• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review: The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, Bruno W. Boesch And Massimo Sterpi, eds. (3rd ed., 2023)
Back

Book Review: The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, Bruno W. Boesch And Massimo Sterpi, eds. (3rd ed., 2023)

March 6, 2024

By Briana Pierre

In 2023, two of the leading art attorneys and scholars Bruno W. Boesch (Switzerland) and Massimo Sterpi (Italy) revised and released the third edition of The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, acquainting readers with the legal procedures of acquiring digital art like Non-Fungible Tokens (“NFTs”). Beginning with COVID’s impact on auction markets and technological trade, Boesch and Massimo divulge how NFTs, AI image generators, and digital art trade became a new form of commodity when in-person gatherings were not possible.

The Art Collecting Legal Handbook guides investors, collectors, and advisors on navigating the new era of buying digital artworks. The book contains two Parts:

  • Part I – Themes contains three chapters on the fluctuating Art market, what an NTF is, and understanding indirect taxes with digital art; and
  • Part II – National discusses cultural property on the national level and international level incorporating 26 countries. Each Chapter considers a country’s cultural property laws and the efforts in selling and buying artworks.
PXL_20240306_164730537
PXL_20240306_164742480

Part 1 – Current Themes

The fluctuating art market

Chapter 1: Christine Bourron (CEO, Pi-eX Ltd) offers a chapter entitled “The Same Ever Changing Art Market.” Here readers garner the art market economic landscape through  reference to the “Pi-eX’s Auction Market Index (Pi-eX AMI), which tracks monthly public auction results at Christie’s, Sotheby’s, and Phillips.”[1] The index indicates exponential growth during the COVID pandemic over 2.5 years. In a combination of three auctions, their earnings “doubled from a low of $6.4 billion in June 2020 to $13.8 billion in June 2022, before reaching over $13.9 billion in November 2022.”[2] This monetary growth testifies to the influence of digital art, online auction trading, and NFTs.

In the subsequent sections, the book details the current factors affecting auction houses. Given that the peak of the COVID pandemic was three years ago, live auctions were not a viable option, and the auction houses utilized online auction sales. This digital method of selling art allowed “auction houses to more than ever collect, analyze, and leverage data and information about bidders and buyers.”[3]

As a result of attaining user information, auction houses can anticipate what collectors or investors want to purchase. Auction houses’ marketing strategy and series of sales can become specific and localized, and “are now able to create and advertise auctions to a very targeted set of potential buyers.”[4] For instance, auction houses can create a new series of sales based on their clientele’s interests rather than current art trends.

User information is one of many data points entering the auction houses. As more artworks are cataloged, information about the works is “published, and more buyers pay attention, the performance of irrevocable bids has decreased.”[5] Irrevocable bids prompt people to bid as a show of faith that the artwork will sell at the highest predicted price or over. Irrevocable bids are a strategy from the 2008 crisis to motivate bidders into buying art. Irrevocable bids are used as a tool for auction houses “to remove the risk they are taking when offering sellers an auction house guarantee”[6] and for sellers “to categorically avoid the risk of a bought-in, as artworks are pre-sold ahead of the public auctions.”[7]

A by-product of online auctions is digital transparency. Auctions can understand how their bidders create less need for irrevocable bids. Since auction houses better understand who the bidders are, there is more transparency on the bidder’s intention to buy the artwork.

Lastly, there has been an increase in interest in new art forms. Most notably, a rise in NFT sales, which is described as “a sign of potential purchasing power” of a new generation of collectors.[8] In addition to NFT sales, there’s an interest in trading luxury fashion.

Issues on NFTs

Chapter 2, submitted by Syndey Chiche-Attali, founder of a firm and a member of the Paris Bar, demystifies NFTs and clarifies the issues that surround them.

As mentioned earlier, an NFT, or non-fungible token is a unique digital ID that acts as “a permanent digital record of ownership, that is, an entry in a decentralized public ledger, called a blockchain.”[9] This allows for individualized ownership in digital art mediums like videos, graphic art, and photography. As NFTs become increasingly popular, more people become acquainted in a decentralized market wherein buyers and sellers transact with one another.

If NFTs represent an entry, users can embed their parameters within the work. “[R]ights associated with the NFT depend on what the smart contract or the platform’s terms and conditions provide: ownership, use, access, exploitation, etc.”[10]

Chiche-Attali lists four problems NFTs in areas regarding cyber risk, artist’s copyright, unstable market, and lack of legislation. One salient issue is the market. NFTs are a budding way to sell digital artworks but still need improvement in creating a stable market. The market is “prone to price manipulation and insider trading,”[11] which are markers of an unregulated market.

Finding One’s Way in the Indirect Maze

In the final chapter of Part I, “Finding One’s Way in the Indirect Tax Maze” contributed by Neil Millen of Christie’s, conclude with an overview of indirect tax. Indirect taxes are taxes on artworks based on their location and the type of art. In the further sections, this book provide a step-by-step guide on considering artwork and indirect taxes that may apply.

With respect to digital art and NFTs, Boesch and Sterpi and their co-authors recommend readers consider “where in the supply chain each transacting party sits, particularly for more complex arrangements when access to particular tax rules are needed.”[12] Readers will receive recommendations of what to consider: the object of the work, the location, custom status, and jurisdiction.

In Part II, Boesh and Sterpi widen the scope to a global scale, including 26 countries, to see how indirect tax changes in each country. The newest edition is certainly expanded and improved reference for art attorneys and art collectors across many jurisdictions, all operating in the ever-growing international art market.

Impressions and Conclusion

The Art Collecting Legal Handbook is an informative manual on auction market sales, artistic trends like NFTs, and how different countries are currently considering cultural property. Boesch and Steppi is compiled in a manner that is easy for curious beginners who want to learn more about how NFTs affect cultural property law. While NFTs are a new area of art that is becoming more globally established, proper legislation for NFTs has yet to be enacted. The Art Collecting Legal Handbook illuminates how countries consider cultural property and seller, artist, and collector rights in a fluctuating market.

About The Author

Briana Pierre (Center for Art Law Spring 2024 Intern) graduated from NYU in May 2023 with a Bachelor’s Degree in Studio Art, and she is passionate about the arts and how the law affects the arts and its surroundings. Specifically, she is interested in cultural restitution, artist rights, and consignments law. Briana Pierre enjoys painting, drawing, and ceramics.

 Source:

  1. Bruno W. Boesch and Massimo Sterpi, The Art Collecting Legal Handbook: Third Edition 3rd Edition, Edward Elgar Publishing (2023), page 2. ↑
  2. Id, 3. ↑
  3. Id, 4. ↑
  4. Id, 5. ↑
  5. Id, 6 ↑
  6. Id, 6 ↑
  7. Id, 6 ↑
  8. Id, 7 ↑
  9. Id, 10 ↑
  10. Id, 11 ↑
  11. Id, 15 ↑
  12. Id, 19 ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Book Review: “Lost Art: The Art Loss Register Casebook Vol I” (2021) by Anja Shortland
Next Book Review: “Posthumous Art, Law and the Art Market,” Sharon Hecker and Peter J. Karol, eds. (2022)

Related Posts

cover of the book

Book Review: “Art Law: A Concise Guide for Artists, Curators, and Art Educators”(2016)

July 27, 2017

Book Review: “Hitler’s Last Hostages” (2019)

February 25, 2020

Book Review: “Possession: The Curious History of Private Collectors from Antiquity to the Present” (2016)

July 7, 2016
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.