• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Six of one, half a dozen of the other? Comparing two Art Law Resources
Back

Six of one, half a dozen of the other? Comparing two Art Law Resources

June 14, 2018

By Jennie Nadel

New Kid on the Block

Getting the Deal Through (GTDT) is a London-based website that provides users with updates on laws and regulations, published by Law Business Research and a number of other publications. The website, managed by Law Business Research Limited (http://lbresearch.com/), solicits lawyers and law firms from around the world to synthesize legal information.

Screen Shot 2018-06-14 at 3.58.23 PM

Their research platform can be useful for a variety of audiences including law firms, universities, regulators, and corporate counsel providing assistance to legal query. Currently, GTDT covers information on 150 countries across 90 practice areas with an audience of around 200,000 including in-house and private practice lawyers. The practice areas span a wide variety of topics including acquisition finance, commercial contracts, copyright, intellectual property & antitrust, mergers & acquisitions, patents, and more. The website content is organized by practice area, then jurisdiction. Information is presented as responses to series of Q&A to help users find information and is designed to take complex subjects and strip them down into understandable summaries. Each practice area is developed by a contributing editor and a leading practitioner in the field. The website offers a compare tool that allows users to make comparisons of the same practice area but in different regions of the world, which is especially handy for those interested in the international exchange of art. It also contains updated information and trends for each country at the bottom of the page.

In 2018, GTDT launched a new page for Art Law practice. This resource is edited by Pierre Valentin, partner at Constantine Cannon LLP in charge of the Art & Cultural Property Law Group practice. The Art Law practice area page posits 49 questions with 12 sets of answers available corresponding to 12 countries such as China, Turkey, France, Switzerland, and the United States, including both California and New York. These questions range from the most common subjects surrounding the buying and selling of art to queries of cultural patrimony, museums, auctions, etc. The answers given for “The United States – New York” page are offered by Amelia Brankov, counsel at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz.

Screen Shot 2018-06-14 at 3.58.13 PM

2nd ed. The Art Collecting Legal Handbook

GTDT’s Art Law Q&A’s are akin to the 2013 and 2016 editions of the “The Art Collecting Legal Handbook” the reference book edited by Bruno Boesch and Massimo Sterpi. The 2013 Handbook was designed to help the collector navigate art collections in an international framework and offered a useful introduction to art law themes for a number of countries including Argentina, Greece, Israel, Japan, and Mexico. While art collecting and preservation has become increasingly transnational, legal frameworks and practices remain fairly local. The book addresses these issues with the aim to provide collectors with knowledge on a wide array of jurisdictions. The United States – New York section of the Handbook was compiled by Ambre Nérinck-Seltzer, attorney at Nerinck Seltzer Law as well as John Charles Thomas, attorney and former Supreme Court Justice of Virginia.

How do the two resources compare?

The 2018 GTDT art law resource is similar to the information provided in the Boesch/Sterpi Handbook. They both use the Q&A style format; however, the 2013 Handbook book includes fewer questions – , only 32 –  and thus fewer answers, while the online resource contains 49. The answers vary in length depending on the nature of the question and its relevance to the country.

Both the GTDT website and 2013 Handbook contain a fair amount of overlap in terms of questions. For example, both explore the need to conduct due diligence on behalf of the seller, laws regarding fakes and forgeries, protection against Holocaust-based claims, copyright, and tax import and export laws. One point of departure is that the 2013 Handbook seems to contain more pointed questions surrounding repatriation of art works and restitution claims. Furthermore, the Handbook helpfully creates subject headings before questions to more easily navigate the various topics including: cultural heritage and the art market, purchase and export, sale, art philanthropy, tax, etc. The Handbook also consists of a list of information and references such as principal laws and regulations, law enforcement authorities, as well as a few collector and trade associations.

Cost/Benefit Analysis

As some of the materials in the 2013 Handbook, now 5 years later, may be outdated, a second edition from 2016 is available. The market value of the original 2013 Handbook retails for $150 on Amazon. The 2nd edition is only $106.55 (plus shiping).

By contrast, the GTDT offers its materials for free during a brief trial period, though this is not available for individual students. Individuals interested in the content long-term need to create a single-user account with a company email address. For companies, organizations, or law schools interested in using the website, price is available upon inquiry. Lastly, for 2-month unlimited access to all content, the price is $850.

Final Thoughts

Overall both the website and the Handbook offer similar information in the Q&A-style format, answering basic art law questions. The pros of GTDT include the comparison tool to quickly contrast the same question from one country to the next and the accessibility of an online format with the inclusion of many other legal practice areas and jurisdictions besides art law. The Handbook requires only a single payment to own the book; however, it cannot be updated like a website can. It might be more cost effective as it retails for $150 rather than a 2-month access available for $850. However, those with a work email can take advantage of GTDT’S free in-house counsel. One of the features available in the Handbook is a list of resources and references to each country’s law and government authorities as well as collector and trade associations relevant to that specific country. Lastly, the Handbook offers legal advice for 21 countries while GTDT only offers 12 (though not all of the 12 countries listed in GTDT are available in the handbook).

* * *

The Center for Art Law is pleased to note that contributors to both of the resources have participated in our past events. Massimo Sterpi, one of the co-editors of the The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, was our distinguished speaker at a program held at Ascent Contemporary Projects on November 15, 2014. Amelia Brankov, one of the contributors to the 2018 GTDT resource, spoke at the Center for Art Law Summer 2017 program on negotiating contracts between artists and galleries.

Resources:

  • Bruno Boesch and Massimo Sterpi, eds., The Art Collecting Legal Handbook (2016), available at on Amazon
  • Bruno Boesch and Massimo Sterpi, eds., The Art Collecting Legal Handbook (2013), available on Amazon
  • Pierre Valentin, ed., Getting the Deal Through: Art Law, available at here.

About the Author: Jennie Nadel is a Summer 2018 intern at the Center for Art Law. She graduated from Johns Hopkins University in 2018 majoring in History of Art with a double minor in Museums & Society and Visual Arts. She will be pursuing her M.A. in Contemporary Art at Sotheby’s Institute in the Fall.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Bull’s-Eye: Making Heads or Tails of the Manhattan DA’s Antiquities Trafficking Unit
Next Leaving a Mark: Artistic Expression, New Media in Protest and Law

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law Corporate Art
Art law

Art as an Office Asset: Motivations and Collection Practices in Corporate Settings

August 31, 2026
Center for Art Law Greece
Art law

Greece’s First Comprehensive Legal Framework to Combat Forgeries: Art Market Transparency and Accountability

August 30, 2026
Center for Art Law at an Art Fair Focus
Art lawLegislative efforts

A Case for the Art Market Integrity Act

August 30, 2026
Center for Art Law
August 2026 Summer Promo (2)

Get your leg up on art law

Just in time for 2026-2027

Become a member and access unlimited articles, our Case Law Database, event archives, and exclusive member pricing on all upcoming events.

Learn MORE
Immigration Guide for Artists 2026 Cover Page

Immigration Guide for Artists

Check out the 2026 overview of U.S. immigration pathways available to artists.

Learn MORE
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
For centuries, copying has been an integral part o For centuries, copying has been an integral part of Chinese artistic practice, blurring the line between homage and forgery. Many museums are at a loss for how to evaluate works that challenge Western notions of authenticity.

Through the ongoing debate over the MET’s Riverbank painting, our recent article examines how institutional interests and market value continue to shape perceptions of authenticity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lena Rohde!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #chineseart #zhangdaqian #changdaichien #artforgery #authenticity #museumlaw #arthistory #provenance #artmarket
The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has trans The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has transformed how cultural heritage is documented and preserved, particularly in regions affected by conflict. As 3D models and digital archives become more common, they also raise questions about ownership and cultural self-determination.

In her article, Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis examines the preservation of Syria's cultural heritage. More specifically, how digital reconstructions can both protect endangered sites and act as a tool for erasure when local communities are excluded from the process.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #digitalheritage #3Dreconstruction #provenance #archaeology #culturalproperty #digitization #palmyra #museumlaw
Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go t Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go to the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in New Brunswick. This gallery was included in a law suit between Lord Beaverbrook's Estate and a foundation he had established during his life. 

📚 See more about this case using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artresearch #estates #artist #foundation #gallery
Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago d Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago de Compostela after seventy-two years.

Our recent article examines the Spanish Supreme Court's decision to return the Abraham and Isaac sculptures to Santiago de Compostela, and the pivotal role that object identification played in resolving the dispute.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lucas Güimil Valdés!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalheritage #restitution #provenanceresearch #spain #culturalproperty
Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Wel Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Weller's presentation introducing Germany's new Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property. It explores how the new tribunal differs from the former Limbach Commission and what its procedures, jurisdiction, and binding decisions could mean for future restitution claims.

📚 Read the full article by Savannah Weiler and Amanda Buonaiuto at the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalproperty #nazilootedart #restitution #provenanceresearch #culturalheritage #alternativedisputeresolution
It’s August 🔥 Think Art Law. World Cap 2026 is ove It’s August 🔥 Think Art Law. World Cap 2026 is over. For us it will be remembered for Haaland Memes and $25 MILLION lawsuit filed by environmental artist Robert Wyland against FIFA for painting over the iconic 1999 downtown Dallas mural, Whaling Wall 82.* Summer Internships at the Center are winding down. Oh the places we have been together (from UN to MoMA across the US, Canada and the UK). The 2025-2026 Judith Bresler Fellowship is complete and how! and our new fellow is eager to hit the ground running.

As we move into the final stretch of summer, the reality sets in: little and big fires are everywhere and juggling so many balls or making sense of the everyday is getting increasingly impossible. But before we collapse into off-season, we want to thank you for being part of our community. Whether you were here in person, joining us online, or thinking about art and the law from afar, we can’t wait to see what you’ll create, challenge, and defend come fall. Our complements and heartfelt thanks to our Summer Team for everything they’ve accomplished over these months and invested in our future: for staying on track, for research and rigorous work on articles and databases, for genuine team building, and for pushing all of us to grow. And here’s what we’ve learned: when the real world gets too much, look at art. Play ball. Have a hydration break. These are necessities that keep us sane and running overtime. 

📚 Read the full newsletter and become a subscriber using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #legal artlawyer
What inspires a career in art and cultural propert What inspires a career in art and cultural property law?

In our latest interview, Professor Matthias Weller shares how his academic and professional journey led him to become one of the leading voices in the restitution field. He also discusses Germany's new Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property and what this landmark development could mean for the future of restitution.

📚 Read the full interview using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalreserach #legal #art #lawyer #restitution #artcrime #arbitration #germany
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.