• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Scrolling Through Antiquities: INTERPOL ID-Art App
Back

Scrolling Through Antiquities: INTERPOL ID-Art App

August 9, 2021

By Claire Darrow.

In a continued effort to combat art crime and the illicit traffic of cultural heritage, in 2021, the International Criminal Police Organization (“INTERPOL”) has launched a new app that aims to make fighting trafficking as easy as scrolling on Instagram. Art crime and antiquities trafficking are not blameless offences, often involving many actors and disrupting the art trade in a variety of ways more frequently than most might anticipate. In May 2021, Kim Kardashian found herself in the middle of a trafficked antiquity scandal after the U.S. government determined she had acquired a statue that was illegally smuggled and exported from Italy. To confront the ever evolving and ever surprising world of art crime and antiquities trafficking, INTERPOL, the world’s largest police organization, is continuing to evolve and surprise as well. Through the novel ID-Art App, INTERPOL seeks to increase the general public’s accessibility to their database, encourage due diligence among law enforcement and art collectors alike, and raise international awareness for this largely unrecognized reality. With early successes in both Italy and the Netherlands, the ID-Art App may prove itself to be an invaluable tool in locating stolen objects, increasing accessibility, and fighting transnational criminal activity more broadly.[1]

The Global Scope

In 2020, UNESCO estimated that the illicit trade in cultural goods was worth approximately 10 billion dollars, though it is hard to assign precise numbers to an illicit underground market.[2] Due to the often highly lucrative nature of this illicit trade, the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (“UNTOC”) explains “there is evidence that leads us to establish the link between trafficking in cultural property and other types of transnational organized crime such as the drug trade, arms smuggling, violence, corruption and money laundering.”[3] Especially in conflict zones, looting of archaeological sites “is highly organized and constitutes a major source of financing for criminal and terrorist organizations.”[4] However, this activity is not unique to those zones nor is it localized in one country or region. Antiquities trafficking is international in scope and thus demands a global response. Corrado Catesi, INTERPOL’s Works of Art Unit coordinator, illustrates the international dimensions of illicit trafficking saying: cultural theft “is not a ‘knife crime.’ It involves larger criminal organizations and affects all countries worldwide.”[5]

Conventions/Legal Dimensions

Since its founding in 1945, UNESCO has held three major conventions to address this international problem. The 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict with Regulations for the Execution of the Convention 1954, the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, and the 1995 International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (“UNIDROIT”) Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objectscomprise a global framework of reference. UNESCO considers these three conventions as pioneering instruments in the fight against cultural heritage crimes. Consisting of a patchwork of recommendations, these binding and enforceable legal instruments hold signatory members to uniform standards when it comes to combating attacks on cultural heritage.[6]

Although these conventions do raise awareness and present a call to action to the member countries of UNESCO, national laws and local approaches often complicate the unified goals outlined in conventions and treaties. The UNESCO Toolkit: Fighting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property (“the UNESCO Toolkit”) acknowledges that “the diversity of national legislations leads to loopholes and complexities in the implementation of international conventions…This situation may create problems if mutual legal assistance is required; meanwhile, the traffickers benefit from such discrepancies to continue their illegal business.”[7] In Egypt, for example, “private ownership (of antiquities) is not permitted and the law imposes sanctions of imprisonment with hard labour for the possession or trade in such antiquities”; while in Greece, “persons who export or attempt to export cultural property in violation of the law may be sentenced to imprisonment of up to ten years.”[8] Even when UNESCO member countries sign such conventions, their own national laws can further obfuscate the already complicated matter of hunting down stolen artifacts and prosecuting the people that are connected to the crime. 

The Role of Databases

The UNESCO Toolkit further highlights that different combinations of international conventions and national laws can yield varying results, emphasizing the need for a holistic response based on all relevant tools in addition to a clear legal framework. International databases are just one of those vital tools that can complement the multiple levels of laws and ensure a comprehensive approach to illegal actions. The International Foundation for Art Research (“IFAR”)’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database, The Art Loss Register (“ALR”), and INTERPOL’s Stolen Works of Art Database represent a small sampling of the many types of databases that serve as crucial resources used at multiple levels of the trade.[9]

To understand INTERPOL’s ID-Art’s place among databases like IFAR’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database and the ALR, it is helpful to take a brief look into the models and targeted goals of each. IFAR’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database sprouted from their “Stolen Art Alert” newsletter that began in the mid-1970’s in response to an increased awareness and prevalence of thefts and lootings.[10] This was the first publicly available international archive of stolen art and served as a model for databases that sprung up in the 1990’s as public and private organizations started to digitize their own archives. The ALR was originally part of IFAR as a commercial enterprise to expand and market the database and took over IFAR’s database in 1997. Today, the IFAR database is a non-profit that requires users to register and either pay a yearly subscription fee or pay for 2- or 4-hour session fees to access their educational database. Not only for museum-professionals, the database is targeted towards lay people, collectors, scholars, artists, and art lawyers. In addition to ownership records and stolen items archives, the database has an extensive legal section with case laws and a legal glossary with images of artworks involved in past and current disputes.

The ALR, on the other hand, has been a commercial enterprise from its inception and thus targets a different audience of collectors, insurers, and law enforcement more interested in collections management and risk assessment. The ALR prides itself on its extensive records and claims to hold “the world’s largest private database of lost, stolen and looted art, antiques and collectibles, currently listing more than 700,000 items.”[11] As a private database, the ability to access this exclusive collection — to either search potential purchases, register new objects, or report missing ones — comes at a steep price. Loss registrations, for example, are charged on a basis of £15, €17.50 or US$20 per item (plus VAT where applicable).[12] While fees such as this may not prove to be a large burden for some, it does ultimately reduce accessibility and discourage people from taking action to register or report stolen works.

ID-Art App

  • Screenshot taken by Claire Darrow: ID-Art App, Tutorial Page, July 30, 2021

This is where INTERPOL’s ID-Art App comes into play. As an intergovernmental organization that addresses transnational crimes, INTERPOL has real incentive to make its public database free and accessible to users across the globe, in contrast to private databases like ALR and ArtClaim Register (“ArtClaim”) (est. 2015). The goal of accessibility is apparent from the moment a user downloads the ID-Art App. The app is free on the App Store or Google Play Store and does not require additional fees to search the database or record an entry. Its simple, user-friendly interface and multiple operating languages of Arabic, English, French, and Spanish cement the ID-Art app as a helpful tool that can reach a large audience. The 3 main tabs on the app’s homepage convey the goals of the app: database search, inventory creation, and site reporting. These combined features could fill in the knowledge gaps left by a patchwork of conventions and a mosaic of public and private databases. In terms of breadth, accuracy, and accessibility, the ID-Art App may change the ways stolen art is documented and vulnerable sites are recorded by encouraging people to conduct due diligence before and after an object is reported as missing.

While access to INTERPOL’s database has historically been limited to law enforcement agencies and authorized private users, the general public has been able to access limited amounts of data about recently reported and recovered works since 2009. On the app, users now have unrestricted access to INTERPOL’s 52,000-work database that includes everything from looted antiquities to artworks like Jan Vermeer’s The Concert (1660) stolen from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990.[13] Like IFAR’s Art Law and Cultural Property Database, the ID-Art App has the potential to appeal to a large audience of museum professionals, collectors, scholars, and art-sleuthing amateurs.

For those that fall into any of those categories, using the app to search the database or record an object is straight-forward. To search Jan Vermeer’s The Concert (1660), users first select their country and language and continue to a home screen containing four tabs: Stolen Items, Search, My Inventory, and Settings. On the Stolen Items tab, users can browse the stolen art reported to INTERPOL in the country where they are located or can jump over to the Search tab and manually enter criteria such as object type, medium, and artist. If users miraculously come across The Concert in some forgotten basement or hanging above a mantel somewhere, they could also use the Visual Search feature in the Search tab to take a picture of the artwork and find a match in INTERPOL’s database. If a user wanted to report the work at this stage, they would have to register with the app and provide personal information to confirm their identity and legitimize the report.

Conclusion

As the underground business of art looting and antiquities trafficking continues to rely more heavily on social media and smartphones, INTERPOL is once again adapting to changes in criminal activity and developments of technology.[14] By making this database completely free and accessible to the general public, ID-Art App goes beyond what any government-sponsored database, privately-funded database, or any other subsidiary resources has ever done before in terms of accessibility and transparency. Ernesto Ottone, UNESCO’s Assistant Director General for Culture, praised the app’s innovation: “INTERPOL’s ID-Art App is a milestone in the international fight against the illicit trafficking of cultural property,” “Indeed it is both preventive and reactive as it allows everyone to record cultural objects and sites into the app. This has the potential to improve due diligence practices with potential buyers of cultural artefacts.”[15] Beyond improving due diligence, the app has the potential to reach audiences across the world that may not know about this problem or feel that they, as individuals, have little to contribute to this fight. The looting of art and destruction of cultural property may feel like issues that are beyond an individual’s control, but the ID-Art App shows that individuals are key players in the reporting and prevention of these crimes, while demonstrating that it can even happen in the palm of a hand.


Endnotes:

[1] INTERPOL Launches App to Better Protect Cultural Heritage, INTERPOL (May 6, 2021), https://www.INTERPOL.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2021/INTERPOL-launches-app-to-better-protect-cultural-heritage.

[2] The Real Price of Art: International UNESCO Campaign Reveals the Hidden Face of Art Trafficking, UNESCO (Oct. 20, 2020), https://en.unesco.org/news/real-price-art-international-unesco-campaign-reveals-hidden-face-art-trafficking.

[3] Fighting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: A Toolkit for European Judiciary and Law Enforcement, UNESCO (2018), http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/Toolkit.pdf.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Corrado Catesi, Due diligence in the art market | INTERPOL’s new app to trace and identify stolen cultural property, INTERPOL (2021)

[6] Fighting the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: A Toolkit for European Judiciary and Law Enforcement, UNESCO (2018), http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/movable/pdf/Toolkit.pdf.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Mia Tomijima, Competing or Complementing? Art Law Databases Proliferate, Center for Art Law (Apr. 23, 2015), https://itsartlaw.org/2015/04/23/competing-or-complementing-art-loss-databases-proliferate/.

[10] International Foundation for Art Research, https://www.ifar.org/about.php.

[11] Art Loss Register, https://www.artloss.com/register/#:~:text=Any%20uniquely%20identifiable%20item%20can,case%20of%20a%20large%20theft (2021).

[12] International Foundation for Art Research, https://www.ifar.org/about.php.

[13] Nora McGreevy, INTERPOL’s New App Combats Art Crime and Protects Cultural Heritage, Smithsonian Magazine (May 12, 2021), https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/INTERPOL-launches-app-help-people-report-stolen-art-180977700/.

[14] Lucy Siegel, Social Media: A Smuggler’s Tool For Looted Antiquities, Center for Art Law (Jun. 16, 2020), https://itsartlaw.org/2020/06/16/social-media-a-smugglers-tool-for-looted-antiquities/.

[15] David Klein, INTERPOL Launches App to Combat Looted Art Trade, Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (May 8, 2021), https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/14358-INTERPOL-launches-app-to-help-combat-looted-art-trade.

About the Author: Claire Darrow is a Summer 2021 Intern at the Center for Art Law. She is a rising senior at Middlebury College in Middlebury, Vermont where she is studying art history and romance languages.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous An Introduction to Swiss Copyright Law
Next On the Impact of Arts Council England’s New Restitution Guidelines

Related Art Law Articles

CfAL photo from Rietberg Museum
Art law

Inspiration and Investment: The Benin Bronzes in Western Art and the Market

September 21, 2026
Italy's Bill 2834 A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish Owned Art
Art lawItalylegislative historyNazi-era looted art

Italy’s Bill 2834: A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish-Owned Art

September 17, 2026
#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation
Art law

#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende: Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation

September 13, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant collections of modern Mexican art, is at the center of an ongoing legal and financial controversy. With works by Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, María Izquierdo, and others, the collection raises complex questions about the protections afforded to National Artistic Monuments under Mexican law. 

Paula Gutierrez de Villasante examines what the collection's uncertain future could mean for Mexico’s cultural heritage. 

📚Read the full article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #MexicanArt #FridaKahlo #ArtFinance
Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what t Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what they are, how they work, and the legal and practical considerations for artists!

Please note, this is a hybrid event. Participants are welcome to attend either in person or online via Zoom..

Join the Center for Art Law for Artist Corporations: A New Legal Framework for Creative Practice, a conversation exploring the Colorado Artist Companies Act and what it could mean for artists, lawyers, policymakers, and the broader creative economy.

In 2025, Colorado enacted Senate Bill 133, creating the Artist Corporation (A-Corp); a first-of-its-kind legal business structure designed specifically to recognize and support artists and creative professionals. The legislation offers a new model for balancing artistic practice with sustainable business and legal protections, raising important questions about how the law can better serve creative communities.

Join us for a discussion featuring Lindsay Korotkin, Yancey Strickler, and Sarah Darlene, who will examine the origins of the Artist Corporation, the legislative process behind its creation, and its practical implications for working artists. Drawing on their respective backgrounds in law, advocacy, entrepreneurship, and artistic practice, the panelists will discuss how this innovative legal framework came to fruition, how artists may benefit from it, and whether similar legislation could shape the future of creative industries beyond Colorado.

Following the panel discussion, attendees will have the opportunity to participate in a live audience Q&A as well as a Networking Reception. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #colorado #artistissues
For more than two decades, thousands of counterfei For more than two decades, thousands of counterfeit works attributed to Canadian Anishinaabe artist Norval Morrisseau circulated through galleries, auctions, and private collections. The resulting forgery scandal has made authenticating Morrisseau’s work increasingly difficult and raised larger questions about protecting artists' legacies and the integrity of the art market. 

In her article, Victoria Cook examines the history of the Morrisseau forgery ring and how emerging technologies could help distinguish genuine works from fakes. 

📚 Read the full article at the link in our bio!

1st 📷: Norval Morrisseau, Observations of the Astral World (c. 1994), acrylic on canvas, 236 x 514 cm, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

#ArtLaw #ArtForgery #NorvalMorrisseau #IndigenousArt #CanadianArt
Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Collo Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Colloquium with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. 

Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.