• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet AL Clippings image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet SHEPARD FAIREY V. ASSOCIATED PRESS (PICTURE’S WORTH SOMETHING)
Back

SHEPARD FAIREY V. ASSOCIATED PRESS (PICTURE’S WORTH SOMETHING)

October 19, 2009

STATEMENT BY SHEPARD FAIREY ON ASSOCIATED PRESS FAIR USE CASE
OCTOBER 16, 2009

“In an effort to keep everyone up to date on my legal battle to uphold the principle of fair use in copyright laws, I wanted to notify you of a recent development in my case against The Associated Press (AP). On October 9, 2009, my lawyers sent a letter to the AP and to the photographer Mannie Garcia, through their lawyers, notifying them that I intend to amend my court pleadings. Throughout the case, there has been a question as to which Mannie Garcia photo I used as a reference to design the HOPE image. The AP claimed it was one photo, and I claimed it was another. The new filings state for the record that the AP is correct about which photo I used as a reference and that I was mistaken. While I initially believed that the photo I referenced was a different one, I discovered early on in the case that I was wrong. In an attempt to conceal my mistake I submitted false images and deleted other images. I sincerely apologize for my lapse in judgment and I take full responsibility for my actions which were mine alone. I am taking every step to correct the information and I regret I did not come forward sooner.

“I am very sorry to have hurt and disappointed colleagues, friends, and family who have supported me in this difficult case and trying time in my life. I am also sorry because my actions may distract from what should be the real focus of my case – the right to fair use so that all artists can create freely. Regardless of which of the two images was used, the fair use issue should be the same.”

 

By APL: Statement from Srinandan R. Kasi, VP and General Counsel, The Associated Press

Striking at the heart of his fair use case against the AP, Shepard Fairey has now been forced to admit that he sued the AP under false pretenses by lying about which AP photograph he used to make the Hope and Progress posters. Mr. Fairey has also now admitted to the AP that he fabricated and attempted to destroy other evidence in an effort to bolster his fair use case and cover up his previous lies and omissions.

In his Feb. 9, 2009 complaint for a declaratory judgment against the AP, Fairey falsely claimed to have used an AP photograph of George Clooney sitting next to then-Sen. Barack Obama as the source of the artist’s Hope and Progress posters. However, as the AP correctly alleged in its March 11, 2009 response, Fairey had instead used a close-up photograph of Obama from the same press event, which is an exact match for Fairey’s posters. In its response, the AP also correctly surmised that Fairey had attempted to hide the true identity of the source photo in order to help his case by arguing that he had to make more changes to the source photo than he actually did, i.e., that he at least had to crop it.

After filing the complaint, Fairey went on to make several public statements in which he insisted that the photo with George Clooney was the source image and that “The AP is showing the wrong photo.” It appears that these statements were also false, as were statements that Fairey made describing how he cropped Clooney out of the photo and made other changes to create the posters.

Fairey’s lies about which photo was the source image were discovered after the AP had spent months asking Fairey’s counsel for documents regarding the creation of the posters, including copies of any source images that Fairey used. Fairey’s counsel has now admitted that Fairey tried to destroy documents that would have revealed which image he actually used. Fairey’s counsel has also admitted that he created fake documents as part of his effort to conceal which photo was the source image, including hard copy printouts of an altered version of the Clooney Photo and fake stencil patterns of the Hope and Progress posters. Most recently, on Oct. 15, Fairey’s counsel informed the AP that they intended to seek the Court’s permission to withdraw as counsel for Fairey and his related entities.

The AP intends to vigorously pursue its countersuit alleging that Fairey willfully infringed the AP’s copyright in the close-up photo of then-Sen. Obama by using it without permission to create the Hope and Progress posters and related products, including T-shirts and sweatshirts that have led to substantial revenue. According to the AP’s in-house counsel, Laura Malone, “Fairey has licensed AP photos in the past for similar uses and should have done so in this case. As a not-for-profit news organization, the AP depends on licensing revenue to stay in business.” Proceeds received for past use of the photo will be contributed by the AP to The AP Emergency Relief Fund, which assists staffers and their families around the world who are victims of natural disasters and conflicts.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous GLOBAL PIRACY WATCH: AUSTRALIA’S ISP LIABILITY TEST CASE
Next Arts v. Ads — something light in this part of the city

Related Art Law Articles

CfAL Banksy Balloon Girl
AL Clippings

The Verdict on the Stolen Banksy

June 16, 2026
Benningson V Guggenheim Case Review Center for Art Law
Art lawCase ReviewLegal Issues in Museum Administration

Case Review: Bennigson v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation

March 13, 2026
Center for Art Law Vivianne Diaz Article Portrait of Zborowski
Art lawCase Review

The Modigliani Forgery Epidemic Strikes Again?

January 13, 2026
Maryan Kushnir Kyiv Jun 15 2026

Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra

World Heritage Site Attacked

Ukrainian museums and cultural centers, such as this 11th century UNESCO site are under attack. Learn about Cultural Heritage at Risk.

UNESCO Site
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Thank you for joining us this Saturday for our pan Thank you for joining us this Saturday for our panel discussion at the Landesmuseum as part of the official program of Zurich Art Weekend 2026 @zurichartweekend 

With a fully booked audience, inspiring perspectives from leading voices @thomstauffer @stefanputtaert @alanakushnir @willkorner @pascalrobertgallery, and a warm welcome at an iconic venue, it was a truly memorable event! 

Thanks to everyone who came along - it was a blast💥 

Special thanks to our sponsors @smartstamp @t_transporte.zuerich, the Edge, TRACE and @artdomains!
How do artists, attorneys, and cultural institutio How do artists, attorneys, and cultural institutions navigate copyright law in an era of AI and rapidly evolving case law?

Our latest article revisits our latest Art Lawyering Bootcamp on Copyright Law from February 4th, highlighting conversations on fair use, moral rights, copyright registration, estate planning, and the legal questions raised by generative AI.

📚 Read the full article by Alexandra Kharchenko at the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #copyrightlaw #artlaw #AIandArt #fairuse #intellectualproperty #artistrights #copyright
Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro b Join us for an informative guest lecture and pro bono consultations on legacy and estate planning for visual artists.

Calling all visual artists: join the Center for Art Law's Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic for an evening of low-cost consultations with attorneys, tax experts, and other arts professionals with experience in estate and legacy planning.

After a short lecture on a legacy and estate planning topic, attendees with consultation tickets artist will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer professionals (attorneys, appraisers and financial advisors) for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #clinic #artlawyer #estateplanning #artistlegacy #legal #research #lawclinic
As AI enters all parts of the legal sector, it has As AI enters all parts of the legal sector, it has also been implemented in Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms. The American Arbitration Association and the International Centre for Dispute Resolution recently introduced the "AI arbitrator" in November 2025. 

The process is relatively simple, though it remains reserved for construction cases and subject to the review of a human arbitrator. The tool was created to offer more cost- and time-efficient options. The question remains, if current ADR AI tools can be envisioned in art law disputes, particularly given the individualistic features of art law claims and how they may, or may not, be addressed through the use of AI in ADR procedures

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the full article by Marina Rastorfer!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #ailaw #aiart #adr #alternativedisputeresolution
Don't miss our upcoming conversation with Dr. Rubi Don't miss our upcoming conversation with Dr. Rubina Raja, Professor of Classical Archaeology and Art at Aarhus University, as she presents contemporary, collaborative approaches to combating the illicit trade in antiquities, with a particular focus on Palmyra (Tadmor), Syria.

Drawing on the historical relationship between collecting and looting, the discussion will highlight the Palmyrene Portrait Project, a corpus of over 4,000 funerary portraits from Palmyra compiled by Dr. Raja and her team since 2012. The project serves as a critical record of material that, in many cases, remained in situ prior to the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War.

Before its inception, this body of material had not been treated as a unified corpus, nor systematically digitized. Today, the project stands as both the largest corpus of individual Roman period portraits from a single urban context and an essential scholarly and practical tool for identifying objects from Palmyra as they emerge on the art market.

Please note this event will not be recorded. 

🎟️ Get tickets now using the link in bio!

#centerforartlaw #arlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #culturalheritage #artcrime #antiquities
Recently some artist estates have loosened fair us Recently some artist estates have loosened fair use policies for non-profits. The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation is one such example. In an effort to promote Rauschenberg's work over short-term revenue gain, it implemented one of the first fair use policies for certain museums before widening it to the public at large. 

Artist engagement levels did increase, but the policy brought up other issues, including distinguishing non-profit from for-profit uses. 

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more in our article by Josie Goettel!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #art #artistissues #artistestates #museumissues #iplaw #copyright #ip
Meet our stellar line up of speakers! Thomas Stau Meet our stellar line up of speakers!

Thomas Stauffer | Partner, Gerber & Stauffer Fine Arts; President, Swiss Art Trading Association @thomstauffer 

Stefan Puttaert | CEO, Nicola Erni Collection @stefanputtaert @nicolaernicollection 

Alana Kushnir | Founder & Principal, Aurelian Lawyers & Advisers @aurelianlawyersandadvisers 

Will Korner | Head of Fairs, TEFAF @willkorner 

Pascal Robert | Founder, Pascal Robert Gallery @pascalrobertgallery 

Irina Tarsis | Founder, Center for Art Law, Moderator

▪️See you this Saturday, June 13 | 11:30–13:00
Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich
Free & open to the public

▪️Official part of @zurichartweekend programme
June! Roses are in bloom, summer interns have comp June! Roses are in bloom, summer interns have completed two weeks of orientation and research, and the world is heating up. As we wrap up after the Summer School, with much gratitude to our faculty and students, and digest the Copyright Law Conference takeaways, we cannot wait for our panel discussion Art Markets & the World in Transition (what is not?!) during the Zurich Art Weekend (in town on June 13th? Join us!), and look forward to sharing new research and articles with you posthaste. 

Make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to get all of these updates and more! 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #june #legalresearch
In this episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris In this episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris speak with Will Korner, founder and director of the Cultural Heritage At Risk Database Foundation (CHARD). 

From conflict zones to disaster-stricken regions, Will discusses how documentation, collaboration, and technology can help safeguard the objects and stories that connect us to our shared past from illicit trade. He also explains how CHARD’s database can be used to cross-check whether stolen or missing cultural objects are appearing on the art market, including at auction, and what is at stake when these irreplaceable pieces of heritage are lost. 

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #culture #artcrime
Despite the passage of multiple anti-money launder Despite the passage of multiple anti-money laundering laws in the U.S. over the past two decades, the art market is still considered the "largest legal unregulated industry." Its perceived lax regulatory regime and various industry-specific factors, makes high-value art an attractive tool for laundering criminal proceeds. 

The rise in laundering through high-value art is mainly attributed to the high-dollar transactions values, the ease of transporting artwork across borders, the market's longstanding culture of privacy, and art's evolution as a financial asset. That said, the art market is not entirely unregulated. As this article shows, other mechanisms — including industry self-regulation, public pressure from high-profile litigation and settlements, and sanction laws — provide a certain regulatory structure.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artmarket #AML #internationallaw #lawyer #artcrime #money
10 DAYS TO GO - MARK YOUR CALENDARS! Saturday, Ju 10 DAYS TO GO - MARK YOUR CALENDARS!

Saturday, June 13 | 11:30–13:00
Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich
Free & open to the public

With big gratitude to our sponsors, we look forward to welcoming you at the event!
📍June 13, 11:30 - 13:00 | Auditorium Willy G.S. Hi 📍June 13, 11:30 - 13:00 | Auditorium Willy G.S. Hirzel, Landesmuseum Zurich 

Free & open to the public

This June, as part of the official program of @zurichartweekend, we are bringing together some of the sharpest minds in the international art world for a candid conversation on what’s reshaping collecting today.

▪️Art Markets and the World in Transition: Frameworks Shaping Global Collecting

Geopolitics. Tariffs. AML regulation. Taxes. The rules of the art market are changing as fast as your news feed, and this panel is where experts unpack what that means for collectors, gallerists, and art lovers.

Speakers: 

Will Korner (TEFAF) · Alana Kushnir (Aurelian Lawyers & Advisers) · Pascal Robert (Pascal Robert Gallery) · Stefan Puttaert (Nicola Erni Collection) · Thomas Stauffer (SATA) ·  Irina Tarsis, Esq. (Center for Art Law, moderator)

The event sponsors to be announced soon! 

Link in bio to save your spot 🔗

#ZurichArtWeekend #ArtLaw #ArtMarket #Collecting #ZAW2026 LandesmuseumZürich CenterForArtLaw ArtAndLaw CrossBorderCollecting
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law