• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review: Caveat Emptor: The Secret Life of an American Art Forger (2012) by Ken Perenyi
Back

Book Review: Caveat Emptor: The Secret Life of an American Art Forger (2012) by Ken Perenyi

August 29, 2024

photo of the book cover by Perenyi

By Caitlin O’Hare

Caveat Emptor: The Secret Life of an American Art Forger is a first-hand account by Ken Perenyi, who built a lucrative career out of art forgery, living a life of luxury while duping countless people along the way. For those curious about how one might get away with art forgery and become incredibly wealthy in the process, Perenyi outlines exactly how he did it. When the book was released in 2012, it shocked the art world, sending ripples through major auction houses and galleries worldwide. A self-taught artist had come forward to confess—brag, even—and share his methods, all because he could.

Apparently, the statute of limitations had expired on his crimes. Perenyi’s story is extraordinary, leaving readers to question the authenticity of the art they see in galleries and museums. How can we ever truly identify the work of a master? And do Perenyi’s skills make him a master in his own right?

Forging a Path in Forgery

Perenyi, hailing from New Jersey, describes[1] a youth marked by mediocre performance in school, a lack of ambition, and frequent trouble due to daydreaming and drawing. He grew up with the awareness that “New York City was the center of the entire world,”[2] and it was there, in this bustling center, that he met the counterculture art enthusiasts who would inspire and encourage him to pursue art forgery for over 30 years. Perenyi began painting during the Summer of Love in 1967, and the early part of his story brings to mind Patti Smith’s Just Kids; (see here for information on Just Kids) with Perenyi and his friends hanging out in a Warhol Factory-esque building they called the “Castle.”

Perenyi’s fascination with forgery began after reading about Han Van Meegeren, the Dutch art forger of the 1930s who successfully created a new genre of Vermeer paintings. Inspired, Perenyi confided to a friend that he believed he could replicate the masterpieces found in museums[3], and he quickly became addicted to the thrill of selling fakes for cold hard cash. Initially, these forgeries were “the only thing” keeping him from starvation, but soon he made sure to always have a few “Dutch” paintings ready to sell.[4] He eventually apprenticed with an art restorer, mastering the technical aspects of the craft, which naturally led him to pursue forgery full-time. Before long, he became a master at replicating 18th- and 19th-century American art, producing “Heades,” “Kings,” and “Buttersworths” that eventually appeared at prestigious auctions like Sotheby’s and Christie’s. The book details Perenyi’s techniques, such as baking paintings in the sun or coating them with rotten stone[5] or rabbit skin glue[6]. Despite his criminal activities, Perenyi remains oddly humble, critiquing how art professionals and the ultra-wealthy determine what is and isn’t valuable, leaving readers to question the value we place on art. However, some may argue that his story is devoid of remorse.

Having perfected his craft, Perenyi developed sophisticated systems, often having others sell his paintings on his behalf. He built a network of criminals who knowingly sold his forgeries. As the market became saturated with his Dutch and Flemish fakes, Perenyi crossed paths with Jimmy Ricau, an eccentric American art collector. Ricau, who held disdain for art dealers, encouraged Perenyi to pursue forgery as a form of revenge against the art world. Ricau’s passion for American art left a strong impression on Perenyi, leading him to replicate works by artists such as George Catlin, John F. Francis, Antonio Jacobsen, and William A. Walker, among others.

Perenyi’s forgeries began appearing at auction houses worldwide, emboldening him to start consigning his fakes directly. He frequently travelled to London with suitcases full of his forgeries. His most successful sales were fraudulent Martin Johnson Heade paintings featuring hummingbirds and orchids, with one selling for $90,000 at Christie’s in London and another fetching $717,500 at Sotheby’s. In the 1990s, the FBI launched a five-year investigation into Perenyi. However, by then, Perenyi had begun selling his works as reproductions, claiming he never said they were originals. Throughout the investigation, Perenyi grew suspicious of old associates who resurfaced, fearing they might be wired to incriminate him. He hired a lawyer and ultimately was never charged. In the book, Perenyi speculates that auction houses likely worked to delay or hinder the investigation to avoid public humiliation and potential financial liability when buyers learned of the forgeries.

Impressions

What one takes away from Caveat Emptor will largely depend on the reader’s feelings on art crime. Some will find the book perverse, boastful and unfair. Others will delight in the story, as art scandal has that ability to captivate and amaze us. One will either be impressed by Perenyi’s talents, or convinced he is a criminal bragging about his genius. Perenyi’s ability to recall past events including who was involved and who did what is brilliant. Caveat Emptor must be a terribly difficult read for professional appraisers and authenticators in the art world, as it details how forgers can deceive even the most seasoned experts, revealing the eagerness of many to obtain a “masterpiece” at any cost. The book exposes blindness in the art world. The story is remarkable – just like Perenyi’s talents.

About the Author

Caitlin O’Hare is a past Intern of the Center for Art Law, a lawyer practicing in the UK, interested in art law and intellectual property law.

Bibliography:

  1. Perenyi, Ken. Caveat Emptor: The Secret Life of an American Art Forger (2012) Pegasus Books, page 4 ↑
  2. ibid ↑
  3. ibid, page 22 ↑
  4. ibid, page 93 ↑
  5. ibid, page 57 ↑
  6. ibid, page 60 ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Book Review: “Art & Crime” (2022) by Stefan Koldenhoff & Tobias Timm, eng. ed.
Next Book Review: “Lust on Trial: Censorship and the Rise of American Obscenity in the Age of Anthony Comstock” (2018)

Related Posts

Pitching an idea to e-Textbook Publishers: Trademarks through NY Restaurants

March 1, 2012

Book Review: The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, Bruno W. Boesch And Massimo Sterpi, eds. (3rd ed., 2023)

March 6, 2024

Book Review: “The Whole Picture: The Colonial Story of the Art in Our Museums & Why We Need to Talk About It” (2020) by Alice Procter

August 4, 2021
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law