By Sophia Molina with assistance from Eleanna Antonatou and the Center for Art Law Team
African material culture has undergone various phases of meaning and purpose in the Western world. Initially regarded as colonial trophies, then as ethnographic curiosities, and later as sources of aesthetic inspiration for the avant-garde.[1] These objects are now at the center of decolonial discourse, as communities and institutions contend with a racist and violent past while trying to figure out best practices for cultural repatriation. Benin bronzes, especially, have borne the brunt of debate regarding the overflow of objects plundered not only from Africa, but from most of the Global South, that ought to be returned to their original owners.
But why the Benin Bronzes? Originating in Benin City, now Nigeria, these artworks are not the only prominent African pieces held in Western museums. However, Benin Bronzes are accompanied by a history that makes their case for repatriation particularly compelling: a documented violent looting,[2] significant cultural importance, clear ownership,[3] extensive global dispersal, and sustained advocacy from Nigerian government officials, historians, and the like.[4] Understanding why the Benin Bronzes have become a focal point in the ongoing fight for repatriation requires looking beyond the 1897 British attack on Benin City to the ways these artworks were interpreted and integrated within Western artistic practices during the 20th and 21st centuries.