• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Ransomware Attack on Christie’s: A Wake-Up Call for Art World Cybersecurity?
Back

Ransomware Attack on Christie’s: A Wake-Up Call for Art World Cybersecurity?

June 24, 2024

Screen capture of Christie's page mobile post hack.

By Rachel Sundar

On May 27th, 2024, the cyber-extortionist group RansomHub, notorious for their recent attack on Change Healthcare, published a statement on the dark web, taking responsibility for a cyber assault on Christie’s, one of the world’s largest auction houses, with key locations in cities such as New York, London, Paris, Hong Kong, and Dubai.[1] The ransomware attack on Christie’s underscores the vulnerability of digital systems in the art world. As institutions such as auction houses, galleries, and even art databases increasingly rely on digital infrastructures, implementing robust cybersecurity measures and prioritising data protection become paramount in safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining the trust of clientele. Ransomware is a form of malicious software designed to extract data and restrict access to a computer system until a payment is made.[2] In this case, RansomHub was able to breach Christie’s digital security system, encrypt sensitive files and hold them for ransom.[3] In doing so, it forced the auction house to shut down its website during the entirety of the crucial sales week of New York’s marquee auction events, causing significant disruptions to the company’s operations.[4] Not only does Christie’s website serve as a vital tool for pre-auction arrangements––facilitating bidder registration, catalogue browsing, and pre-sale inquiries––but in a post-pandemic world, it has also become indispensable to the auctions themselves.[5] In the past few years, online bidding has emerged as the preferred method of participation for both local and international buyers, ensuring broader market reach and heightened bidding activity. According to Christie’s CEO Guillaume Cerutti in a statement to Vanity Fair, “80% of all bids across sales at the house last year were placed online, up from 45% in 2019.”[6]

Despite the security breach, Christie’s chose not to make an immediate public statement addressing the ransomware attack in an attempt to protect and prioritise upcoming sales.[7] Instead, the auction house referred to the incident as a “technology security issue,” proceeding with all six scheduled 20th/21st Century Art live auctions, achieving the highest total sales of any auction house for the week.[8] This success was largely attributable to “Christie’s Live,” a digital platform for remote bidding, which remained accessible during the incident and allowed registered bidders to participate online.[9] In addition, online catalogues were made available in PDF format on a temporary holding site, providing further convenience and accessibility for potential buyers.[10] Besides online bidding, clients turned to in-person and phone bidding throughout the week.[11] The auctions in question––highlighted by the 20th Century Evening Sale, the 21st Century Evening Sale, and The Rosa de la Cruz Collection Evening Sale––achieved a leading market performance, with a combined total of $640,219,290.[12] While these sales results may suggest a sense of reassurance among clients, the long-term repercussions of the incident on future sales remain uncertain, particularly in light of the recent claims made by RansomHub.

In a post on the dark web on Monday, May 27th, RansomHub claimed to have accessed data on “at least 500,000” Christie’s customers from “all over the world,” including full names, document numbers, nationalities, and birth dates.[13] The hackers have since threatened to release this sensitive data by the end of May, unless Christie’s complies with their ransom demand.[14]Although these claims have not yet been verified, “several cybersecurity experts have said RansomHub was a known ransomware operation and that the claim was plausible”.[15] Should RansomHub’s claims prove accurate, the incident may potentially result in far more profound consequences than initially anticipated by Christie’s clientele. In an interview with the New York Times, Brett Callow, a threat analyst at the New Zealand-based cybersecurity firm, Emsisoft, stated that while many types of cyberattacks can often be recovered from relatively swiftly, ransomware stands as a notable exception.[16]

In a statement released on May 26th, Edward Lewine, a spokesperson for Christie’s, addressed the situation more comprehensively, stating that an internal investigation had confirmed that there had been “unauthorised access by a third party to parts of Christie’s network,”[17] and that “the group behind the incident took some limited amount of personal data relating to some of our clients,”[18] but that “there was no evidence that any financial or transactional records were compromised.”[19]

The auction house has since taken several steps to enhance its cyber-security, including notifying the relevant law enforcement authorities of the incident, such as the FBI and the British police, as well as maintaining communication with clients whose data had been compromised.[20] While the full extent of the stolen data is unclear, this cyberattack highlights the heightened vulnerability of auction houses in a digitised era. Since its foundation in 1766, the world-leading auction house has cultivated a reputation for excellence in the art world, hosting auctions for coveted masterpieces and boasting record-breaking sales. Given the nature of these high-value transactions, the security and confidentiality of their digital infrastructure are paramount. The ramifications of such a breach are far-reaching, endangering not only the privacy and security of individual clients but also undermining a fundamental tenet of the auction industry itself: the imperative of discretion.

Beyond raising concerns about cybersecurity and client confidentiality, this breach has also led to legal repercussions for the auction house, further underscoring the severity of the situation. A class-action lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York on June 3rd.[21] The complaint alleges that the personal information of over 500,000 current and former buyers was left vulnerable due to the company’s failure to implement adequate cybersecurity measures.[22] The exposed data allegedly includes full names, passport numbers, and other sensitive details from passport scans, which, if verified, would leave affected individuals at risk for identity theft and fraud.[23] A pre-trial conference for the case has been scheduled for September 10th.[24] This lawsuit highlights the potential legal and financial fallout that even the most established institutions may be exposed to in the wake of such cybersecurity incidents. Despite its scale and prominence, Christie’s has not been able to avoid this risk. Nonetheless, as a larger institution, it is likely to possess the resources and expertise necessary to address the breach and reinforce its cybersecurity infrastructure. However, the incident also raises broader concerns about the preparedness of smaller auction houses and players in the art market, such as galleries, that may lack the same capabilities to defend against cyber attacks.

Sources:

  1. Zachary Small, Ransomware Group Claims Responsibility for Christie’s Hack, N. Y. Times (May 27, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/27/arts/design/hackers-claim-christies-attack.html. ↑
  2. Info. Comm’r’s Off., Ransomware and Data Protection Compliance, ico., https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/security/a-guide-to-data-security/ransomware-and-data-protection-compliance/, (last visited June 20, 2024). ↑
  3. Small, supra note 1. ↑
  4. Brian Boucher, Ransomware Gang Threatens to Leak Data on Christie’s Clients After Major Hack, Artnet (May 27, 2024), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/ransomhub-christies-hack-2493192. ↑
  5. Place Bids from Anywhere in the World, Christie’s, https://www.christies.com/en/stories/place-bids-from-anywhere-in-the-world-4bfd8c5eb92a4cf1b74b34cfb9f5eb2c (last visited June 20, 2024). ↑
  6. Nate Freeman, Selling Through the Christie’s Cyberattack, Vanity Fair (May 16, 2024), https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/christies-sale-hack. ↑
  7. Zachary Small, Ransomware Group Claims Responsibility for Christie’s Hack, N. Y. Times (May 27, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/27/arts/design/hackers-claim-christies-attack.html. ↑
  8. Daniel Cassady, Hacker Outfit RansomHub Claims Credit for Christie’s Auction Week ‘Technology Security Issue’, Artnews (May 27, 2024, 7:39 PM), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/ransomhub-hack-christies-website-1234707976/. ↑
  9. Christie’s, supra note 4. ↑
  10. Zachary Small, Hobbled by Cyberattack, Christie’s Says Marquee Sales Will Proceed, N. Y. Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/12/arts/design/christies-cyberattack.html (May 14, 2024). ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Achieving $640 Million and Counting, Christie’s 20th/21st Century Art Sales Lead the Market, Christie’s (May 20, 2024), https://www.christies.com/en/stories/20-21-may-2024-marquee-week-sale-results-b4efc2671a484b7f91571852025eaa8b. ↑
  13. Kabir Jhala, Hackers Claim Responsibility for Christie’s Cyberattack and Threaten to Release Client Data, Art Newspaper (May 28, 2024), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/05/28/hackers-claim-christies-cyberattack-and-threaten-to-release-client-data. ↑
  14. Id. ↑
  15. Small, supra note 1. ↑
  16. Id. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Id. ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Zachary Small, After Hack, Christie’s Gives Details of Compromised Client Data, N. Y. Times (May 30, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/arts/design/christies-hack-client-data.html. ↑
  21. Karen Ho, Christie’s Hit With Class-Action Lawsuit Over Client Data After Cyberattack Shuts Down Website, Artnews (June 7, 2024, 5:25 PM), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/christies-class-action-lawsuit-client-data-cyberattack-ransomhub-1234708936/. ↑
  22. Id. ↑
  23. Id. ↑
  24. Id. ↑

 

About the Author:

Rachel Sundar, a postgraduate fellow at the Center for Art Law, recently graduated from Sciences Po Paris Law School, where she majored in Economic Law, specialising in Innovation Law. Her primary interest lies in exploring the effects of digital creation and artificial intelligence on the art world, with a particular focus on issues of authorship and copyright protection.

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: Kerson v. Vermont Law School, Inc.
Next Case Review: Farmer-Paellmann v Smithsonian Inst.

Related Posts

Polovtsian stone sculptures (babas) on Mount Kremenets following Russian shelling during the Battle of Izium. One of the statues was completely destroyed. A nearby World War II monument (seen in the right-hand background) was partially destroyed.

Too Little, Too Late? Funding for Cultural Heritage Protection during Armed Conflict

October 31, 2025

Larry Gagosian Withdraws Suit Against Billionaire Ronald Perelman

October 25, 2012
(Credit: Blue Shield Austria, Blue Shield Placed in the National Historical Museum, Buenos Aires)

Protecting Culture in Times of Conflict

April 8, 2024
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law