• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Ballet Costumes and the Art of Copyright
Back

Ballet Costumes and the Art of Copyright

April 18, 2022

The Rehearsal of the Ballet Onstage. ca, 1874 Edgar Degas; Courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

The Rehearsal of the Ballet Onstage. ca, 1874 Edgar Degas; Courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

By Cielomar Puccio

The image of a ballerina is not complete if it is missing its tutu and pointe shoes. These two images have become icons of what a ballerina should wear to perform the lovely art we call dance. In fact, these icons are so important that little girls take ballet classes dreaming of one day performing in a full theater with pointe shoes and a beautiful tutu.

While pointe shoes have a short life and are a personal item of the ballerina, the tutus and costumes, many times, are created and kept by the dance company for many years to be used by many different dancers. Many dancers look up to wearing a costume worn previously by a praised ballerina or even by a friend making the past “life” of the costume as important as the costume itself.[1]

Intellectual Property In Costume Design

Art, which includes ballet in the more physical side of visual artistry, is an important component of human life. In fact, it is so important that the United States Constitution (“Constitution”) provides for its protection. The Constitution grants Congress the enumerated power “to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”[2] In legal terms, the protection of these creations are named intellectual property (“IP”). There are different types of IP. Some examples are patents, copyright, and trademarks, among others. Each one has a specific definition and is protected by law. [3] When it comes to ballet costumes, it is important to consider all IP laws to figure out what the best method is to protect them.

Trademarks and Patents

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce. Among its many roles, it grants patents for the protection of inventions and registers trademarks.[4] The USPTO defines trademark as “any word, phrase, symbol, design, or a combination of these things that identifies your goods or services.”[5] Examples could be “word, slogan, design, or combination of these. It could even be a sound, a scent, or a color.”[6] An example would be a unique signature color or even a unique color scheme used in the creation of the ballet costumes for a specific performance.

In contrast, a patent for an invention is the grant of a property right to the inventor, issued by the USPTO. There are three types of patents. These are the utility patents, design patents, and plant patents. The design patents may be granted to anyone who invents a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture.[7] This kind of patent sometimes overlaps with copyright law. For example under the copyright law you cannot protect the way that design elements are identical in shape as another, identical in cut, in dimensions, and/or pieced together in a costume. Nonetheless, you may be able to get protection of this under the design patent protection. A design patent can also prevent others from creating costumes that show any resemblance to your sketch design. Design patents, nonetheless, are very expensive to obtain.

Copyright

The Copyright Act of 1976 (“Act”) protects original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression.[8] An example of how this protection applies to costume can be the sketches. The actual drawings used to create the costumes can be protected by copyright law if original. Besides the sketches of the costume, sometimes even the textile designs, in other words the actual design imprinted in or on the fabric can be protected by copyright law.

Costumes and Copyright Law

Costumes have long been a highly contested copyright law area for many decades. After many litigations[9], the The Copyright Office (“Office”) in 1991 issued a Policy Decision on the Registrability of Costume Designs, in which it stated that fanciful costumes will be treated as useful articles for copyright registration purposes. The Act defines “useful article” as “an article having an intrinsic utilitarian function that is not merely to portray the appearance of the article or to convey information. An article that is normally part of a useful article is considered a ‘useful article’.”[10] An example of a useful article is clothing. Pants are a type of clothing and has a utilitarian function which is to cover the body. So, if a costume is made of something that resembles pants like fabric to cover the lower area of a person in a shape of “birdlike legs”, this will not be protected by copyright law because it is essentially a useful article otherwise known as pants. An exception would be masks. The Office has stated that masks will not be considered as a useful article and can be granted copyright protection.

In conclusion, with this information it could be said that a costume would be copyrightable if it contains artistic works that can be separated from the utilitarian aspect.

Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc.

In Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc., the United States Supreme Court (“the Court”) rendered its most recent decision based on this subject of costumes and the “conceptual separability” of utility and design[11]. The case concerned Varsity Brands, a company which makes cheerleader uniforms and had several copyright registrations on two-dimensional designs. Varsity Brands sued Star Athletica, another company known for creating cheerleader uniforms, for an alleged infringement in their copyright in terms of copying their two-dimensional stripes, colors and other ornamentation on the uniforms that Star Athetlica created.

The Court held that a feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection only if the feature can satisfy two requirements. The first requirement is that the design is a work of art that can be separated from the useful article. The second requirement is that the work of art separated from the useful article would have copyright protection on its own or placed in any other medium.

In this specific case even though the cheerleading uniforms were considered utility articles, the symbolism and insignia portrayed on the outfits were given artistic value and determined to be a design that can be separated from the useful article and that can be given copyright protection.[12]

Conclusion

Costumes, ballet or otherwise, are copyrightable depending on the ability to separate the design elements from the utilitarian costume elements and find that these design elements are original and creative enough to receive independent protection. This is a case-by-case decision that the Office will have to determine each time a costume registration comes along. When protecting the IP of costumes other laws can be considered like trademarks and patents. A protected ballet tutu and costume allow that important piece of cultural relevance to live on for generations and generations to come; granting little girls who come to watch ballet performances the opportunity to be part of that important piece of cultural relevance and identity that will continue to inspire them every day. Nonetheless, of its legal protection, any individual that attends a ballet performance can without a doubt conclude that the costumes worn by the dancers are definitely works of art.

Suggested Readings

Can I use copyright to protect my fashion designs?, Copyright Alliance. Available at: https://copyrightalliance.org/education/qa-headlines/copyright-fashion-designs/.

Caroline Hamilton, Behind the Seams: Ballet Costumes carry an Embodied History, Pointe, (Feb. 18, 2020). Available at: https://pointemagazine.com/ballet-costume-history/.

Compendium of U.S Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition. Available at https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap900/ch900-visual-art.pdf

Halloween Costumes and Copyright: 5 things you should know, JD Supra, (Oct. 27, 2017). Available at: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/halloween-costumes-and-copyright-5-87331/.

Katie Scholz, Costumes and Copyrights: Can you afford to wear that?, IPWatchdog, (July 18, 2018). Available at: https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/07/18/costumes-copyrights-can-you-afford-to-wear-that/id=99278/.

Sam Behbehani, Supreme Court Hearing Copyright Case on Costumes, LegalMatch: Intellectual Property, (Nov. 17, 2016). Available at: https://legalmatch.typepad.com/intellectualproperty/2016/11/supreme-court-hearing-copyright-case-on-costumes.html

Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1002.

United States House of Representatives, Protection for Fashion Design, Statement of the United States Copyright Office before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary, (July 27, 2006). Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat072706.html#N_11_.

About the Author

Cielomar Puccio is an attorney barred in Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia currently residing in Miami, Florida with a virtual law firm called Brandllet that focuses on Trademark, Copyright, and Artist Immigration for artists, especially ballet dancers. She is also a ballet dancer, lover and advocate of the arts. You can read more about her and her law firm at http://www.brandllet.com.

  1. Caroline Hamilton, Behind the Seams: Ballet Costumes Carry an Embodied History, Pointe, (Feb. 18, 2020). ↑
  2. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8 ↑
  3. What is Intellectual Property?, World Intellectual Property Organization, https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/ (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  4. General information concerning patents, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/general-information-patents (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  5. What is a trademark?, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/what-trademark (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  6. Trademark Examples, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trademark-examples (last visited Jan. 24, 2022) ↑
  7. General information concerning patents, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/general-information-patents (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  8. 17 U.S.C. § 102. ↑
  9. Whimsicality, Inc. v. Rubies Costumes Co., Inc., 721 F.Supp. 1566 (1989); Masquerade Novelty, Inc. v. Unique Industries, Inc., 912 F.2d. 633 (3dCir.1990) ↑
  10. 17 U.S.C. § 101. ↑
  11. Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1002. ↑
  12. Id. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Art Market Compliance As Seen From Switzerland
Next Dynamic Policies of Deaccessioning and Disposal in American Museums

Related Art Law Articles

Seymour Fogel Wealth of the Nation
Art law

Selling America’s Sistine Chapel: The Trump Administration’s Effort to Sell Federal Buildings and the Artworks Trapped Inside

July 2, 2026
Fig1 Reflecting Pool from Lincoln Mem
Art law

Beautification Out of the (American Flag) Blue: The Lawsuit That Attempted to Halt the Reflecting Pool Makeover

July 2, 2026
Art Law at America 250 Hannah Gadway
Art law

Art Law at America 250: Gilbert Stuart’s Art Battles and National Imagination

June 28, 2026
Center for Art Law
ART x LAW SCHOOL instagram

Summer School in Zurich?

Join us

This five-day intensive program combines classroom and lecture format.

Learn MORE
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

What happens when the world's most famous anonymou What happens when the world's most famous anonymous artist is no longer anonymous?

One of our latest articles examines the legal and cultural implications of Banksy's unmasking, exploring how anonymity shaped the reception of his work and what this revelation may mean for the future of his career. More broadly, this piece explores how Banksy’s anonymity functioned within a culture increasingly defined by visibility and personal branding.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Afroditi Karatagli

#centerforartlaw #banksy #artlaw #streetart #copyrightlaw #freedomofexpression #contemporaryart #artmarket #legalresearch
Grüezi mitenand 👋 Center for Art Law Switzerland i Grüezi mitenand 👋 Center for Art Law Switzerland is introducing ART x LAW INTENSIVE!

Globalization is reshaping the art world, and with it comes a growing need for legal literacy across the market’s key players. Join us in the heart of Europe for a five-day deep dive into the legal frameworks shaping today’s art world.

Location: Zurich 
Hosting Partners: museums, law firms, galleries, universities, and artist studios
Dates: September 1–5, 2026

🎓 Taught by leading art law practitioners: transactional and litigation attorneys, art dealers, law professors and provenance researchers

Ideal for law and pre-law students, young attorneys, and art world professionals ready to build both knowledge and network.

Applications open between July 7 - 31, decisions on selected participants announced by August 10.

Language: English | Cost: CHF 2,500

Link in bio to apply, or reach us at zurich@itsartlaw.org

#ArtLaw #ArtLawSchool #Zurich #ArtMarket #Provenance Restitution Copyright ArtAndTech SummerSchool CenterForArtLaw
On the United States 250th Anniversary make sure t On the United States 250th Anniversary make sure to check out our article by @hannahegadway: "Art Law at America 250: Gilbert Stuart’s Art Battles and National Imagination"

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the full article!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #250 #unitedstates #4thofjuly #newarticle
Learn about art and cultural heritage destroyed or Learn about art and cultural heritage destroyed or damaged by the ongoing war.

Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022, hundreds of museums, churches, archaeological sites, libraries, monuments, and historic buildings have been damaged or destroyed. As of July 1 2026, UNESCO had verified damage to more than 540 cultural sites across Ukraine, underscoring the unprecedented threat facing the country's cultural heritage. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #internationallaw #artcrime #culturalheritage
Recently one of our summer interns Cara Ianuale vi Recently one of our summer interns Cara Ianuale visited  the MET. Below is her thoughts on one item she saw within the Costume Art exhibition.👗💭⚖️

This fibrous dress in the MET’s Costume Art exhibition rests at the heart of an attribution dispute between artist Anouska Samms and designer Yoav Hadari. In May, Samms alleged that the MET did not rightfully credit her for Corpus Nervina 0.0, which bears significant resemblance to a work, Hair Dress, that she and Hadari created using her proprietary human hair-based textile she developed in 2019. The MET had expressed interest in acquiring Hair Dress in 2025, but plans fell through—according to Samms’ lawyer Jon Sharples, Hadari decided to withdraw Hair Dress and submit two other independently-designed garments instead.

Solely crediting Hadari, the label states that Corpus Nervina 0.0 is made of synthetic fibers, their scattered arrangement and wispy clusters meant to evoke the fragility of the human nervous system. Hadari claims that, while the garment was inspired by Hair Dress, its design, concept, and construction are entirely his own. The museum has declined involvement, indicating that the parties must first try to work it out on their own. For now, the label remains unchanged… 

📚 Check out more information on this topic using the link in our bio!
Learn about the Center's specialized resources ava Learn about the Center's specialized resources available on immigration and visas for artists!

Join the Center for Art Law at our Immigration Showcase, a free 30-minute webinar introducing the Center’s resources designed to support international visual artists navigating the U.S. immigration process.

Rakhel Milstein, Board Member at the Center and Founder of Milstein Law Group, will share brief remarks on recent immigration developments affecting artists, important policy considerations to keep in mind, and key issues for artists and creative professionals to watch. Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research at the Center, will introduce the Center’s upcoming Immigration Guide for Artists, available in July 2026. This comprehensive resource provides artists with an accessible overview of U.S. immigration pathways, including O-1 visas and other relevant options. The guide is designed to help artists better understand the immigration process, identify potential pathways, prepare more effectively, and recognize the importance of planning ahead when pursuing opportunities in the United States. Kameé Payton, the Center’s 2025-2026 Judith Bresler Fellow, will also share information about the Center’s Immigration Clinic, which provides artists with individualized support through one-on-one consultations to help them better understand their immigration options and access guidance tailored to their needs.

Join us to explore our resources and connect with the tools available to support artists navigating the U.S. immigration landscape. 

🎟️ Get tickets today using the link in our bio!!
Over 100 Benin bronzes housed at Cambridge Univers Over 100 Benin bronzes housed at Cambridge University have officially been returned to Nigeria. As university museums move forward with repatriation initiatives, larger, national institutions are left behind the curve due to statutory restrictions. From domestic legal roadblocks to internal ownership disputes, the road to restitution is rarely straightforward. 

📚 Head to the link in our bio to read The Observer's full breakdown of how Cambridge’s move puts pressure on the rest of the UK cultural sector.

📸: Adam Eastland / Alamy, University of Cambridge
Join us for an informative short lecture and pro b Join us for an informative short lecture and pro bono consultations to understand contracts with galleries and art dealers.

The Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic helps artists and gallerists negotiate effective and mutually-beneficial contracts. By connecting artists and dealers to attorneys, this Clinic looks to forge meaningful relations and to provide a platform for artists and dealers to learn about the laws that govern their relationship, as well as have their questions addressed by experts in the field.

After a short lecture on an artist-dealer relationships topic, attendees with consultation tickets will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer attorneys for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!!
And finally...here's to our Undergrad Summer 2026 And finally...here's to our Undergrad Summer 2026 interns! 

Dylan Cosgrove is a rising undergraduate senior at the American University of Paris, pursuing a B.A. in Finance with minors in Art History and Economics. Drawing on experiences across fashion, law, and finance - alongside coursework at Sotheby's - her interests sit at the intersection of capital markets, legal frameworks, and cultural value. She has developed a particular interest in art finance and the mechanisms through which law shapes the movement and monetization of art, and looks forward to exploring these themes further as she advances her academic and professional career.

Natasha is an undergraduate student pursuing a BA in History of Art at The Courtauld Institute of Art, with a particular interest in Modern and Contemporary British art. She currently serves as Events Coordinator for The Courtauld’s Art Law Society. Her academic interests include intellectual property and copyright law, restitution, and the protection of architectural heritage. Since November 2025, she has also volunteered with the Centre’s Nazi-Looted Art Restitution Project, and looks forward to continuing her contribution to the project while also working across other areas of the center over the summer. 

Swipe through to learn more about this year's cohort and join us in welcoming them to the Center for Art Law! 👏
Say hello to the Center for Art Law's Summer 2026 Say hello to the Center for Art Law's Summer 2026 interns🗽

Victoria Cook is a second-year law student at Queen's University and a Philosophy graduate from St. Francis Xavier University whose background includes artist advocacy and arts administration. Her interests focus on cultural heritage and restitution, authentication, and copyright. 

@hannahegadway is a rising 2L at Harvard Law School and a Summer 2026 legal intern with the Center for Art Law. She graduated from Harvard College in 2025, where she majored in History & Literature. Hannah is interested in art law-related questions concerning museum provenance and the Internet. 

Ian Silverstein is a dual-degree candidate at Rutgers University, pursuing a J.D. at Rutgers Law School alongside a graduate degree in Cultural Heritage and Preservation Studies, with a certificate in Intellectual Property Law. He is a painter and visual artist and has conducted separate research on emotional and aesthetic responses to art. His museum research has been supported by the NEA, and he holds a certificate in Art as a Global Business from Sotheby's Institute of Art. Ian’s illustrations can be seen in the NYTimes shortlisted book by Andrew Shtulman, titled ‘Scienceblind: Why Our Intuitive Theories about the World Are So Often Wrong’. 

Eleanna Antonatou is an LLM candidate in Art, Business and Law at Queen Mary University of London and a Law LLB graduate from the University of Nottingham. Her experience spans vacation schemes at international law firms across London, Athens, and Geneva. Her interests centre on intellectual property, dispute resolution, and the regulation of cross-border art transactions. 

@rebecca.caitlin is a rising 2L J.D. candidate at New York University School of Law. She completed her undergraduate degree at Middlebury College, where she studied philosophy, English, & American literatures, writing a thesis on contemporary feminist poetry’s power to cultivate moral behaviors in readers. Rebecca is interested in the overlap of human rights and art law, and particularly in cultural heritage/cultural property law, repatriation and restitution of stolen or looted cultural objects, & museum law.
Say hello to the Center for Art Law's Summer 2026 Say hello to the Center for Art Law's Summer 2026 Graduate Interns🎓

Sam Brady-Myerov is a rising second-year master’s student in the History, Theory, and Criticism of Architecture and Art program at MIT. She earned her BA in Art History and Political Science from Washington University in St. Louis in 2025 and was awarded a Fulbright Research/Open Study Award to Brazil. Her work focuses on urban decoration and the negotiations through which artists, architects, institutions, and public and private actors shape shared visual space.

Sophia Molina is a recent graduate of Wesleyan University, where she studied History and Fine Art. Her academic and professional work focuses on the intersections of art and politics, with particular interests in museum provenance, cultural heritage preservation, and cultural diplomacy. She has conducted research and worked in communications roles at institutions including the National Museum of Women in the Arts and the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

Kira Hernandez is a recent graduate of Williams College, where she received her B.A. in Art History and Justice & Law Studies. Currently, Kira is pursuing a M.S. in Informatics at San Jose State University, where her research focuses primarily on museum informatics, collections management systems, and improving the integration of provenance research into public-facing databases.

Cara Ianuale is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she earned degrees in the History of Art & Architecture and English. Her senior thesis in art history explores how artist Sherrie Levine’s solo exhibition of rephotographed images challenges the foundations of copyright. She is broadly interested in the intersection of art and intellectual property, and intends to study law in New York. 

Lena Rohde is a recent graduate of NYU's Institute of Fine Arts, having just obtained her M.A. in the History of Art and Archaeology. She completed her undergraduate studies in 2024 with an Honours Art History and French degree from the University of St. Andrews. Her primary interests include cultural heritage protection, provenance and restitution, and intellectual property.
The passage of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Reco The passage of the Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery (HEAR) Act was intended to help Holocaust survivors and their heirs pursue the recovery of artworks lost during the Nazi era. However, as recent litigation demonstrates, significant legal hurdles remain.

In Bennigson v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, courts grappled with questions of Nazi-era sales under duress, provenance research, and the equitable defense of laches. This case demonstrates the tension between historical justice and legal doctrines designed to protect defendants from stale claims.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Lauren Stein and Donyea James!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artrestitution #HEARAct #holocaustart #provenance #museumlaw #culturalheritage #legalresearch
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law

Become a Member

Since 2009, the Center for Art Law has organized hundreds of events and published over 1,200 relevant, accessible, and editorially independent articles. As a nonprofit working with artists and students, the Center for Art Law relies on your support to fund our work. Become a premium subscriber and gain access to discounts on events and archives of articles and/or hundreds of case summaries, intended for a worldwide audience of legal professionals, artists, researchers, and students.

Camille Pissarro, Rue St Honoré, apres midi, effet de pluie, 1897

Camille Pissarro, Rue St Honoré, apres midi, effet de pluie, 1897

$70 /per year

Case Law Corner

See All Benefits

Read case law summaries and enjoy unlimited access to our legendary Case Law Corner, now in a new and improved Database with over 700 entries.

Get this subscription
$75 /per year

Artist & Student Membership

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to our Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
Get this subscription
$150 /per year

Annual Subscription

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
  • Discounts to third-party events
Get this subscription