• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet AL Clippings image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Lawsuit Against Christie’s Over Piatigorsky Collection Highlights the Ongoing Struggle to Recover and Reform Practices After Sandy Devastation
Back

Lawsuit Against Christie’s Over Piatigorsky Collection Highlights the Ongoing Struggle to Recover and Reform Practices After Sandy Devastation

August 26, 2013

logo

Christie’s Fine Art Storage Services (CFASS), wholly owned subsidiary of Christie’s auction house, has been hit with a damning lawsuit in New York State‘s Supreme Court. CFASS is being sued for $1.5 million on claims of gross negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract arising from damage sustained by the Gregor and Jacqueline Piatigorsky art collection (the “Collection”) housed at a CFASS storage facility during Superstorm Sandy.

Image

The late Gregor Piatigorsky, world-renowned cellist, and his wife Jacqueline, tennis and chess champion—a power couple that met in the 1930s—amassed an impressive art collection, including many valuable Impressionist and Expressionist era works that were housed at CFASS during the storm. Though the complaint does not specify which works were damaged, a longtime Piatigorsky aide said that the Collection included a 1904 Degas entitled “Monsieur and Madame Louis Rouart.” Other damaged pieces could include paintings by Chaim Soutine. AXA Art Insurance, one of the world’s foremost purveyors of art insurance, filed the complaint against CFASS on Thursday, August 15, as subrogee of the Jacqueline Piatigorsky Revocable Trust. As a subrogee, AXA acts for the injured parties to recoup its own losses sustained from paying out insurance claims.

Image

 The complaint paints a condemning picture, alleging that the Collection was left “languishing… on the ground floor of the warehouse” and that CFASS took “virtually no steps to protect it.” According to the complaint, the Piatigorsky Collection arrived at the warehouse at 100 Imlay Street in Red Hook on October 18, 2012, about a week before Sandy hit. The complaint also states that CFASS fired its warehouse manager around the same time, leaving the facility in the hands of an inexperience crew during one of the worst natural disasters ever to hit New York. By the time the storm began, the works were still “unprocessed by Christie’s staff, fully exposed on the floor.” The complaint goes on to state that “despite dire warnings about the impact of Sandy…Christie’s took virtually no steps to protect art, failing to even elevate the Collection and other art from the ground floor to higher floors of the warehouse.” As a result, the Collection was “exposed to water, high humidity, significant temperature fluctuations, and particulate matter.”

The complaint goes on to accuse CFASS of “intentionally misrepresent[ing] the precautions taken” and of failing to take proper steps after the storm hit. Christie’s storage also allegedly failed to inform clients of damage right away, which allegedly delayed restoration. Attached to the complaint, an email sent on November 1, 2012 to CFASS clients stated “staff has inspected our facility today and I can confirm that your property is safe and has experienced no damage.” 

Christie’s spokesperson declined to comment except to say that CFASS had yet to be served with court papers.

There have been grumblings against CFASS’ handling of Sandy for months. In April, The Art Newspaper published an article detailing how CFASS was losing several angry clients over damage sustained to their artworks during the storm. At the time, Christie’s explained that CFASS has measures in place for extreme weather that were implemented and that the backup generators worked, but “there was damage on the ground floor because the surge was not expected.” Although the article also suggested that a class action lawsuit against CFASS was in the works, the dispute with AXA is the first lawsuit filed against CFASS for its handling of the Sandy response and losses.

Though this case represents a big blow to CFASS’ public image, the dispute highlights two broad facts: that New York is still grappling with Sandy’s unprecedented devastation (for which no one was truly prepared) and that insurance companies, AXA included, are reconsidering their prior practices.

Image

CFASS was certainly not the only storage facility to sustain damage, as most of the city’s fine art storage facilities are located in cheap, industrial areas close to the waterfront. For example, SurroundArt, a 160,000-square-foot storage facility in the Brooklyn Navy Yard, also sustained damage and losses estimated at $40 million. Additionally, LeConte Moore of insurance brokerage DeWitt Stern stated that 60% of the art that got wet is “turning out to be a total loss,” because even after policies and restoration costs are paid out, the value of the artwork is still decreased.  The total insured losses from Sandy are estimated at around $35 billion, and approximately $200 million to $300 million consisted of losses to art. In the wake of the damage sustained by galleries, storage facilities, personal homes, and conservators’ workshops across the city, major insurance companies are limiting the scope of policies, attempting to influence art storage practices. For example, Blouin Art News quoted AXA’s president and CEO, Christiane Fescher, suggesting that insurers are adjusting their underwriting practices in consideration of a redrawn flood map for New York. Fescher calculated AXA’s Sandy claims between $36-38 million and revealed that AXA will no longer insure art that is kept in basements in Chelsea. It is likely that more lawsuits are in store, as the insurance industry attempts to determine who bears Sandy damages, grapple with its current payouts, and protect against future losses.

The truth of the allegations and possible extent of CFASS’ negligence will be revealed as the legal proceedings unfold. But, as the devastation caused by Sandy is fully surveyed and quantified, one of the greatest hubs of the art world will continue to recover from the unparalleled disaster and to rethink the best ways it can protect and preserve its artworks.

For previous Center for Art Law coverage of Sandy damage, see: The NYC Art World Surveys Damage And Makes Predictions Following the Devastation Caused By Hurricane Sandy

Sources: The Art Newspaper, New York Daily News, The Independent.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Rauschenberg Foundation Fights Fees from Trustees
Next California Court Rules that Chalk Art is Not Vandalism

Related Posts

Painting courtesy of the United States Attorney’s Office Central District of California

The Cost of Fakes: The Aesthetic, Legal, and Economic Implications of Forgeries

June 19, 2024
screen shot of the official swiss page re nazi era looted art commission

Spotlight: Swiss Federal Council Approves Creation of an Independent Commission on Nazi Looted Art

December 3, 2022
logo

Sotheby’s Takes Action Against Cambodian Property Claim

June 12, 2012
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law