• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Matters of Baldessari: Estate of the Artist Finds Itself on Both Sides of Litigation
Back

Matters of Baldessari: Estate of the Artist Finds Itself on Both Sides of Litigation

May 16, 2024

Source: ArtNet https://www.artnet.com/artists/john-baldessari/

Source: ArtNet https://www.artnet.com/artists/john-baldessari/

By Olivia Zinzi

The estate of John Baldessari, a 20th century pop conceptual artist, is currently in the midst of two multi-million dollar lawsuits.[1] Baldessari, who died in 2020, may not have anticipated the headache his body of work would trigger involving the Marian Goodman Gallery, AXA XL, and Beyer Projects.

 

Who was John Baldessari?

Baldessari entered the art world as a semi-abstract painter in the 1950s and then pivoted to a wide range of mediums incorporating texts and photography and utilizing colorful Pop Art themes.[2] In the 1970s, he started working in printmaking, film, video installation, sculpture and photography.[3] Baldessari is known as an influential and prolific artist; his extensive collection of works demonstrates the power of language and text in art and the storytelling behind images.[4]

According to The New York Times, he is credited for transforming Los Angeles into a global art hub, and his works are currently being shown at The Broad in Los Angeles.[5] His artwork has been featured in over 200 solo shows and 1,000 group shows in his sixty year career, and included in the permanent collection of museums like the Museum of Modern Art, the Guggenheim Museum, the Art Institute of Chicago, and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.[6] Notably, his works have been offered at auction multiple times and the record price for a Baldessari piece at auction is $2.517 million for a painting sold at Sotheby’s New York in 2014.[7]

Baldessari worked as an artist both in an individual capacity and through his studio in California and an entity called JAB Art Enterprises, Inc. which became JAB Art Enterprises, LLC in 2006.[8] He lived and worked in Santa Monica and Venice, California. During his lifetime, he was represented by Sonnabend Gallery, Margo Leavin, Mai 36 Galerie, and Galerie Greta Meert.[9] Since 2021, the artist’s estate has been represented by Sprüth Magers Gallery.

Some of Baldessari’s works were made alongside contractors, such as Water on the Brain (2015) and Pineapple (2019).[10] Other works he made entirely on his own, like his Cremation Project (1970).[11] It is common for artists of his caliber to create works using assistance of studio hands and contractors (printers, carvers, metalworkers, etc.) and this is usually treated as a work for hire or joint project where the copyright remains with the artist but proceeds are split or paid contractually. Furthermore, contractual obligations usually survive an artist’s death. In the case of celebrated painter Mark Rothko’s estate, his children filed suit to remove the estate’s executors, the Marlborough Gallery, for “conspiring to waste the assets of the estate.”[12] There are other cases where galleries seek to continue representing an artist after their death but the estate has other plans and cannot stop the contract from being enforceable.

Case 1: Baldessari Trust v. Marian Goodman Gallery

In October 2022, the Baldessari Estate (“the Estate”) filed suit in the Supreme Court of New York accusing Marian Goodman Gallery (the “Goodman Gallery”) of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of obligations under NYACAL Article 12, and breach of negligence and gross negligence.[13] The Estate is administered by Jab Art Enterprises, LLC, Annamarie Baldessari and Antonio Baldessari as Trustees of the John Baldessari Trust, Annamarie Baldessari as Special Administrator of the Estate of John Baldessari and Annamarie Baldessari and Antonio Baldessari as heirs and successors in interest to John Baldessari.[14] The Goodman Gallery displayed Baldessari’s work from the late 1990s until the artist’s death in 2020 and represented the artist for twenty years prior to his passing.[15] During the artist’s lifetime, he consigned over a hundred works to the Goodman Gallery.[16] According to the Complaint, Plaintiffs decided to end this artist-dealer consignment relationship and transfer all of Baldessari’s works to a different gallery.[17]

The Estate claimed that when representatives for its current gallery, Sprüth Magers, went to retrieve the works, some pieces were in boxes with “damaged” labels on them.[18] Plaintiffs discovered many of the works were damaged as a result of Goodman Gallery’s alleged wrongful conduct while the works of art were “on consignment to, in the possession of, and/or under the control of” Defendant.[19] In this time period, the Estate claimed the Goodman Gallery ruined 55 of the artist’s works through grossly mishandling and improperly storing the paintings, resulting in large dents, broken corners, scratches, cracks and water damage.[20] The Goodman Gallery, as consignee and dealer, had a contractual obligation to keep Baldessari’s works free from damage and return the works in the same condition they were in at the time of consignment.[21]

Upon discovery of the damage, Plaintiffs informed the Gallery of the damage to the works and sought payment of conservation work.[22] According to the complaint, neither the Gallery nor their insurer, AXA, would pay for conservation or restoration costs.[23] To date, Defendants have not compensated Plaintiffs for their losses, and the Estate is seeking $21 million.[24]Although the suit alleges that 55 works were damaged, it does not specify which ones or their individual values.[25] Several of the works are considered a “total loss” while others are repairable, based on the Estate’s assessment.[26]

Baldessari has produced over 400 works and was prolific and worked in the genre of multiples. If the case does not settle, the court is likely to grapple with the issue of valuation of the damaged pieces. Which begs the question: what happens to a work of art which gets damaged in the artist’s studio? Do insurance companies offer insurance against this kind of loss and why would AXA not pay for the damage to the works in Goodman’s care.

Case development

In September 2023, there was a development in the case when the Gallery sought to be indemnified by AXA XL, the Gallery’s insurer.[27] The Gallery claimed the injuries to the works were caused by third parties and asked to be indemnified by AXA, meaning AXA would pay the amount owed by the Goodman Gallery to the Estate if the Goodman Gallery were found responsible in the lawsuit.[28]

The Goodman Gallery attributed any alleged damage of the works to “negligence, carelessness, recklessness and/or intentional acts of third persons over whom Defendant had no control.”[29] In response to the filings, the Goodman Gallery and AXA denied the claims and are seeking to have the case dismissed.[30] At the end of 2023, the Parties agreed to enter into mediation and have been working to find a mutually agreeable time for mediation.[31]

Case 2: Beyer Projects v. Baldessari Estate

During May 2023, New York-based production company, Beyer LLC, d/b/a Beyer Projects (“Beyer”) filed suit against Annamarie Baldessari, individually and as trustee of the John Baldessari Trust and Antonio Baldessari, individually and as trustee, of the John Baldessari Trust (the “Trust”). Beyer brought suit against the Trust in the Southern District of New York seeking ownership of works the company alleges it produced for the deceased artist, thus asserting a fifty percent claim to possession.[32] Throughout this partnership, Beyer allegedly spent over $2 million creating over 70 separate sculptures. [33] The claims are breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and tortious interference with contract.

Beyer alleges in its complaint that Baldessari did not have the background in or ability to create large-scale sculptures prior to their partnership in 2005.[34] The two parties entered into a series of agreements containing three material aspects.[35] According to the contracts attached to the complaint, first, Beyer would create sculptures in collaboration with John, fully bearing the costs associated with bringing the sculptures to life; second, the agreement provided for one sculpture to be wholly owned by John and one to be wholly owned by the Beyers; third, the remaining sculptures would be co-owned with profits split 50-50 after Beyer recouped its costs.[36] The nature of Beyer and Baldessari’s collaboration is expanded upon in the complaint; Baldessari would orally suggest concepts to Beyer and Beyer would then return with sketches and Beyer would create a small-scale model after oral discussions between the two and would handle the physical details and production of the final large-scale sculpture.[37]

Furthermore, the complaint alleges Baldessari wanted all his sculptures to be displayed together in one gallery and there were only four galleries that had the space and capacity to exhibit the entire collection.[38] The show was expected to run in May 2023 and generate approximately $10 million but the Gagosian Gallery canceled due to ownership disputes.[39] Acting as trustees for the Trust, John Baldessari’s two adult children, Annamarie and Antonio, demanded all the co-owned art as their exclusive property with an exclusive right to profits.[40] The Trust also refused to reimburse Beyer for the production costs liquidated in their contracts.[41]

Case Development

In response to these claims, the Estate filed a motion to dismiss the case claiming there was no breach of contract. A Confidentiality Agreement and Order was entered by District Judge Vernon S. Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel extended to communications with employees of Sprüth Magers Gallery. The parties will brief these issues as the litigation continues. The Trust claimed that the co-owned art was always 100% owned by John and was “on consignment” by the Beyers and the court will now have to examine the contractual language and determine the nature of the relationship between the two parties.[44]

Conclusion

Litigation is costly and when art becomes the subject of a courtroom drama, it either means there is sentimental value or financial value driving the process. Baldessari’s works in question (Camel (Albino) Contemplating Needle (Large), Beethoven’s Trumpet (with Ear), Fake Carrot, Lead Cloud, among others) have yet to be exhibited due to the ongoing controversy.[45] For the sake of Baldessari’s legacy, let’s hope there will be no other lawsuits starting, involving collectors, conservators and other art market participants. Of course, there is always the possibility of the cases settling before they proceed to a trial. These ongoing disputes highlight how the different stages of an artist’s career are in need of careful custodial work and a clear paper trail outlining these relationships. Estate planning and artist dealer relationships work hand in hand to (hopefully) protect artists and their creations long after they are alive.

While Balessari’s legacy is arguably secured given his well-regarded name and recognizable art; however, an artist’s legacy postmortem is not guaranteed and estates have to be careful not to destroy the artist’s honor and influence. The Center for Art Law will be hosting an online program on artist legacy and estate planning clinic on June 12, 2024.

Suggested Readings:

Alex Greenberger, John Baldessari Estate Beleaguered by Lawsuits Over Damaged Art and Canceled Exhibition, ARTNews (Sep. 12, 2023), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/john-baldessari-estate-lawsuits-marian-goodman-gallery-axa-beyer-projects-1234679459/.

News Desk, John Baldessari Estate Sues, Is Sued, ArtForum (Sep. 14, 2023), available at https://www.artforum.com/news/john-baldessari-estate-sues-is-sued-252983/.

Jori Finkel, John Baldessari, Who Gave Conceptual Art a Dose of Wit, Is Dead at 88, New York Times (Jan. 5, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/05/arts/john-baldessari-dead.html.

About the Author:

Olivia Zinzi is a Legal Intern at the Center for Art Law. She is a 3L at Northeastern University School of Law and received her BA in government and art history from Georgetown University. She is an Articles Editor for the Northeastern University Law Review and is interested in intellectual property, corporate law and technology.

Select Sources:

  1. News Desk, John Baldessari Estate Sues, Is Sued, ArtForum (Sep. 14, 2023), available at https://www.artforum.com/news/john-baldessari-estate-sues-is-sued-252983/. ↑
  2. Jori Finkel, John Baldessari, Who Gave Conceptual Art a Dose of Wit, Is Dead at 88, New York Times (Jan. 5, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/05/arts/john-baldessari-dead.html. ↑
  3. Tate, Biography: John Baldessari, Tate Britain (2023), available at https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/john-baldessari-687. ↑
  4. Tate, Biography: John Baldessari, Tate Britain (2023), available at https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artists/john-baldessari-687. ↑
  5. Jori Finkel, John Baldessari, Who Gave Conceptual Art a Dose of Wit, Is Dead at 88, New York Times (Jan. 5, 2020), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/05/arts/john-baldessari-dead.html; https://www.thebroad.org/art/collection-exhibitions/desire-knowledge-and-hope-smog-1. ↑
  6. Complaint at 2, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  7. MutualArt, Artist Overview, Mutual Art (2023), available at https://www.mutualart.com/Artist/John-Baldessari/D2F1EF191C02DBE5. ↑
  8. Complaint at 7, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  9. https://www.artnet.com/artists/john-baldessari/biography ↑
  10. Complaint at 7–9, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  11. Allison C. Meier, Why John Baldessari Burned His Own Art, Jstor Daily (Jan. 23, 2020) https://daily.jstor.org/why-john-baldessari-burned-his-own-art/. ↑
  12. Poppy Burton, The Mark Rothko Case: How Greed Rocked the Art World, Far Out Magazine (Aug. 10, 2023), https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/the-mark-rothko-case-how-greed-rocked-the-art-world/. ↑
  13. Complaint at 20–26, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  14. Complaint at 3, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  15. Alex Greenberger, John Baldessari Estate Beleaguered by Lawsuits Over Damaged Art and Canceled Exhibition, ARTNews (Sep. 12, 2023), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/john-baldessari-estate-lawsuits-marian-goodman-gallery-axa-beyer-projects-1234679459/. ↑
  16. Complaint at 20, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  17. Complaint at 9, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  18. Complaint at 19, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  19. Complaint at 2, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  20. Complaint at 18, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  21. Complaint at 20, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  22. Complaint at 3, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  23. Complaint at 3–4, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  24. Complaint at 28, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  25. Complaint at 23, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  26. Complaint at 25, Baldessari et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery et al., No. 653792/2022 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2022). ↑
  27. Alex Greenberger, John Baldessari Estate Beleaguered by Lawsuits Over Damaged Art and Canceled Exhibition, ARTNews (Sep. 12, 2023), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/john-baldessari-estate-lawsuits-marian-goodman-gallery-axa-beyer-projects-1234679459/. ↑
  28. News Desk, John Baldessari Estate Sues, Is Sued, ArtForum (Sep. 14, 2023), available at https://www.artforum.com/news/john-baldessari-estate-sues-is-sued-252983/. ↑
  29. Alex Greenberger, John Baldessari Estate Beleaguered by Lawsuits Over Damaged Art and Canceled Exhibition, ARTNews (Sep. 12, 2023), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/john-baldessari-estate-lawsuits-marian-goodman-gallery-axa-beyer-projects-1234679459/. ↑
  30. Alex Greenberger, John Baldessari Estate Beleaguered by Lawsuits Over Damaged Art and Canceled Exhibition, ARTNews (Sep. 12, 222023), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/john-baldessari-estate-lawsuits-marian-goodman-gallery-axa-beyer-projects-1234679459/. ↑
  31. Joint stipulation between the parties filed by Plaintiffs on February 15, 2024 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 39)

    JAB Art Enterprises, LLC et al. v. Marian Goodman Gallery, Inc. et al., 653792/2022 ↑

  32. Complaint at 3, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  33. Complaint at 3, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  34. Complaint at 2, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  35. Complaint at 2, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  36. Complaint at 2–3, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  37. Complaint at 8, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  38. Complaint at 4, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  39. Complaint at 4, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN.

    Alex Greenberger, John Baldessari Estate Beleaguered by Lawsuits Over Damaged Art and Canceled Exhibition, ARTNews (Sep. 12, 2023), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/john-baldessari-estate-lawsuits-marian-goodman-gallery-axa-beyer-projects-1234679459/. ↑

  40. Complaint at 4–5, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  41. Complaint at 5, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  42. Beyer LLC v. Baldessari, 1:23-cv-03819-VSB (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 28, 2023), available at https://casetext.com/case/beyer-llc-v-baldessari-3. ↑
  43. Beyer LLC v. Baldessari, 23-CV-03819 (LTS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 12, 2024), available at https://casetext.com/case/beyer-llc-v-baldessari-6. ↑
  44. Complaint at 5, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑
  45. Complaint at 9, Beyer LLC v. Baldessari et al., No. 23-3819 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) Case 1:23-cv-03819-LTS-SN. ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Trends in Repatriation of Cultural Objects from US Museums
Next Generative AI and transparency of databases and their content, from a copyright perspective

Related Art Law Articles

word image 78618 1
Art law

Collaboration in Cultural Heritage: Greater Questions of Digital Reconstructions

May 24, 2026
CfAL Marion Davies 1
Art law

Who Owns Hollywood’s Past? 

May 20, 2026
Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

10 DAYS TO GO - MARK YOUR CALENDARS! Saturday, Ju 10 DAYS TO GO - MARK YOUR CALENDARS!

Saturday, June 13 | 11:30–13:00
Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich
Free & open to the public

With big gratitude to our sponsors, we look forward to welcoming you at the event!
📍June 13, 11:30 - 13:00 | Auditorium Willy G.S. Hi 📍June 13, 11:30 - 13:00 | Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich 

Free & open to the public

This June, as part of the official program of @zurichartweekend, we are bringing together some of the sharpest minds in the international art world for a candid conversation on what’s reshaping collecting today.

▪️Art Markets and the World in Transition: Frameworks Shaping Global Collecting

Geopolitics. Tariffs. AML regulation. Taxes. The rules of the art market are changing as fast as your news feed, and this panel is where experts unpack what that means for collectors, gallerists, and art lovers.

Speakers: 

Will Korner (TEFAF) · Alana Kushnir (Aurelian Lawyers & Advisers) · Pascal Robert (Pascal Robert Gallery) · Stefan Puttaert (Nicola Erni Collection) · Irina Tarsis, Esq. (Center for Art Law, moderator)

The event sponsors to be announced soon! 

Link in bio to save your spot 🔗

#ZurichArtWeekend #ArtLaw #ArtMarket #Collecting #ZAW2026 LandesmuseumZürich CenterForArtLaw ArtAndLaw CrossBorderCollecting
Join the Center for Art Law for a conversation wit Join the Center for Art Law for a conversation with Dr. Rubina Raja, Professor of Classical Archaeology and Art at Aarhus University, as she presents contemporary, collaborative approaches to combating the illicit trade in antiquities, with a particular focus on Palmyra (Tadmor), Syria.

Drawing on the historical relationship between collecting and looting, the discussion will highlight the Palmyrene Portrait Project, a corpus of over 4,000 funerary portraits from Palmyra compiled by Dr. Raja and her team since 2012. The project serves as a critical record of material that, in many cases, remained in situ prior to the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War. 

Before its inception, this body of material had not been treated as a unified corpus, nor systematically digitized. Today, the project stands as both the largest corpus of individual Roman period portraits from a single urban context and an essential scholarly and practical tool for identifying objects from Palmyra as they emerge on the art market. 

🎟️ Get tickets now using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #arlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #culturalheritage #artcrime #antiquities
On October 6, 2025, the Flemish Government announc On October 6, 2025, the Flemish Government announced plans to transform the Museum of Contemporary Art Antwerp (M HKA) into an art center — a change that would make the institution lose its legal museum status and transfer its collection to the Stedelijk Museum voor Actuele Kunst in Ghent. Losing this status will have huge legal, financial, and cultural repercussions for the M HKA. 

This decision raised strong reactions from the art world, denouncing the false administrative logic behind this reorganization, which, according to the Flemish Minister of Culture, aims to strengthen collaboration and coherence within the cultural landscape. How does this transfer truly impact the Belgian artistic landscape — and does it really contribute to any coherence, or does it instead destroy the long-term curation and expertise that the institution has built in Antwerp?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the full article by Alexandra Kharchenko. 

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/flemish-governments-plan-to-dismantle-m-hkas-collection-in-the-name-of-centralization-of-art/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalresearch #artcuration #MHKA #artcuration
Thank you to all of our sponsors for all of their Thank you to all of our sponsors for all of their help in executing our 2026 Art Law Conference!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
This is the final day to bid in our Annual Art Law This is the final day to bid in our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 Silent Auction to support the Center's mission to advance artists’ rights and provide accessible legal resources to the artistic community. All proceeds go directly toward the Center’s programs, including our Summer Internship and ongoing educational initiatives. 

Don't miss out on the amazing pieces  and experiences up for grabs!

 Biding will end May 27 at 5:30pm ET.

1st: Floragen 2.0.1 by Colleen Hoffenbacker 
2nd: Jumping Frog by Vija Doks 
3rd: Untiled no.11( Amy Hollywood) by Andre Pace 

🖼️ Follow the link in our bio to begin bidding! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
In 1935 Ernst Magnus was forced to sell "The Virgi In 1935 Ernst Magnus was forced to sell "The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne" and other works in order to escape the Nazi regime. In 1941 the painting was sold to Hermann Göring and was then recovered by the Allies at the close of World War II. By the 1960s the painting was held by the Bayerische Staatsgemäldesammlungen.

Originally restitution was rejected, but under expanded guidelines the Museum chose to restitute the piece  to Ernst Magnus' heirs. It is now set to be Auction by Sotheby's on June 2, 2026. The starting bid is listed at $28k and the estimated price between $40-60k.

🔗 Check out more about this work and it's provenance using the links in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #nazilootedart #artcrime #wwii #restitution
Make sure to check out our Annual Art Law Conferen Make sure to check out our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 Silent Auction to support the Center's mission to advance artists’ rights and provide accessible legal resources to the artistic community. All proceeds go directly toward the Center’s programs, including our Summer Internship and ongoing educational initiatives. 

 Biding will end on May 27 at 5:30pm ET.

🗽 Swipe to preview a selection of the consultations & experiences that will be available for purchase through the auction and follow the link in our bio to begin bidding! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
Historical examples of famous fakes and forgeries Historical examples of famous fakes and forgeries explain how technical skill is not the only factor that allow forgeries to flourish in the art market. Historical context — as illustrated by World War II-era cases — or, in the modern world, the lack of due diligence and risk assessment and failures of authentication, show how a combination of factors allows forgeries to flourish in particular contexts. 

From a legal perspective, fraud and forgeries are not the only issues complicating the operation of the art market. They are further amplified by related problems such as money laundering, fraud schemes, and theft. In this context, due diligence and authentication become even more critical considerations for buyers and sellers.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lauren Stein to get a deeper understanding of the vulnerabilities of the art market!

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/when-imitation-is-not-flattery-art-fakes-forgeries-and-the-market-they-fool/ 

 #centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalresearch #forgery #fraud #arttransparency
Don't miss out on our Annual Art Law Conference 20 Don't miss out on our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 silent auction to support the Center's mission to advance artists’ rights and provide accessible legal resources to the artistic community. All proceeds go directly toward the Center’s programs, including our Summer Internship and ongoing educational initiatives. 

 Biding will end on May 27 at 5:30pm ET.

📚 Swipe to preview a selection of the books that will be available for purchase through the auction and follow the link in our bio to begin bidding! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #2026annualconference #2026 #auction #nonprofit
Day 4 of ☀️school: from Brooklyn to Manhattan (and Day 4 of ☀️school: from Brooklyn to Manhattan (and back)
@brooklynmuseum @pacegallery
Running a nonprofit, art law or not, only looks gl Running a nonprofit, art law or not, only looks glamorous. Before our founder completes her metamorphosis from dewy-faced starlet to aging legend, consider supporting the Center by registering for our silent auction. Marion Davies photographs, artworks, books, and more await their next owners. 

Follow the link in our bio to begin bidding!
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law