• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Artist Feature Series image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Hilde Lynn Helphenstein/ Jerry Gogosian
Back

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Hilde Lynn Helphenstein/ Jerry Gogosian

May 23, 2023

art smack Jerry Hilde

Atreya Mathur and the Center for Art Law Team

Introduction

In the context of the Center for Art Law’s Artists’ Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic as well as Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic, the Center sat down with American gallerist and artist Hilde Lynn Helphenstein, a.k.a. Jerry Gogosian, whose instagram account is a satire of the contemporary art world[1], to discuss her work and her recent experiences in connection with the Yayoi Kusama x Louis Vuitton (LV) collaboration.

The only thing better than pumpkin spice season is Yayoi Kusama x Louis Vuitton season. Source: Louis Vuitton and ArtNet.

Yayoi Kusama is one of the best known artists in the world. She is a nano-generian and has been renowned for her mental health issues and her ubiquitous dots. LV is a French-based fashion house and an international corporation known for partnering with artists, including Jeff Koons and Sol LeWitt for mega-commercial projects. In 2023, LV launched its second collaboration with Kusama, dotting storefronts and hundreds of products as well as reproducing Kusama’s likeness as automated manikins in Paris, New York and other storefronts. Many commentators have expressed mixed feelings about the propriety of the Kusama company.

Read the Center’s background work in preparation for the interview HERE.

Center for Art Law is interested in this topic in the contents of protecting artists’ rights, addressing estate planning needs and legacy questions as well as duties of artists and dealers to each other when in a contractual relationship.

https://www.instagram.com/jerrygogosian/

Interview with Hilde Lynn Helphenstein/ Jerry Gogosian

Please let us know a little bit about yourself? The alias name you use– the story behind it?

My name is Hilde Lynn Helphenstein, but I’m known online as Jerry Gogosian. I have an Instagram account following of 126K followers who are mostly artists, art dealers, major art institutions, and broadly speaking art enthusiasts. I have been satirizing the art world for about 5 years via memes, but occasionally I use my platform for other things namely: supporting other artists, having conversations about the contemporary art world, watching auctions, discussing the art market and calling out major injustices or exploitation, if I deem it necessary.

What kind of work do you do and what art do you enjoy practicing? How long have you been creating art? (Any links to your art we could see?)

I am a multi-media cross-disciplinary artist. Making art is my full time job in the sense that Jerry Gogosian is very much a full time job. I make memes, have a weekly podcast called Art Smack, write a private [online] newsletter where I write about the art market and major art world occurrences called “The Jerry Report,” and sell merchandise. I also make public appearances, do brand partnerships, and curate highly produced exhibitions of other artists’ work.

You can see the bulk of what I do by visiting www.gogosian.com or going on Instagram.

What brands have you worked with? What kind of collaborations have you done?

I have worked with ON Running, BMW, Ruinart, MATCHESFASHION, The EDITION hotels, Frieze Art Fair, and The Standard. When I partner with brands I do everything from throwing large parties, highlighting their participation in art world events, and using my multiple platforms to advertise for them.

Do you have any inspirations for your work – if so, whom or what inspires you?

I see myself in direct lineage to artists like Barbara Krueger and Jenny Holzer. These two women have used text and imagery to call attention to issues in culture while maintaining a sense of humor which I find important in my work.

About the Kusama x LV collaboration

In 2022, LV rolled out its latest collaboration with Yayoi Kusama. How did you learn about the Kusama x LV Collaboration?
I saw the roll out of the campaign everywhere I looked. It was on social media, every news outlet, and plastered all over every major city. It was hard to not know about it.

Did you have any thoughts on the collaboration and why?
I believe this is an example of corporate exploitation of an artist’s work and legacy for pure financial gain.

What attracted your attention to the Kusama collaboration with LV?
I was concerned by the collaboration as I was aware of Kusama’s age (from editors: Yayoi Kusama, born in 1929 is now 94 years old) who has been in a psychiatric institute (from editors: since 1977), and struggles from various health and mental health issues. My common sense and intuition told me something did not seem right. She was represented by an automaton and a huge replica on top of the Paris store, but to me she seemed diluted in the LV mega-campaign, the actual human artist was nowhere to be found in this collaboration. Yes, her famous dots were on everything including building exteriors, shopping malls, airports, cookies…not to mention an entire line of products which seemed to have nothing but a bunch of dots that anyone could have painted. There were also Look-alike Robots of Kusama installed in store windows painting dots, which began to feel more and more creepy and genuinely in bad taste/inauthentic.

What did you do? What kind of questions were you asking and to whom were you posing these questions?
I spoke about this issue during one of the episodes of podcast: Art Smack. I began to voice my concerns when someone sent me a “recent” photo of a wheelchair bound Yayoi Kusama staring off into the distance looking very frail and as if she had no idea where she was. (from editors: in the Art Smack Episode 9 called “Smashing Pumpkins,” Jerry shared her feelings about her own nanogenerian grandmother (at 1h4m) and thoughts about what she thinks would be a dignified end of life of an artist). It was clear from the image that she was not mentally present. I first posted that picture and began to question the nature of Kusama’s involvement. As I used searching mechanisms that surpass just Google, I scoured the internet to find a quote from her about the 2023 collaboration, just anything to show that she was a part of the collaboration. There was only a statement from her studio (name and place) stating that “the studio was excited to collaborate with LV.” I invited the art world to look into it for me as well by … how? Was I missing something very obvious? Who was profiting from this? How could this elderly woman have consented to this project with mental health struggles while living in a psychiatric ward?

Did you know that Kusama collaborated with LV in the past?

Yes, I am aware that sometime in the earlier she did a beautiful collaboration with Marc Jacobs who was working with LV at the time.

How do you perceive Kusama’s legacy? Her interest in her public persona?

I believe her legacy has been trivialized into polka dots and infinity rooms. She doesn’t have a public persona anymore.

Under the US law, copyright holders and celebrities can license their rights for others to make derivative works. If we assume that Kusama transferred her copyright and other rights to her studio or other third persons, the use of her IP, name and likeness are authorized exploitations for commercial purposes. In this light, why would making any licensed derivative works using Kusama’s intellectual property be controversial?

I believe so long as an artist has consented either verbally or in writing for their work and likeness to be appropriated, it is ethical. If she had explicitly instructed her foundation, gallery, or representatives to make derivative art works in her name, then I see no problem with this. However, we are talking about a frail and sickly woman who’s given no public statement about the project.

Did you reach out to curators, art historians or the studio of the artist?

I reached out to the entire art world via my Instagram account. I was overwhelmed with people who felt the same sentiment. Artists and other members of the art world felt very much the same. Many reposted my posts and asked similar questions online.

What responses did you receive either from LV or others who were concerned about the collaboration? Did you find many others who supported your views/thoughts?
Many fellow artists shared the same concerns I did and believed it was exploitation. Thousands of my followers reposted my words and thoughts on the campaign. I never heard directly back from LVMH regarding any of my questions though I did tag them in several of my posts. This is around the time that trolls started swarming my Instagram page. I was blocking hundreds of people and accounts a day, [new commentators] who I’d never seen following before and who did not follow my instagram. They were calling me terrible names for speaking my mind, calling out what I saw was very troubling.

Why were you troubled by this?

As a woman artist, interested in collaborations between corporations and fashion houses and artists, I am wondering about the power dynamic and the role artists play in fast and high fashion.

What are your thoughts on the collaboration as an attempt to build and preserve the legacy of Kusama?
If you look at Kusama’s older work, she made a lot more than polka dots, but because the polka dots and pumpkins are so easy to reproduce with or without the artist, I believe this was an attempt to defang a once edgy artist by capitalizing on her iconic presence and over simplifying her earlier work, making easily reproducible objects with high price labels and imitations of what a brand could have imagined that maybe she would have made. This feels like uncoupling her work from its original context, debasing it somehow, making it a cheap commodity not art. Sure, she will have a FLASH in the public’s consciousness so long as the campaign goes on, but to me this does not seem like preservation of her legacy. This is monetizing on her achievements and may be corporate appropriation of artist’s work for financial gain.

M21949LV x YK Twist PM, $5,100.00: Source: https://us.louisvuitton.com/
Artist Yayoi Kusama. Source: Gothammag

What are your concerns now about the collaboration and the preservation of her legacy, what questions do you have in mind? Did you get in touch with anyone or an attorney to help answer some of these questions?
I did get in touch with a Swiss art attorney, Dr. Andreas Ritter, to ask him about this matter and he was at a loss. I understand that I have no standing to bring action on behalf of the artist (who is residing in Japan). She must have agents and fiduciaries who have the right to do that on her behalf, to see that she is not being taken advantage of to her detriment. When a brand as big as LVMH engages in a project with an artist’s gallery or estate, members of the public, like me, have no legal rights to act, but we have moral rights to ask questions. I did not know what to do next.

What are your thoughts on protecting artists rights? What platform do you think may work well for advocacy for artists?
It is in my nature to stand up for artists who I see being discriminated against, taken advantage of, or abused. I have done so and I am doing it now for myself because I was very unpleasantly surprised to be attacked for my opinions and comments. If my platform were as big as other influencers or celebrities, like The Kardashians, I think I would have heard something back from LVMH. However, and ironically, because I’m just AN ARTIST voicing my concern to my 126K followers, I do not think a corporation of that size felt they owed me or anyone an explanation.

About the social media bots and comments

You mentioned that you received aggressive backlash while sharing your thoughts about the LV x Kusama collaboration on social media. Which questions or thoughts you posted elicited/invoked the negative backlash?
Those who attacked me came at me from any angle. No matter how I tried to comprehensively address my issues by writing about it, speaking directly to my audience via Instagram live, or posting about it and simply asking questions, I felt like I was pinned against the wall. It was like I wasn’t allowed to be critical about the campaign period, which is strange because I always thought that artists were meant to help the world think critically and question power.

If you’re comfortable sharing, what kind of comments did you receive? Did you know any of these accounts? Do you believe they were bots?
I was told I was jealous of Kusama’s success, a fraud and a fake artist, anti-feminist, ageist, and attention seeking. I was also attacked for the way I speak, being emotional, and for the way I look. Different parts of my identity and persona online were shredded by these anonymous accounts online. I do not know if they were bots programmed to send me hate, but I do believe that a third party was hired or directed to attack me to silence me, because when I stopped writing about this collaboration, messages attacking me ceased.

Did you respond or retaliate to any of the comments in any way?
I blocked and deleted messages. It was a disturbing and very dark time for me. The bullying, it felt like bullying, really seeped into my brain and for a period of time I began to doubt myself and everything I’d done with my life. I thought maybe I was better off dead. I can’t believe it worked, but it does and I’m a tough 37 year old woman. I have weathered many storms in my life, but this was so incredibly hurtful and damaging. I had to block so many people every single day. The comments were out of control and my inbox was full of nasty messages.

When did the nasty comments stop?

When I stopped talking about the LV x Kusama “collaboration.” It stopped almost immediately.

Have you shared more of your thoughts on the collaboration after they stopped? If so, did they begin again?
No. I have decided to back off because it was devastating to my mental health to discuss the topic online.

Have you heard from other artists or in general about the use of trolls to stop artists and others from speaking out?

Yes, I have heard that it is possible to bully and harass people online. Usually, I do not have an issue with trolls on my Instagram account. Occasionally, I’ll have to block or remove a follower for speaking to me inappropriately, but this is 3 or 4 times a month, not hundreds of people a day. When I started writing about the LV x Kusama collaboration, I saw a lot of negative comments. Too many. It does not make sense that there are that many die hard Kusama fans that came after me for asking obvious questions about the nature of this collaboration. This wasn’t an art discourse or debate. This was bullying plain and simple. I pushed the topic very hard for about a week until a family member voiced their concerns for my well-being. I made the decision to walk away from the entire issue until this interview.

People definitely wanted me to shut up about this topic at the time. I was told to literally “shut up” dozens of times a day during this period. Someone and I cannot say who with any certainty wanted to silence me. Currently, as I say nothing about the campaign, no one is telling me to “shut up.” What an odd coincidence!

What would your advice be to someone who may be in a similar situation?
My advice would be that if you are up to the task of standing up against a major corporation, there is a chance that you could end up in a severe online bullying situation which can amount to your mental health deteriorating. Make sure you are surrounded by your loved ones, of sober and sound mind, mentally healthy, considered with what you say, and prepared to take on financial losses if you are an artist that also collaborates with major brands.

What do you think about preserving your own legacy? What kind of aspirations do you have for the posterity of your own work?
I do not care about my own legacy. That is up to art history and the rest of the world in the future. I care about how I live in my life in the present and the values and ethics I uphold.

Read Our Background information for this interview HERE.

For More on this Topic, read:

  • https://www.wmagazine.com/culture/jerry-gogosian-sothebys-sale-hilde-lynn-helphenstein-interview;

  • https://www.timeslive.co.za/sunday-times/lifestyle/2020-05-31-i-make-memes-to-expose-the-art-world-says-acerbic-creator-jerry-gogosian/#:~:text=But%20the%20most%20galvanising%20meme,of%20the%20contemporary%20art%20world;

  • https://www.widewalls.ch/magazine/jerry-gogosian-interview ↑

  • https://www.shiftlondon.org/news/the-comeback-of-yayoi-kusama-x-louis-vuitton/

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous For Background Purposes: Prep for an Artist Interview
Next Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Andy Rosen

Related Posts

image4.png FileProtected Andy Rosen

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Andy Rosen

September 19, 2023

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Steven J. Oscherwitz

April 5, 2022
photo from paris with automaton of Kusama

For Background Purposes: Prep for an Artist Interview

May 23, 2023
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Check out our new episode where Paris and Andrea s Check out our new episode where Paris and Andrea speak with Ali Nour, who recounts his journey from Khartoum to Cairo amid the ongoing civil war, and describes how he became involved with the Emergency Response Committee - a group of Sudanese heritage officials working to safeguard Sudan’s cultural heritage. 

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #podcast #february #legalresearch #newepisode #culturalheritage #sudaneseheritage
When you see ‘February’ what comes to mind? Birthd When you see ‘February’ what comes to mind? Birthdays of friends? Olympic games? Anniversary of war? Democracy dying in darkness? Days getting longer? We could have chosen a better image for the February cover but somehow the 1913 work of Umberto Boccioni (an artist who died during World War 1) “Dynamism of a Soccer Player” seemed to hit the right note. Let’s keep going, individuals and team players.

Center for Art Law is pressing on with events and research. We have over 200 applications to review for the Summer Internship Program, meetings, obligations. Reach out if you have questions or suggestions. We cannot wait to introduce to you our Spring Interns and we encourage you to share and keep channels of communication open. 

📚 Read more using the link in our bio! Make sure to subscribe so you don't miss any upcoming newsletters!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #newsletter #february #legalresearch
Join the Center for Art Law for conversation with Join the Center for Art Law for conversation with Frank Born and Caryn Keppler on legacy and estate planning!

When planning for the preservation of their professional legacies and the future custodianship of their oeuvres’, artists are faced with unique concerns and challenges. Frank Born, artist and art dealer, and Caryn Keppler, tax and estate attorney, will share their perspectives on legacy and estate planning. Discussion will focus on which documents to gather, and which professionals to get in touch with throughout the process of legacy planning.

This event is affiliated with the Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic which seeks to connect artists, estate administrators, attorneys, tax advisors, and other experts to create meaningful and lasting solutions for expanding the art canon and art legacy planning. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #clinic #artlawyer #estateplanning #artistlegacy #legal #research #lawclinic
Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice Authentication is an inherently uncertain practice, one that the art market must depend upon. Although, auction houses don't have to guarantee  authenticity, they have legal duties related to contract law, tort law, and industry customs. The impact of the Old Master cases, sparked change in the industry including Sotheby's acquisition of Orion Analytical. 

📚 To read more about the liabilities of auction houses and the change in forensic tools, read Vivianne Diaz's published article using the link in our bio!
Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro b Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro bono consultations on legacy and estate planning for visual artists.

Calling all visual artists: join the Center for Art Law's Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic for an evening of low-cost consultations with attorneys, tax experts, and other arts professionals with experience in estate and legacy planning.

After a short lecture on a legacy and estate planning topic, attendees with consultation tickets artist will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer professionals (attorneys, appraisers and financial advisors) for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions.

Please be sure to read the entire event description using the LinkedIn event below.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets On May 24, 2024 the UK enacted the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC). This law increases transparency requirements and consumer rights, including reforming subscription contracts. It grants consumers cancellation periods during cooling-off times. 

Charitable organizations, including museums and other cultural institutions, have concerns regarding consumer abuse of this option. 

🔗 Read more about this new law and it's implications in Lauren Stein's published article, including a discussion on how other jurisdictions have approached the issue, using the link in our bio!
Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.