• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Artist Feature Series image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with John M. Carnright
Back

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with John M. Carnright

September 12, 2022

By Atreya Mathur

“Poetry and art- it was a great interaction. That is something I will always value. One of the key parts of art, for me, is you create.. and then poetry puts it all together.”

J.M. Carnright, Interview with Center for Art Law (August 16, 2022)

John M. Carnright is an artist, an author and a poet based in Connecticut. He received his BFA degree from the University of Colorado and his Masters from Pratt Institute in New York. His artworks have been collected in over 200 Private, Public and Corporate International Collections. A few years ago, Carnright learned that a significant number of his artworks that were collected by and gifted to a company in New York were discarded and destroyed, without offering the artist an option to retrieve his artwork and with no possibility of salvaging the work after it was discarded in a city dump. Carnright had no recourse to save his artwork or receive any compensation or damages for the destruction of his art by the company.

While Carnright decided not to seek damages for his lost art, in the summer of 2022, the Center for Art Law spoke with Carnright as part of our Artists’ Legacy Clinic, to learn about his artwork, the challenges he has faced as an artist and his advice to artists who may find themselves with their art being discarded or destroyed.

Q: Thank you for offering to speak with us. Please tell us what are the different kinds of work you enjoy creating? Apart from visual art, you also have mentioned you are a poet and writer- what do you think defines you as an artist?

I work on paintings, sculptures, larger pieces and smaller pieces as well. I create artwork with metal, I enjoy a mixture of painting while bringing in different elements of metals and even rocks that tie into characters. I did a series on cro-magnon (primitive) characters of the early man and humankind as well.

Apart from visual art, I have also authored “Aria Hahn: The Sena Project” which is a science-fiction book set in the future. It’s all about our environmentally negating nature, how we are not paying attention to the Earth’s needs as we do our own needs. The book was also recast as a “cinematic e-book” in 2012.[1]

I also write and perform poetry. While I was in high school I had the opportunity to interact and work with the Beat poets, and 30 years ago I was invited to the Beat reunion in New York where I met with the Lawrence Ferlinghetti, Ray Manzarek and several other Beat period poets and journalists (Al Aronowitz, Jan Kerouac, Michael McClure, Gregory Corso, Sax Man, Bob Feldmanamon) among others. Ferlinghetti and the other Beats poets also endorsed my poetry and considered me as a part of the Beats reunion and movement which blew me away. What I love is that a lot of the Beat poets were artists as well. Poetry and art- it was a great interaction. That is something I will always value. One of the key parts of art, for me, is you create… and then poetry puts it all together.

Ferlinghetti’s response & endorsement of Carnright’s poetic verse “In A Dream ” at the 1994 “NYU BEAT REUNION ” The poem was originally written in 1962 during Carnright’s high school days.

Q: When did you begin creating and exhibiting artwork?

I began painting in 1972. A collector from Austria, who was an expert on art, also visited my studio in Brooklyn back in the 80’s and shipped a ton of work to Europe. I have also sold artwork in California, which served as a strong collectors’ base. I also worked with collectors from China and Japan apart from the United States and Europe.

Over the years I had both solo and group exhibition shows across the United States in Los Angeles, New York and Washington D.C as well as internationally in Austria and Germany. For the complete list of Carnright’s exhibitions and portfolio, see HERE.

“DOORMAN AT MOMA” 1969, J.M Carnright (Private Collection of Original Founder Couple, MOCA, Los Angeles on Photo-chemical Paper; credit: http://primitivefuturisms.com/1960s-thru-1970s.html)

Q: Have you copyrighted/registered your artwork? Have you ever faced any instance where creators, artists or any others have infringed on your artwork?

I never got any of my art copyright protected or registered with the Copyright Office. I felt my artwork was different enough; it had my own signature. There were a few people who did rip off my artwork– there was one person who copied the style and I actually talked to him one day and told him that “I was glad that you liked my art.” But I never got to a point where I thought about copyright. The art market today is different. I think art has become more repetitive and copyright protection is probably much more useful now for artwork.

I use copyright in my writing but not in art- in art, I find it a little strange. There are artists who do it, of course, copyright is a necessity. But in art I just hadn’t thought about it. People have duplicated my work as I mentioned, but I would not chase them out, it doesn’t affect me.

Q: What about with your writing, have you ever faced any infringement issues there?

When my book “Aria Hahn,” came out in New York in 2012, it was doing good. There were a couple of people who were in touch and they came together with a plan, they knew the book was coming out, it was already out. And they took a copy to a well known film maker. The film maker took elements and different scenes out of the book but I never went after him. There are scenes from the book that are in the film maker’s work. And my book came out 20 years before his work did and my book was also handed over to him so he knew about it.

Q: Did you ever get in touch with a lawyer?

I wanted to get in touch with a lawyer, but it was a lot to deal with, especially monetarily. I did not know the process or have the fiscal resources to do so at the time.

Q: Now, can you describe the crux and the background of the issue you faced with your artwork being discarded?

I worked with Raiffeiseizerzentralank, Raiffeisen Bank International in Austria (RZB) for a few years and I was close to Dieter Beintrexler, the President RZB. Dieter, who ran the place, had viewed my artwork before and asked if I would be willing to sell some of my work to them. I said yes, and so RZB purchased a good amount of my artwork at a good price. I also gifted some of the work to them.

At one of the RZB functions, I remember one of my art pieces was given to the RZB assistant, Diedre Braun. I thought she liked the artwork and then a few years ago Diedre called me up and said that they threw away my art; 45-50 pieces of my work, small and large pieces. All of my artwork was in a city dump in New York) and was going to be crushed and destroyed. In fact, she told me specifically not to come and that the work had already been destroyed.

Q: What was your response to what happened?

I walked away- the damage had already been done. I was angry. I was surprised with myself. I despise her for what she did, but there was just nothing I could do to get my work back. It was crushed and destroyed.

Q: If you had the opportunity, would you want to take action against them now?

This was some of the strongest artwork I had created. The whole thing bothered me for a few weeks- but as I mentioned, it was meaningless- the works were gone. I couldn’t understand their thought process, I am sure they had other options available but chose to do what they did.

I did not get in touch with a lawyer or anyone after this had happened. I actually did not know the process, the costs involved and I did not even think of it.

If there was a way of suing now, I would do it. But it is 5 years too late. More than anything, being able to take action against the collectors would help bring some justice.

Q: What were some of the pieces that were part of the collection?

Located on the RZB/RBI archive wall there was “Evolution” (circa 2003). This work expresses the passage of time we feel and we see in dreamscapes that we all tend to drift in and out of. “Evolution” is meant as symbolic of the experience we grow with and evolve with during our own daily lives. Another, located in the RZB/RBI reception area was “Ages”. (circa 2002). An abstract artwork expressing the bending and stressing of space and time perhaps linked to humankind bending and stressing of the self throughout our lives to conform or not to conform; to live free of confinement or to accept confinements.

“After the Dust”, J.M Carnright, Series of Photo-chemical paper towels (this particular artwork was on originally treated paper towels exceeding 50 years old) (Credit: http://primitivefuturisms.com/1960s-thru-1970s.html)

Q: While working with dealers, collectors, or galleries- are there any precautions you generally take to safeguard your work or your interests? Do you have any contracts or agreements?

Generally, none. Most artists don’t. I don’t think at the time it was a very common practice to have contracts either, maybe now it is different. If I had ever known someone was going to discard and destroy my work though, I think I would have had an agreement or something on a contractual basis for my artwork. If I can muster it up and have more exhibitions and such now, I think I would have a contract. I think it is prevalent now.

Q: Do you have a ton of your artwork with you right now? Do you have any ideas for legacy and estate planning concerning your artwork?

There are a lot of art pieces and sculpture- both large and small with me. My wife is the heir to the artwork. I think having a will is important for artists and planning for the legacy and estate as well. It is important to think about what happens to your artwork during your lifetime and afterwards.

“Exploration Space” 1979, J.M Carnright

Q: What would your advice be to artists who may face a similar situation or may wind up in similar circumstances?

It is important for artists to be cognizant of who they work with and what people are doing with their work. I think copyright protecting artwork may be helpful but more than anything having an agreement going forward is necessary. I think artists should have some contract which defines what happens to their work and includes clauses and protection that ensures the work will not be damaged or destroyed or that it would be given away or discarded.

This conversation and agreement should happen at the outset. It is sad that this is the case and that this needs to be done, but these things happen and I did not expect what happened to me to ever happen at all. This would be helpful and I would advise other artists to take this into consideration as well.

Center for Art Law would like to thank John Carnright for taking the time to speak with us and sharing his story and advice for other artists with us.

The interview was conducted by Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research in connection with the Center for Art Law’s Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic and our newly launched Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic. For more information and for pro-bono consultations with Volunteer Professionals and our legal clinics, view Center for Art Law’s Clinical programming HERE.

  1. “This is a new art form. a hybrid of literature and cinema and also art and music. One key reason we decided to make it this way is to get reluctant readers to start reading again. By combining cinema and music with the written word, we hope it acts as a kind of stimulant to start reading.” John Carnight, Interview with the Daily News, available at https://www.courant.com/ctnow/arts-theater/hc-cinematic-ebook-0313-20120313-story.html ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Confessions of an Artist and a Lawyer: Practicing Art Law, One Trial and Painting at a Time
Next Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Vincent Inconiglios

Related Art Law Articles

Photo: Vincent Inconiglios Studio
Artist Feature Series

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Vincent Inconiglios

March 8, 2024
image4.png FileProtected Andy Rosen
Artist Feature SeriesInterview

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Andy Rosen

September 19, 2023
art smack Jerry Hilde
Artist Feature Series

Artist Feature Series: In Conversation with Hilde Lynn Helphenstein/ Jerry Gogosian

May 23, 2023
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
For centuries, copying has been an integral part o For centuries, copying has been an integral part of Chinese artistic practice, blurring the line between homage and forgery. Many museums are at a loss for how to evaluate works that challenge Western notions of authenticity.

Through the ongoing debate over the MET’s Riverbank painting, our recent article examines how institutional interests and market value continue to shape perceptions of authenticity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lena Rohde!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #chineseart #zhangdaqian #changdaichien #artforgery #authenticity #museumlaw #arthistory #provenance #artmarket
The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has trans The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has transformed how cultural heritage is documented and preserved, particularly in regions affected by conflict. As 3D models and digital archives become more common, they also raise questions about ownership and cultural self-determination.

In her article, Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis examines the preservation of Syria's cultural heritage. More specifically, how digital reconstructions can both protect endangered sites and act as a tool for erasure when local communities are excluded from the process.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #digitalheritage #3Dreconstruction #provenance #archaeology #culturalproperty #digitization #palmyra #museumlaw
Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go t Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go to the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in New Brunswick. This gallery was included in a law suit between Lord Beaverbrook's Estate and a foundation he had established during his life. 

📚 See more about this case using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artresearch #estates #artist #foundation #gallery
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.