Back

The Price of Protest: How Activism Affects the Economics of Art Insurance

headlines about climate activists in museums

By Kouros Sadeghi-Nejad

Introduction

National Museum in Sweden, National Gallery of Art in Washington DC, Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, National Gallery in London, Louvre... climate protestors have been increasingly frequenting art museums.

On the morning of April 27th , 2023, climate activists Timothy Martin and Joanna Smith of the Declare Emergency organization were indicted by a federal grand jury for their protest at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. Martin and Smith, alongside other unnamed conspirators of the climate group, targeted Degas’s Little Dancer, Age Fourteen (1878-1881), smearing paint on both its protective glass case and pedestal.[1] In the indictment released by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in D.C on May 24th, it was revealed that the individuals in question were charged with "conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States" and causing injury to museum property in violation of Title 40, United States Code, Sections 6303(b)(2):

Dear Visitor,

We share your curiosity for art law. Thank you for reading our complimentary articles for the month. To read more free articles, please register for a free account. For even more access and perks, consider becoming a premium member!

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Already a premium member? Sign in

Or, become a premium member for unlimited access

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.