• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet The Inside Job: Who is Protecting Art Museums from Themselves?
Back

The Inside Job: Who is Protecting Art Museums from Themselves?

February 15, 2024

Collage with headlines and a view of the British museum

By Lily Elkwood

When most people think of art theft, they imagine something out of a spy movie, a villain trying to steal a masterpiece or a criminal mastermind in his evil lair plotting how to evade the highest security measures. In many cases, art thieves are the very individuals responsible for taking care of museums.[1] The security guards, the curators, the researchers, and even the summer intern are “the criminal masterminds” stealing from some of the most important cultural institutions in the world.

The Issue

Ittai Gradel, a gem dealer, was searching eBay when he found what was advertised as a 19th century glass gem.[2] With his expertise, Gradel quickly realized it was much more valuable; the item was a Roman Medusa cameo from the second century.[3] He bought the coin for £15 plus postage and sold it for thousands.[4] Grabel then followed the seller, Sultan 1966.[5] For years, Grabel continued to find undervalued collectibles on Sultan 1966’s page, such as a ring from the Ptolemaic kingdom and a fragment of a sardonyx cameo from Roman times.[6] Grabel began to investigate, and using his keen memory, he discovered that some of these items were in a catalog for the British museum.[7] Grabel’s research was not limited to the items for sale, but the identity of the man behind the account. The ebay register said the creator of this mysterious account was Paul Higgins, and then later to Peter Higgs, a curator in the British Museum.[8] While Grabel continued to investigate, Higgs was promoted to keeper of the Greek Collections.[9] Grabel grew angry and emailed museum officials warning that there was a thief in their midst.[10] An investigation was announced and days later Higgs was dismissed.[11]

In recent years, there have been headlines detailing museum thefts by employees. There have been reports of British Museum staff stealing ancient treasures and gems and a German museum employee swapping paintings for forgies.[12] The issue goes beyond headlines. According to experts, it is an “unspoken problem.”[13] FBI agent Robert Whitman said, “About 90 percent of art thefts from museums are internal.”[14] In other words, nearly all art theft is an inside job.[15] Experts in the field say that museums can be “institutionally corrupt.”[16] It is not uncommon for “cherished items” donated to the institution to be quietly sold to collectors or small auction houses in virtually every museum in the world.[17]

The issue isn’t limited to a certain kind of employee either. According to Robert J. Combs, former head of security at the J. Paul Getty Trust, he has seen that theft among insiders occurs at all levels. Within the span of 12 months he saw seven thefts, the perpetrators including curators, archivists, librarians, custodians and even summer interns showing this is an issue for every level of employee. [18]

Why is it an Issue?

As it becomes more obvious that inside jobs are an issue within museums, there are questions of why. Curiosity grows as continuous headlines arrive in the news. Experts have connected the origins of the issue to a few causes.

Lack of Cataloging and Size of Collections

Insider theft may be an issue due to the size of many museum collections. A museum worker spoke on the issue, saying, “it would be easy to take something small without it being noticed for quite a while.”[19] In the case of a British Museum worker who sold 1500 jewels on eBay, the items stolen were not even cataloged.[20] This is one example but is not the norm for every case.

This issue reveals the cataloging issues in museums that allow for employees to steal. Most of these items were stored in an area primarily for academic and research purposes and were not on recent display.[21] Museum specialists have emphasized that employees were likely able to steal because the museum had failed to properly catalog on a digital database. [22] A director of the Institute for Digital Heritage stated that “most museums do not have all objects registered on their databases, which annihilates the promise of museum preservation. Objects kept for research for lingo for no curator could find them in a database, and consequently would not exhibit them.”[23] These thefts are not representative of rogue employees taking advantage of their access to some of the most valuable items in the world but a “ fundamental lack of care and system failures.”[24] The issue lies with the highest level of leadership.[25]

Lack of Security in Private Areas

Many of these items go missing because of more lax security measures within private areas of the museum.[26] A museum employee was charged with stealing $75,000 in artifacts from the New Bedford Whaling Museum. [27]

In nearly all of these thefts, the museum workers were stealing items in storage rather than on display. The Imperial War Museum of Britain stated that thefts and losses ‘are rare’ because the museum has policies and systems to safeguard the 33.5 million items in its care ‘regular audits and spot checks and restricted access’ to its collection storage facilities.`[28] In addition the spokesperson specified, “police carry out a thorough investigation for every lost item and these investigations have never established any evidence of internal malicious activity.”[29] Based on the information provided by experts in the field, the belief that these thefts are rare is miscategorized.

Lack of Security for Employees Entering and Exiting the Museum

Art thefts of this kind rarely target well-known masterpieces and instead focus on smaller items of lesser value. According to a 2014 study, “smaller objects in the $10,000-50,000 range are the most vulnerable.[30] Some museums even have very few security checks for employees leaving the museum at the end of the day, making it very easy for staff to take items undetected.[31] Given an employee often has special access to collections and knows the security precautions in the museum, insider knowledge makes it easy to get away with the theft.[32]

Solutions

Increase Security Measures

Whitman advised museums on this issue over ten years ago.[33] He suggested ways to reduce the risk of insider theft. One suggestion is obvious. He states that these institutions must“look at [their] staff, [their] procedures for bringing researchers and experts in, making sure that when they leave, you know what they’re taking with them.”[34] He also suggests that museums should take even minor thefts extremely seriously. It is not about getting the one piece back, but it is sending a message that theft will not be tolerated. He also pressed how important it is to emphasize that theft from museums is a federal violation since these museums are owned by the government. These individuals should not just be fired but prosecuted as a deterrent.

Redistribute the Budget

Museums should focus a greater proportion of the budget on security if they would like to curb these thefts. Museums devote most of their budgets to building their collections and the very buildings that house these collections. As a result, the museums skimp on security.[35]

Conclusion

Inside jobs in museums seem to be caused by museums ignoring the risk of employee theft. In order to stop these crimes from continuing to happen, museums have to emphasize internal security as much as they do external. Employees should have to be checked before exiting the museum and security has to be active even in private areas. These thefts cost museums and police millions of dollars. The issue must be solved. Cultural heritage should be protected by its protectors.

Additional Reading:

(Germany) — Jo Lawson-Tancred, “A German Museum Employee Has Been Caught ‘Shamelessly’ Swapping Original Paintings for Fakes to Fund His Lavish Lifestyle,” ArtNet (Sept. 25, 2023), available at https://news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/german-museum-employee-swapped-paintings-fakes-2367937

(United Kingdom) Steven McIntosh, “British Museum was victim of inside job, George Osborne says,” BBC (Oct. 18, 2023), available at https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-67144607.

(Switzerland)  Christopher F. Schuetze, “Swiss Museum Cashier Pockets Over $1 Million in Yearslong Scam,” TNYT (Aug. 8, 2023), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/08/arts/design/switzerland-museum-cashier-theft.html

About the Author:

Lily Elkwood is a 2L year student at Fordham Law School. She graduated from Cornell University where she studied Blockchain and the Art Market. She is passionate about how art and law intersect in the art market. She is interested in art investing, especially fractional ownership, and is excited to see how art and technology intersect in the future.

Sources:

  1. Harriet Sherwood, “Thefts by staff a common problem in UK museums, say experts” The Guardian (2023), https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/aug/18/thefts-by-staff-a-common-problem-in-uk-museums-say-experts (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  2. Noli Novak, “How an academic uncovered one of the biggest museum heists of all time,” The Wall Street Journal (2023), https://www.wsj.com/style/british-museum-ittai-gradel-heist-efec0847 (last visited Nov 20, 2023). ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Id. ↑
  6. Id. ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Supra, Novak. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Emmet Lyons, The British Museum fires employee for suspected theft of Ancient Treasures CBS News (2023), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/british-musuem-theft-treasures-artifacts-employee-fired/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023); Christy Choi, German museum employee swaps painting for fake and sells original to fund “luxury lifestyle” CNN(2023), https://www.cnn.com/style/german-munich-museum-stolen-paintings-sold/index.html (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  13. Bea Mitchell, Staff stealing from museums is an “unspoken problem”, according to experts Blooloop (2023), https://blooloop.com/museum/news/staff-stealing-museums-problem-experts-say/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  14. Susan Mandel, Insider theft, fires, and Vandals top list of museum concerns ASIS Homepage, https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2008/06/insider-theft-fires-and-vandals-top-list-of-museum-concerns/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  15. Sherwood, supra. ↑
  16. Mitchell, supra. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Mandel, supra. ↑
  19. Mitchell, supra. ↑
  20. Id. ↑
  21. Sammy Westfall, “British Museum fires worker over “missing, stolen and damaged” treasures” The Washington Post (2023), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/16/british-museum-theft-stolen-missing-damaged-jewelry-gold/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  22. Id. ↑
  23. Tom Seymour, “British Museum Imposes “emergency security measures” after staff member allegedly steals priceless artefacts,” The Art Newspaper (Aug. 17, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/08/17/british-museum-imposes-emergency-security-measures-after-staff-member-allegedly-steals-priceless-artefacts (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  24. Id. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. Makar, supra. ↑
  27. Staff Reports, “Former New Bedford Whaling Museum employee charged with stealing $75,000 in artifacts,” New Bedford Standard-Times (Jan. 13, 2023), https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/news/2023/01/13/former-new-bedford-whaling-museum-employee-charged-in-artifact-thefts/69807600007/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  28. Adam Schrader, “U.K. museums maintain that art theft is “rare” following reports exaggerating the scale of the problem,” Artnet News (2023), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/uk-museums-contest-art-theft-after-british-museum-scandal-2376132 (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  29. Id. ↑
  30. Vanessa Kelly, How Art Theft Affects Museum Attendance, Membership, and Fundraising Revenue, 2021, https://crossworks.holycross.edu/econ_honor/32/. ↑
  31. Sherwood, supra. ↑
  32. Rhiannon Alban-Davies & Ruby Chan, “Do current collection management practices belong in a museum?” WTW (2023), https://www.wtwco.com/en-hk/insights/2023/10/do-current-collection-management-practices-belong-in-a-museum (last visited Dec 29, 2023). ↑
  33. Mandel, supra. ↑
  34. Id. ↑
  35. Katharine L. Salomon, Art theft, art vandalism, and guardianship in U.S. art institutions., 2018, https://ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4206&context=etd. ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Diversity-Fraud: Accent Delight v. Sotheby’s
Next Case Review: Reif, et al. v. The Art Institute of Chicago (2023)

Related Art Law Articles

#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation
Art law

#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende: Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation

September 13, 2026
A New Type of Varnish Nightshade Glaze and Artists Battle with AI Image
Art law

A New Type of Varnish: Nightshade, Glaze, and Artists’ Battle with AI

September 12, 2026
Sam Brady Myerov Folk Modern and Facade Images
Art law

Folk, Modern, and Facade: MoMA and the Afterlife of the American Folk Art Museum Building

September 8, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law