• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Is it Strictly Business?: Shifts in the Artist-Dealer Landscape
Back

Is it Strictly Business?: Shifts in the Artist-Dealer Landscape

February 27, 2024

Mock-up draft of the Artist’s Contract by Seth Siegelaub (1971). Source: Museum of Modern Art.

Mock-up draft of the Artist’s Contract by Seth Siegelaub (1971). Source: Museum of Modern Art.

By Patrick K. Lin

The relationship between gallery and artist has long been compared to that of a marriage. Historically, a single dealer nurtured an artist’s career. In exchange, the artist exclusively sold their work with that dealer. For instance, after art dealer Leo Castelli offered artist Jasper Johns his first solo exhibition in 1958, Johns continued to work exclusively with Castelli, even developing a close friendship that endured until Castelli’s passing in 1999.[1] Similarly, painter Wayne Thiebaud met and befriended dealer Allan Stone in 1961, becoming Thiebaud’s sole dealer until Stone’s death in 2006.[2]

However, this traditional power dynamic has been undergoing significant changes. Not only are artists today more promiscuous (that is, showing with multiple galleries), more and more artists are leaving behind gallery representation in favor of going independent or even owning and operating their own galleries.

This trend is perhaps best exemplified by the 2023 ArtReview Power 100 annual rankings, where the top ten positions are occupied exclusively by artists, including Nan Goldin and Simone Leigh, who both changed galleries in the past few years. Compare this with a decade ago, when mega-gallerists Larry Gagosian and David Zwirner competed for the top spot, and it clarifies just how much power in the art market has shifted from dealers to artists in recent years.

To be fair, it has been standard practice for artists to have different dealers in different markets, such as one for Los Angeles and one for New York. Moving from a small gallery to a larger one is also a common occurrence, particularly when an artist’s career advances. Nevertheless, the art world is always abuzz when an artist switches galleries.

In October 2023, Alicja Kwade left König Galerie after 15 years to join Pace Gallery, a mega-gallery whose roster of artists has expanded rapidly over the past few years. Although Kwade’s departure from controversial dealer Johann König made a splash in the press, the star sculptor of the Berlin art scene continues to be represented by New York’s 303 Gallery, Paris’s Mennour gallery, and Reykjavik’s i8 Gallery. Pace will stage a solo show of Kwade’s work at its Los Angeles gallery in May 2024.

David Diao was represented by Postmasters Gallery for nearly 40 years when he left to join Greene Naftali in April 2023. In November 2023, On Barnett Newman, 1991-2023 marked Diao’s debut exhibition at Greene Naftali. Like Kwade, Diao is represented by other dealers, including the Office Baroque gallery in Antwerp and Tanya Leighton in Los Angeles.

There are a multitude of reasons why an artist might change galleries: the appeal of more exposure, association with a different movement or group of artists, access to a different collector base, the list goes on. The reasons for changing galleries have mostly remained the same for decades.[3]

Greener Pastures: Money and Reach

Switching galleries—like jobs—is one of a few surefire ways to get a worthwhile increase in prices. The move often results in greater visibility too.

For example, Elizabeth Peyton, who had exhibited with Gladstone Gallery since 2007, left in March 2023 to join David Zwirner, where her solo exhibition Angel was presented from June to July. Given Peyton’s oil painting Nick with His Eyes Shut (2003) sold for a record-setting $2.5 million with buyer’s fees at Sotheby’s in 2022,[4] it is apparent the move was motivated by her market being on the rise.

In September 2023, sculptor Carol Bove ended her 12-year relationship with mega-gallery Zwirner to join competitor Gagosian for global representation. Commentators speculated that the move is in part motivated by Bove’s underwhelming secondary market track record. In 2022, a solo presentation of new works by Bove, “Carol Bove: Vase/Face,” opened at Zwirner’s Paris gallery just in time for Paris+ and reportedly sold out. Although Bove is considered a premier sculptor working today, her secondary market prices have not kept pace with her skyrocketing primary prices. Bove’s primary prices have jumped from less than $100,000 for a large sculpture in 2007, to about $400,000 a decade later, and not to $1.8 million. In contrast, according to Artnet Price Database, roughly one-third of her 66 lots failed to sell. The highest price Bove’s work has sold for in auction is $329,000 in 2008.[5]

After exhibiting with the Marian Goodman Gallery for five years, Nan Goldin left to join the Gagosian Gallery in March 2023. Despite the recognition and praise, Goldin said that prices for her photography have lagged behind those of her contemporaries. She told The New York Times she hopes a new gallery can increase her profile around the globe and expand her collector base. At the same time, Marian Goodman also withdrew from daily operations of her gallery, resulting in a new management team.[6] Leadership changes can be challenging at galleries, which rely on personal relationships between dealers and artists. Goldin has said her decision to join Gagosian was motivated in part by the move of Andrew Heyward, a former Goodman employee—who has known the artist for nearly 30 years—to the Gagosian Gallery.[7]

Reading the Fine Print: When Artist-Dealer Relations Sour

Although news coverage and media portrayals of the relationship between artists and their galleries are often emotional, the legal relationship between them is transactional: buyer-seller or consignor-consignee.

In a buyer-seller relationship, the gallery buys an artist’s work outright and resells it to its clients. Alternatively, in the consignment context, the artist gives permission to the gallery to take care of a work and retain full ownership of the work for exhibition and sale. In a consignment relationship, title typically remains with the artist until the gallery sells the work and the gallery assumes the role of an agent.

Disputes can arise from these relationships when there is, for example, confusion over ownership of the artwork or disagreement about profit and cost splitting.

In May 2022, Marianne Boesky Gallery lost a lawsuit brought against one of its former artists, sculptor Diana Al-Hadid, whom it alleged owed a “six-figure” amount to the gallery for “fabrication costs, rent for defendant’s studio, framing costs, and crating costs.” Art Works, Inc., the entity that owns the gallery, brought the lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court. The subject of the lawsuit was a bronze sculpture, which the gallery claimed it had an ownership interest in because it had advanced money for its fabrication. The court issued a ruling in favor of Al-Hadid in large part because of the “unambiguous contractual language of the parties’ agreement,” which was an agreement for consignment; not a transfer of ownership.

However, contracts between artists and dealers are not always so clear cut. Disputes can arise when an agreement does not clearly outline terms related to payment and costs. In May 2023, Jeffrey Gibson, the solo artist set to represent the United States at the 2024 Venice Biennale, sued his former gallery, Kavi Gupta, alleging that it withheld nearly $640,000. According to Gibson’s complaint, in 2018, Gupta and Gibson came to an agreement in which both parties would retain a 50-50 split of the sale of each artwork on consignment; however, “at some point the Gallery fell behind and failed to timely remit Gibson’s full share of sales proceeds.” According to Gupta’s affidavit, Gibson began claiming he was owed money in 2022. The gallery and the artist appear to disagree on which expenses would be reimbursed. Gibson claims he only agreed to repay framing costs to the gallery for unframed works on consignment. On the other hand, Gupta claims the gallery expected to recoup additional costs, such as vendor costs and production expenses, including $57,000 the gallery spent on Gibson’s Aspen Art Museum exhibition, which opened in November 2023.[8]

An Emerging Trend: Artists Striking Out on Their Own—Together

2023 saw an increasing number of artists trading gallery representation for more flexible approaches to creating, marketing, and selling their art. For instance, in February 2023, the now gallery-free Peter Doig left international dealer Michael Werner after 23 years to work independently. Some speculate that Doig was spurred to leave Michael Werner due to “a series of financial slights inflicted by the gallery that he felt constituted breaches of their relationship.” Doig’s wife, Parinaz Mogadassi, who founded and runs Tramps Gallery in New York, confirmed the move to The Art Newspaper, adding, “Ultimately, from an artist’s perspective, the best way to be assured transparency in all dealings, is to be the one directly leading the conversations surrounding one’s work and life.”

The emergence of artist agents have also started to encroach on the dealer market. United Talent Agency (UTA), one of the major talent agencies in the United States, launched its fine arts division in 2015. UTA Fine Arts quickly signed acclaimed artists like Judy Chicago, Isaac Julien, and Billy Al Bengston. Rival entertainment agencies WME (part of Frieze’s parent company, Endeavor) and Creative Artists Agency (CAA) have since built up their own roster of fine artists. Dealers argue they already provide professional representation as well as specialized knowledge of the art world and connections with museums and private collectors. However, as the art world becomes increasingly intertwined with luxury retail, fashion, TV, film, and music, more and more artists may partner with talent agencies.[9]

It is far from a guarantee for an artist to find a foothold in the gallery scene. Alternatively, some artists opt to cultivate a more distinct outsider status in the art world that does not fit the mold of traditional galleries or mainstream art establishments.

Enter artist-led spaces. Galleries owned and operated by artists were first and foremost designed for visibility. Secret Project Robot, an art space co-founded by artists turned gallerists Rachel Nelson and Erik Zajaceskowski, started off as a “D.I.Y. party venue” in the late 1990s, where parties were thrown to encourage people to stay and look at artwork.[10] Today, Secret Project Robot is located in a small house with a storefront converted from a garage, featuring sculptures and paintings. “We’re slightly reformed rebels,” Nelson aptly told The New York Times. “Our first 15 years, we were balking the system but, to be an artist, you can’t reject the art world.”

Other artist-led spaces have also gained popularity, particularly in Europe, Africa, and Asia. In the past several years, artists established institutes and residences in response to cuts to public funding as well as collective desires to create art beyond the demands of mainstream art institutions. Faced with extremely limited public and private support for the arts in their home countries, African and African diaspora artists have had to take matters into their own hands. Established artists like Kaloki Nyamai and Aïda Muluneh launched artist residency programs and online platforms to cultivate a younger generation of artists while connecting their work to a more global audience.[11]

Conclusion

Given the musical-chairs nature of artists changing galleries in 2023, the year ahead will see many of those artists showcase their work at debut exhibitions and gallery shows.

A gallery’s roster of artists and estates is only one barometer of success. It is also the most publicized aspect of commercial galleries. Sales, physical expansion, and staff size are rarely made public but have an impact on the financial health of a gallery as well. Artists also have far more options than ever for showing their work to the world: today’s galleries are taking on more artists; artists have more power to make the jump to other galleries; and artists are reaching a more global audience with online platforms and communities made for and by artists.

2023 ended with what many would consider a shake-up of the status quo. How will the artist-dealer dynamic shake out in 2024?

About the Author

Patrick K. Lin is the Center for Art Law’s 2023-2024 Judith Bresler Fellow and author of Machine See, Machine Do, a book about how public institutions use technology to surveil, police, and make decisions about the public, as well as the historical biases that impact that technology. Patrick is interested in legal issues that exist at the intersection of art and technology, particularly involving artificial intelligence, data privacy, and copyright law.

Suggested Readings

  1. Power 100, AʀᴛRᴇᴠɪᴇᴡ, https://artreview.com/power-100/ (last accessed Jan. 24, 2024).
  2. Anny Shaw, Why Are Ever More Artists Ditching Dealers?, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (Dec. 12, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/12/12/why-ever-more-artists-are-ditching-the-dealers.
  3. Jennifer Wilson, Where the Artists Are Present — and in Charge, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Sept. 27, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/t-magazine/artist-run-galleries-new-york.html.
  4. Alex Greenberger, Daniel Cassady, and Angelica Villa, Why Do Pace, Gagosian, and the Other Mega-Galleries Keep Taking On So Many Artists?, ARTɴᴇᴡs (Apr. 6, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/market/why-pace-gagosian-mega-galleries-artist-rosters-1234663300/.
  5. Margaret Carrigan, Have Gallery Representation and Exclusivity Had Their Day?, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (June 25, 2018), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2018/06/25/have-gallery-representation-and-exclusivity-had-their-day.
  6. Nate Freeman, One-Two Punch: The Rise of Joint Representation Has Dealers Sharing Artists All the Way to the Bank, ARTɴᴇᴡs (Feb. 2, 2016), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/market/one-two-punch-the-rise-of-joint-representation-has-dealers-sharing-artists-all-the-way-to-the-bank-5757/.
  7. John Russell, Leo Castelli, Influential Art Dealer, Dies at 91, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Aug. 23, 1999), https://www.nytimes.com/1999/08/23/arts/leo-castelli-influential-art-dealer-dies-at-91.html. ↑
  8. Wayne Thiebaud, Aᴄᴀᴅᴇᴍʏ ᴏғ Aᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴇᴍᴇɴᴛ, https://achievement.org/achiever/wayne-thiebaud/ (last updated on Dec. 26, 2021). ↑
  9. Annie Armstrong, Why Artists Change Galleries, Aʀᴛsʏ (Jan. 27, 2020), https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-artists-change-galleries. ↑
  10. Nick with His Eyes Shut, Sᴏᴛʜᴇʙʏ’s, https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2022/the-now-evening-auction-5/nick-with-his-eyes-shut (last accessed Jan. 24, 2024). ↑
  11. Katya Kazakina, Sculptor Carol Bove Is in High Demand, Now With a Show at Zwirner’s New Gallery in Paris. So Why Aren’t Her Auction Prices Keeping Up?, Aʀᴛɴᴇᴛ (Oct. 21, 2022), https://news.artnet.com/market/carol-bove-sculptor-has-new-show-at-david-zwirner-in-paris-2196536. ↑
  12. Zachary Small, Nan Goldin is Second Major Artist to Exit Marian Goodman Gallery, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Mar. 30, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/arts/design/nan-goldin-marian-goodman-gagosian-gallery.html. ↑
  13. Id. ↑
  14. Alex Greenberger, Artist Jeffrey Gibson Sues Chicago’s Kavi Gupta Gallery, Alleging He Is Owed More than $600,000, ARTɴᴇᴡs (Aug. 7, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/jeffrey-gibson-sues-chicagos-kavi-gupta-gallery-1234676421/. ↑
  15. Anny Shaw, Why Are Ever More Artists Ditching Dealers?, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (Dec. 12, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/12/12/why-ever-more-artists-are-ditching-the-dealers. ↑
  16. Jennifer Wilson, Where the Artists Are Present — and in Charge, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Sept. 27, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/t-magazine/artist-run-galleries-new-york.html. ↑
  17. Rebecca Anne Proctor, Artist-Led Spaces Are Proliferating Around the World, Filling a Gap Caused by Dwindling Public Funding and Market Pressures, Aʀᴛɴᴇᴛ (Dec. 26, 2022), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artist-led-spaces-are-proliferating-around-the-world-filling-a-gap-caused-by-dwindling-public-funding-and-market-pressures-2232925. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous AI and Artists’ IP: Exploring Copyright Infringement Allegations in Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.
Next Appropriation or Art? Court Orders Richard Prince to Pay Damages in Highly Anticipated Copyright Lawsuit

Related Posts

Tax Season: From Gray Zone to Opportunity Zones, and Other Tax Developments for Art

April 4, 2019

The National Historic Preservation Act at 50: A Look at the Historic Preservation Movement in the United States

October 28, 2015
(Image Credit: Sotheby’s video Great Collectors: The (Art) World According to Hubert Neumann)

A Modern Day King Lear? Neumann v Neumann

October 31, 2023
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
What happens when culture becomes collateral damag What happens when culture becomes collateral damage in war?
In this episode of Art in Brief, we speak with Patty Gerstenblith, a leading expert on cultural heritage law, about the destruction of cultural sites in recent armed conflicts.

We examine the role of international courts, the limits of accountability, and whether the law can truly protect history in times of war.

We would like to also thank Rebecca Bennett for all of her help on this episode. 

 🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #lawyer #podcast #artpodcast #culturalheritage #armedconflict #internationallaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law