• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet The Inside Job: Who is Protecting Art Museums from Themselves?
Back

The Inside Job: Who is Protecting Art Museums from Themselves?

February 15, 2024

Collage with headlines and a view of the British museum

By Lily Elkwood

When most people think of art theft, they imagine something out of a spy movie, a villain trying to steal a masterpiece or a criminal mastermind in his evil lair plotting how to evade the highest security measures. In many cases, art thieves are the very individuals responsible for taking care of museums.[1] The security guards, the curators, the researchers, and even the summer intern are “the criminal masterminds” stealing from some of the most important cultural institutions in the world.

The Issue

Ittai Gradel, a gem dealer, was searching eBay when he found what was advertised as a 19th century glass gem.[2] With his expertise, Gradel quickly realized it was much more valuable; the item was a Roman Medusa cameo from the second century.[3] He bought the coin for £15 plus postage and sold it for thousands.[4] Grabel then followed the seller, Sultan 1966.[5] For years, Grabel continued to find undervalued collectibles on Sultan 1966’s page, such as a ring from the Ptolemaic kingdom and a fragment of a sardonyx cameo from Roman times.[6] Grabel began to investigate, and using his keen memory, he discovered that some of these items were in a catalog for the British museum.[7] Grabel’s research was not limited to the items for sale, but the identity of the man behind the account. The ebay register said the creator of this mysterious account was Paul Higgins, and then later to Peter Higgs, a curator in the British Museum.[8] While Grabel continued to investigate, Higgs was promoted to keeper of the Greek Collections.[9] Grabel grew angry and emailed museum officials warning that there was a thief in their midst.[10] An investigation was announced and days later Higgs was dismissed.[11]

In recent years, there have been headlines detailing museum thefts by employees. There have been reports of British Museum staff stealing ancient treasures and gems and a German museum employee swapping paintings for forgies.[12] The issue goes beyond headlines. According to experts, it is an “unspoken problem.”[13] FBI agent Robert Whitman said, “About 90 percent of art thefts from museums are internal.”[14] In other words, nearly all art theft is an inside job.[15] Experts in the field say that museums can be “institutionally corrupt.”[16] It is not uncommon for “cherished items” donated to the institution to be quietly sold to collectors or small auction houses in virtually every museum in the world.[17]

The issue isn’t limited to a certain kind of employee either. According to Robert J. Combs, former head of security at the J. Paul Getty Trust, he has seen that theft among insiders occurs at all levels. Within the span of 12 months he saw seven thefts, the perpetrators including curators, archivists, librarians, custodians and even summer interns showing this is an issue for every level of employee. [18]

Why is it an Issue?

As it becomes more obvious that inside jobs are an issue within museums, there are questions of why. Curiosity grows as continuous headlines arrive in the news. Experts have connected the origins of the issue to a few causes.

Lack of Cataloging and Size of Collections

Insider theft may be an issue due to the size of many museum collections. A museum worker spoke on the issue, saying, “it would be easy to take something small without it being noticed for quite a while.”[19] In the case of a British Museum worker who sold 1500 jewels on eBay, the items stolen were not even cataloged.[20] This is one example but is not the norm for every case.

This issue reveals the cataloging issues in museums that allow for employees to steal. Most of these items were stored in an area primarily for academic and research purposes and were not on recent display.[21] Museum specialists have emphasized that employees were likely able to steal because the museum had failed to properly catalog on a digital database. [22] A director of the Institute for Digital Heritage stated that “most museums do not have all objects registered on their databases, which annihilates the promise of museum preservation. Objects kept for research for lingo for no curator could find them in a database, and consequently would not exhibit them.”[23] These thefts are not representative of rogue employees taking advantage of their access to some of the most valuable items in the world but a “ fundamental lack of care and system failures.”[24] The issue lies with the highest level of leadership.[25]

Lack of Security in Private Areas

Many of these items go missing because of more lax security measures within private areas of the museum.[26] A museum employee was charged with stealing $75,000 in artifacts from the New Bedford Whaling Museum. [27]

In nearly all of these thefts, the museum workers were stealing items in storage rather than on display. The Imperial War Museum of Britain stated that thefts and losses ‘are rare’ because the museum has policies and systems to safeguard the 33.5 million items in its care ‘regular audits and spot checks and restricted access’ to its collection storage facilities.`[28] In addition the spokesperson specified, “police carry out a thorough investigation for every lost item and these investigations have never established any evidence of internal malicious activity.”[29] Based on the information provided by experts in the field, the belief that these thefts are rare is miscategorized.

Lack of Security for Employees Entering and Exiting the Museum

Art thefts of this kind rarely target well-known masterpieces and instead focus on smaller items of lesser value. According to a 2014 study, “smaller objects in the $10,000-50,000 range are the most vulnerable.[30] Some museums even have very few security checks for employees leaving the museum at the end of the day, making it very easy for staff to take items undetected.[31] Given an employee often has special access to collections and knows the security precautions in the museum, insider knowledge makes it easy to get away with the theft.[32]

Solutions

Increase Security Measures

Whitman advised museums on this issue over ten years ago.[33] He suggested ways to reduce the risk of insider theft. One suggestion is obvious. He states that these institutions must“look at [their] staff, [their] procedures for bringing researchers and experts in, making sure that when they leave, you know what they’re taking with them.”[34] He also suggests that museums should take even minor thefts extremely seriously. It is not about getting the one piece back, but it is sending a message that theft will not be tolerated. He also pressed how important it is to emphasize that theft from museums is a federal violation since these museums are owned by the government. These individuals should not just be fired but prosecuted as a deterrent.

Redistribute the Budget

Museums should focus a greater proportion of the budget on security if they would like to curb these thefts. Museums devote most of their budgets to building their collections and the very buildings that house these collections. As a result, the museums skimp on security.[35]

Conclusion

Inside jobs in museums seem to be caused by museums ignoring the risk of employee theft. In order to stop these crimes from continuing to happen, museums have to emphasize internal security as much as they do external. Employees should have to be checked before exiting the museum and security has to be active even in private areas. These thefts cost museums and police millions of dollars. The issue must be solved. Cultural heritage should be protected by its protectors.

Additional Reading:

(Germany) — Jo Lawson-Tancred, “A German Museum Employee Has Been Caught ‘Shamelessly’ Swapping Original Paintings for Fakes to Fund His Lavish Lifestyle,” ArtNet (Sept. 25, 2023), available at https://news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/german-museum-employee-swapped-paintings-fakes-2367937

(United Kingdom) Steven McIntosh, “British Museum was victim of inside job, George Osborne says,” BBC (Oct. 18, 2023), available at https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-67144607.

(Switzerland)  Christopher F. Schuetze, “Swiss Museum Cashier Pockets Over $1 Million in Yearslong Scam,” TNYT (Aug. 8, 2023), available at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/08/arts/design/switzerland-museum-cashier-theft.html

About the Author:

Lily Elkwood is a 2L year student at Fordham Law School. She graduated from Cornell University where she studied Blockchain and the Art Market. She is passionate about how art and law intersect in the art market. She is interested in art investing, especially fractional ownership, and is excited to see how art and technology intersect in the future.

Sources:

  1. Harriet Sherwood, “Thefts by staff a common problem in UK museums, say experts” The Guardian (2023), https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/aug/18/thefts-by-staff-a-common-problem-in-uk-museums-say-experts (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  2. Noli Novak, “How an academic uncovered one of the biggest museum heists of all time,” The Wall Street Journal (2023), https://www.wsj.com/style/british-museum-ittai-gradel-heist-efec0847 (last visited Nov 20, 2023). ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Id. ↑
  6. Id. ↑
  7. Id. ↑
  8. Supra, Novak. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Emmet Lyons, The British Museum fires employee for suspected theft of Ancient Treasures CBS News (2023), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/british-musuem-theft-treasures-artifacts-employee-fired/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023); Christy Choi, German museum employee swaps painting for fake and sells original to fund “luxury lifestyle” CNN(2023), https://www.cnn.com/style/german-munich-museum-stolen-paintings-sold/index.html (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  13. Bea Mitchell, Staff stealing from museums is an “unspoken problem”, according to experts Blooloop (2023), https://blooloop.com/museum/news/staff-stealing-museums-problem-experts-say/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  14. Susan Mandel, Insider theft, fires, and Vandals top list of museum concerns ASIS Homepage, https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2008/06/insider-theft-fires-and-vandals-top-list-of-museum-concerns/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  15. Sherwood, supra. ↑
  16. Mitchell, supra. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Mandel, supra. ↑
  19. Mitchell, supra. ↑
  20. Id. ↑
  21. Sammy Westfall, “British Museum fires worker over “missing, stolen and damaged” treasures” The Washington Post (2023), https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/08/16/british-museum-theft-stolen-missing-damaged-jewelry-gold/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  22. Id. ↑
  23. Tom Seymour, “British Museum Imposes “emergency security measures” after staff member allegedly steals priceless artefacts,” The Art Newspaper (Aug. 17, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/08/17/british-museum-imposes-emergency-security-measures-after-staff-member-allegedly-steals-priceless-artefacts (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  24. Id. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. Makar, supra. ↑
  27. Staff Reports, “Former New Bedford Whaling Museum employee charged with stealing $75,000 in artifacts,” New Bedford Standard-Times (Jan. 13, 2023), https://www.southcoasttoday.com/story/news/2023/01/13/former-new-bedford-whaling-museum-employee-charged-in-artifact-thefts/69807600007/ (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  28. Adam Schrader, “U.K. museums maintain that art theft is “rare” following reports exaggerating the scale of the problem,” Artnet News (2023), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/uk-museums-contest-art-theft-after-british-museum-scandal-2376132 (last visited Nov 5, 2023). ↑
  29. Id. ↑
  30. Vanessa Kelly, How Art Theft Affects Museum Attendance, Membership, and Fundraising Revenue, 2021, https://crossworks.holycross.edu/econ_honor/32/. ↑
  31. Sherwood, supra. ↑
  32. Rhiannon Alban-Davies & Ruby Chan, “Do current collection management practices belong in a museum?” WTW (2023), https://www.wtwco.com/en-hk/insights/2023/10/do-current-collection-management-practices-belong-in-a-museum (last visited Dec 29, 2023). ↑
  33. Mandel, supra. ↑
  34. Id. ↑
  35. Katharine L. Salomon, Art theft, art vandalism, and guardianship in U.S. art institutions., 2018, https://ir.library.louisville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4206&context=etd. ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: Reif, et al. v. The Art Institute of Chicago (2023)
Next Diversity-Fraud: Accent Delight v. Sotheby’s

Related Art Law Articles

The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law Canada Pledges Resale Royalty
Art lawCanadaresale royalty

Canada pledges an artist’s resale royalty—can the United States follow “suite”?

April 9, 2026
Abraham and Isaac Returned Home Center for Art Law
Art law

Abraham and Isaac: Sculptures returned home after Spanish Supreme Court decision

April 8, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 2: The Copyright Office Weighs In — Three Reports on AI and the Law

This panel examines the U.S. Copyright Office’s three recent reports on artificial intelligence and copyright, unpacking what they clarify, and what they leave unresolved about authorship, ownership, and protection in the age of AI. Panelists will also situate these reports within the broader legal landscape, touching on emerging litigation and contested issues shaping how AI‑generated and AI‑assisted works are treated under current copyright law.

Moderator: Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research, Center for Art Law

Speakers: Miriam Lord, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Public Information and Education; Ben Zhao, Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at University of Chicago and Founder, Nightshade & Glaze; Katherine Wilson-Milne, Partner, Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP 

Reserve your tickets today! 🎟️ 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel wit Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel… Case law is fascinating, and litigation is often the only path when disputes over valuable art cannot be resolved through negotiation or ADR. 

As news of the renewed HEAR Act spreads through the restitution community, we invite you to read a case review by two of our legal interns, Donyea James (Fordham Law, JD Candidate 2026) and Lauren Stein (Wake Forest University School of Law, JD Candidate 2027), who spent this semester immersed in the facts and law of "Bennigson et al. v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation."

$1,552. That is what a Picasso sold for in 1938 by a Jewish businessman fleeing Nazi Germany. Roughly one-tenth of what he sought just six years earlier. The heirs went to court and two courts said the claim came too late. HEAR Act might very well challenge that conclusion. The case is now pending before New York's highest court. 

🔗 Link in bio.

#ArtLaw #Restitution #HolocaustArt #HEARAct #Guggenheim #Picasso #ProvenanceResearch
Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens wh Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens when the present confronts colonial memory? Join us in Zurich for a special screening of "Elephants & Squirrels," a documentary following Sri Lankan artist Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige as she traces looted artifacts and human remains of the indigenous Wanniyala-Aetto people, held in Swiss museum collections for over a century, and fights for their return home.

Film director Gregor Brändli and the artist will open the evening with reflections on colonial collecting, cultural heritage, and the ethics of museum stewardship.

📅 May 12, 2026 | 18:00 – 21:00
📍 schwarzescafé | Luma Westbau, Limmatstrasse 270, Zurich

This event is free to attend and is offered as part of the CineLöwenbräukunst series. Link in bio for more information.

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #Restitution #Repatriation #Zurich #FilmScreening #ColonialHistory #MuseumEthics 

#MuseumEthics
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for, Panel 1: So Inappropriate — Lessons About Copyright Law and Art: First There Was Art, Then Copyright, Then Fair Use… and Now AI?

From early copyright doctrines to contemporary fair use debates, this panel examines how artists and lawyers have navigated questions of ownership, appropriation, and originality in visual art. Panelists will explore key developments in copyright law affecting traditional artistic practices, from borrowing and remixing to transformative use, while also considering how emerging technologies, including AI, are beginning to reshape long‑standing legal frameworks and artistic norms.

Moderator: Irina Tarsis, Founder, Center for Art Law
Speakers: Vivek Jayaram, Founder, Jayaram Law; Vincent Wilcke, Pace Gallery; Greg Allen, Artist and writer 

Reserve your tickets using the link in our bio or by visiting our website itsartlaw.org 🎟️ 
See you soon!
Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been maki Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been making waves and headlines for weeks and the doors have not even opened yet. The jury refused to award prizes and resigned nine days before the opening over geopolitical controversies. Some artists boycott while others show up even if unwelcome. Some pavilions will be empty, some will not be open to the public… Sources of funds, sources of inspiration, so many questions, so much on display for critical eyes. Meanwhile the boats are waiting for anyone lucky enough to find themselves in the floating world.

Help us reflect on the Biennale by sharing your art law stories.

#ArtLaw #Venice #Biennale2026 #ArtWorld #BiennaleofDissent #LaSerenissima #GoldenLion #SeeArtThinkArtLaw
Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective, scheduled at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in D.C., after a curatorial controversy over the potential removal of her recent work, "Trans Forming Liberty" (2024). Sherald denounced the attempt to remove this work as a blatant and intentional erasure of trans lives. 

This is one of the best examples and the most illustrative examples of the current administration's growing efforts to control the Smithsonian Institution's programming. In this climate of political tension, how do cultural institutions defend themselves against censorship and keep their curatorial independence?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artcuration #curatorialindependance #censorship
Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Arti Grab 15% off tickets the upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!! 

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

Get 15% off using the code: Final15 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia se On the night of April 15–16, 2026 alone, Russia sent hundreds of drones and missiles on sleeping cities across Ukraine, killing and injuring dozens of civilians. War is funded in part by individuals who have important artworks in their personal collections. This full-scale invasion of Ukraine, now in its fifth year, daily exacts a grave toll on Ukrainian lives and cultural heritage, while fundamentally disrupting European commerce. In response, art market participants have adapted their practices, most have accepted, if not always embraced, the need to scrutinize the source of funds and the ultimate beneficiaries of their transactions. Yet there is a growing sense that parts of the trade are holding their breath, waiting to see when they might safely return to dealing with the oligarchs who continue to fund the Russian war machine.

For art market participants operating in the UK, compliance is no longer a peripheral concern, it is a legal imperative. Regulators are watching, the consequences of non-compliance increasingly extend beyond administrative penalties into criminal liability, and private-public partnerships offer the most credible path toward a more resilient and trustworthy market. 

Join us on April 24th for a panel discussion in London on the current state of AML enforcement and sanctions.

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artcrime #london #artissues #museumissues
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law