Book Review: “Lust on Trial: Censorship and the Rise of American Obscenity in the Age of Anthony Comstock” (2018)
December 8, 2025
By Lauren Stein
Amy Werbel’s Lust on Trial: Censorship and the Rise of American Obscenity in the Age of Anthony Comstock offers a compelling portrait of Anthony Comstock, America’s first professional censor, and the moral crusades that defined his life.
Werbel traces Comstock’s life from his childhood in New Canaan, Connecticut, where his Christian upbringing shaped a lifelong obsession with purity and self-control.[1] From an early age, Comstock believed sin must be resisted and masturbation was morally corrupt.[2] Through Comstock’s story, Werbel provides a broader lens on the evolution of American fantasies and the nation’s early attempts to curtail desire in the decades before World War I.
Comstock’s faith directly fueled his censorship mission. In his diary, Comstock attributed the beginning of his war on vice to the death of a fellow clerk who, Comstock believed, “had been led astray and corrupted and diseased” by exposure to pornography.[3] Determined to save others from similar “dangerous desires provoked by sexually arousing materials,” Comstock investigated publishers of explicit literature, often working alongside the police to carry out raids.[4]
Comstock’s campaign gained momentum through the support of the Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA).[5] Backed by YMCA board chairman Morris Ketchum Jesup, Comstock launched a full-time crusade against obscenity, earning a yearly salary of $3,000 plus expenses.[6] With this support, Comstock carried out major seizures. In just one raid in a basement on Ann Street, Comstock seized 6,000 cards, 4,000 pictures, and 244 printing plates.[7] In 1873, Comstock and his YMCA allies turned to the government, which incorporated the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice (NYSSV).[8] The move cemented Comstock’s position and greatly amplified his influence.
As Comstock’s notoriety grew, so too did public criticism. Comstock became an easy target for ridicule in comics and newspapers, depicted as self-righteous and prudish. He was rejected from joining fraternal organizations, was not wealthy enough to travel in upper circles, and avoided spaces that were filled with paintings and images he found immoral and distasteful, such as saloons.[9]
Comstock’s downfall proved nearly as dramatic as his rise. His unrelenting zeal spared no one; he targeted both the working class and cultural elites.[10] Public opinion continued to turn against Comstock as he attempted to prosecute Edmund Knoedler, the renowned art dealer serving America’s wealthiest collectors.[11] The case exposed the central tension in Comstock’s crusade: how to distinguish between indecent material and legitimate art.[12] The controversy forced the public to confront complex questions about the boundaries between art, morality, and nudity.
Werbel highlights how Comstock’s rigid personality eventually undermined his mission. Unlike newer anti-vice organizations that operated more discreetly and effectively, Comstock’s bombastic approach drew ridicule and alienated allies.[13] As his influence waned, so too did the NYSSV, which suffered from dwindling donations and strained relations with law enforcement. Even successful prosecutions often failed to result in convictions.[14]
Throughout the book, Werbel also illuminates how censorship heightened public fascination with the very works it sought to suppress. Exhibitions that were “Comstocked” became instant sensations, attracting curious crowds eager to see what had been deemed too indecent for display.[15]
By the end of his life, Comstock was seen as too polarizing and rigid to adapt to a changing America. Werbel’s narrative not only charts his life but also reveals how Comstock’s legacy helped shape the ongoing debate over art, morality, and free expression in the United States.
Select References:
- Amy Werbel, LUST ON TRIAL: CENSORSHIP AND THE RISE OF AMERICAN OBSCENITY IN THE AGE OF ANTHONY COMSTOCK 15 (2018). ↑
- Id. at 15. ↑
- Id. at 52. ↑
- Id. ↑
- Id. at 55. ↑
- Id. at 55-56, 58. ↑
- Id. at 81. ↑
- Id. at 89. ↑
- Id. at 139. ↑
- Id. at 190. ↑
- Id. at 191. ↑
- Id. at 195. ↑
- Id. at 211. ↑
- Id. at 268-67. ↑
- Id. at 208. ↑
Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.