• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Scrolling Through Antiquities: INTERPOL ID-Art App
Back

Scrolling Through Antiquities: INTERPOL ID-Art App

August 9, 2021

By Claire Darrow.

In a continued effort to combat art crime and the illicit traffic of cultural heritage, in 2021, the International Criminal Police Organization (“INTERPOL”) has launched a new app that aims to make fighting trafficking as easy as scrolling on Instagram. Art crime and antiquities trafficking are not blameless offences, often involving many actors and disrupting the art trade in a variety of ways more frequently than most might anticipate. In May 2021, Kim Kardashian found herself in the middle of a trafficked antiquity scandal after the U.S. government determined she had acquired a statue that was illegally smuggled and exported from Italy. To confront the ever evolving and ever surprising world of art crime and antiquities trafficking, INTERPOL, the world’s largest police organization, is continuing to evolve and surprise as well. Through the novel ID-Art App, INTERPOL seeks to increase the general public’s accessibility to their database, encourage due diligence among law enforcement and art collectors alike, and raise international awareness for this largely unrecognized reality. With early successes in both Italy and the Netherlands, the ID-Art App may prove itself to be an invaluable tool in locating stolen objects, increasing accessibility, and fighting transnational criminal activity more broadly.[1]

The Global Scope

In 2020, UNESCO estimated that the illicit trade in cultural goods was worth approximately 10 billion dollars, though it is hard to assign precise numbers to an illicit underground market.[2] Due to the often highly lucrative nature of this illicit trade, the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (“UNTOC”) explains “there is evidence that leads us to establish the link between trafficking in cultural property and other types of transnational organized crime such as the drug trade, arms smuggling, violence, corruption and money laundering.”[3] Especially in conflict zones, looting of archaeological sites “is highly organized and constitutes a major source of financing for criminal and terrorist organizations.”[4] However, this activity is not unique to those zones nor is it localized in one country or region. Antiquities trafficking is international in scope and thus demands a global response. Corrado Catesi, INTERPOL’s Works of Art Unit coordinator, illustrates the international dimensions of illicit trafficking saying: cultural theft “is not a ‘knife crime.’ It involves larger criminal organizations and affects all countries worldwide.”[5]

Conventions/Legal Dimensions

Since its founding in 1945, UNESCO has held three major conventions to address this international problem. The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention 1954, the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, and the 1995 International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (“UNIDROIT”) Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objectscomprise a global framework of reference. UNESCO considers these three conventions as pioneering instruments in the fight against cultural heritage crimes. Consisting of a patchwork of recommendations, these binding and enforceable legal instruments hold signatory members to uniform standards when it comes to combating attacks on cultural heritage.[6]

Although these conventions do raise awareness and present a call to action to the member countries of UNESCO, national laws and local approaches often complicate the unified goals outlined in conventions and treaties. The UNESCO Toolkit: Fighting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property (“the UNESCO Toolkit”) acknowledges that “the diversity of national legislations leads to loopholes and complexities in the implementation of international conventions…This situation may create problems if mutual legal assistance is required; meanwhile, the traffickers benefit from such discrepancies to continue their illegal business.”[7] In Egypt, for example, “private ownership (of antiquities) is not permitted and the law imposes sanctions of imprisonment with hard labour for the possession or trade in such antiquities”; while in Greece, “persons who export or attempt to export cultural property in violation of the law may be sentenced to imprisonment of up to ten years.”[8] Even when UNESCO member countries sign such conventions, their own national laws can further obfuscate the already complicated matter of hunting down stolen artifacts and prosecuting the people that are connected to the crime. 

The Role of Databases

The UNESCO Toolkit further highlights that different combinations of international conventions and national laws can yield varying results, emphasizing the need for a holistic response based on all relevant tools in addition to a clear legal framework. International databases are just one of those vital tools that can complement the multiple levels of laws and ensure a comprehensive approach to illegal actions. The International Foundation for Art Research (“IFAR”)’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database, The Art Loss Register (“ALR”), and INTERPOL’s Stolen Works of Art Database represent a small sampling of the many types of databases that serve as crucial resources used at multiple levels of the trade.[9]

To understand INTERPOL’s ID-Art’s place among databases like IFAR’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database and the ALR, it is helpful to take a brief look into the models and targeted goals of each. IFAR’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database sprouted from their “Stolen Art Alert” newsletter that began in the mid-1970’s in response to an increased awareness and prevalence of thefts and lootings.[10] This was the first publicly available international archive of stolen art and served as a model for databases that sprung up in the 1990’s as public and private organizations started to digitize their own archives. The ALR was originally part of IFAR as a commercial enterprise to expand and market the database and took over IFAR’s database in 1997. Today, the IFAR database is a non-profit that requires users to register and either pay a yearly subscription fee or pay for 2- or 4-hour session fees to access their educational database. Not only for museum-professionals, the database is targeted towards lay people, collectors, scholars, artists, and art lawyers. In addition to ownership records and stolen items archives, the database has an extensive legal section with case laws and a legal glossary with images of artworks involved in past and current disputes.

The ALR, on the other hand, has been a commercial enterprise from its inception and thus targets a different audience of collectors, insurers, and law enforcement more interested in collections management and risk assessment. The ALR prides itself on its extensive records and claims to hold “the world’s largest private database of lost, stolen and looted art, antiques and collectibles, currently listing more than 700,000 items.”[11] As a private database, the ability to access this exclusive collection — to either search potential purchases, register new objects, or report missing ones — comes at a steep price. Loss registrations, for example, are charged on a basis of £15, €17.50 or US$20 per item (plus VAT where applicable).[12] While fees such as this may not prove to be a large burden for some, it does ultimately reduce accessibility and discourage people from taking action to register or report stolen works.

ID-Art App

  • Screenshot taken by Claire Darrow: ID-Art App, Tutorial Page, July 30, 2021

This is where INTERPOL’s ID-Art App comes into play. As an intergovernmental organization that addresses transnational crimes, INTERPOL has real incentive to make its public database free and accessible to users across the globe, in contrast to private databases like ALR and ArtClaim Register (“ArtClaim”) (est. 2015). The goal of accessibility is apparent from the moment a user downloads the ID-Art App. The app is free on the App Store or Google Play Store and does not require additional fees to search the database or record an entry. Its simple, user-friendly interface and multiple operating languages of Arabic, English, French, and Spanish cement the ID-Art app as a helpful tool that can reach a large audience. The 3 main tabs on the app’s homepage convey the goals of the app: database search, inventory creation, and site reporting. These combined features could fill in the knowledge gaps left by a patchwork of conventions and a mosaic of public and private databases. In terms of breadth, accuracy, and accessibility, the ID-Art App may change the ways stolen art is documented and vulnerable sites are recorded by encouraging people to conduct due diligence before and after an object is reported as missing.

While access to INTERPOL’s database has historically been limited to law enforcement agencies and authorized private users, the general public has been able to access limited amounts of data about recently reported and recovered works since 2009. On the app, users now have unrestricted access to INTERPOL’s 52,000-work database that includes everything from looted antiquities to artworks like Jan Vermeer’s The Concert (1660) stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990.[13] Like IFAR’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database, the ID-Art App has the potential to appeal to a large audience of museum professionals, collectors, scholars, and art-sleuthing amateurs.

For those that fall into any of those categories, using the app to search the database or record an object is straight-forward. To search Jan Vermeer’s The Concert (1660), users first select their country and language and continue to a home screen containing four tabs: Stolen Items, Search, My Inventory, and Settings. On the Stolen Items tab, users can browse the stolen art reported to INTERPOL in the country where they are located or can jump over to the Search tab and manually enter criteria such as object type, medium, and artist. If users miraculously come across The Concert in some forgotten basement or hanging above a mantel somewhere, they could also use the Visual Search feature in the Search tab to take a picture of the artwork and find a match in INTERPOL’s database. If a user wanted to report the work at this stage, they would have to register with the app and provide personal information to confirm their identity and legitimize the report.

Conclusion

As the underground business of art looting and antiquities trafficking continues to rely more heavily on social media and smartphones, INTERPOL is once again adapting to changes in criminal activity and developments of technology.[14] By making this database completely free and accessible to the general public, ID-Art App goes beyond what any government-sponsored database, privately-funded database, or any other subsidiary resources has ever done before in terms of accessibility and transparency. Ernesto Ottone, UNESCO’s Assistant Director General for Culture, praised the app’s innovation: “INTERPOL’s ID-Art App is a milestone in the international fight against the illicit trafficking of cultural property,” “Indeed it is both preventive and reactive as it allows everyone to record cultural objects and sites into the app. This has the potential to improve due diligence practices with potential buyers of cultural artefacts.”[15] Beyond improving due diligence, the app has the potential to reach audiences across the world that may not know about this problem or feel that they, as individuals, have little to contribute to this fight. The looting of art and destruction of cultural property may feel like issues that are beyond an individual’s control, but the ID-Art App shows that individuals are key players in the reporting and prevention of these crimes, while demonstrating that it can even happen in the palm of a hand.


Endnotes:

[1] INTERPOL Launches App to Better Protect Cultural Heritage, INTERPOL (May 6, 2021), https://www.INTERPOL.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2021/INTERPOL-launches-app-to-better-protect-cultural-heritage.

[2] The Real Price of Art: International UNESCO Campaign Reveals the Hidden Face of Art Trafficking, UNESCO (Oct. 20, 2020), https://en.unesco.org/news/real-price-art-international-unesco-campaign-reveals-hidden-face-art-trafficking.

[3] Fighting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: A Toolkit for European Judiciary and Law Enforcement, UNESCO (2018), http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/Toolkit.pdf.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Corrado Catesi, Due diligence in the art market | INTERPOL’s new app to trace and identify stolen cultural property, INTERPOL (2021)

[6] Fighting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: A Toolkit for European Judiciary and Law Enforcement, UNESCO (2018), http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/Toolkit.pdf.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Mia Tomijima, Competing or Complementing? Art Law Databases Proliferate, Center for Art Law (Apr. 23, 2015), https://itsartlaw.org/2015/04/23/competing-or-complementing-art-loss-databases-proliferate/.

[10] International Foundation for Art Research, https://www.ifar.org/about.php.

[11] Art Loss Register, https://www.artloss.com/register/#:~:text=Any%20uniquely%20identifiable%20item%20can,case%20of%20a%20large%20theft (2021).

[12] International Foundation for Art Research, https://www.ifar.org/about.php.

[13] Nora McGreevy, INTERPOL’s New App Combats Art Crime and Protects Cultural Heritage, Smithsonian Magazine (May 12, 2021), https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/INTERPOL-launches-app-help-people-report-stolen-art-180977700/.

[14] Lucy Siegel, Social Media: A Smuggler’s Tool For Looted Antiquities, Center for Art Law (Jun. 16, 2020), https://itsartlaw.org/2020/06/16/social-media-a-smugglers-tool-for-looted-antiquities/.

[15] David Klein, INTERPOL Launches App to Combat Looted Art Trade, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (May 8, 2021), https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/14358-INTERPOL-launches-app-to-help-combat-looted-art-trade.

About the Author: Claire Darrow is a Summer 2021 Intern at the Center for Art Law. She is a rising senior at Middlebury College in Middlebury, Vermont where she is studying art history and romance languages.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous On the Impact of Arts Council England’s New Restitution Guidelines
Next An Introduction to Swiss Copyright Law

Related Posts

"Limited Edition" Murakami Lawsuit Settled …

March 5, 2011

Welcome to the Machine: Law, Artificial Intelligence and the Visual Arts

November 26, 2018
emersive experience monet

The Public Domain and Immersive Art: How Copyright Law Impacts Interactive Art Experiences

March 23, 2023
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
What happens when culture becomes collateral damag What happens when culture becomes collateral damage in war?
In this episode of Art in Brief, we speak with Patty Gerstenblith, a leading expert on cultural heritage law, about the destruction of cultural sites in recent armed conflicts.

We examine the role of international courts, the limits of accountability, and whether the law can truly protect history in times of war.

We would like to also thank Rebecca Bennett for all of her help on this episode. 

 🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #lawyer #podcast #artpodcast #culturalheritage #armedconflict #internationallaw
Where did you go to recharge your batteries? Where did you go to recharge your batteries?
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.