• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art History image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Who owns African Art?
Back

Who owns African Art?

February 1, 2024

fragment from a 17th century map of Africa name

By Delela Ndela and Adenike Fapohunda

The ongoing conversation about the ownership of African art tends to center historical works and cultural artifacts. From the Benin Bronzes to the body of Sarah Bartmann, the relationship between African cultural production and the west has been characterized in great part by theft, violence, and the outright objectification of African bodies. In a political climate where redress and reparations for colonial crimes are becoming increasingly mainstream, it’s only natural that the return of stolen objects would be a leading demand of African progressives. However, this framing tends to ignore the ongoing reality of art in Africa, a reality in which Africa’s most prominent artists—from Wangechi Mutu to Adel Abdessemed—live, create, study, exhibit and sell work in western cultural capitals. This is a reality in which African cultural production comes to be owned by the cultured classes of the global north.

Cultural Imposition and the destruction of African ways of creating

Neo-colonialism, as described by Kwame Nkrumah, is the exertion of control by imperialist states over their nominal post colonies by economic, cultural and “humanitarian” means, rather than direct military intervention or indirect political control.[1] In cultural studies, neo-colonialism is thought to take the form of cultural imposition, where an imperial state engages in culture (language, tradition, and art, for example) to assert its power over its colonial possessions.[2] In African contexts, this has meant destroying indigenous cultural realities and asserting the superiority of western culture while excluding Africans from full participation in that culture.

Africans are taught that western aesthetic practices are superior to African ones, that the classics consist of Bronte and not Mariam Ba, and that movements in contemporary art such as cubism can be attributed only to Picasso and not the countless, nameless, African artists that he was inspired by.[3]

As African post-coloniality has progressed, artists have challenged this cultural neo-colonialism, deploying a range of tools to do so: from Wa Thiong’o’s indigenisation of the novel to Mutu’s paintings, which explicitly take on the misrepresentation of women in culture. These artists form part of a movement to change how Africans are viewed in the world and view themselves, a welcome intervention after centuries of de-humanisation.

Economic realities: Art and Capital

The reality remains that capital is concentrated in the imperial core and, as Clement Greenberg said, art and capital are “attached by an umbilical cord of gold.”[4] Artists need to eat and their work will go where the money they need to create flows freely. This is not the reality in the African continent, where only a handful of major cities can be said to support a thriving art market. As such the African art market stands in contrast to art markets in Europe or North America, where Paris, New York, Miami, Milan, London and so many more have built rich (if speculative) art markets. For many African artists to survive, they must access western markets.

There is also a popular sentiment that the time of western domination in Africa has ended. That Africans ought to banish the memories of colonialism and move on. In a 2014 speech, former US president Barack Obama stated, “Africa should stop blaming history for its economic problems.”[5] Recently, French president Emmanuel Macron stated on a four nation tour of Africa that the era of French interference in Africa is over.[6] Optimists would say that the repatriation of stolen objects points to a crucial turning point in Africa’s relationship with Europe, that it shows a willingness to apologize for past injustice and highlights an eagerness to engage in a process of healing. There is an acknowledgement that those items were taken by force; art then functions as a site of truth telling and mourning when other avenues of social expression have not yet caught up.

However, in this moment, while reflecting on the past, it is important to acknowledge that African art is experiencing a renaissance, with experiments abound across the continent. The western art world is experiencing this renaissance as its own rejuvenation, as western galleries and festivals increasingly elevate African artists—what they introduce is a spirit of possibility, of true belief. African art, so long diminished, treated as fodder for anthropology, is now a field for western consumption. As evidenced by musicians like Rema performing at the Ballon’dor and South African auction house Strauss & Co, reporting sales totalling 20.6 million dollars in 2022.[7]

When you attend large art fairs, such as FNB Joburg Art Fair and ART X Lagos, it would seem that the era of displacement has come to an end. When you look closely, however, you must confront the discomfort in a physical space that displays the work of black African artists as represented by white European staff.

Notably, African art attains its highest sales figures beyond the continent, this is exemplified by South African painter Irma Stern, who consistently achieves top sales at African art auctions with her paintings averaging around $300,000 per artwork, Stern notably sold her most expensive painting and the second most expensive african artwork ever sold at auction to the Orientalist Museum in Doha for $4.8 million in 2011. As Africans, it’s crucial to reflect on the implications for our historical and cultural legacy when even our contemporary art is being removed from the continent.

Furthermore, notwithstanding the construction of galleries, such as the Zeitz Museum of Modern Art and the Zoma Art Center, pointing to growth in the art ecosystem in Africa, there is still an overwhelming lack of investment in art as a public good. In Lagos, one of the three biggest African art cities, there are no state-owned art galleries. In Johannesburg, another African city with a vibrant art scene, the Johannesburg Art Gallery was left in ruin for many years before it finally closed its doors due to rain damage. Until recently, it was almost impossible to have a sustainable career from art on the continent. Universities by and large, with the exception of South Africa, do not offer degrees in curation or art history.

Perhaps introspection is necessary on how Africans can preserve ownership of artistic capital at a time where there is such a large demand for the work produced. When an artist based in Africa signs an agreement with an art gallery to represent them, to promote their work, is it their responsibility to ensure that the benefits of such a contract flow back to their communities? When the team that works with this artist is based in the west, does their art become yet another site for extraction, where the profits made from artists on the continent are taken to the west?

African Art Renaissance: A Complete Shift

Some argue that to ensure sustainable art practices, young Africans must be taught to invest in art and collect art. Some galleries have introduced lay-bys for pieces where collectors can pay off their art over extended periods of time. However, when artists gain western acclaim, the price of their pieces are further inflated, making it impossible for people in their countries of origin to collect.

Over and above, this is the issue of documentation. It becomes pertinent to see the work that is being created as a link in the thread of history. How will contemporary work will be remembered if Africa does not have the space to store the work that will come to define this cultural zeitgeist?

A partial answer to these questions must include reflection by all parties. It becomes important to discuss how to look at the cultural relationships between countries that were colonized and those that colonized. How can a community reimage a global cultural exchange in a manner that upholds the dignity of the art, people and communities that influenced its creation?

Perhaps the accord signed by the German government and Nigeria’s Commission for Museums and Monuments might allow us to imagine a different future. It is noteworthy that this goes further than simply laying out the procedure for the return of artifacts. Instead, the accord creates the framework for joint projects in archaeology, education, and museum infrastructure that will be jointly beneficial and give back to communities in Benin City, from where the bronzes come.

Conclusion

Notwithstanding the role that Europe and North America have played in decimating Africa’s cultural heritage, it does not suffice to look to the west to carry all the responsibility in resolving the issues faced in preserving Africa’s cultural heritage. The ongoing project of restoring and preserving African art may should consider the words of Ousmane Sembene: “My future does not depend on Europe… Why be a sunflower and turn to the sun, I myself am the sun.” It is the responsibility of Africans and our governments to buy, preserve and invest in the arts and recognize art as a social good that contributes to our collective wellbeing.

Suggested Readings:

  1. Nɢᴜ̃ɢɪ̃ ᴡᴀ Tʜɪᴏɴɢ’ᴏ, Pᴇɴᴘᴏɪɴᴛs, Gᴜɴᴘᴏɪɴᴛs, ᴀɴᴅ Dʀᴇᴀᴍs (1998).
  2. Aʟɪᴄᴇ Pʀᴏᴄᴛᴇʀ, Tʜᴇ Wʜᴏʟᴇ Pɪᴄᴛᴜʀᴇ: Tʜᴇ Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟ Sᴛᴏʀʏ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ Aʀᴛ ɪɴ Oᴜʀ Mᴜsᴇᴜᴍs & Wʜʏ Wᴇ Nᴇᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ Tᴀʟᴋ Aʙᴏᴜᴛ Iᴛ (2020).
  3. Kᴡᴀᴍᴇ Nᴋʀᴜᴍᴀʜ, Nᴇᴏ-Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟɪsᴍ : Tʜᴇ Lᴀsᴛ Sᴛᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ Iᴍᴘᴇʀɪᴀʟɪsᴍ (1965).
  4. Rᴏsᴀʟɪɴᴅ Mᴏʀʀɪs, Cᴀɴ ᴛʜᴇ Sᴜʙᴀʟᴛᴇʀɴ Sᴘᴇᴀᴋ?: Rᴇғʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴs ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ Hɪsᴛᴏʀʏ ᴏғ ᴀɴ Iᴅᴇᴀ (2010).

About the Authors

Delela Ndlela is an essayist in Johannesburg.

Adenike Fapohunda is a writer and lawyer based in Johannesburg.

Sources:

  1. Kᴡᴀᴍᴇ Nᴋʀᴜᴍᴀʜ, Introduction, in Nᴇᴏ-Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟɪsᴍ : Tʜᴇ Lᴀsᴛ Sᴛᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ Iᴍᴘᴇʀɪᴀʟɪsᴍ (1965). ↑
  2. Ramón Grosfoguel, The Epistemic Decolonial Turn: Beyond Political-Economy Paradigms, 21 Cᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴀʟ Sᴛᴜᴅɪᴇs 211 (2007), 10.1080/09502380601162514. ↑
  3. Lisa Modiano, How Much Does Picasso Owe to African Art?, Tʜᴇ Cᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛᴏʀ (Apr. 30, 2022), https://www.thecollector.com/picasso-and-african-art/. ↑
  4. Clement Greenberg, Avant-Garde and Kitsch, in Aʀᴛ ᴀɴᴅ Cᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ (1965). ↑
  5. Maeve Shearlaw, ‘Africa Should Stop Blaming History for Its Economic Problems’ – Is Obama Right?, Tʜᴇ Gᴜᴀʀᴅɪᴀɴ (July 30, 2014), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/30/-sp-obama-africa-colonial-excuses-poll. ↑
  6. Macron Says Era of French Interference in Africa is ‘Over’, Aʟ Jᴀᴢᴇᴇʀᴀ (Mar. 2, 2023), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/3/2/macron-says-era-of-french-interference-in-africa-is-over. ↑
  7. Anny Shaw, Global Demand for African Art Brings Near-Record Year for South African Auction House Despite ‘Much Higher Degrees of Uncertainty’, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (Jan. 27, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/01/27/global-demand-for-african-art-brings-near-record-year-for-south-african-auction-house-despite-much-higher-degrees-of-uncertainty. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous US Museums Return Schiele artworks to the heirs of Fritz Grünbaum
Next Case Review: Reif, et al. v. The Art Institute of Chicago (2023)

Related Posts

UNESCO calls for ban on trade in Haitian artifacts to prevent pillaging of the country’s cultural heritage

January 31, 2010
logo

Prison Sentence for Leader of Giacometti Forgery Ring

April 16, 2011

Trove of Cultural Property Laws: Where Would You Rather Find a Treasure Trove?

April 24, 2011
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law