• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art Donations 101: a Guide for Artists, Collectors, and Nonprofits
Back

Art Donations 101: a Guide for Artists, Collectors, and Nonprofits

September 18, 2019

By Hannah Tager

In the Summer 2019, the Center for Art Law hosted its first charitable auction, during which it considered: how can artists and donors receive tax benefits for donating artworks to a non-profit organization? As it turns out, the answer is a bit lengthier than one might expect.

The Current Legal Landscape

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017[1] brought about large changes to all areas of taxation, deductibles included—as a reminder, if something is tax deductible it means that its value can be subtracted from the taxpayer’s legally taxable income. Due to this broad reform, publications pertaining to tax code are now outdated if not obsolete (including this previous publication by the Center on the topic). For a recent guide on the subject of art donations as deductibles please see IRS Publication 526 (2018), Charitable Contributions, which summarizes the Internal Revenue Code Section 170: Charitable, etc., contributions and gifts. Intended as a general guide (and not as a checklist), this article focuses on these IRS publications, highlighting pertinent sections of the tax code for artists, collectors, and donors interested in giving charitable donations of artworks.

Condition 1: Artists Excluded

Professional artists—i.e. artists who can demonstrate having gained a profit from their artworks—can generally deduct the cost of materials used to create an artwork from their taxable income as a business expense rather than a charitable donation. Since the IRS considers this artwork to be a self-created asset, artists can claim materials needed to produce their original creative work, such as paints, brushes, canvases and frames, as business-related expenses on their federal tax returns (IRS Form 1040 Schedule C). It should be noted that nontraditional materials, whether they be bottle caps or barbed wire, can also be deducted, although the time and physical labor put into constructing an artwork cannot be; for a charcoal sketch that took hours to make, an artist can only deduct the charcoal and paper costs. With these provisions, artists only pay taxes on their profit, not their total revenue. However, the IRS does not allow “double-dipping,”. Therefore, if an artist has already deducted materials under Schedule C, they cannot list them again as a charitable expense for a donated artwork.

In short, an artist, if donating directly to a foundation, cannot receive a tax deduction for an artwork he or she has created. According to the Internal Revenue Code Section 170 titled “Charitable, etc., contributions and gifts”,[2] where property is donated, the deduction must exclude the “amount of gain which would not have been long-term capital gain.” That is to say, one can only deduct a contribution that is a long-term capital gain, for example, property that has been owned for over a year and is then donated. In the case of professional artists, however, donations of their artwork constitute neither a short nor long-term gain. Instead, artwork is thought of as the professional artist’s trade, and it is thus treated as income by the IRS. The IRC thus prohibits artists from donating their own work for tax deductions.

In the case of a collector donating artwork to a nonprofit, if the artwork and the receiving organization fulfill the requirements, the work’s former owner may be able to deduct the fair market value of the artwork from their taxable income. This introduces a further condition.

Condition 2: Determining the Fair Market Value

When filing for deduction, the donor must determine the “fair market value” of the artwork. This requirement introduces a new set of guidelines and terms related to the appraisal of the piece. As per the IRS definition, the fair market value is the price that the artwork would sell for on the open market on the date of its contribution.[3] The value must reflect the price that would be agreed upon by a willing buyer and a willing seller, with neither being required to act and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. For works valued at $5,000 or more, a written appraisal by a qualified appraiser is required. To be a qualified appraiser, one must have earned appraisal designation from a recognized organization and met education and experience requirements, i.e. is certified for the property in question or has completed college or professional-level coursework relevant to the property being valued. Also, the appraiser must work regularly and cannot have been prohibited from practicing before the IRS under section 330(c) of title 31 of the United States Code. The Official Museum Directory of the American Association of Museums has a list of qualified appraisers for reference.

Appraisers can be expensive, and generally, appraisal fees cannot be deducted. In select cases, however, appraiser fees can qualify as a miscellaneous deduction, subject to a 2% limit, on Schedule A (Form 1040) if they were paid to determine the amount allowable as a charitable contribution. The selected appraiser must write an appraisal that meets the relevant requirements of Regulations section 1.170A-13(c)(3) and Notice 2006-96, 2006-46 I.R.B. 902 and attach Form 8283, Section B, Part II to the former owner’s tax returns.

Condition 3: Related Use Requirement*

Before one can deduct the now appraised fair market value of the artwork, a collector must make sure that the donation itself fulfills some requirements. As the IRS outlines, a donor cannot deduct the artwork as a charitable contribution if the piece is a contribution to a specific individual, nor can the contribution benefit the donor directly.

The most specific requirement, and the most taxing to fulfill, is the “related use” condition. A donor of art can deduct the fair market value of the artwork from their taxable income if the donation was put to a “related use” by the nonprofit (e.g. if the art was received by an art institution and is used an educational tool, then it’s “related use”). However, if the use if “unrelated” to the nonprofit’s mission, the donor must deduct the lesser of either the fair market value or the original value of the work. 
Therefore, the IRS mandates that one cannot deduct the fair market value of a piece of property if the donated work is then put to “unrelated use” and its original value is less than the fair market value.  

Within the related use clause, it is also underscored that the artwork must be put to relevant use for at least one year before the receiving organization sells, trades, or otherwise disposes of the property. Likewise, for works over $5,000, the donee must retain it for three years; otherwise, the donor must recapture part of his or her charitable contribution deduction by including it in income. For the Center’s purposes, this means that the artists and collectors that donated artworks to our auction are unfortunately not eligible to receive a tax deduction for the fair market value of their pieces since the Center sold the artworks within a year of receiving them for “unrelated use” to the Center’s mission.

Condition 4: Donation to a Fully Qualified 501(c)(3) Organization

In addition to fulfilling these requirements, the donated artwork must also have been a contribution to a fully qualified organization before it can be deducted. A fully qualified organization must be a 501(c)3 as determined by the government– you can check the exempt organization database to see a charity’s 501(c)3 status. All charities that have received 501(c)3 status are non-profit groups that are religious, charitable, educational, scientific, or literary in purpose, or that work to prevent cruelty to children or animals.[5] Once the donor has ascertained that the receiving organization is a qualified non-profit, the charity must issue the donor a statement that declares that it did not exchange any goods or services for the donation. 

Effect and Deduction

If the charity and donation meet all these requirements, in most cases the donor can deduct the fair market value of the property at the time of the contribution. For the most part, the deduction for charitable contributions generally cannot be more than 60% of the donor’s adjusted gross income (which is the gross income minus adjustments and deductions to that income). From there, collectors must file a Schedule A (Form 1040) with their tax forms to deduct donations. If the donor wants to deduct a non-cash donation, as is the case with art, form 8283 is also required. All filings must be done within the year the contribution was made.

By following these steps, a successful deduction can be possible, yet the strict regulations with which collectors must comply may deter these donors from giving to charities. The best approach as a collector would be to make a contract with the selected organization to guarantee that they will fulfill the conditions set by the IRS. Otherwise, count on cash donations to non-profit organizations for easy deductions and be very selective in choosing charities to which you donate your artwork. Many charities, and the ones that may need art donations the most, will not be able to meet the prerequisites for a deduction. In this case, make sure to set a budget for how many artworks you will donate and remember that donating a non-deductible piece of artwork could be a small loss for you but a massive gain for an organization.

Reminder: The Center for Art Law is a qualified 501(c)(3) which will gladly accept your donation!


Footnotes:

  1. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Pub. L. No. 115-97, (2017) 26 U.S.C.(2017). ↑
  2. 26 U.S. Code § 170 (2018). ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. DEP’T OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERV., PUB. 526 CAT. NO 15050A, CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS: FOR USE IN PREPARING 2018 RETURNS 11-12 (2019). ↑
  5. Id., 1. ↑

Additional Readings:

  • IRC § 170.1.6
  • Hannah Cole, How the New Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Impact the Art World, Hyperallergic (Sept. 24, 2018).
  • IRS Publication 561 (4/2007): Determining the Value of Donated Property, April 2007.
  • IRS Publication 526. Cat. No 15050A: Charitable Contributions: For use in preparing 2018 Returns, Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service, IRS CC, 12.
  • https://www.usa.gov/donate-to-charity

Acknowledgments:

The author would like to thank Jason Kleinman for his thoughtful advice during the preparation of this article.

About the Author:

Hannah Tager was a Summer 2019 intern at the Center for Art Law and a rising Senior at Williams College in Williamstown, MA, where she also works at the Clark Art Institute and serves on the board of the town’s radio station, WCFM 91.9.

* On September 15, 2020, this article was edited to correct the section on the “related use” requirement.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Deconstructing “Orphan Works”
Next The Art of Bankruptcy: Consigned Artworks and Bankrupt Galleries

Related Art Law Articles

A-Corp Article veronika martinelli q5YQ2zNniVc unsplash
Art law

A for …. A-Corp: Understanding Artist Corporations

August 25, 2026
Signs Article Sam Brady Myerov
Art lawWhitney Biennial

POPS Art! David L. Johnson’s “Rule” and the Legal Landscape of New York’s Privately Owned Public Spaces

July 31, 2026
What do Artists Give Up in Museums VARA Shah Priya Image
Art law

What Do Artists Give Up in Museums?

July 30, 2026
Center for Art Law
August 2026 Summer Promo (2)

Get your leg up on art law

Just in time for 2026-2027

Become a member and access unlimited articles, our Case Law Database, event archives, and exclusive member pricing on all upcoming events.

Learn MORE
Immigration Guide for Artists 2026 Cover Page

Immigration Guide for Artists

Check out the 2026 overview of U.S. immigration pathways available to artists.

Learn MORE
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸 A thrifted box of 1 Who owns Hollywood’s past? 🎬📸

A thrifted box of 1930s photographs of actress Marion Davies opens up a much bigger question: who owns the image and the rights behind it? 

One of our latest articles explores the story behind these photographs, including MGM studio stamps, Davies’s handwritten dedication, and the distinction between owning a physical photograph and owning the intellectual property rights in its image.

📚To read the full story by Irina Tarsis, head to the link in our bio

https://itsartlaw.org/art-law/who-owns-hollywoods-past/ 

#ArtLaw #CopyrightLaw #MarionDavies #HollywoodHistory #CulturalHeritage
Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Works Join us on September 18th for an Art and Law Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines.

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
For centuries, copying has been an integral part o For centuries, copying has been an integral part of Chinese artistic practice, blurring the line between homage and forgery. Many museums are at a loss for how to evaluate works that challenge Western notions of authenticity.

Through the ongoing debate over the MET’s Riverbank painting, our recent article examines how institutional interests and market value continue to shape perceptions of authenticity.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lena Rohde!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #chineseart #zhangdaqian #changdaichien #artforgery #authenticity #museumlaw #arthistory #provenance #artmarket
The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has trans The rapid rise of digital reconstruction has transformed how cultural heritage is documented and preserved, particularly in regions affected by conflict. As 3D models and digital archives become more common, they also raise questions about ownership and cultural self-determination.

In her article, Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis examines the preservation of Syria's cultural heritage. More specifically, how digital reconstructions can both protect endangered sites and act as a tool for erasure when local communities are excluded from the process.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Jacqueline Koutrodimos-Lewis!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #digitalheritage #3Dreconstruction #provenance #archaeology #culturalproperty #digitization #palmyra #museumlaw
Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go t Recently our intern Hannah Gadway was able to go to the Beaverbrook Art Gallery in New Brunswick. This gallery was included in a law suit between Lord Beaverbrook's Estate and a foundation he had established during his life. 

📚 See more about this case using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artresearch #estates #artist #foundation #gallery
Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago d Two sculptures have finally returned to Santiago de Compostela after seventy-two years.

Our recent article examines the Spanish Supreme Court's decision to return the Abraham and Isaac sculptures to Santiago de Compostela, and the pivotal role that object identification played in resolving the dispute.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lucas Güimil Valdés!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalheritage #restitution #provenanceresearch #spain #culturalproperty
Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Wel Our recent article revisits Professor Matthias Weller's presentation introducing Germany's new Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property. It explores how the new tribunal differs from the former Limbach Commission and what its procedures, jurisdiction, and binding decisions could mean for future restitution claims.

📚 Read the full article by Savannah Weiler and Amanda Buonaiuto at the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #culturalproperty #nazilootedart #restitution #provenanceresearch #culturalheritage #alternativedisputeresolution
It’s August 🔥 Think Art Law. World Cap 2026 is ove It’s August 🔥 Think Art Law. World Cap 2026 is over. For us it will be remembered for Haaland Memes and $25 MILLION lawsuit filed by environmental artist Robert Wyland against FIFA for painting over the iconic 1999 downtown Dallas mural, Whaling Wall 82.* Summer Internships at the Center are winding down. Oh the places we have been together (from UN to MoMA across the US, Canada and the UK). The 2025-2026 Judith Bresler Fellowship is complete and how! and our new fellow is eager to hit the ground running.

As we move into the final stretch of summer, the reality sets in: little and big fires are everywhere and juggling so many balls or making sense of the everyday is getting increasingly impossible. But before we collapse into off-season, we want to thank you for being part of our community. Whether you were here in person, joining us online, or thinking about art and the law from afar, we can’t wait to see what you’ll create, challenge, and defend come fall. Our complements and heartfelt thanks to our Summer Team for everything they’ve accomplished over these months and invested in our future: for staying on track, for research and rigorous work on articles and databases, for genuine team building, and for pushing all of us to grow. And here’s what we’ve learned: when the real world gets too much, look at art. Play ball. Have a hydration break. These are necessities that keep us sane and running overtime. 

📚 Read the full newsletter and become a subscriber using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #legal artlawyer
What inspires a career in art and cultural propert What inspires a career in art and cultural property law?

In our latest interview, Professor Matthias Weller shares how his academic and professional journey led him to become one of the leading voices in the restitution field. He also discusses Germany's new Court of Arbitration for Nazi-Looted Cultural Property and what this landmark development could mean for the future of restitution.

📚 Read the full interview using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalreserach #legal #art #lawyer #restitution #artcrime #arbitration #germany
ART × LAW INTENSIVE 2026 - the countdown begins! S ART × LAW INTENSIVE 2026 - the countdown begins!
See you in Zurich in September ✨

The response to our inaugural edition has exceeded all expectations, with applications received from around the world. Thank you to everyone who applied! We look forward to welcoming our first cohort of participants very soon.

Sessions will take place across some of Switzerland’s leading institutions, including ZHdK, the University of Zurich, Kunsthaus Zurich, Swiss Re, Homburger, and more. This year’s faculty will be announced in the upcoming posts. 

From copyright and AI to provenance, restitution, dispute resolution, and the future of collecting, the ART × LAW INTENSIVE 2026 brings together the people shaping the future of the art world. Excited! 

 
Photos: 1. “Zardoz” by Monster Chetwynd, the garden of Kunsthaus Zurich. 2. Tram stop of Museum Rietberg. 3. Picnic spot in Belvoirpark. 4. The roofs of Rämistrasse. 5. The drone view over Bellevueplatz.
Major changes to restitution law are underway on b Major changes to restitution law are underway on both sides of the Atlantic.

Recent developments in the United States and the United Kingdom could reshape how Nazi-looted art claims are resolved. Our latest article breaks down the proposed amendments to the U.S. HEAR Act, changes to the U.K.'s Charities Act, and why alternative dispute resolution is becoming an increasingly important part of the conversation.

📚 Read the full article by Marina Rastorfer at the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #nazilootedart #restitution #provenanceresearch #culturalheritage #museumlaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law