• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art Law History image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet IFAR: In lieu of an Obituary
Back

IFAR: In lieu of an Obituary

July 1, 2025

screenshot IFAR closure

By Irina Tarsis

On September 27, 2024, International Foundation for Art Research (IFAR) notified its mailing list of the plans to close. The email, entitled “Important News from IFAR,” stated that “After 55 years of championing the principles of authenticity and ethical ownership in the art world, the International Foundation for Art Research has made the difficult decision to begin winding down operations.” The message was unsigned. Like thunder in a clear sky, the announcement shocked the art law community, and sparked a flurry of emails and calls: “Impossible!” “Have you heard?!”

The full text of the September 2024 Press Release is available HERE. According to the announcement:

As we prepare to close this chapter, we are focused on ensuring a thoughtful and responsible transition and one that celebrates and preserves IFAR’s legacy. We are mapping out a timeline for when IFAR will conclude its programmatic work and cease operations, which we anticipate will take place in mid-2025. In the meantime, we are committed to serving as a resource to the art community, continuing our new online education programs, and completing research projects that have been submitted to us to date. However, we will no longer publish the IFAR Journal or host IFAR Evenings, as we focus on re-homing our mission-related assets, including the Art Law Database, Catalogues Raisonnés Database, and our Institutional Archive.

Source: Department of State, Division of Corporations, “Entity: International Foundation for Art Research, Inc.” (as of as of June 27, 2025), available at  https://apps.dos.ny.gov/publicInquiry/NameHistory

Established in 1969, IFAR became a venerable and standard-setting institution, with impeccable reputation, known for its high standard of excellence – across publications, events, and research. Under the decades of Sharon Flescher’s leadership, IFAR accumulated knowledge and talent, collected and created resources, and disseminated valuable and authoritative information. It set a high bar for other nonprofits operating in the United States and beyond, conducting research, shepherding together authoritative scholarship, and ushering experts from all relevant disciplines to provide opinions on ethics, authenticity, and legal standards.

An invitation to speak, write or opine for IFAR was tantamount to a certain and undisputed badge of honor in every professional’s cap. In 2017, this author together with Evelien Campfens contributed an article to the IFAR Journal about cultural heritage on loan from the Crimean Museums following the annexation of the peninsula. Drafting and editing Cri-Me-a-River! was a humbling experience, but also one of the publications this author is particularly proud of having drafted.

In addition to publishing the IFAR Journal, providing opinions on authenticity and provenance, IFAR also created and updated valuable research tools including, such as a bibliography of catalogues raisonne and an Art Law & Cultural Property Database (the Database). These resources were hailed by the luminaries of art law practice and scholarship, including the late Judith Bresler, co-author of Art Law: The Guide for Collectors, Investors, Dealers & Artists, and John Merryman, co-author of Law, Ethics and the Visual Arts. Bresler called IFAR’s Database “an invaluable resource for anyone involved in the art world,” and Merryman said that IFAR’s Art Law & Cultural Property Website was, “an unmatched digital resource for students, attorneys, art professionals, and others interested in American and international art and cultural property law.” See the undated IFAR’s promo about the Database.

Scholarly articles, sold out programs on authenticity and restitution, provenance research and law enforcement, influenced students of all ages and practitioners, collectors, and dealers. In March of 2022, IFAR was one of the first NGO organizations to comment about full scale evasion of Ukraine and the threat to its cultural heritage. Also that spring, IFAR held a webinar about the state of the Ukrainian cultural heritage threatened by the ongoing war unleashed by the Russian Federation and organized resources on the subject. IFAR could do a lot and IFAR cared.

Harrison Jacobs, “Longtime Art Authentication Nonprofit IFAR to Shut Down After 55 Years,” ARTnews (Sept. 27, 2024).

At the end of 2023, after 25 years of service, Dr. Sharon Flescher stepped down from the post, passing the baton to Dr. Lindsey Schneider, the fourth and final executive director of IFAR. From the outside, back in December 2023, there were no indicators that IFAR would go dark any time soon; on the contrary the expectation was more than half way to its centennial. The financials reported on the IFAR 990 Form indicate that the institution was not flush with cash, but it was comfortable. However, as reported in Art Forum on October 2, 2024, Schneider “performed a six-month assessment of the foundation’s activities and finances and concluded that the operation was no longer feasible.”

Art Authenticator IFAR to Cease Operations
News Desk, “Art Authenticator IFAR to Cease Operations” ARTFORUM (Oct. 2, 2024).

According to Jennifer Schipf, on IFAR Board starting September of 2023 and the ultimate chair of the organization stated “The board brought on a new executive director to help us chart the optimal future for IFAR, and, ultimately, her insights and analyses made it clear to us all that the best course of action is to wind down.” It is hard to believe that the optimal future for IFAR was shuttering, it was certainly not the optimal future for the IFAR followers and visitors. Perhaps we all could have done more.

Only five years earlier, according to one of Schipf’s predecessors, Jack Josephson (1930-2022), who chaired IFAR’s Board of Directors for 17 years after his retirement around 2016, said “[IFAR] is very much in business, they have some marvelous websites, catalogue raisonnes, lots of things where people can get solid background on objects they might be contemplating buying or selling, so it’s a great organization.” He was right, IFAR did have substantial influence in matters of stolen art, forgeries and more. IFAR did a lot.

Source: “Introduction to Provenance Research (May 2025), available at https://my.cheddarup.com/c/introduction-to-provenance-research-19412/items

Despite the announced closure, in May 2025, IFAR offered a series of workshops on provenance research, led by Lisa Duffy-Zeballos, Ph.D., Art Research Director, IFAR (for 17 years) and Theresa Kutasz-Christensen, Ph.D., Independent Art Research Consultant, who joined IFAR team in April of 2024. The Observer article featured this May program and made no reference to the imminent closure, and some optimists dared to hope that the promised closure would be delayed or cancelled altogether. Daniel Grant, who wrote for The Observer, quoted “Duffy-Zeballos as lamenting lack of “master’s degree programs focused on provenance research… in the United States.” He added “Looking to fill the gap, IFAR, a 55-year-old nonprofit that supports arts institutions with information on fakes, forgeries, frauds and authentication, launched a seven-class online course called, simply, Introduction to Provenance Research. The latest session, taught by Duffy-Zeballos with art historian Theresa Kutasz Christensen, kicked off yesterday (May 6).” Grant also quoted Schneider “It’s a kind of learning by doing… We designed our course to be skills-based rather than a theoretically based program focused on why provenance is important.” This ‘latest’ session apparently became IFAR’s last.

True to their word, IFAR must have wrapped operations by mid-2025 as planned, and as of 24 June, 2025 its site is stripped of all the substantive content but for a corporate farewell:

“After over 50 years of service to the art community, the International Foundation for Art Research has brought its work to a close. We are proud of our pioneering commitment to advancing scholarship and best practices for the ethical stewardship of art objects, and remain grateful for the longstanding support of our partners and patrons.”

Ethical stewardship and authenticity. Looking at the current IFAR page, there is much incredulity. How can this be real or right?! The September 2024 announcement promised “re-homing [IFAR] mission-related assets.” As of this writing, it is unclear how the ‘re-homing’ went and which parts of IFAR’s legacy ended up where.

What triggered the dismantling of an institution that had long served a beacon for members of its and our community? Lack of funding? Delayed succession? Lack of conviction? New form of intelligence? Yes, there are new authentication services offered, some with the assistance of AI. Still, in an age of fast news and proliferation of AI generated answers, the stolid substantial work of IFAR will be missed, and it is unclear whether other nonprofits serving legal and creative communities can fill the void.

Sample Dissolution Doc
VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION OF NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS WITH ASSETS, Source: https://ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/dissolution-with-assets.pdf

What’s next? Governed by New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, if nothing else, voluntary dissolution of not-for profit corporations incorporated in New York with assets, such as IFAR, must be dissolved in accordance with the state law. According to the guidance helpfully provided by the Office of the New York State Attorney General Charities Bureau, the board must submit a plan for approval of the Attorney General and, if approved, within 270 days after the date on which the Attorney General or the Court approved the Plan, the corporation must carry out the Plan, pay its liabilities, distribute its assets and wind up its business in accordance with the Plan.

To date, it appears that no Certificate of Dissolution has been issued to IFAR. And while the site no longer offers access the IFAR archives and databases, the archives and files survive. In addition to the physical property, financial assets and liabilities, IFAR also retains intellectual property including trademarks in its name “IFAR” and “Stolen Art Alert.” Both, standard character marks, were renewed in 2021 for ten years. Who, if anybody will host the IFAR Evenings?

Knoedler & Company. Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20120218122000/http://knoedlergallery.com/

How have various aspects of IFAR been distributed and where? Perhaps to law schools, museums, or libraries? The mission of IFAR still deserves to be fulfilled as its assets must find new repositories to ensure the continued public benefit of the treasure trove that is/was IFAR. Perhaps the Attorney General will not accept the application for dissolution. Looking back, looking forward, the current state of IFAR’s site recalls the metamorphosis of the Knoedler Gallery website in 2011, that read:

Knoedler & Company closed for regular business
on November 30, 2011. Our staff remain available to assist you.
If you need further information, please call 212 794-0550.

Web.Archive.org

Knoedler, the oldest gallery in the US, was busy answering subpoenas and juggling irate collectors with forgeries on their hands.

IFAR and its affiliates played an active role in setting the Knoedler Saga straight. IFAR’s last chapter is not written yet. For now, and in all honesty, most of IFAR digital resources can still be accessed through the Wayback Machine.

About the Author:

Irina Tarsis, Esq., is the Founder and Managing Director of the Center for Art Law.

Select Sources:

  • International Foundation for Art Research, Ifar.org.
  • Harrison Jacobs, “Longtime Art Authentication Nonprofit IFAR to Shut Down After 55 Years,” ARTNews (Sept. 27, 2024), available at https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/art-authentication-nonprofit-ifar-to-shut-down-1234718928/
  • Campfens, Evelien and Irina Tarsis, “Cri-Me-a-River! Crimean Gold in the Crosshairs of Geopolitics,” IFAR, Vol. 18 (Summer 2017).
  • The News Desk, “Art Authenticator IFAR to Cease Operations,” Art Forum (Oct. 2, 2024), available at https://www.artforum.com/news/art-authenticator-ifar-to-cease-operation-560581/
  • Grant, Daniel, “Lost, Looted, Disputed: Why Provenance Is Still the Art World’s Blind Spot,” The Observer (May 7, 2025), available at https://observer.com/2025/05/ifar-how-to-learn-provenance-research-training-art-market/
  • The Ancient Egyptian Heritage and Archaeology Fund, Egyptologist Jack Josephson Discusses His Career, Chairman of IFAR Board (17 years), available https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFJoKQgAsFU
  • NYS Department of Taxation and Finance, “Voluntary dissolution of New York State not-for-profit corporations,” available https://www.tax.ny.gov/bus/doingbus/vol_dissolution.htm

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Cultural Property Advisory Committee (1983-2025): Its History, Implementation, Separation of Powers Considerations, and Proposed Amendments
Next From the Canvas to the Courtroom: Discovering Artistic Collections in Legal Locations

Related Posts

logo

New Cultural Heritage & the Arts Interest Group

February 10, 2010
Cover of Chasing Aphrodite

‘Chasing Aphrodite’ Co-Authors Felch and Frammolino to Receive 2011 SAFE Beacon Award

October 12, 2011

It’s Not That Easy: Artist Resale Royalty Rights and The ART Act

July 1, 2019
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on Februar Don't miss our on our upcoming Bootcamp on February 4th! Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
The expansion of the use of collaborations between The expansion of the use of collaborations between artists and major consumer corporations brings along a myriad of IP legal considerations. What was once seen in advertisement initiatives  has developed into the creation of "art objects," something that lives within a consumer object while retaining some portion of an artists work. 

🔗 Read more about this interesting interplay in Natalie Kawam Yang's published article, including a discussion on how the LOEWE x Ghibli Museum fits into this context, using the link in our bio.
We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th! We can't wait for you to join us on February 4th!  Check out the full event description below:

Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Collo Don't forget to grab tickets to our upcoming Colloquium, discussing the effectiveness of no strike designations in Syria, on February 2nd. Check out the full event description below:

No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

Michelle Fabiani will discuss current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #culturalheritage #lawyer #legalreserach #artlawyer
Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day train Don't miss our up coming in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with art market participants and understanding their unique copyright law needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys, Louise Carron, Barry Werbin, Carol J. Steinberg, Esq., Scott Sholder, Marc Misthal, specialists in copyright law. 

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #copyright #CLE #trainingprogram
In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, In order to fund acquisitions of contemporary art, The Phillips Collection sold seven works of art from their collection at auction in November. The decision to deaccession three works in particular have led to turmoil within the museum's governing body. The works at the center of the controversy include Georgia O'Keefe's "Large Dark Red Leaves on White" (1972) which sold for $8 million, Arthur Dove's "Rose and Locust Stump" (1943), and "Clowns et pony" an 1883 drawing by Georges Seurat. Together, the three works raised $13 million. Three board members have resigned, while members of the Phillips family have publicly expressed concerns over the auctions. 

Those opposing the sales point out that the works in question were collected by the museum's founders, Duncan and Marjorie Phillips. While museums often deaccession works that are considered reiterative or lesser in comparison to others by the same artist, the works by O'Keefe, Dove, and Seurat are considered highly valuable, original works among the artist's respective oeuvres. 

The museum's director, Jonathan P. Binstock, has defended the sales, arguing that the process was thorough and reflects the majority interests of the collection's stewards. He believes that acquiring contemporary works will help the museum to evolve. Ultimately, the controversy highlights the difficulties of maintaining institutional collections amid conflicting perspectives.

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.
Make sure to check out our newest episode if you h Make sure to check out our newest episode if you haven’t yet!

Paris and Andrea get the change to speak with Patty Gerstenblith about how the role international courts, limits of accountability, and if law play to protect history in times of war.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was a Alexander Butyagin, a Russian archaeologist, was arrested by Polish authorities in Warsaw. on December 4th. Butyagin is wanted by Ukraine for allegedly conducting illegal excavations of Myrmekion, an ancient city in Crimea. Located in present-day Crimea, Myrmekion was an Ancient Greek colony dating to the sixth century, BCE. 

According to Ukrainian officials, between 2014 and 2019 Butyagin destroyed parts of the Myrmekion archaeological site while serving as head of Ancient Archaeology of the Northern Black Sea region at St. Petersburg's Hermitage Museum. The resulting damages are estimated at $4.7 million. Notably, Russia's foreign ministry has denounced the arrest, describing Poland's cooperation with Ukraine's extradition order as "legal tyranny." Russia invaded and annexed Crimea in 2014.

🔗 Read more by clicking the link in our bio

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artcrime #artlooting #ukraine #crimea
Join us on February 18th to learn about the proven Join us on February 18th to learn about the provenance and restitution of the Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art.

A beloved Cranach painting at the North Carolina Museum of Art was accused of being looted by the Nazis. Professor Deborah Gerhardt will describe the issues at stake and the evidentiary trail that led to an unusual model for resolving the dispute.

Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #museumissues #artwork
“In the depth of winter, I finally learned that wi “In the depth of winter, I finally learned that within me there lay an invincible summer."
~ Albert Camus, "Return to Tipasa" (1952) 

Camus is on our reading list but for now, stay close to the ground to avoid the deorbit burn from the 2026 news and know that we all contain invincible summer. 

The Center for Art Law's January 2026 Newsletter is here—catch up on the latest in art law and start the year informed.
https://itsartlaw.org/newsletters/january-newsletter-which-way-is-up/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #lawyer #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #art #law #newsletter #january
Major corporations increasingly rely on original c Major corporations increasingly rely on original creative work to train AI models, often claiming a fair use defense. However, many have flagged this interpretation of copyright law as illegitimate and exploitative of artists. In July, the Senate Judiciary Committee on Crime and Counterterrorism addressed these issues in a hearing on copyright law and AI training. 

Read our recent article by Katelyn Wang to learn more about the connection between AI training, copyright protections, and national security. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!
Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all- Join the Center for Art Law for an in-person, all-day  CLE program to train lawyers to work with visual artists and their unique copyright needs. The bootcamp will be led by veteran art law attorneys specializing in copyright law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to copyright law for art market clients. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in copyright law and its specificities as applied to works of visual arts, such as the fair use doctrine and the use of generative artificial intelligence tools. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.