• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Case Review image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet May Flash: Basqui-what?
Back

May Flash: Basqui-what?

June 7, 2018

By Shlomit Heering*

A Case in Review: Neumann v. Sotheby’s, Inc., No. 652170/2018

The New York art-collecting Neumann family owns “one of the most staggering private collections of 20th-century art in the United States”, with works by Andy Warhol, Pablo Picasso – and Jean-Michel Basquiat. 86-year-old paterfamilias Hubert Neumann has been characterized as a “hunted and haunted man” who believes that museum directors are eagerly awaiting his death in the hopes of acquiring works from his family’s collection. However, the drama surrounding the Neumann collection is not limited to outsiders. Before her death in 2016, Neumann’s wife, Dolores Ormandy Neumann, changed her last will and testament to disinherit her husband of 62 years and leave most of her personal property to their middle daughter Belinda, leaving the other two daughters with small shares. Incidentally, according to her obituary, in the 1980s Dolores was “a leading graffiti art dealer, helping them transfer their work from the trains to canvas.”

Belinda was also appointed “the preliminary executor of her mother’s estate” in 2016 and began the disposal of Dolores’ artworks by offering some of them at public auction. In April 2018, Hubert Neumann learned about Belinda’s consignment of the painting “Flesh and Spirit” by Jean-Michel Basquiat – part of the Neumann collection – to Sotheby’s, and in early May he tried to prevent Sotheby’s from selling the painting  by seeking a TRO in which court. He alleged that per a 2015 agreement, which was confirmed a year later, Sotheby’s promised him to seek his “approval on all matters relating to cataloguing, placement, and exhibiting each and every work consigned” from Neumanns. Neumann also alleged that although individual pieces in the collection are “owned by a variety of persons and entities”, they are all considered part of the Neumann Family Collection, of which he is the steward. Nevertheless, in a quick decision, New York Justice O. Peter Sherwood ruled that Neumann has no authority over the painting and that the sale could go ahead. Neumann appealed the decision on May 9th, but the First Department Appellate Division denied his motion to stay the sale, and the large, 2-panel artwork was sold as planned on May 16 – for a hammer price of just over $30.7 million.

The Ghost of Basquiat

Jean Michel Basquiat died in 1988, at the age of 27, from a heroin overdose. According to the recollections of his friends and colleagues, Jean-Michel was an intensely talented and unique artist working in NY and CA, side by side with Andy Warhol, Keith Haring, and other contemporaries. The artist’s life has been examined in a number of interviews and documentaries, both during his lifetime and posthumously. This spring a new documentary, directed by Sara Driver, offers yet another look at the formative years of the artist. Titled “Boom For Real: The Late Teenage Years of Jean-Michel Basquiat”, the 2018 film alternates “archival footage from the late 1970s and early ’80s with newly shot interviews”, interspersed with songs from the period. Although similar in style to the earlier documentary, one crucial difference is that, for all the footage of Basquiat included in the film, the viewer never hears his voice. In an interview with NPR, the director explains that this was a purposeful choice: “I wanted him like a ghost in the movie, that he was a touchstone throughout the film for this kind of greater environment which helped create who he was”. As interpreted by a New York Times review, this also serves as a way to emphasize the fact that “Basquiat’s art — raw, inventive, socially engaged — continues to speak to us even as the artist himself cannot”.

According to another review of the 2018 film, Driver’s new documentary is an excellent counterpoint to Tamra Davis’ 2010 documentary “Jean-Michel Basquiat: The Radiant Child” and Julian Schnabel’s 1996 eponymous biopic “Basquiat”.

WYWH: You’ve Been Served: “Jean-Michel Basquiat: The Radiant Child” (2010)

Screen Shot 2018-06-07 at 4.55.56 PM

On May 22, the Center for Art Law hosted an evening screening of the 2010 documentary “Jean-Michel Basquiat: The Radiant Child” at the AC Institute in Midtown. Combining original documentary footage, including an informal interview with Basquiat, with recent interviews with the artist’s former friends and colleagues, the film provided a fascinating insight into Basquiat’s complicated life and shed some light on the circumstances that influenced his art – and his early death. Not assuming that the average viewer would be familiar with all the details of Basquiat’s biography, the film explained his background and how this gifted young man from a middle-class Brooklyn family went from a runaway street artist living off cheese doodles and couchsurfing between (girl)friends to the “it” artist receiving commissions from wealthy collectors and forming a close relationship with Andy Warhol. Rather than focusing solely on the excitement of his meteoric rise, the film deftly explored the dark side of such a trajectory, including Basquiat’s insecurities and the accompanying isolation he experienced, which contributed to his increasing drug use and eventual overdose.

Following the screening of this moving and enlightening documentary, lawyers Dean Nicyper, head of Withers Bergman Dispute Resolution Group in the United States, and Andrew Gerber, founding partner at Kushnirsky Gerber PLLC, led a discussion about some of the legal issues connected to Basquiat’s work. Mr. Nicyper first spoke about authentication and challenges in the process. He explained that, although decisions about authenticity are essentially opinions, the advance of forensics has allowed some experts to positively identify works as authentic, rather than simply being able to deny works as fake. He also spoke about a long-pending bill in New York that would protect authenticators from baseless lawsuits that have a detrimental effect on the authentication community. Basquiat’s Estate, for example, stopped authenticating works in 2012. Andy Warhol Authentication Committee disbanded in 2014.  Mr. Gerber, meanwhile, focused on issues specific to street art. He touched upon recent cases and matters such as copyright, ownership, and use of street art. He also provided some insight into what constitutes street art and what street artists hope to accomplish within the broader art world, based on his personal experience. According to one of the dealers who represented Basquiat and enabled his artistic career, Basquiat was not a street artist at all. Photographs of him holding spray cans and tagging walls of buildings suggest otherwise. Both Mr. Nicyper and Mr. Gerber answered numerous questions from a varied audience that was engaged in the conversation and interested in learning more.

Overall, this was an evening of plentiful snacks, a fascinating documentary, topical speakers, and people from various personal and professional backgrounds coming together to bask in all that is Jean-Michel Basquiat and art law.

Sources:

  • Maya Salam, “Collector Sues Sotheby’s to Block Basquiat Auction, Exposing Ugly Family Dispute”, New York Times 3 May 2018. (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/03/arts/basquiat-auction-sothebys-neumann.html?mc_cid=97c8bdba58&mc_eid=3c6894d5e4)
  • Neumann v. Sotheby’s, Inc., Complaint. (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4451958-Complaint.html?mc_cid=97c8bdba58&mc_eid=3c6894d5e4)
  • Maya Salam, “Contested Auction of Basquiat Painting Can Proceed, Judge Rules”, New York Times 8 May 2018. (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/arts/basquiat-sothebys-lawsuit.html)
  • Neumann v. Sotheby’s, Inc., Motion to Appeal (https://www.leagle.com/decision/innyco20180517503)
  • Sotheby’s, “Jean-Michel Basquiat, Flesh and Spirit”. (http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2018/contemporary-art-evening-auction-n09858/lot.24.html)
  • Neda Ulaby, “Artist Jean-Michel Basquiat’s Teenage Years In ‘Boom For Real’”, NPR 9 May 2018. (https://www.npr.org/2018/05/09/609650255/artist-jean-michel-basquiats-teenage-years-in-boom-for-real)
  • Glenn Kenny, “Review: ‘Boom for Real’ Is a Beguiling Look at a Teenage Basquiat”, New York Times 9 May 2018. (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/movies/boom-for-real-review-jean-michel-basquiat.html)
  • John DeFore, “’Boom for Real: The Late Teenage Years of Jean-Michel Basquiat’: Film Review | TIFF 2017”, Hollywood Reporter 10 September 2017. (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/boom-real-late-teenage-years-jean-michel-basquiat-1037379)

About the Author: Shlomit Heering is a Center for Art Law 2018 Summer Intern. She holds an MA from University College London in Cultural Heritage Studies and a BA from the University of Pennsylvania in Ancient History and Anthropology. She is an incoming NYU JD Candidate, Class of 2021.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: Sotheby’s v. Greece
Next WYWH: NYC’s Art Business Conference 2018

Related Art Law Articles

Turkey map
Art lawCase ReviewCultural Heritage

The Mendelsohn Case: Implications for Future Restitution

August 28, 2026
CPAL Day 2 WYWH
Art lawWish You Were Here

WYWH: 2026 CPAL Conference on Preserving Artists’ Legacies (Day 2 of 3)

June 18, 2026
Center for Art Law WYWH Jan 2026 Weller
Wish You Were Here

Wish You Were Here: Professor Weller’s Introduction of the New Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property

April 7, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.