• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Museums and COVID-19: from Deaccessioning to Reopening
Back

Museums and COVID-19: from Deaccessioning to Reopening

June 25, 2020

By Olivia Baker.

Since March of 2020, it is an understatement to say that the world has been completely altered due to the coronavirus pandemic. In the past few months, artists and art institutions faced the ramifications of the pandemic, between canceled exhibitions, dealing with extraordinary financial losses, and numerous layoffs and furloughs. It was reported that, in April 2020 alone, the cultural sector in Italy was expected to lose 3 billion euros and Spain was expected to lose 980 million euros.[1] In the United States, the American Alliance of Museums (“AAM”) announced that American museums were losing at least $33 million a day and estimates that a third will not reopen after COVID-19.[2] Some of the first states to initiate reopening began as early as April 24th and many other states began to follow their lead throughout the end of April into May.[3] While states and other countries begin to reopen, museums have to think about how to approach reopening in a safe manner for both museumgoers and their staff. Deaccessioning has also become a hot issue for museums that may have to sell part of their collections to stay afloat.

Deaccessioning in a Post-COVID-19 World

Art museums are very familiar with the concept of deaccessioning; the mechanism of officially removing an item from the listed holdings of a library, museum, or art gallery, typically in order to sell to raise funds. Deaccessioning a work of art from a museum’s collection occurs through transfer of ownership either to another institution or by individual sale, exchange, or grant. Museums use deaccession to either improve the usefulness of a collection to adhere to the intentions and mission of the museum, or to acquire other works of art that will better suit the needs of the collection.[4]

Under normal circumstances, deaccessioning is considered an ethical violation for an art museum. The ethical dilemma usually comes up in debates about how to use the funds from the deaccessioning process. “Is it worth paying to keep the lights on in the museum when you sell the collection to do so?”[5] The Association of Art Museum Directors (“AAMD”) policy states that deaccessioning may only be done to improve the collection and to further the museum’s long-term curatorial goals. In essence, this means museums can only sell an art collection to buy or improve another collection. Deaccessioning funds should never be used towards operating expenses. This policy is in place so the attention of museums stays focused on the artwork. The policy is a matter usually for the board’s discretion only, but as shown in the 2013 lawsuit against DIA Art Foundation, it rarely goes without notice from the public.[6] The two founders of DIA, Heiner and Fariha Friedrich, filed a lawsuit against both the foundation’s current administrators and Sotheby’s auction house for injunctive relief to prevent the deaccession of works by Cy Twombly, John Chamberlain and Barnett Newman. The Friedrichs alleged that Dia’s board undermined the original mission of preserving the donations for future generations by auctioning these works off to the highest bidder. The case was voluntarily discontinued six months later.

However, due to COVID-19, on April 15, 2020, the AAMD announced that museum’s will not be censured, sanctioned, suspended, or expelled as they usually would. The AAMD reported that the museum’s good faith use of deaccessioning proceeds to pay for “direct care” of the museum’s collections is permitted.

According to the AAMD, direct care is investing a museum’s funds into existing collections by enhancing their “life, usefulness or quality and thereby ensuring they will continue to benefit the public.”[7] The museum must adopt a policy outlining what expenses it considers to be direct care and make the policy outline publicly available. Although this is a very helpful and lenient exception to the AAMD’s typical rules, museums still have to be careful with deciding which funds to use for direct relief. The use of donor-restricted funds is regulated by state law so some museums will not be able to use these funds for direct care needs.[8] In other situations, a gift from a donor can have certain restrictions that are enforced in the contract. Some contracts might forbid an object’s deaccession or restrict what can be done with the sale proceeds. Museums must be meticulous in deciding how to use the new deaccessioning exceptions during the pandemic. In the statement released by the AAMD, it was made clear that the exceptions are temporary and will only be in effect through April 10, 2022.[9]

When a Museum Closes…

Hopefully AAMD’s leniency will be enough relief to help museums stay in business, as 95% of the world’s museums have been forced to temporarily close due to COVID.[10] Phillip Kennicott from the Washington Post explains, “Consider all the ways arts and cultural groups earn money: from ticket sales and admission fees; participation in educational programs; renting spaces for galas and gatherings; investments and endowments; and the largesse of public and private giving. Every one of those streams is now potentially shut off.”[11] To keep communities engaged during the closures, museums have done online exhibitions, seminars, and tours. Although this has helped keep society’s artistic interest peaked, there are a lot of other concerns in relation to the closure of museums. Museums have to think about problems revolving conservation and safety of collections.

Research on the deterioration of the virus is still under development so all current instruction for museums is based on data from general human coronavirus research. The International Council of Museums (“ICOM”) has put together a list of “pandemic guidelines”on how to deal with conservation during the pandemic, such as limiting handling of collections, extending loans, having objects on display cleaned only by trained conservators, and restricting access to areas that cannot be disinfected completely. Museums should also have a quarantine area where infested objects with minimum handling can be separated from other collections. Overall, prudent safety and conservation procedures call for more frequent cleaning of areas where people have access to.[12]

Furthermore, while museums are closed, people and staff (including security guards) are required to remain home, therefore, museums are at a greater risk of receiving unwanted visitors. While the Singer Laren museum in the Netherlands was closed to the public, the Vincent Van Gogh painting, The Parsonage Garden at Nuenen in Spring (1884), was stolen. On March 30, 2020, around 3:15 a.m. the thieves smashed a large glass door at the front of the museum. The museum’s alarm was triggered, but police reached the scene too late and the perpetrators were long gone by the time of their arrival. The painting, which depicts the short time period in which Van Gogh lived with his parents in the garden of the parsonage, is estimated to be worth over £5 million[13] and was on loan from Groninger Museum.[14] Adding to this sad occurrence, this was the only painting by Van Gogh in the Groninger Museum’s collection. Police said that the painting has been added to Interpol’s stolen art database, but there has yet to be any leads on where the painting is and who stole it.[15] In June 2020, a “hostage-style” photograph of the painting was found to be circulating in the criminal underworld.[16] This can be seen as good news, as the painting has not been destroyed.

Museums around the world are taking this incident as a learning lesson. Just because there are no visitors does not mean that there should be less security. ICOM suggests to check security and alarm systems, adapt new procedures and additional protection plans, communicate with police services on a regular basis, collaborate with other cultural institutions that face the same difficulties, and involve neighbors and the local community. While establishing thorough security measures museums might also want to investigate insurance policies. At a minimum, museum insurance should include property and liability insurance coverage to help protect a museum’s building, exhibits, on loan art, and art in storage.[17]

On the topic of insurance, many art-related events have had to be canceled by their organizers, including the Met Gala,[18] Venice Art and Architecture Biennales, La Paris Biennale, Art Basel Switzerland, Object & Thing, New York, and many more.[19] Hopefully, these events were covered by event cancelation insurance, which may contain “force majeure” clauses that explain how risks and losses should be allocated in the event of an unforeseeable external event that makes performance impossible.[20] Depending on the particular language in a given contract, force majeure clauses may not apply to every coronavirus-caused cancellation unless the primary city has declared an official law banning large events. In June 2020, the Art Newspaper reported that UK arts institutions are preparing to file a class-action lawsuit against major insurers for failing to cover business interruption claims during the pandemic.

… Another One Reopens

As the pandemic begins to taper in some states and countries, art museums are beginning to think about how to reopen. The International Committee for Museums and Collections of Modern Art has issued new safety guidelines for reopening museums. The majority were elicited from the National Gallery Singapore, M+ Hong Kong, and Mori Art Museum when they responded to the outbreak of COVID-19 in March. These safety guidelines include temperature screenings of all visitors, implementing contact tracing measures, ensuring all visitors wear masks, suspending large events of 100 or more participants at a time, and suspending guided tours.[21]

Countries may turn to France for advice on reopening systems and procedures, as France began reopening small museums in May 2020. While government officials have not explicitly defined what qualifies as a “small museum”, gatherings will be restricted to no more than ten people and reopening dates will vary depending on if the museum is in a “red” area, where there is a high occurrence of Covid-19, or “green” area where there is a lower risk. For example, the Foundation Giacometti in Paris is considered to be a small museum and reopened on May 15th. The Foundation’s director Catherine Grenier explains, “We’ve decided to open soon because it’s important to serve the public and reintroduce people to artworks after this virtual-viewing period and to say, symbolically, that the world is starting again, and that culture is here.”[22] The Foundation is asking interested visitors to register online so that they can retain relatively small groups. Larger French museums such as the Musee d’Orsay reopened in June and the Louvre, the largest museum in the world, is due to do so on July 7. On the other side of the Atlantic, while the Museum of Fine Arts in Houston, TX was the first major US art institution to reopen in May with strict security measures, The Metropolitan Museum of Art pushed reopening to late August. The former encourages the purchase of advance timed-entry tickets online in order to keep visitors below 25 percent capacity on a room-by-room basis. Masks are mandatory for everyone in the building, visitors will have their temperatures taken upon entering the galleries, plastic panels will be placed in front of the admissions desk and gift shop register, no food or drinks are permitted, no large bags will be allowed, water fountains and the cafe will be closed, and social distancing rules will be enforced at all times.[23] This is likely to be the reality for many museumgoers for months to come, which is a small price to pay compared to the luxury of a quiet and less crowded visit.

Artists, art workers, and institutions are staying hopeful that the world will not abandon them during the pandemic. While museums concentrate on temporary rules for deaccessioning and guidelines for reopening, they will hopefully begin to evolve towards a more sustainable model after the coronavirus pandemic.


Endnotes:

  1. International Council of Museums, Statement on the Necessity for Relief Funds for Museums During the COVID-19 Crisis (Apr. 2, 2020), https://icom.museum/en/news/statement-on-the-necessity-for-relief-funds-for-museums-during-the-covid-19-crisis/. ↑
  2. American Alliance of Museums, American Alliance of Museums Urges US Congress to Include $4 Billion for Nonprofit Museums in COVID-19 Economic Relief Legislation (Mar. 19, 2020), https://www.aam-us.org/2020/03/19/american-alliance-of-museums-urges-us-congress-to-include-4-billion-for-nonprofit-museums-in-covid-19-economic-relief-legislation/. ↑
  3. Sarah Mervosh et al., See How All 50 States Are Reopening, The New York Times (June 8, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/states-reopen-map-coronavirus.html. ↑
  4. Jennie Nadel, Berkshire Stock: Much to do About Deaccessioning, Center for Art Law (July 6, 2018), https://itsartlaw.org/2018/07/06/berkshire-stock-much-to-do-about-deaccessioning/. ↑
  5. Hanoch Sheps, Columbia Law School Event Explores the Legal & Ethical Dilemmas of Deaccessioning as DIA Bankruptcy Pushes the Envelope on Deaccession Debate, Center for Art Law (Nov. 5, 2013), https://itsartlaw.org/2013/11/05/columbia-law-school-event-explores-the-legal-ethical-dilemmas-of-deaccessioning-as-dia-bankruptcy-pushes-the-envelope-on-deaccesion-debate/. ↑
  6. Summons, Heiner Friedrich & Fariha Friedrich v. DIA Art Foundation & Sotheby’s, Inc., No. 160379/2013 (N.Y. App. Div. filed Nov. 7, 2013). ↑
  7. John Sare & Justin Zaremby, Nonprofits Take on the COVID-19 Crisis: Art Museum Standards Temporarily Relaxed to Help Museums Meet New Economic Challenges, Patterson Belknap (Apr. 20, 2020), https://www.pbwt.com/exempt-org-resource-blog/nonprofits-take-on-the-covid-19-crisis-art-museum-standards-temporarily-relaxed-to-help-museums-meet-new-economic-challenges. ↑
  8. See id. (referring to the New York Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act).
 ↑
  9. Association of Art Museum Directors, AAMD Board of Trustees Approves Resolution to Provide Additional Financial Flexibility to Art Museums During Pandemic Crisis (Apr. 15, 2020), https://aamd.org/for-the-media/press-release/aamd-board-of-trustees-approves-resolution-to-provide-additional. ↑
  10. International Council of Museums, Ensuring Cultural Heritage Security During Lockdown: A Challenge for Museum Professionals and Police Services (Apr. 23, 2020), https://icom.museum/en/news/ensuring-cultural-heritage-security-during-lockdown-a-challenge-for-museum-professionals-and-police-services/. ↑
  11. Philip Kennicott, The Arts Will Recover from the Coronavirus, as They Did After 9/11. But They Might Look a Lot Different., The Washington Post (Mar. 19, 2020), https://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/museums/the-arts-will-recover-from-the-coronavirus-as-they-did-after-sept-11-but-they-might-look-a-lot-different/2020/03/19/40e97950-6934-11ea-b313-df458622c2cc_story.html. ↑
  12. International Council of Museums, Recommendations for the Conservation of Museum Collections (Apr. 16, 2020), https://icom.museum/en/news/recommendations-for-the-conservation-of-museum-collections/. ↑
  13. Daniel Boffey, Van Gogh Painting Stolen from Dutch Museum, The Guardian (Mar. 30, 2020), https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/mar/30/van-gogh-painting-stolen-from-dutch-museum. ↑
  14. Laurence Norman & Kelly Crow, Thieves Steal Van Gogh Painting From Museum Shut by Coronavirus, The Wall Street Journal (Mar. 30, 2020), https://www.wsj.com/articles/thieves-steal-van-gogh-painting-from-museum-shut-by-coronavirus-11585586273. ↑
  15. Mick Krever & Amy Woodyatt, Van Gogh Painting Stolen from Museum Shuttered by Covid-19 Pandemic, CNN (Mar. 31, 2020), https://www.cnn.com/style/article/van-gogh-stolen-covid-19-intl-scli/index.html. ↑
  16. Naomi Rea, A Remarkable Hostage-Like Photograph Showing ‘Proof of Life’ of a Stolen Van Gogh Painting Is Circulating in the Criminal Underworld, artnet news, (June 18 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/van-gogh-hostage-photo-1888189?utm_content=from_artnetnewsbar&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=US%209:40%20a.m.%20newsletter%20for%206/19/20&utm_term=US%20Daily%20Newsletter%20%5BMORNING%5D ↑
  17. The Hartford, Cultural Organizations & Museum Insurance Coverage, https://www.thehartford.com/business-insurance/museum-insurance-coverage (last visited June 8, 2020). ↑
  18. See Vanessa Friedman & Jessica Testa, The Met Gala Has Been Postponed ‘Indefinitely’, The New York Times (Mar. 16, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/16/fashion/met-gala-postponed.html> (explaining the ramifications and the large amount of money lost from postponing the Met Gala). ↑
  19. Artforum, Art World Coronavirus Tracker, (June 1, 2020), https://www.artforum.com/news/coronavirus-art-world-tracker-canceled-and-rescheduled-events-82427. ↑
  20. Kate Lucas, How COVID-19 May Impact the Art Law Sphere in the Coming Months, Grossman LLP (Mar. 31, 2020), https://www.grossmanllp.com/How-COVID-19-May-Impact-the-Art-Law-Sphere-In-the. ↑
  21. International Committee for Museums and Collections of Modern Art, Precautions for Museums during Covid-19 Pandemic (Apr. 29, 2020), https://cimam.org/resources-publications/precautions-museums-during-covid-19-pandemic/. ↑
  22. Anna Sansom, French Galleries and ‘Small Museums’ to Reopen in Stages from 11 May, The Art Newspaper (Apr. 29, 2020), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/galleries-and-small-museums-to-re-open-in-france. ↑
  23. Taylor Dafoe, The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, Is the First Major Art Institution in the US to Reopen. Here’s How They’re Making It Work, artnet news (May 19, 2020), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/museum-fine-arts-houston-reopening-1865358. ↑

About the Author: Olivia Baker is a Summer 2020 Intern at the Center for Art Law and a rising senior at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, studying studio art with minors in business and art history.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Updates from the Video Game World: The Copyright Issues of Realistic Gameplay
Next Homage or Faux Pas: Cultural Appropriation in Fashion Apparel

Related Posts

M. Dougenis, Poor Butterfly (1986) (Photo credit: https://sagharborexpress.com/)

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Miriam “Molly” Dougenis

January 26, 2022

As I sit studying: Art is getting its own “stock exchange”

December 15, 2010
logo

Art Dealer Is Charged With Stealing $88 Million

March 26, 2009
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law