• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art and Restorative Justice: Transformative Healing Through Expression
Back

Art and Restorative Justice: Transformative Healing Through Expression

January 14, 2020

By Madhulika Murali

As of 2019, 5% of the world’s population resides in the territory of the United States.[1] However, the US prison population makes up 25% of the world’s prison population, with the country assuming the leader position in global incarceration rates.[2] Since the 1970s, incarceration in America has increased by 700%.[3] It is now well known that mass incarceration does not affect all US communities equally. According to The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and other nonprofit organizations that documented research into incarcerations in the US, one out of every three Black boys born today will go to prison in his lifetime, as will one of every six Latino boys, as compared to one of every 17 white boys.[4]

Thus, one of the harms of mass incarceration, as analyzed by lawyers and academics such as Michelle Alexander[5] and Bryan Stevenson,[6] is that it serves as a contemporary tool of oppression for Black and Brown communities that have historically been persecuted in America. The documentary “13TH” by Ava Duvernay skillfully explores this reality.[7] This is charted from slavery, through Jim Crow and the War on Drugs, to the current state of disenfranchisement through incarceration. In addition to this troubling role, the actual impact of mass incarceration on crime rates is highly questionable. The Brennan Center for Justice, in its 2015 review of the research, found that incarceration’s effect on crime since 2000 has been non-existent.[8] Instead, the decline in crime seen in the last two decades was owed to “various social, economic, and environmental factors”[9] — for example, growth in income and an aging population. The report concluded that programs targeted towards boosting economic opportunities and expanding treatment programs would be better public safety investments than the current astronomical investments ($182 billion a year according to World Prison Brief) into incarceration.[10]

Restorative Justice

Increasing realization of racialized mass incarceration has meant that restorative justice has made its way into mainstream discussions and initiatives to serve as an alternative to incarceration.

Rooted in Native American and indigenous practices,[11] restorative justice is a set of principles and practices that aims to help communities heal from conflict and harm by developing a common understanding of the root causes and effects.[12] Restorative justice can occur in a variety of different contexts: in the workplace, at schools and within, or instead of, the criminal justice system. It rests on the belief that everyone involved in conflict and harm — often categorized as those who perpetrate it and those who are the victims — deserve healing, community care, and the opportunity to grow. There are three main “pillars” associated with restorative justice — harms and needs, obligation (to put right) and engagement (of stakeholders).[13] There is no one particular way of taking part in restorative justice. Often, it can take the shape of moderated group meetings with the immediate actors as well as wider community members to talk through particular conflicts, paying close attention to everyone’s needs.

In the US, restorative justice is most often used in schools, which research shows to have several advantages over traditional disciplinary methods, including a better relationship between students and teachers and lower rates of disciplinary referrals.[14] It has also been used with success in courts in Colorado, Chicago, and New York, where young people charged with non-violent felonies or misdemeanors, instead of being incarcerated, can take part in a mediated dialogue with various actors and engage with ideas of restitution targeted at the local community.[15]

Through the growing prominence of restorative justice, a new development has emerged: the introduction of art to restorative justice.

Art and Restorative Justice

There is a growing consensus that art can be a powerful tool in restorative justice processes. This is, in part, due to the therapeutic nature of art — art, as an introspective and expressive endeavor, can encourage emotional processing and the kind of active and productive healing that restorative justice aims towards.[16]

To that end, there are several organizations that have created programs that integrate art and restorative justice in and around the criminal justice system: Young New Yorkers, the Prison Arts Collective in California, a program in Nashville, the Mural Arts Program in Philadelphia, the Justice Arts Coalition, a nation-wide project, Transform/Restore Brownsville, and Project Reset in Brooklyn, among others.

How do these organizations bring art and restorative justice together? There are two main approaches: a diversionary approach, in which programs conducted by the organization serve as alternatives to incarceration, and an integrated approach, in which certain restorative justice aims are achieved through art, but within an incarceration setting.

Interacting with the Criminal Justice System

Young New Yorkers and Project Reset are two New York-based organizations that have developed successful diversionary programs that combine art and restorative justice. Project Reset was started in 2015 by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office to give teenagers who have committed nonviolent crimes such as trespassing and turnstile-jumping the opportunity to avoid criminal justice involvement. The process “begins at the point of arrest and before arraignment,”[17] when police officers inform potential participants of their eligibility for this program. The program itself consists of two counseling sessions of three-hours each, where participants may be paired with an artist. The artists then lead group activities for participants, focusing on positive self-expression. On completion of the program, the case is “declined by the local district attorney’s office, the arrest record is sealed, and the individual never sets foot in a court room.”[18] The program has a 98% completion rate, with 96% of participants recommending it to others.[19] To date, more than 1,750 people have participated in the program.[20]

Young New Yorkers, a nonprofit founded in 2012 by Rachel Barnard, is somewhat similar. Through conversations with the Honorable Judge Gubbay, and with the support of Brooklyn Defender Services, Brooklyn Legal Aid, and the Brooklyn District Attorney, Young New Yorkers, a restorative justice and arts program, has now become a court-mandated alternative to incarceration for 16 and 17 year olds convicted of misdemeanors. Graduates of the program thereby avoid being “saddled” with the burden of a lifelong criminal record, while engaging in a workshop that allows them self-reflection and “healing from the harms of the system,” as described by Ms. Barnard.[21]

Young New Yorker graduates with Executive Director Rachel Barnard, program artist Ash Rucker, and program teacher and artist Izzy Webb. Credit: Mansura Khanam, courtesy of Young New Yorkers.

Daniel Aguilar, a 25-year-old Young New Yorkers graduate and ambassador for the organization, spoke to the Center for Art Law about his experience with the program when he was 16 years old. Engaging with art, for him, was powerful as a self-reflective tool; it allowed him to “dig down deep inside” and ask himself questions such as: “Who am I? What do I think I can become?” The program allowed him a “safe space” to “decompress, breathe and analyze.” One of the projects he completed during the program was a collage of different animals, all of which symbolized certain concepts or feelings — lions for strength, eagles for bravery. Another project involved taking simple videos of a regular day, encouraging mindfulness and attention to the small aspects of everyday life. “It grounded me in a bigger purpose,” Daniel reflects. Daniel is currently in the process of developing a restorative justice curriculum at a school in New York, which is one of the many ways in which he enjoys “giving back” to his community.

Meanwhile, projects such as the Prison Arts Collective are grounded in “principles of restorative justice”[22] but adopt an integrative approach rather than a diversionary approach. As such, they offer art programs in corrections facilities that “serve the needs of each specific population.”[23] They understand art as promoting the “development of self-expression, reflection, communication and empathy.”[24]

Other projects such as Mural Arts Philadelphia adopt a post-incarceration approach to restorative arts and justice. The Guild, one of their programs, gives formerly incarcerated people the opportunity to work on creative projects such as “mural making, carpentry and mosaics,” while concurrently developing “job skills” and reconnecting with their community.[25] The Guild seeks to prevent re-incarceration and has success with this — participants of the Guild are recidivistic at a “marginal” rate of 12%, versus a 35% average across the state of Pennsylvania.[26]

The Way Forward

What can these projects and organizations suggest about the way forward for justice, particularly in the age of mass incarceration?

“The collateral consequences of a 16- or 17-year-old being sentenced as an adult and in turn incurring a criminal record can be devastating on a young life, narrowing one’s chances of completing high school, attending college, finding a career, or accessing many welfare and housing benefits,” writes Ms. Barnard.[27] This is in addition to the trauma of facing arrest as a teenager. Ms. Barnard details how, during a photography field trip intended for the kids to “make sense of the experience of the arrests,” one 16-year-old described how scary it was to be handcuffed, turning around as though “shoved against the police van.”[28] A criminal justice system that disproportionately affects Black and Brown people[29] and ultimately inefficient at tackling community harms[30] appears to be particularly ill-suited to young people, creating high recidivism rates and affecting those who already have “high levels of instability” in their lives.[31]

Restorative justice through art instead offers a more nuanced exploration of the factors that lead to community harms and encourages positive thinking about the ways in which individuals and communities can be restored from them. Not only, as detailed earlier, do these projects have more success in eliminating future harms, but they also reflect greater respect for the human dignity of those taking part in these projects. The core beliefs of restorative justice — of everyone’s potential for growth and collective empathy — humanizes young people instead of “other”-ing them for choices made under conditions unknowable to others. Incarceration, by contrast, a cruel, violent, and unnecessary practice, reinforces negative and damaging messages to young people, pulling them further into cycles of harm.

A deeper consequence of restorative justice through art is to encourage us as a society to confront and interrogate our understanding of “crime.” Against the backdrop of research showing that the decline in crime is attributable to social and economic factors, as well as the research indicating that the majority of children affected by incarceration have high levels of instability in their lives, it would be short-sighted to understand crime as the singular domain of “bad people.” A more honest approach would understand “crime” as a broader community harm that flows in cycles from the conditions of society that already inflict harm and, in the cases of poverty and racism, intergenerational trauma on young people. Restorative justice brings us closer to this truth, through exploration of the causes and consequences of such harms on both the individual and the community.

More broadly, restorative justice and art initiatives cultivate a culture of empathy and mutual understanding that young people deserve the opportunity to “rewrite their own story,” as Ms. Barnard told the Center for Art Law during an in-person conversation. Art can and should be used as a powerful tool with which to access this higher level of common humanity. The resulting connection between all members of society would allow for a more positive and ambitious vision for everyone’s future.

Acknowledgments: The author thanks Rachel Barnard and Daniel Aguilar for speaking with her about the work and mission of Young New Yorkers. More information about the program can be found here.


Sources:

  1. American Civil Liberties Union, Mass Incarceration, American Civil Liberties Union, https://www.aclu.org/issues/smart-justice/mass-incarceration. ↑
  2. World Prison Brief, Highest to Lowest – Prison Population Total, https://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison-population-total?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All. ↑
  3. Id. ↑
  4. supra note 1. ↑
  5. Michelle Alexander, The New Jim Crow (2010). ↑
  6. Bryan Stevenson, Slavery gave America a fear of black people and a taste for violent punishment. Both still define our criminal-justice system, New York Times (August 14, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/prison-industrial-complex-slavery-racism.html. ↑
  7. Ava Duvernay, 13TH (2016), http://www.avaduvernay.com/13th. ↑
  8. Lauren Brooke-Eisen, What Caused the Crime Decline?, Brennan Center for Justice, https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/what-caused-crime-decline. ↑
  9. id. ↑
  10. id. ↑
  11. Yana Kunichoff, Should Communities Have a Say in How Residents Are Punished for Crime?, The Atlantic (May 2, 2017), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/chicago-restorative-justice-court/524238/. ↑
  12. Restorative Justice Initiative, What is Restorative Justice, https://restorativejustice.nyc/what-is-restorative-justice/. ↑
  13. Howard Zehr and Ali Gohar, The Little Book of Restorative Justice (2003), 21, https://www.unicef.org/tdad/littlebookrjpakaf.pdf. ↑
  14. Daisy Yuhas, Restorative justice is about more than just reducing suspensions, The Hechinger Report (July 25, 2018), https://hechingerreport.org/restorative-justice-is-about-more-than-just-reducing-suspensions/. ↑
  15. Yana Kunichoff, supra note 11. ↑
  16. Jenna Walters, Integrating Restorative Justice Approaches in an Art Therapy Group (2014). LMU/LLS Theses and Dissertations. 60. https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=etd ↑
  17. Shay Urbani, Arts-centered New York Diversion Program for Youth Displays High Success Rate, Juvenile Justice Information Exchange (Dec. 13 2019, 9:34pm) https://jjie.org/2018/05/25/arts-centered-new-york-diversion-program-for-youth-displays-high-success-rate/ ↑
  18. Laura Staugaitis, Project Reset Diverts Low-Level Offenders from Court with Art Workshops in New York City, This is Colossal (Dec. 13 2019, 9:37pm) https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2019/11/project-reset-criminal-justice/ ↑
  19. id. ↑
  20. id. ↑
  21. Rachel Barnard, Young New Yorkers: Restorative Justice Through Public Art, Urban Omnibus, https://urbanomnibus.net/2013/07/young-new-yorkers-restorative-justice-through-public-art/ ↑
  22. Prison Arts Collective, About Us, Prison Arts Collective, https://www.prisonartscollective.com/about ↑
  23. id. ↑
  24. Prison Arts Collective, Mission & Vision, Prison Arts Collective, https://www.prisonartscollective.com/cba ↑
  25. Mural Arts Philadelphia, The Guild, Mural Arts Philadelphia, https://www.muralarts.org/program/restorative-justice/the-guild/ ↑
  26. id. ↑
  27. Rachel Barnard, supra note 21. ↑
  28. id. ↑
  29. supra note 1. ↑
  30. supra note 8. ↑
  31. Mark Lynch, Julianne Buckman & Leigh Krenske, Youth Justice: Criminal Trajectories, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 265 (Sept. 2003), https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi265. ↑

Suggested readings:

  • Howard Zehr and Ali Gohar, The Little Book of Restorative Justice (2003), https://www.unicef.org/tdad/littlebookrjpakaf.pdf.
  • Annie Buckley, Art Inside: Does Art Contribute To Restorative Justice?, BLOG // LOS ANGELES REVIEW OF BOOKS (Sept. 3, 2018), https://blog.lareviewofbooks.org/arts-culture/art/art-inside-art-contribute-restorative-justice/.
  • Angela Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete? (Seven Stories Press, 2003), https://www.amazon.fr/Are-Prisons-Obsolete-Angela-Davis/dp/1583225811.

About the Author:

Madhulika Murali was a Fall 2019 intern at the Center for Art Law. She is undertaking a Master of Laws (LL.M.) at New York University School of Law, focusing on how law relates to social justice. She completed her undergraduate law degree at the University of Oxford (U.K.) and specialized in human rights law. Madhulika can be reached at mm10773@nyu.edu.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The “Artist Visa”: Immigration Law Primer and Artists’ Perspectives
Next Good Art, Ugly Divorce

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
Fleurs en Pot
Art law

The Dorville Case: A Judicial Turn Facilitating the Restitution of Artworks Acquired During the French Occupation

May 7, 2026
The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Confere We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 on May 27, 2026. You can join in-person at Brooklyn Law School or online via Zoom.

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with a keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees.

The opening panel will examine the current state of copyright law in the visual arts and the practical challenges facing artists, galleries, institutions, and practitioners. Subsequent panels will address artificial intelligence, recent legislative and regulatory developments, the role of the U.S. Copyright Office, and emerging questions around licensing, enforcement, and appropriation in a contemporary digital environment.

The conference convenes artists, attorneys, scholars, collectors, arts administrators, students, and policy professionals for in-depth and timely discussion, and will be accompanied by a silent auction and exhibitor networking opportunities. 

Closing Remarks by Lindsay Korotkin, Partner, ArentFox Schiff
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 3: Registration Is Dead? Long Live Licensing?

As copyright enforcement becomes more complex, this panel explores the evolving role of registration and the growing importance of licensing agreements in protecting creative works. Panelists will discuss how artists, rights holders, and legal practitioners navigate enforcement today, examining when registration still matters, how licensing structures are being used strategically, and what effective rights management looks like in a shifting legal and art market landscape.

Moderator: Carol J. Steinberg, Art, Copyright & Entertainment Law Attorney, Faculty, School of Visual Arts

Speakers: Janet Hicks, Vice President and Director of Licensing, Artists Rights Society; Yayoi Shionoiri, art lawyer and Vice President of External Affairs and General Counsel at Powerhouse Arts; Martin Cribbs, Intellectual Property Licensing Strategist

You can join us in-person or online! Grab your tickets using the link in our bio! 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightregistration #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your passport and tickets on your way to Venice, or floating toward the Most Serene City on the waves of your imagination? Yes, this newsletter is inspired by the 61st Venice Biennale, entitled In Minor Keys, and by the May flurry of activities. For us the month of May closes books on FY 2026 (thanks to you and our programming, we are ending this year strong and ready for the 2026-2027 encore), and it makes our heads spin with final preparations for the Summer School and Annual Conference, punctuated by the arrival of the summer interns (final count is still a mystery). Please share with us your art law stories and experiences as we strive to do the same in New York, Zurich, London, Venice…

The eyes of the art and law world are on La Serenissima because the world needs serenity instead of sirens and because people love art, it imitates life, art that allows us to experiment with real feelings and overcome the drama. From lessons in artistic advocacy with the “Invisible Pavilion” (2026) to historical echoes of the Biennale del Dissenso [Biennial of Dissent] (1977), this Biennale is giving us a lot to process. Hope and joy, loss and disappointment, reunions and new encounters, memorialization and belonging, realization that different motivations drive us to take to the road. Don’t lose your moral compass or your keys, and remember: even minor movements can lead to major reverberations. 

🔗 Check out our May newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #may #legalresearch
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 2: The Copyright Office Weighs In — Three Reports on AI and the Law

This panel examines the U.S. Copyright Office’s three recent reports on artificial intelligence and copyright, unpacking what they clarify, and what they leave unresolved about authorship, ownership, and protection in the age of AI. Panelists will also situate these reports within the broader legal landscape, touching on emerging litigation and contested issues shaping how AI‑generated and AI‑assisted works are treated under current copyright law.

Moderator: Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research, Center for Art Law

Speakers: Miriam Lord, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Public Information and Education; Ben Zhao, Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at University of Chicago and Founder, Nightshade & Glaze; Katherine Wilson-Milne, Partner, Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP 

Reserve your tickets today! 🎟️ 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel wit Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel… Case law is fascinating, and litigation is often the only path when disputes over valuable art cannot be resolved through negotiation or ADR. 

As news of the renewed HEAR Act spreads through the restitution community, we invite you to read a case review by two of our legal interns, Donyea James (Fordham Law, JD Candidate 2026) and Lauren Stein (Wake Forest University School of Law, JD Candidate 2027), who spent this semester immersed in the facts and law of "Bennigson et al. v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation."

$1,552. That is what a Picasso sold for in 1938 by a Jewish businessman fleeing Nazi Germany. Roughly one-tenth of what he sought just six years earlier. The heirs went to court and two courts said the claim came too late. HEAR Act might very well challenge that conclusion. The case is now pending before New York's highest court. 

🔗 Link in bio.

#ArtLaw #Restitution #HolocaustArt #HEARAct #Guggenheim #Picasso #ProvenanceResearch
Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens wh Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens when the present confronts colonial memory? Join us in Zurich for a special screening of "Elephants & Squirrels," a documentary following Sri Lankan artist Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige as she traces looted artifacts and human remains of the indigenous Wanniyala-Aetto people, held in Swiss museum collections for over a century, and fights for their return home.

Film director Gregor Brändli and the artist will open the evening with reflections on colonial collecting, cultural heritage, and the ethics of museum stewardship.

📅 May 12, 2026 | 18:00 – 21:00
📍 schwarzescafé | Luma Westbau, Limmatstrasse 270, Zurich

This event is free to attend and is offered as part of the CineLöwenbräukunst series. Link in bio for more information.

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #Restitution #Repatriation #Zurich #FilmScreening #ColonialHistory #MuseumEthics 

#MuseumEthics
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for, Panel 1: So Inappropriate — Lessons About Copyright Law and Art: First There Was Art, Then Copyright, Then Fair Use… and Now AI?

From early copyright doctrines to contemporary fair use debates, this panel examines how artists and lawyers have navigated questions of ownership, appropriation, and originality in visual art. Panelists will explore key developments in copyright law affecting traditional artistic practices, from borrowing and remixing to transformative use, while also considering how emerging technologies, including AI, are beginning to reshape long‑standing legal frameworks and artistic norms.

Moderator: Irina Tarsis, Founder, Center for Art Law
Speakers: Vivek Jayaram, Founder, Jayaram Law; Vincent Wilcke, Pace Gallery; Greg Allen, Artist and writer 

Reserve your tickets using the link in our bio or by visiting our website itsartlaw.org 🎟️ 
See you soon!
Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been maki Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been making waves and headlines for weeks and the doors have not even opened yet. The jury refused to award prizes and resigned nine days before the opening over geopolitical controversies. Some artists boycott while others show up even if unwelcome. Some pavilions will be empty, some will not be open to the public… Sources of funds, sources of inspiration, so many questions, so much on display for critical eyes. Meanwhile the boats are waiting for anyone lucky enough to find themselves in the floating world.

Help us reflect on the Biennale by sharing your art law stories.

#ArtLaw #Venice #Biennale2026 #ArtWorld #BiennaleofDissent #LaSerenissima #GoldenLion #SeeArtThinkArtLaw
Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.