• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Spotlight: India Pride Project and the Future of Art Restitution in India
Back

Spotlight: India Pride Project and the Future of Art Restitution in India

September 19, 2025

CfAL cultural heritage India article 1

By Atreya Mathur

Imagine scrolling through Google Street View on your laptop, zooming in on an art gallery in New York, and among polished marble floors and glass display cases, you spot sculptures that should probably not be there. You see sculptures that were reported stolen years ago from temples in India, scattered across countries by illicit trafficking networks. While this sounds like the opening scene of an art heist thriller, for S. Vijay Kumar, co-founder of the India Pride Project (IPP), this was a very real moment where he virtually looked around a New York gallery and located two antique bronze statues with a market value of $8.5 million stolen from India by Shubhash Kapoor.[1]

The India Pride Project is a global effort to track and reinstate India’s stolen-heritage.[2] Founded in 2014 by S. Vijay Kumar and Anuraag Saxena, it has grown into an international network of art lovers and heritage activists who use historical documents, social media, and investigative techniques to track down stolen sacred artifacts from Indian temples and facilitate their return.[3] The organisation has associates around the world and has been recognised by foreign governments, universities, and cultural institutions for its pioneering work in cultural restitution.[4] The project comprises a core group of about a dozen members and 280 volunteers who pitch in ad-hoc.[5]

Origins and Heart Behind the Project

CfAL cultural heritage India article 2

The origins of the India Pride Project trace back well before it became a formal organisation. In 2006, S. Vijay Kumar’s fascination with India’s ancient heritage was sparked by a work of Tamil historical fiction.[6] This turned into a personal quest and he travelled to historic temples and monuments, photographing and blogging about their artistry, symbolism, and craftsmanship.[7] At first, his efforts were simply a way to record and share the cultural treasures he encountered. But as he revisited sites, he began to notice unsettling patterns, ornamental panels missing, sculptures inexplicably gone and architectural gaps where sacred gods once stood.[8]

Driven by these observations, Kumar started tracking the global antiquities trade. He learned that artifacts from Indian heritage sites were turning up in galleries, auction houses, and private collections abroad, often in clear defiance of laws protecting cultural property, some dating back to colonial-era legislation in 1878. In many cases, these entities were able to skirt or exploit loopholes in those protections, for example, by relying on inadequate provenance documentation, using intermediary dealers in jurisdictions with weaker controls, or presenting objects as from old collections predating modern restrictions. In 2013, his path crossed with that of Anuraag Saxena, a Singapore-based chartered accountant and MBA with a shared passion for repatriating stolen heritage. Recognising that their scattered, volunteer-led interventions could have greater impact together, they formalised their collaboration in 2014 by launching the India Pride Project.[9] “It’s all kinds of personal. If you look at the industry that peddles heritage art, they strip an object’s emotional value away and sell it only for its functional or aesthetic value. I get emails from people from small villages, saying ‘we had this temple; when my grandparents died they did their shraadh (last rites) there; my parents got married there; but now the deity is not there any more; can you help us get it back?’ They don’t look at it as a national crime or a heritage crime; it’s a personal loss.”[10]

And while the name was new, the work was not. Both Kumar and Saxena had already spent years advising, investigating, and liaising with authorities and cultural institutions. By creating a more organised platform, they were able to enable deeper engagement with museums, law enforcement, and the media, as well as calling volunteers to participate in the project.

How the IPP Works to Track Looted and Smuggled Heritage

CfAL cultural heritage India article 3The India Pride Project operates at the intersection of archival research, open-source intelligence, and legal advocacy.[11] “You’ll be quite surprised to know that, like matchmaking, today dealers use social media. Like prospective grooms searching for brides, these dealers are soliciting purchases, sharing robber photos on WhatsApp and social media.”[12] Volunteers worldwide monitor auctions, museum catalogues, deaccession lists, and private collections, looking for anomalies or suspicious items.[13] Every potential match is verified against historical records, photographs, and provenance documentation.[14] Once confirmed, IPP prepares a detailed dossier, which is shared confidentially with law enforcement agencies, museums, or private owners to initiate recovery processes.

IPP’s work often complements formal law enforcement. In many cases, Indian authorities were historically slow or unresponsive, and international organisations began consulting IPP directly because of its deep knowledge of Indian artifacts and expertise in tracing them. “When worldwide organisations needed to check on an Indian artefact, they contacted Indian officials such as the Archaeological Survey of India and the customs, but the response from the Indian side was quite weak. So, after that, they began to approach us when they discovered that there is a group that has specific information and operates as a non-profit entity…We can know a lot about a statue or artefact merely by looking at it or the material used to make it. We inform the agencies about the article’s or region’s origin.”[15] Further collaborations with agencies such as INTERPOL, U.S. Homeland Security Investigations, and foreign customs offices have enabled the recovery of numerous objects, including those stolen by notorious traffickers like Subhash Kapoor, whose apprehension in 2011 followed investigative work facilitated by IPP.

Other Recoveries of Ancient Artifacts facilitated by Indian Pride Project[16]

Nalanda Buddha

The Nalanda Buddha, a small bronze statue dating to the twelfth century, was originally part of the Archaeological Survey of India’s site museum at Nalanda. The statue, which reflects the rich Buddhist iconography of the Pala-Sena period, was stolen in 1961 and disappeared into the international art market.[17] Decades later, it surfaced in Europe, where it was identified by S. Vijay Kumar of the India Pride Project alongside Lynda Albertson of Association for Research into Crimes Against Art (ARCA).[18] Kumar identified the statue by comparing contemporary photographs to ASI records and theft reports and thus produced the documentary evidence necessary for legal and diplomatic intervention. IPP coordinated with the Metropolitan Police and the Indian consulate to secure its return.[19] In August 2018, the statue was formally handed over to the Indian High Commissioner in London during a ceremony timed with India’s Independence Day.[20]

Yogini Statues

In early 2022, a 10th-century goat-headed Yogini statue, stolen from a temple in Lokhari village (Banda district, Uttar Pradesh) in the late 1970s or early 1980s, was recovered from a garden shed in England.[21] The discovery was made when a salvage company was liquidating the belongings of an estate sale and, before selling, investigated the provenance of the items.[22] The statue was then referred to Art Recovery International (ARI) founder Christopher Marinello, who identified it with help from IPP’s S. Vijay Kumar. Kumar matched the figure against archival imagery from Yogini Cult and Temples: A Tantric Tradition by Vidya Dehejia.[23] ARI negotiated its unconditional return to India, and it was formally handed over to the Indian High Commissioner at India House, London.[24] The idol was then dispatched to the Archaeological Survey of India for installation at the National Museum in New Delhi.[25]

2021 United States Repatriation of 157 Artifacts

In 2021, the United States made a significant repatriation of 157 stolen Indian artifacts, marking one of the largest such returns.[26] This handover occurred during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the U.S. and included a remarkable variety of pieces, from a 10th-century Revanta sandstone bas-relief to a 12th-century bronze Nataraja. Along with terracotta, stone, and metal artifacts spanning Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and secular traditions.[27] The roles played by U.S. authorities, including Homeland Security Investigations and the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, were critical in the seizures and returns of the artifacts. Similarly integral were the contributions of IPP as they supplied provenance dossiers and necessary archival documentation. The assistance lent to law enforcement by IPP and IPP’s contributions to diplomatic negotiations, further facilitated the returns.

The Impact of the IPP and its effect on Restitution in India

CfAL cultural heritage India article 4

The India Pride Project has helped transform the landscape of cultural restitution in India by placing citizens and local communities at the center of heritage protection. Through its outreach, IPP encourages villagers, temple authorities, and enthusiasts to document statues and artifacts, preserve photographs, and promptly report thefts, whether recent or decades old. IPP also urges people who spot potentially stolen objects in museums or galleries to take photos and send them in, activating its global network of volunteers to trace provenance and facilitate returns. “In case a statue is stolen, report the theft to the local police station and reach out to us. Even if the case is 50 years old, report it to us and we will try our best to bring it back. Acknowledging the theft is the first step to its recovery,” says S. Vijay Kumar.[28]

By combining both community vigilance with provenance research, IPP has helped shift the evidentiary standards for restitution away from vague ownership claims toward more verifiable documentation, which was not as strong in India. While criminal prosecutions against trafficking networks have provided deterrence and factual bases for repatriation, IPP’s work shows that enforcement alone is not enough. Civil negotiations, voluntary institutional returns, and diplomatic engagement are often more effective than such litigation.CfAL cultural heritage India article 5

The project also exposes gaps and loopholes in India’s legal framework to prevent illicit trafficking of artifacts. The Antiquities and Art Treasures Act of 1972 remains poorly enforced, with temple thefts typically prosecuted under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, meant for ordinary theft, rather than through specialized heritage crime statutes. IPP’s citizen-driven model has filled some of these gaps by providing access to expertise, documentation, and international contacts that state agencies cannot always mobilize on their own.

Sign up as a volunteer with the India Pride Project HERE.

Center for Art Law is also hosting a program Efforts to Recover India’s Idols & Heritage: Modern Tools for Old Crimes featuring S. Vijyay Kumar, founder of the India Pride Project on September 24 (2025) at 11 am ET. Learn more HERE.

Suggested Readings and Videos

  • The Idol Thief by S. Vijay Kumar
  • The Idol Thief by S.Vijay Kumar : Book Release (Part 1)
  • The Idol Thief by S.Vijay Kumar : Book Release (Part 2)

About the Author

Atreya Mathur is the Director of Legal Research at Center for Art Law.

Select Sources:

  1. Looted and smuggled, how India is bringing Gods and glory home, India Today (July 27, 2024) available at https://www.indiatoday.in/sunday-special/story/repatriation-india-pride-project-looted-smuggled-gods-statues-colonial-rule-heritage-vijay-kumar-british-museums-2563311-2024-07-07 ↑
  2. See India Pride Project, https://x.com/indiaprideproj?lang=en ↑
  3. ‘We still prosecute temple heritage loot as house theft, need strict antiquity laws’: Vijay Kumar, the co-founder of India Pride Project speaks to OpIndia, OpIndia (17 May, 2022) available here https://www.opindia.com/2022/05/india-pride-project-vijay-kumar-stolen-idols-tracking-back-home-art-antiquity-laws-temples-gods-interview/ ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Sharanya Gopinathan, Meet the Amateur Art Sleuths Fighting To Bring Back India’s Looted Cultural Heritage, Vice (Sept. 7, 2021) available here https://www.vice.com/en/article/india-pride-project-bringing-artefacts-back-from-colonisers-art-thieves/#:~:text=Saxena%20is%20one%20of%20the,who%20pitch%20in%20ad%2Dhoc. ↑
  6. ‘We still prosecute temple heritage loot as house theft, need strict antiquity laws’: Vijay Kumar, the co-founder of India Pride Project speaks to OpIndia, OpIndia (17 May, 2022) available here https://www.opindia.com/2022/05/india-pride-project-vijay-kumar-stolen-idols-tracking-back-home-art-antiquity-laws-temples-gods-interview/ ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Id. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. See Pia Krishnankutty, How stolen art detectives India Pride Project tracked down 265 artefacts, The Print (27 March, 2022) available at https://theprint.in/india/how-stolen-art-detectives-india-pride-project-tracked-down-265-artefacts/889814/ ↑
  12. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2FT-N8UhCA ↑
  13. See Pia Krishnankutty, How stolen art detectives India Pride Project tracked down 265 artefacts, The Print (27 March, 2022) available at https://theprint.in/india/how-stolen-art-detectives-india-pride-project-tracked-down-265-artefacts/889814/ ↑
  14. Id. ↑
  15. We still prosecute temple heritage loot as house theft, need strict antiquity laws’: Vijay Kumar, the co-founder of India Pride Project speaks to OpIndia, OpIndia (17 May, 2022) available here https://www.opindia.com/2022/05/india-pride-project-vijay-kumar-stolen-idols-tracking-back-home-art-antiquity-laws-temples-gods-interview/ ↑
  16. Some of the key restitutions and identifications facilitated by Vijay Kumar have resulted in successful returns of significant cultural property to India. These include the restitution of the Vriddhachalam Ardhanari from the Art Gallery of New South Wales in Australia, the Sripuranthan Nataraja and Gupta-era Buddha from Australia, the Toledo Ganesha from the United States, the Barahma Barahmani from London, the Sripuranthan Uma from Singapore, and the Tengupura Durga from Germany. His work also contributed to the seizure of a Shiva and Parvathi sculpture from Ball State Museum in the United States, multiple seizures during Asia Week New York in 2016, and restitutions from institutions such as the Honolulu Museum and the Harn Museum. Additional returns include the Chandavaram worshippers of Buddha and the Vriddhachalam Pratyangira from Australia, the Vijayanagara-era pair of door guardians to Tamil Nadu, and a Vijayanagara-era Shiva Nataraja from Kulasekaram, Tamil Nadu. In July 2020, the Natesa sculpture was successfully restituted from London to India. Vijay Kumar also facilitated the restitution of the Nalanda Buddha from London and identified related Buddhas under claim from the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA). Beyond these restitutions, he has provided over 57 positive identifications to the Archaeological Survey of India and law enforcement authorities, which are now part of ongoing claim processes in France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, and the United States. (Source: S. Vijay Kumar) ↑
  17. Buddha statue returned to India 57 years after theft, The History Blog (Aug, 17, 2018) available at https://www.thehistoryblog.com/archives/52435?utm_source ↑
  18. Id. ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Id. ↑
  21. Jo Lawson-Tancred, Two 10th-Century Stone Idols, Which Were Stolen From a Temple in India and Found in a Garden Shed in the U.K., Will Be Repatriated, artnet (Jul.12, 2023) available at ​​https://news.artnet.com/art-world/10th-century-idols-found-in-garden-shed-returned-to-india-2335670 ↑
  22. Id. ↑
  23. Id. ↑
  24. Id. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. 12th century Nataraj to 2nd century vase: US hands over 157 antiques to India, Indian Express (Sept. 26, 2021) available at https://indianexpress.com/article/india/modi-artefacts-antiquities-us-7534516/ ↑
  27. Id. ↑
  28. We still prosecute temple heritage loot as house theft, need strict antiquity laws’: Vijay Kumar, the co-founder of India Pride Project speaks to OpIndia, OpIndia (17 May, 2022) available here https://www.opindia.com/2022/05/india-pride-project-vijay-kumar-stolen-idols-tracking-back-home-art-antiquity-laws-temples-gods-interview/ ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Room 18 should be Empty: Is a permanent loan enough to resolve the Parthenon Marbles dispute?
Next When Grants Become Grievances: Woodmere’s Battle for a Federal Grant

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law Susan (Central Park) Legacy Over Licensing Josie Goettel
Art lawcopyrightlicensing

Legacy Over Licensing: How Artist Estates and Museums Are Redefining Control in the Digital Age

February 19, 2026
Center for Art Law M HKA
Art lawLegal Issues in Museum Administration

Flemish Government’s Plan to Dismantle M HKA’s Collection in the Name of Centralization of Art

February 18, 2026
Center for Art law Imitation is Not Flattery Lauren Stein The Supper at Emmaus
Art law

When Imitation is Not Flattery: Art Fakes, Forgeries, and the Market They Fool

January 28, 2026
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

A recent report by the World Jewish Restitution Or A recent report by the World Jewish Restitution Organization (WRJO) states that most American museums provide inadequate provenance information for potentially Nazi-looted objects held in their collections. This is an ongoing problem, as emphasized by the closure of the Nazi-Era Provenance Internet Portal last year. Established in 2003, the portal was intended to act as a public registry of potentially looted art held in museum collections across the United States. However, over its 21-year lifespan, the portal's practitioners struggled to secure ongoing funding and it ultimately became outdated. 

The WJRO report highlights this failure, noting that museums themselves have done little to make provenance information easily accessible. This lack of transparency is a serious blow to the efforts of Holocaust survivors and their descendants to secure the repatriation of seized artworks. WJRO President Gideon Taylor urged American museums to make more tangible efforts to cooperate with Holocaust survivors and their families in their pursuit of justice.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #museumissues #nazilootedart #wwii #artlawyer #legalresearch
Join us for the Second Edition of Center for Art L Join us for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School! An immersive five-day educational program designed for individuals interested in the dynamic and ever-evolving field of art law. 

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field. 

Applications are open now through March 1st!

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlawsummerschool #newyork #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #lawyer #art
Join us for an informative presentation and pro bo Join us for an informative presentation and pro bono consultations to better understand the current art and copyright law landscape. Copyright law is a body of federal law that grants authors exclusive rights over their original works — from paintings and photographs to sculptures, as well as other fixed and tangible creative forms. Once protection attaches, copyright owners have exclusive economic rights that allow them to control how their work is reproduced, modified and distributed, among other uses.

Albeit theoretically simple, in practice copyright law is complex and nuanced: what works acquire such protection? How can creatives better protect their assets or, if they wish, exploit them for their monetary benefit? 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In October, the Hispanic Society Museum and Librar In October, the Hispanic Society Museum and Library deaccessioned forty five paintings from its collection through an auction at Christie's. The sale included primarily Old-Master paintings of religious and aristocratic subjects. Notable works in the sale included a painting from the workshop of El Greco, a copy of a work by Titian, as well as a portrait of Isabella of Portugal, and Clemente Del Camino y Parladé’s “El Columpio (The Swing). 

The purpose of the sale was to raise funds to further diversify the museum's collection. In a statement, the institution stated that the works selected for sale are not in line with their core mission as they seek to expand and diversify their collection.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlawnews #artlawresearch #legalresearch #artlawyer #art #lawyer
Check out our new episode where Paris and Andrea s Check out our new episode where Paris and Andrea speak with Ali Nour, who recounts his journey from Khartoum to Cairo amid the ongoing civil war, and describes how he became involved with the Emergency Response Committee - a group of Sudanese heritage officials working to safeguard Sudan’s cultural heritage. 

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #podcast #february #legalresearch #newepisode #culturalheritage #sudaneseheritage
When you see ‘February’ what comes to mind? Birthd When you see ‘February’ what comes to mind? Birthdays of friends? Olympic games? Anniversary of war? Democracy dying in darkness? Days getting longer? We could have chosen a better image for the February cover but somehow the 1913 work of Umberto Boccioni (an artist who died during World War 1) “Dynamism of a Soccer Player” seemed to hit the right note. Let’s keep going, individuals and team players.

Center for Art Law is pressing on with events and research. We have over 200 applications to review for the Summer Internship Program, meetings, obligations. Reach out if you have questions or suggestions. We cannot wait to introduce to you our Spring Interns and we encourage you to share and keep channels of communication open. 

📚 Read more using the link in our bio! Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss any upcoming newsletters!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #newsletter #february #legalresearch
Join the Center for Art Law for conversation with Join the Center for Art Law for conversation with Frank Born and Caryn Keppler on legacy and estate planning!

When planning for the preservation of their professional legacies and the future custodianship of their oeuvres’, artists are faced with unique concerns and challenges. Frank Born, artist and art dealer, and Caryn Keppler, tax and estate attorney, will share their perspectives on legacy and estate planning. Discussion will focus on which documents to gather, and which professionals to get in touch with throughout the process of legacy planning.

This event is affiliated with the Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic which seeks to connect artists, estate administrators, attorneys, tax advisors, and other experts to create meaningful and lasting solutions for expanding the art canon and art legacy planning. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #clinic #artlawyer #estateplanning #artistlegacy #legal #research #lawclinic
Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice, one that the art market must depend upon. Although, auction houses don't have to guarantee  authenticity, they have legal duties related to contract law, tort law, and industry customs. The impact of the Old Master cases, sparked change in the industry including Sotheby's acquisition of Orion Analytical. 

📚 To read more about the liabilities of auction houses and the change in forensic tools, read Vivianne Diaz's published article using the link in our bio!
Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro b Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro bono consultations on legacy and estate planning for visual artists.

Calling all visual artists: join the Center for Art Law's Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic for an evening of low-cost consultations with attorneys, tax experts, and other arts professionals with experience in estate and legacy planning.

After a short lecture on a legacy and estate planning topic, attendees with consultation tickets artist will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer professionals (attorneys, appraisers and financial advisors) for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions.

Please be sure to read the entire event description using the LinkedIn event below.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC). This law increases transparency requirements and consumer rights, including reforming subscription contracts. It grants consumers cancellation periods during cooling-off times. 

Charitable organizations, including museums and other cultural institutions, have concerns regarding consumer abuse of this option. 

🔗 Read more about this new law and it's implications in Lauren Stein's published article, including a discussion on how other jurisdictions have approached the issue, using the link in our bio!
Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.