• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art History image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Who owns African Art?
Back

Who owns African Art?

February 1, 2024

fragment from a 17th century map of Africa name

By Delela Ndela and Adenike Fapohunda

The ongoing conversation about the ownership of African art tends to center historical works and cultural artifacts. From the Benin Bronzes to the body of Sarah Bartmann, the relationship between African cultural production and the west has been characterized in great part by theft, violence, and the outright objectification of African bodies. In a political climate where redress and reparations for colonial crimes are becoming increasingly mainstream, it’s only natural that the return of stolen objects would be a leading demand of African progressives. However, this framing tends to ignore the ongoing reality of art in Africa, a reality in which Africa’s most prominent artists—from Wangechi Mutu to Adel Abdessemed—live, create, study, exhibit and sell work in western cultural capitals. This is a reality in which African cultural production comes to be owned by the cultured classes of the global north.

Cultural Imposition and the destruction of African ways of creating

Neo-colonialism, as described by Kwame Nkrumah, is the exertion of control by imperialist states over their nominal post colonies by economic, cultural and “humanitarian” means, rather than direct military intervention or indirect political control.[1] In cultural studies, neo-colonialism is thought to take the form of cultural imposition, where an imperial state engages in culture (language, tradition, and art, for example) to assert its power over its colonial possessions.[2] In African contexts, this has meant destroying indigenous cultural realities and asserting the superiority of western culture while excluding Africans from full participation in that culture.

Africans are taught that western aesthetic practices are superior to African ones, that the classics consist of Bronte and not Mariam Ba, and that movements in contemporary art such as cubism can be attributed only to Picasso and not the countless, nameless, African artists that he was inspired by.[3]

As African post-coloniality has progressed, artists have challenged this cultural neo-colonialism, deploying a range of tools to do so: from Wa Thiong’o’s indigenisation of the novel to Mutu’s paintings, which explicitly take on the misrepresentation of women in culture. These artists form part of a movement to change how Africans are viewed in the world and view themselves, a welcome intervention after centuries of de-humanisation.

Economic realities: Art and Capital

The reality remains that capital is concentrated in the imperial core and, as Clement Greenberg said, art and capital are “attached by an umbilical cord of gold.”[4] Artists need to eat and their work will go where the money they need to create flows freely. This is not the reality in the African continent, where only a handful of major cities can be said to support a thriving art market. As such the African art market stands in contrast to art markets in Europe or North America, where Paris, New York, Miami, Milan, London and so many more have built rich (if speculative) art markets. For many African artists to survive, they must access western markets.

There is also a popular sentiment that the time of western domination in Africa has ended. That Africans ought to banish the memories of colonialism and move on. In a 2014 speech, former US president Barack Obama stated, “Africa should stop blaming history for its economic problems.”[5] Recently, French president Emmanuel Macron stated on a four nation tour of Africa that the era of French interference in Africa is over.[6] Optimists would say that the repatriation of stolen objects points to a crucial turning point in Africa’s relationship with Europe, that it shows a willingness to apologize for past injustice and highlights an eagerness to engage in a process of healing. There is an acknowledgement that those items were taken by force; art then functions as a site of truth telling and mourning when other avenues of social expression have not yet caught up.

However, in this moment, while reflecting on the past, it is important to acknowledge that African art is experiencing a renaissance, with experiments abound across the continent. The western art world is experiencing this renaissance as its own rejuvenation, as western galleries and festivals increasingly elevate African artists—what they introduce is a spirit of possibility, of true belief. African art, so long diminished, treated as fodder for anthropology, is now a field for western consumption. As evidenced by musicians like Rema performing at the Ballon’dor and South African auction house Strauss & Co, reporting sales totalling 20.6 million dollars in 2022.[7]

When you attend large art fairs, such as FNB Joburg Art Fair and ART X Lagos, it would seem that the era of displacement has come to an end. When you look closely, however, you must confront the discomfort in a physical space that displays the work of black African artists as represented by white European staff.

Notably, African art attains its highest sales figures beyond the continent, this is exemplified by South African painter Irma Stern, who consistently achieves top sales at African art auctions with her paintings averaging around $300,000 per artwork, Stern notably sold her most expensive painting and the second most expensive african artwork ever sold at auction to the Orientalist Museum in Doha for $4.8 million in 2011. As Africans, it’s crucial to reflect on the implications for our historical and cultural legacy when even our contemporary art is being removed from the continent.

Furthermore, notwithstanding the construction of galleries, such as the Zeitz Museum of Modern Art and the Zoma Art Center, pointing to growth in the art ecosystem in Africa, there is still an overwhelming lack of investment in art as a public good. In Lagos, one of the three biggest African art cities, there are no state-owned art galleries. In Johannesburg, another African city with a vibrant art scene, the Johannesburg Art Gallery was left in ruin for many years before it finally closed its doors due to rain damage. Until recently, it was almost impossible to have a sustainable career from art on the continent. Universities by and large, with the exception of South Africa, do not offer degrees in curation or art history.

Perhaps introspection is necessary on how Africans can preserve ownership of artistic capital at a time where there is such a large demand for the work produced. When an artist based in Africa signs an agreement with an art gallery to represent them, to promote their work, is it their responsibility to ensure that the benefits of such a contract flow back to their communities? When the team that works with this artist is based in the west, does their art become yet another site for extraction, where the profits made from artists on the continent are taken to the west?

African Art Renaissance: A Complete Shift

Some argue that to ensure sustainable art practices, young Africans must be taught to invest in art and collect art. Some galleries have introduced lay-bys for pieces where collectors can pay off their art over extended periods of time. However, when artists gain western acclaim, the price of their pieces are further inflated, making it impossible for people in their countries of origin to collect.

Over and above, this is the issue of documentation. It becomes pertinent to see the work that is being created as a link in the thread of history. How will contemporary work will be remembered if Africa does not have the space to store the work that will come to define this cultural zeitgeist?

A partial answer to these questions must include reflection by all parties. It becomes important to discuss how to look at the cultural relationships between countries that were colonized and those that colonized. How can a community reimage a global cultural exchange in a manner that upholds the dignity of the art, people and communities that influenced its creation?

Perhaps the accord signed by the German government and Nigeria’s Commission for Museums and Monuments might allow us to imagine a different future. It is noteworthy that this goes further than simply laying out the procedure for the return of artifacts. Instead, the accord creates the framework for joint projects in archaeology, education, and museum infrastructure that will be jointly beneficial and give back to communities in Benin City, from where the bronzes come.

Conclusion

Notwithstanding the role that Europe and North America have played in decimating Africa’s cultural heritage, it does not suffice to look to the west to carry all the responsibility in resolving the issues faced in preserving Africa’s cultural heritage. The ongoing project of restoring and preserving African art may should consider the words of Ousmane Sembene: “My future does not depend on Europe… Why be a sunflower and turn to the sun, I myself am the sun.” It is the responsibility of Africans and our governments to buy, preserve and invest in the arts and recognize art as a social good that contributes to our collective wellbeing.

Suggested Readings:

  1. Nɢᴜ̃ɢɪ̃ ᴡᴀ Tʜɪᴏɴɢ’ᴏ, Pᴇɴᴘᴏɪɴᴛs, Gᴜɴᴘᴏɪɴᴛs, ᴀɴᴅ Dʀᴇᴀᴍs (1998).
  2. Aʟɪᴄᴇ Pʀᴏᴄᴛᴇʀ, Tʜᴇ Wʜᴏʟᴇ Pɪᴄᴛᴜʀᴇ: Tʜᴇ Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟ Sᴛᴏʀʏ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇ Aʀᴛ ɪɴ Oᴜʀ Mᴜsᴇᴜᴍs & Wʜʏ Wᴇ Nᴇᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ Tᴀʟᴋ Aʙᴏᴜᴛ Iᴛ (2020).
  3. Kᴡᴀᴍᴇ Nᴋʀᴜᴍᴀʜ, Nᴇᴏ-Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟɪsᴍ : Tʜᴇ Lᴀsᴛ Sᴛᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ Iᴍᴘᴇʀɪᴀʟɪsᴍ (1965).
  4. Rᴏsᴀʟɪɴᴅ Mᴏʀʀɪs, Cᴀɴ ᴛʜᴇ Sᴜʙᴀʟᴛᴇʀɴ Sᴘᴇᴀᴋ?: Rᴇғʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴs ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ Hɪsᴛᴏʀʏ ᴏғ ᴀɴ Iᴅᴇᴀ (2010).

About the Authors

Delela Ndlela is an essayist in Johannesburg.

Adenike Fapohunda is a writer and lawyer based in Johannesburg.

Sources:

  1. Kᴡᴀᴍᴇ Nᴋʀᴜᴍᴀʜ, Introduction, in Nᴇᴏ-Cᴏʟᴏɴɪᴀʟɪsᴍ : Tʜᴇ Lᴀsᴛ Sᴛᴀɢᴇ ᴏғ Iᴍᴘᴇʀɪᴀʟɪsᴍ (1965). ↑
  2. Ramón Grosfoguel, The Epistemic Decolonial Turn: Beyond Political-Economy Paradigms, 21 Cᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴀʟ Sᴛᴜᴅɪᴇs 211 (2007), 10.1080/09502380601162514. ↑
  3. Lisa Modiano, How Much Does Picasso Owe to African Art?, Tʜᴇ Cᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛᴏʀ (Apr. 30, 2022), https://www.thecollector.com/picasso-and-african-art/. ↑
  4. Clement Greenberg, Avant-Garde and Kitsch, in Aʀᴛ ᴀɴᴅ Cᴜʟᴛᴜʀᴇ (1965). ↑
  5. Maeve Shearlaw, ‘Africa Should Stop Blaming History for Its Economic Problems’ – Is Obama Right?, Tʜᴇ Gᴜᴀʀᴅɪᴀɴ (July 30, 2014), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/30/-sp-obama-africa-colonial-excuses-poll. ↑
  6. Macron Says Era of French Interference in Africa is ‘Over’, Aʟ Jᴀᴢᴇᴇʀᴀ (Mar. 2, 2023), https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/3/2/macron-says-era-of-french-interference-in-africa-is-over. ↑
  7. Anny Shaw, Global Demand for African Art Brings Near-Record Year for South African Auction House Despite ‘Much Higher Degrees of Uncertainty’, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (Jan. 27, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/01/27/global-demand-for-african-art-brings-near-record-year-for-south-african-auction-house-despite-much-higher-degrees-of-uncertainty. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous US Museums Return Schiele artworks to the heirs of Fritz Grünbaum
Next Case Review: Reif, et al. v. The Art Institute of Chicago (2023)

Related Art Law Articles

Benningson V Guggenheim Case Review Center for Art Law
Art lawCase ReviewLegal Issues in Museum Administration

Case Review: Bennigson v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation

March 13, 2026
Art Muralists Artists? Center for Art Law
Art law

Are Muralists Artists? Legally, It Varies

March 13, 2026
Clinic Instagram
Art lawWish You Were Herebootcampevent review

WYWH: “Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Copyright Law”

March 6, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

Annual Conference

2026 edition explores Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century.

 

Early Bird Tickets Available
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Digital repatriation is a practice being used by m Digital repatriation is a practice being used by museums to "return" a digital version of a work to source communities while retaining the physical object. Digitization itself can increase eduction and access to items, but does a digital version of an object truly act as a sufficient substitute to the heritage contained in the original or does it create a further layer of colonial control through the access to such digital property?

Read out recent article by Afroditi Karatagli to learn more about the impact of digital repatriations and what actions should be taken instead. 

📚 Find the full article using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #digitalrepatriation #digitalart #artmarket #artistissues #museumissues
Join us for a on April 9th for a new colloquium on Join us for a on April 9th for a new colloquium on the legal foundations for restitution of Nazi-looted art. Raymond J. Dowd will discuss his recent article "Taking The Profit Out of War: Why International Law Requires Restitution of Nazi-Looted Art" published in the Fordham Law Review Online. He will delve into the impact of international property law on those looking to bring restitution claims. 

🎟️ Grab you tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #restitution #nazilootedart #lootedart #artcrimes
In January, two Roman bronze statutes of toddlers In January, two Roman bronze statutes of toddlers reaching for partridges, were returned and displayed by the Spanish Museo Arqueológico Nacional. The statues had previously been sold by Christie's in 2012 to a private collector. Christie's had stated the statues came from an unnamed collector, who had gotten them from Giovanni Züst. This was determined to be false. 

After a lengthly journey through the Swiss legal system, due to a Swiss man stating the statues were in his family, before being taken by an Italian man, and then later false documents being prepared prior to the Christie's sale. Later investigators in Spain determined the statues were looted property taken from Spain around 2007. The statues were voluntarily restituted 

📚 Read more using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #looting #artcrimes #spain #restitution
You may have noticed our February newsletter arriv You may have noticed our February newsletter arrived twice, think of it as an encore. March has arrived with its familiar whirlwind, and like many of you, we find ourselves following world affairs with disbelief, dismay, and a deepening sense of urgency. Mahatma Gandhi observed that “the difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.” At the Center, we believe that building knowledge, access, and community in art law is one meaningful way to solve some of the world’s problems; we wish we could do more. 

🔗 Check out our March newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #march #legalresearch
Don't miss out on our upcoming Copyright Clinic on Don't miss out on our upcoming Copyright Clinic on March 18th!! Join us for an informative presentation and pro bono consultations to better understand the current art and copyright law landscape. Copyright law is a body of federal law that grants authors exclusive rights over their original works — from paintings and photographs to sculptures, as well as other fixed and tangible creative forms. Once protection attaches, copyright owners have exclusive economic rights that allow them to control how their work is reproduced, modified and distributed, among other uses.

Albeit theoretically simple, in practice copyright law is complex and nuanced: what works acquire such protection? How can creatives better protect their assets or, if they wish, exploit them for their monetary benefit?

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
September of 2025 stuck a potential death blow to September of 2025 stuck a potential death blow to the NFT market: Christie's announced the closing of their digital art department. It had only lasted 3 years. NFTs experienced a incredibly  fast tracked rise and fall in popularity, leaving behind questions as to their continuing value and ownership rights. And yet, there could be some lasting change on how digital ownership will continue moving foward. 

📚 To learn more about this niche and potentially, completely, disappearing market read Shaila Gray's recently published article using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #nfts #blockchain #digitalart #artmarket #artistissues
ONLY 5 DAYS LEFT to apply for the Second Edition ONLY 5 DAYS LEFT to apply  for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School!! Deadline to apply is  March 15th! Check out these memories from our 2025 Summer School. Don't miss your chance to participate in a whirlwind adventure exploring art law in NYC. 🗽

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field.

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio!
After many years of hard work we’ve officially cro After many years of hard work we’ve officially crossed the 1,000 cases mark in our case law database!! Let us know what your favorites are below!
Join us on March 12 for Charitable Contributions: Join us on March 12 for Charitable Contributions: Tax Considerations for Artists and Collectors. For this event we are pleased to be hearing from Attorney Karin Gross. With over 30 years of experience, Ms. Gross is an expert in the area of tax law and specializes in the area of tax aspects for charitable giving. She served in the Office of Legislative Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives, drafting legislation on behalf of Members of Congress and committee and has worked at the IRS Office of Chief Council. Ms. Gross will guide participants through important tax considerations for artists, collectors and art market participants. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #tax #taxlaw #artist #irs #artandtaxlaw
On March 2nd, SCOTUS ended the saga of "The Recent On March 2nd, SCOTUS ended the saga of "The Recent Enteance to Paradise ", having denied writ of certiorari in Thaler v. Perlmutter. The question posed to the Court was if a work with a nonhuman author could receive copyright protections. The Court of Appeals for D.C. (2025) and the District Court (2023) have already answered 'no' to this issue, citing prior case law human requirements, statute interpretation of the word human artist, and other arguments. Check out our coverage discussing both lower court opinions using the link in bio. Human authorship remains a must for copyright registration. 

📚 Read more about the Supreme Court petition and outcome using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #copyright #artlaw #artlawyer #copyrightlaw #ailaw #aiart #artissues #artandai
Deadline Extended!! We are still accepting applica Deadline Extended!! We are still accepting applications for the Second Edition of Center for Art Law Summer School until March 15th! Don't miss this opportunity to explore art law NYC style 🗽

Taking place in the vibrant art hub of New York City, the program will provide participants with a foundational understanding of art law, opportunities to explore key issues in the field, and access to a network of professionals and peers with shared interests. Participants will also have the opportunity to see how things work from a hands-on and practical perspective by visiting galleries, artist studios, auction houses and law firms, and speak with professionals dedicated to and passionate about the field.

Applications Extended till March 15th!

🎟️ APPLY NOW using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawsummerschool #newyork #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #lawyer #art
Have you seen the 2024 documentary "The Spoils"? O Have you seen the 2024 documentary "The Spoils"? Our latest review covers Jamie Kastner's film that follows the Max Stern Foundation's restitution efforts and asks hard questions about who holds power in the art world. Savannah Weiler reviews it and we want to hear your take. Read it via the link in bio and drop your thoughts in the comments! 👇 

#centerforartlaw #FILMREVIEW #nazieralootedart #maxsternfoundation
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law