• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review: “Art & Crime” (2022) by Stefan Koldenhoff & Tobias Timm, eng. ed.
Back

Book Review: “Art & Crime” (2022) by Stefan Koldenhoff & Tobias Timm, eng. ed.

August 6, 2024

English cover of the book screen capture

By Anna Bashlakova

Stefan Koldenhoff and Tobias Timm’s book Kunst und Verbrechen came out in 2020. Translated and published in English in 2022 as “Art & Crime,” this work explores the hidden dark history of art thefts and the usage of art for fraud and manipulation. Stefan Koldenhoff is a German journalist who specializes in art markets, and he currently works in the Kulture Heute as a part of the editorial team. Tobias Timm is a specialist in cultural studies and history – he currently writes for Die Zeit’s feature pages where he continues to explore concepts of art crime and architecture. The authors previously released another body of work together, “Fake Paintings, Real Money” (2012). There latest collaboration ranges from events such as the theft of the Mona Lisa in 1911 to Donald Trump’s controversial usage of art in the 1980s during the establishment of Trump Tower. Through the chapters the authors uncover the variety of crimes committed using art and discuss the abundance of forgeries, ransoms, and usage of art in white-collar crimes such as money laundering. Chapters describe issues which hold modern-day relevance by connecting the increased misuse of art to concepts such as price increases and globalization. The target audience for the book varies however it will be of interest to – culture studying professors, legal professions, art historians, government agents, and general public with interest in the art field. There have been previously published book reviews by magazines such as: The Financial Times, The Washington Post, and the Library Journal.

Chapter 1: Stolen, Robbed, Kidnapped

This chapter sets the stage by presenting cases such as the theft of the Mona Lisa in 1911, which was held ‘hostage’ for two years. Between which six replicas were sold to collectors under the appearance of the genuinely iconic painting, in truth being pre-drawn a year before the theft by Yves Chaudron. Furthermore, the chapter presents the concept of “art-napping” through the example of an attack on the Zurich Museum – for the moment, it was considered the most prominent art theft in Europe. Along, discussing the grand theft of the Golden coin, highlighting art being used for its value of raw materials.

Chapter 2: The Disappearance of the Original

This chapter focuses on measures art museums typically take to prevent crime, highlighting the security precautions, describing raids following the counterfeiting of art and the violation against art trading, explaining the attraction of counterfeiters to Russian Modernist art such as Malevich and the influence of Soviet Union due to the ban of “avant-garde” – resulting in destroyal or disappearance of influential pieces. Later, the process of counterfeiting is described: usage of canvases and materials to match the time and origin of the painting – and the self-stimulated paint cracking is caused by adding certain chemicals or heating the canvas. Overall, the chapter deals with historical thefts and high-profile cases, including Hitler’s works during the Nazi time and its role in counterfeit at auctions. Some of these are better know and others seem rather obscure like the counterfeit of Pablo Picasso’s works done in a small auctions and markets for rather cheap prices

Chapter 3: Cultural History Destroyed

Next chapter is dedicated to modern-day thefts and their use of modern technology, economy, politics, and increased globalization. As an example, the book uses the conflict in Iraq in 2003, where, due to political chaos, the illegal exchange of cultural goods forced the European Union to close imports and exports with both Iraq and Syria. Illegal cultural exchanges in countries such as Germany have also highlighted the low percentage of innocence in the art markets.

Chapter 4: When Dictators Collect

The main focus in this chapter, as the title suggests, is on international kleptocracy – autocrats and other leaders using power to steal a country’s resources – the chapter also describes the ethical downside regarding it. To demonstrate the authors employ the story of Vilma Hernandez – as a secretary for the Philippine diplomatic mission – with an officially low salary but a costly lifestyle – real estate and jewelry. As the reader learns, the funding for this lifestyle arose from the dictator’s – Ferdinand Marcos’s – family, who supposedly stole over $10 billion to buy luxuries such as art. By illegally selling famous art, such as the famous water lilies by Claud Monet – the dictator’s associates managed to fuel the illegal art market and kleptocracy. The incriminating invoices and kleptocracy Marcos fled the country and his office.

Chapter 5: The Fake President

This chapter explores how art’s misusage manifests among powerful and power-hungry, political figures such as the US 45th President, Donald Trump. The chapter includes a discussion about how under Trump supervision of a series of Art Deco friezes on Bonwit Teller Building in New York, a property of a museum – which were destroyed during the the construction of a Trump Tower. Although the book does not accuse Trump of a particular crime, it critiques his statements about the originality of his art, specifically those of French Impressionism. After reading this chapter, the reader might be convinced that additional charges against Trump might include his lousy taste and misusing art for personal satisfaction.

Chapter 6: Art Investment as Fraud

The next chapter critiques art advisers, specifically the usage of art as a financial investment rather than a means to passion. Using an example of Western Germany in the 70s – where corporations would use artworks as symbols of prestige. The individual discussed in the book is Helge Achenbach, who used tactics such as fake phone calls in the middle of meetings to create fake demand – allowing him to secure high profile art pieces for large corporations. He is described as a figure who bent ethical boundaries and involvement in corruption.

Chapter 7: Dirty Money and Clean Art

The concluding chapter focuses on the need to prevent crime in the market – by presenting charges in the market, both legal and ethical. Further, it explores the concepts of ‘dirty’ money and ‘clean art’ by presenting cases such as the Pandolfini auction and how it served as a means for money laundering. Classic pieces by artists such as Miró, Degas, Modigliani, and Matisse were also included. The artworks, although authentic, were labeled with low prices and low suspicion. In reality, the works were a part of a tax evasion scheme.

Conclusion

German cover of the bookThe book is a journalistic piece that teaches concepts and uncovers art-related crimes by presenting historical and legal cases and how they were orchestrated. The book often refers to primary sources such as court cases, information released at the time of the events – it also integrates secondary sources such as journalists’ analysis on the matter. The book also provides illustrations and questions at the end, in reference to the discussed topics. It is also well referenced with a variety of sources to support each discussion. The book gradually uncovers and underlines the importance of dealing with art crime and ways to prevent it in parallel to the modern day technology and safety regulations. Co-authors ​Koldenhoff and Timm call for action and transparency in the art market and reevaluation of the actual value of art. Amen.

About the Author:

Anna Bashlakova is an IB student in Geneva, Switzerland, who is interested in studying in the US for college. Anna is aiming to major in economics and perceive corporate law in the future.

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Book Review: “Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market,” Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, eds. (2022)
Next Book Review: Caveat Emptor: The Secret Life of an American Art Forger (2012) by Ken Perenyi

Related Posts

Book Review: “The Whole Picture: The Colonial Story of the Art in Our Museums & Why We Need to Talk About It” (2020) by Alice Procter

August 4, 2021
book cover for Posthumous

Book Review: “Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market,” Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, eds. (2022)

May 20, 2024

Art Law Journals

November 30, 2020
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.