Forbes, available at ihttps://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/nft-non-fungible-token/#:~:text=NFT%20stands%20for%20non%2Dfungible,or%20exchanged%20for%20one%20another

Bibliography:

  1. Mission, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Aug 9. 2023). ↑
  2. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  3. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  4. Conti, Robyn, What Is An NFT? Non-Fungible Tokens Explained, Forbes Advisor (May 10,2024). ↑
  5. Klein, Jessica, ‘Should Art Be Regulated by the SEC?’: NFT Artists’ New Lawsuit Seeks Answers, Wired (Aug 26, 2024). ↑
  6. Legal Information Institute, Securities Act of 1933, Cornell Law School (Oct, 2023). ↑
  7. Manoylov, MK, A brief history of NFTs: From CryptoPunk to Bored Apes, The Block (Oct 18, 2023). ↑
  8. Id. ↑
  9. SEC Charges Creator of Stoner Cats Web Series for Unregistered Offering of NFTs, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Sep 13, 2023). ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Kinsella, Eileen, NFT Artists Sue SEC, Disputing Its Regulation of Digital Art Sales, Artnet (Jul 31, 2024). ↑
  14. Jonathan Mann and Brian L. Frye v. Securities and Exchange Commission, Eric I. Bustillo, Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizárrage, Hester M. Peirce, and Mark T. Uyeda, in their official capacities, No. 2:24-cv-01881 (E.D. La. Jul 29, 2024). ↑
  15. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  16. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Mann, Jonathan, I’m Suing the SEC, songaday (Aug 6,2024). ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Frye, Brian L., Why I Sued the SEC, Right Click Save (Sep 11, 2024). ↑
  21. Id. ↑
  22. Hoffman, David, Suing the SEC | Jonathan Mann & Brian Frye, Bankless (Jul 30, 2024). ↑
  23. Kinsella, Eileen, NFT Artists Sue SEC, Disputing Its Regulation of Digital Art Sales, Artnet (Jul 31, 2024). ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The U.S. Copyright Office: Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Challenges
Next Can a Duct-taped Banana be a Copyrightable Work of Art?

Related Art Law Articles

word image 78618 1
Art law

Collaboration in Cultural Heritage: Greater Questions of Digital Reconstructions

May 24, 2026
CfAL Marion Davies 1
Art law

Who Owns Hollywood’s Past? 

May 20, 2026
Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

In this episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris In this episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris speak with Will Korner, founder and director of the Cultural Heritage At Risk Database Foundation (CHARD). 

From conflict zones to disaster-stricken regions, Will discusses how documentation, collaboration, and technology can help safeguard the objects and stories that connect us to our shared past from illicit trade. He also explains how CHARD’s database can be used to cross-check whether stolen or missing cultural objects are appearing on the art market, including at auction, and what is at stake when these irreplaceable pieces of heritage are lost. 

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #culture #artcrime
Despite the passage of multiple anti-money launder Despite the passage of multiple anti-money laundering laws in the U.S. over the past two decades, the art market is still considered the "largest legal unregulated industry." Its perceived lax regulatory regime and various industry-specific factors, makes high-value art an attractive tool for laundering criminal proceeds. 

The rise in laundering through high-value art is mainly attributed to the high-dollar transactions values, the ease of transporting artwork across borders, the market's longstanding culture of privacy, and art's evolution as a financial asset. That said, the art market is not entirely unregulated. As this article shows, other mechanisms — including industry self-regulation, public pressure from high-profile litigation and settlements, and sanction laws — provide a certain regulatory structure.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artmarket #AML #internationallaw #lawyer #artcrime #money
10 DAYS TO GO - MARK YOUR CALENDARS! Saturday, Ju 10 DAYS TO GO - MARK YOUR CALENDARS!

Saturday, June 13 | 11:30–13:00
Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich
Free & open to the public

With big gratitude to our sponsors, we look forward to welcoming you at the event!
📍June 13, 11:30 - 13:00 | Auditorium Willy G.S. Hi 📍June 13, 11:30 - 13:00 | Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich 

Free & open to the public

This June, as part of the official program of @zurichartweekend, we are bringing together some of the sharpest minds in the international art world for a candid conversation on what’s reshaping collecting today.

▪️Art Markets and the World in Transition: Frameworks Shaping Global Collecting

Geopolitics. Tariffs. AML regulation. Taxes. The rules of the art market are changing as fast as your news feed, and this panel is where experts unpack what that means for collectors, gallerists, and art lovers.

Speakers: 

Will Korner (TEFAF) · Alana Kushnir (Aurelian Lawyers & Advisers) · Pascal Robert (Pascal Robert Gallery) · Stefan Puttaert (Nicola Erni Collection) · Irina Tarsis, Esq. (Center for Art Law, moderator)

The event sponsors to be announced soon! 

Link in bio to save your spot 🔗

#ZurichArtWeekend #ArtLaw #ArtMarket #Collecting #ZAW2026 LandesmuseumZürich CenterForArtLaw ArtAndLaw CrossBorderCollecting
Join the Center for Art Law for a conversation wit Join the Center for Art Law for a conversation with Dr. Rubina Raja, Professor of Classical Archaeology and Art at Aarhus University, as she presents contemporary, collaborative approaches to combating the illicit trade in antiquities, with a particular focus on Palmyra (Tadmor), Syria.

Drawing on the historical relationship between collecting and looting, the discussion will highlight the Palmyrene Portrait Project, a corpus of over 4,000 funerary portraits from Palmyra compiled by Dr. Raja and her team since 2012. The project serves as a critical record of material that, in many cases, remained in situ prior to the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War. 

Before its inception, this body of material had not been treated as a unified corpus, nor systematically digitized. Today, the project stands as both the largest corpus of individual Roman period portraits from a single urban context and an essential scholarly and practical tool for identifying objects from Palmyra as they emerge on the art market. 

🎟️ Get tickets now using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #arlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #culturalheritage #artcrime #antiquities
On October 6, 2025, the Flemish Government announc On October 6, 2025, the Flemish Government announced plans to transform the Museum of Contemporary Art Antwerp (M HKA) into an art center — a change that would make the institution lose its legal museum status and transfer its collection to the Stedelijk Museum voor Actuele Kunst in Ghent. Losing this status will have huge legal, financial, and cultural repercussions for the M HKA. 

This decision raised strong reactions from the art world, denouncing the false administrative logic behind this reorganization, which, according to the Flemish Minister of Culture, aims to strengthen collaboration and coherence within the cultural landscape. How does this transfer truly impact the Belgian artistic landscape — and does it really contribute to any coherence, or does it instead destroy the long-term curation and expertise that the institution has built in Antwerp?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the full article by Alexandra Kharchenko. 

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/flemish-governments-plan-to-dismantle-m-hkas-collection-in-the-name-of-centralization-of-art/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalresearch #artcuration #MHKA #artcuration
Thank you to all of our sponsors for all of their Thank you to all of our sponsors for all of their help in executing our 2026 Art Law Conference!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
This is the final day to bid in our Annual Art Law This is the final day to bid in our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 Silent Auction to support the Center's mission to advance artists’ rights and provide accessible legal resources to the artistic community. All proceeds go directly toward the Center’s programs, including our Summer Internship and ongoing educational initiatives. 

Don't miss out on the amazing pieces  and experiences up for grabs!

 Biding will end May 27 at 5:30pm ET.

1st: Floragen 2.0.1 by Colleen Hoffenbacker 
2nd: Jumping Frog by Vija Doks 
3rd: Untiled no.11( Amy Hollywood) by Andre Pace 

🖼️ Follow the link in our bio to begin bidding! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
In 1935 Ernst Magnus was forced to sell "The Virgi In 1935 Ernst Magnus was forced to sell "The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne" and other works in order to escape the Nazi regime. In 1941 the painting was sold to Hermann Göring and was then recovered by the Allies at the close of World War II. By the 1960s the painting was held by the Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen.

Originally restitution was rejected, but under expanded guidelines the Museum chose to restitute the piece  to Ernst Magnus' heirs. It is now set to be Auction by Sotheby's on June 2, 2026. The starting bid is listed at $28k and the estimated price between $40-60k.

🔗 Check out more about this work and it's provenance using the links in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #nazilootedart #artcrime #wwii #restitution
Make sure to check out our Annual Art Law Conferen Make sure to check out our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 Silent Auction to support the Center's mission to advance artists’ rights and provide accessible legal resources to the artistic community. All proceeds go directly toward the Center’s programs, including our Summer Internship and ongoing educational initiatives. 

 Biding will end on May 27 at 5:30pm ET.

🗽 Swipe to preview a selection of the consultations & experiences that will be available for purchase through the auction and follow the link in our bio to begin bidding! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
Historical examples of famous fakes and forgeries Historical examples of famous fakes and forgeries explain how technical skill is not the only factor that allow forgeries to flourish in the art market. Historical context — as illustrated by World War II-era cases — or, in the modern world, the lack of due diligence and risk assessment and failures of authentication, show how a combination of factors allows forgeries to flourish in particular contexts. 

From a legal perspective, fraud and forgeries are not the only issues complicating the operation of the art market. They are further amplified by related problems such as money laundering, fraud schemes, and theft. In this context, due diligence and authentication become even more critical considerations for buyers and sellers.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lauren Stein to get a deeper understanding of the vulnerabilities of the art market!

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/when-imitation-is-not-flattery-art-fakes-forgeries-and-the-market-they-fool/ 

 #centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalresearch #forgery #fraud #arttransparency
Don't miss out on our Annual Art Law Conference 20 Don't miss out on our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 silent auction to support the Center's mission to advance artists’ rights and provide accessible legal resources to the artistic community. All proceeds go directly toward the Center’s programs, including our Summer Internship and ongoing educational initiatives. 

 Biding will end on May 27 at 5:30pm ET.

📚 Swipe to preview a selection of the books that will be available for purchase through the auction and follow the link in our bio to begin bidding! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law