• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art Law Visiting the Non-profit Side: On Qualifying for 501(c)(3) Status as an Arts Organization
Back

Art Law Visiting the Non-profit Side: On Qualifying for 501(c)(3) Status as an Arts Organization

May 27, 2014

By Benjamin Takis

2014-05-25 collage

Background

New non-profit organizations often find that the world is not a hospitable place. While innovation, entrepreneurship, and risk-taking by new for-profit companies are lauded, fledgling non-profits typically struggle to gain the acceptance and support of private foundations, donors and others in the non-profit community. There is, after all, only a limited supply of grants and donations to fund charitable, artistic, and educational endeavors. Furthermore, the administrative burden of forming and administering a non-profit can be staggering. New non-profits are therefore often advised to pair up with an existing organization, use a for-profit structure, or explore other alternatives before forming a new entity and applying to qualify under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

Despite these challenges, arts organizations share certain traits that can help them thrive as non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations, with fewer of the hurdles faced by other kinds of non-profits. First, while many organizations rely largely on foundation grants and private donations, arts organizations can raise funds from ticket sales to performances, exhibits, and other events. For many kinds of organizations, these “fee-for-service” revenue sources can trigger “unrelated business income tax” or endanger 501(c)(3) status under the “commerciality doctrine” applied by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the courts. However, these revenue sources are generally consistent with the tax-exempt status of arts organizations. Additionally, these types of revenue sources can more easily satisfy the “public support” tests that enable an organization to qualify as a public charity, and thereby avoid classification as a private foundation and the stringent oversight to which private foundations are subjected.

The Benefits and Burdens of 501(c)(3) Status

501(c)(3) is a special tax status under federal law, generally available to organizations formed and operated for a charitable, educational, scientific or religious purpose, and promotion of the arts is recognized as a valid educational purpose. Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3)(ii), Example 4 (Educational organizations include “[m]useums, zoos, planetariums, symphony orchestras, and other similar organizations,” provided that the organizations otherwise satisfy the requirements of section 501(c)(3) of the Code). However, before embarking on the 501(c)(3) qualification process, it is important to carefully consider whether the benefits of 501(c)(3) status are worth the burdens.

There are three legal benefits to having 501(c)(3) status: (1) the organization’s net revenue (after expenses) is generally not subject to tax; (2) contributions to the organization are eligible for the charitable deduction; and (3) the organization is eligible for grants from private foundations.

These benefits are not quite as advantageous as they may appear. Most non-profits (including arts organizations) do not have large amounts of excess revenue – most struggle to earn enough revenue to pay their expenses. Therefore, the tax exemption on net revenue may not be crucial. Second, while the charitable deduction is a powerful incentive for individuals inclined to give money to non-profit organizations, it is still a difficult task to convince people to give. The charitable deduction tends to be important only when an organization’s Board of Directors has a strong and committed network of high-wealth individuals. Lastly, it can be difficult to get grants from private foundations. Finding grant opportunities takes significant research, and the grant writing process requires preparation, perseverance, and commitment.

Maintaining 501(c)(3) status can also be quite burdensome. A 501(c)(3) organization must be run by a Board of Directors (generally 3 or more people) in accordance with Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and various corporate policies that comply with requirements set forth under federal tax law and state non-profit corporation law. In addition, any compensation to Directors or Officers must be closely scrutinized to ensure that such payments are reasonable. And complex tax filings called the Form 990 (or Form 990-EZ) are generally required for organizations with gross revenue exceeding $50,000 per year, and are open to public inspection. (Organizations whose annual gross receipts are normally $50,000 or less, file a much simpler electronic form called the Form 990-N). These and other administrative difficulties are not typically worth the trouble unless 501(c)(3) status would significantly enhance an organization’s fundraising capabilities, or at least its image in the arts community.

Designing a Program of Activities to Qualify under 501(c)(3)

An arts organization that has thoroughly considered the benefits and burdens of 501(c)(3) status and wishes to move forward with the qualification process will need to design a program of activities consistent with 501(c)(3) status. It is important to be aware of which types of activities are acceptable and which activities raise suspicions at the IRS, and be able to show the IRS several bona fide activities that fit squarely within the traditional notions of a 501(c)(3) arts organization.

The exemption under section 501(c)(3) for arts organizations is based on the statutory exemption for “educational” organizations, so educational activities carry significant weight in the approval of 501(c)(3) status. Examples of educational arts organizations include:

  • An organization formed to promote the advancement of young musical artists by conducting weekly workshops, and sponsoring public concerts by the artists. Rev. Rul. 67-392, 1967-2 C.B. 191.
  • An organization formed to promote public appreciation of group harmony singing by holding frequent meetings of members where they receive training and instruction in vocal harmony and opportunities to practice under trained supervision. Rev. Rul. 66-46, 1966-1 C.B. 133.
  • A dance school with a regular faculty, daily comprehensive curriculum, and a regularly enrolled body of students. Rev. Rul. 65-270, 1965-2 C.B. 160.

Educational activities can also include individual instruction, or the dissemination of instructional materials for free or for a nominal charge. See Rev. Rul. 68-71, 1968-1 C.B. 249 (approving the 501(c)(3) status of an organization that provided career education by distributing educational publications at a nominal charge and providing free vocational counseling services).

Public exhibits or performances are also typically valid 501(c)(3) activities, provided that steps are taken to ensure that the selection of artists is disinterested (i.e. the organization is not merely a vehicle for showing the work of founders, directors or other insiders of the organization), and provided that the artists or works are chosen for their artistic merit rather than their ability to appeal to a mass audience. See Plumstead Theatre Soc’y, Inc. v. Comm’r, 74 T.C. 1324, 1332-1333 (1980), aff’d 675 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1982) (contrasting commercial theaters, which “choose plays having the greatest mass audience appeal … run the plays so long as they can attract a crowd …[and] … set ticket prices to pay the total costs of production and to return a profit,” with 501(c)(3) theaters, which “fulfill their artistic and community obligations by focusing on the highest possible standards of performance; by serving the community broadly; by developing new and original works; and by providing educational programs and opportunities for new talent.”). It helps if at least some of these exhibits or performances are open to the public for free.

For example, the IRS has approved the 501(c)(3) status of the following organizations:

  • An organization whose sole activity was sponsoring an annual art exhibit of artists selected by a panel of qualified art experts. Rev. Rul. 66-178, 1966-1 C.B. 138.
  • A filmmaking organization that organized annual festivals to provide unknown independent filmmakers with opportunities to display their films. Rev. Rul. 75-471, 1975-2 C.B. 207.
  • An organization that presented public jazz concerts featuring aspiring jazz composers and high school students performing alongside established jazz musicians. Rev. Rul. 65-271, 1965-2 C.B. 161.
  • A touring repertory theatre company that focused on works that were part of college curricula. Rev. Rul. 64-175, 1964-1 C.B. 185.

Note that the IRS views the exhibition of art much differently than the sale of art, especially with respect to the visual arts. The IRS typically denies 501(c)(3) status to art galleries that engage in the sale of art for a commission. See Rev. Rul. 76-152, 1976-1 CB 151 (rejecting the 501(c)(3) status of a gallery formed to promote modern art trends by exhibiting works of modern artists and selling the works on consignment basis with the artist setting the selling price and the organization keeping a 10% commission, even though this commission was lower than that charged by commercial entities and the gallery planned to supplement its revenue through donations); Rev. Rul. 71-395, 1971-2 CB 228 (rejecting the 501(c)(3) status of a gallery formed and operated by approximately 50 artists for the purpose of exhibiting and selling the work of the founders).

Gallery sales activities are permitted only under very limited circumstances when sales activities are sufficiently minor in comparison to educational and other valid 501(c)(3) activities. Goldsboro Art League, Inc. v. Comm’r, 75 T.C. 337 (1980) (approving the 501(c)(3) status of a gallery that engaged in some sales for commissions in addition to educational activities, based on the following factors: (1) there were no other museums or galleries in the area, thus, the exhibition of art works showed a purpose primarily to educate rather than to sell and the selling activity served merely as an incentive to attract artists to exhibit their work; (2) works were selected by an independent jury for their representation of modern trends rather than salability; (3) the organization demonstrated that educational activities were its priority; (4) the art sales were not conducted at a profit; and (5) of more than 100 works of arts exhibited in the organization’s galleries, only 2 members of the organization had their art exhibited).

Most 501(c)(3) arts organizations focus predominantly on education and/or public exhibits or performances, but other types of activities can be acceptable as well. For example, the awarding of grants to aspiring artists and students is a permissible 501(c)(3) activity, provided that procedures ensuring disinterested selection of winners are developed and scrupulously followed. See Rev. Rul. 66-103, 1966-1 C.B. 134 (approving the 501(c)(3) status of organization formed for the purpose of making grants available to writers, composers, painters, sculptors, and scholars for projects in their respective fields which they would not otherwise be able to undertake or finish due to the lack of funds. In awarding grants, preference was given to persons showing distinction or promise in their respective fields, and the recipients promised to make their work available for the benefit of the public in ways customary and appropriate to the particular work. The organization received no financial benefit from these grants).

The IRS has also approved of activities promoting the appreciation of art by less traditional means, such as the recording and sale of obscure classical music pieces to educational institutions, Rev. Rul. 79-369, 1979-2 C.B. 226, and a museum’s sale of greeting cards displaying printed reproductions of selected works from the museum’s collection and from other art collections. Rev. Rul. 73-104, 1973-1 C.B. 263. However, these types of non-traditional promotional activities should be approached with caution, as they implicate difficult issues that can lead to unpredictable results from the IRS. See e.g. Rev. Rul. 76-206, 1976-1 C.B. 154 (rejecting the 501(c)(3) status of an organization formed to generate community interest in classical music by urging the public to support the classical music program of a for-profit radio station).

In summary, when applying for 501(c)(3) status, an arts organization should be prepared to describe several activities similar to those approved by the IRS. There should be at least some educational component, whether through workshops, classes, online publications or tutorials, or other means. It is helpful to show engagement with the public or local community through free exhibits or performances, and to focus on art that lacks mainstream commercial viability. Lastly, an organization founded or run by artists should make sure to focus on a wide variety of artists rather than just its founders or members.

About the Author: Benjamin Takis is the founder and principal attorney of Tax-Exempt Solutions, PLLC. He may be reached at btakis@taxexemptsolutions.com.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Art Law – the Corporate Side: Sotheby’s Wins the Battle in the Delaware Chancery Court But Loses the Proxy War
Next Detroit Institute of Arts Fights to Safeguard its Collection (Still)

Related Art Law Articles

Screen shot from Google scholar of different Warhol cases
Art lawCase ReviewArt Law

Degrees of Transformation: Andy Warhol’s 102 minutes of fame before the Supreme Court

November 17, 2022
Art lawArt Law

“Outsider Artists” and Inheritance Law: What Happens to an Artist’s Work When They Die Without a Will?

November 11, 2022
Art lawCase ReviewArt LawCase Review

Case Review: US v. Philbrick (2022)

November 7, 2022
Center for Art Law
ART x LAW SCHOOL instagram

Summer School in Zurich?

Join us

This five-day intensive program combines classroom and lecture format.

Learn MORE
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Thieves pulled off a speedy nighttime heist at the Thieves pulled off a speedy nighttime heist at the private Magnani-Rocca Foundation near Parma, Italy. In three minutes, pieces by Renoir, Cézanne, and Matisse were suddenly gone. Coming just months after a daytime theft at the Louvre, security experts warn that high-profile museum heists are on the rise. 

👉 Head to the link in our bio to read The New York Times's full breakdown

📸: “Still Life With Cherries” by Paul Cézanne
July 2026, another month of, well, fill in the bla July 2026, another month of, well, fill in the blank.

Summer is for cherries, weddings, garden parties, catching up on reading and catching up with friends. And yet the worst of humanity keeps getting in the way of enjoying what the season brings. The heat so many of us feel right now, in the air, in the headlines, is at times unbearable and frankly unnecessary. Some of it comes from nature; too much of it is man-made.

It is so much harder to build, protect or preserve than to destroy. This month, we invite you to read the latest articles from the Center, including stories inspired by the 250th anniversary of the United States of America, meet our Summer Team, and stay tuned for upcoming events, including a colloquium with Konstantin Akinsha on Ukrainian art and cultural heritage under assault. Thank you, as always, for caring for and protecting art and cultural heritage. 

Make sure to subscribe to our newsletter to get all of these updates and more!

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #july #legalresearch
What happens when the world's most famous anonymou What happens when the world's most famous anonymous artist is no longer anonymous?

One of our latest articles examines the legal and cultural implications of Banksy's unmasking, exploring how anonymity shaped the reception of his work and what this revelation may mean for the future of his career. More broadly, this piece explores how Banksy’s anonymity functioned within a culture increasingly defined by visibility and personal branding.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the complete article by Afroditi Karatagli

#centerforartlaw #banksy #artlaw #streetart #copyrightlaw #freedomofexpression #contemporaryart #artmarket #legalresearch
Grüezi mitenand 👋 Center for Art Law Switzerland i Grüezi mitenand 👋 Center for Art Law Switzerland is introducing ART x LAW INTENSIVE!

Globalization is reshaping the art world, and with it comes a growing need for legal literacy across the market’s key players. Join us in the heart of Europe for a five-day deep dive into the legal frameworks shaping today’s art world.

Location: Zurich 
Hosting Partners: museums, law firms, galleries, universities, and artist studios
Dates: September 1–5, 2026

🎓 Taught by leading art law practitioners: transactional and litigation attorneys, art dealers, law professors and provenance researchers

Ideal for law and pre-law students, young attorneys, and art world professionals ready to build both knowledge and network.

Applications open between July 7 - 31, decisions on selected participants announced by August 10.

Language: English | Cost: CHF 2,500

Link in bio to apply, or reach us at zurich@itsartlaw.org

#ArtLaw #ArtLawSchool #Zurich #ArtMarket #Provenance Restitution Copyright ArtAndTech SummerSchool CenterForArtLaw
On the United States 250th Anniversary make sure t On the United States 250th Anniversary make sure to check out our article by @hannahegadway: "Art Law at America 250: Gilbert Stuart’s Art Battles and National Imagination"

📚 Click the link in our bio to read the full article!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #250 #unitedstates #4thofjuly #newarticle
Learn about art and cultural heritage destroyed or Learn about art and cultural heritage destroyed or damaged by the ongoing war.

Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022, hundreds of museums, churches, archaeological sites, libraries, monuments, and historic buildings have been damaged or destroyed. As of July 1 2026, UNESCO had verified damage to more than 540 cultural sites across Ukraine, underscoring the unprecedented threat facing the country's cultural heritage. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #internationallaw #artcrime #culturalheritage
Recently one of our summer interns Cara Ianuale vi Recently one of our summer interns Cara Ianuale visited  the MET. Below is her thoughts on one item she saw within the Costume Art exhibition.👗💭⚖️

This fibrous dress in the MET’s Costume Art exhibition rests at the heart of an attribution dispute between artist Anouska Samms and designer Yoav Hadari. In May, Samms alleged that the MET did not rightfully credit her for Corpus Nervina 0.0, which bears significant resemblance to a work, Hair Dress, that she and Hadari created using her proprietary human hair-based textile she developed in 2019. The MET had expressed interest in acquiring Hair Dress in 2025, but plans fell through—according to Samms’ lawyer Jon Sharples, Hadari decided to withdraw Hair Dress and submit two other independently-designed garments instead.

Solely crediting Hadari, the label states that Corpus Nervina 0.0 is made of synthetic fibers, their scattered arrangement and wispy clusters meant to evoke the fragility of the human nervous system. Hadari claims that, while the garment was inspired by Hair Dress, its design, concept, and construction are entirely his own. The museum has declined involvement, indicating that the parties must first try to work it out on their own. For now, the label remains unchanged… 

📚 Check out more information on this topic using the link in our bio!
Learn about the Center's specialized resources ava Learn about the Center's specialized resources available on immigration and visas for artists!

Join the Center for Art Law at our Immigration Showcase, a free 30-minute webinar introducing the Center’s resources designed to support international visual artists navigating the U.S. immigration process.

Rakhel Milstein, Board Member at the Center and Founder of Milstein Law Group, will share brief remarks on recent immigration developments affecting artists, important policy considerations to keep in mind, and key issues for artists and creative professionals to watch. Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research at the Center, will introduce the Center’s upcoming Immigration Guide for Artists, available in July 2026. This comprehensive resource provides artists with an accessible overview of U.S. immigration pathways, including O-1 visas and other relevant options. The guide is designed to help artists better understand the immigration process, identify potential pathways, prepare more effectively, and recognize the importance of planning ahead when pursuing opportunities in the United States. Kameé Payton, the Center’s 2025-2026 Judith Bresler Fellow, will also share information about the Center’s Immigration Clinic, which provides artists with individualized support through one-on-one consultations to help them better understand their immigration options and access guidance tailored to their needs.

Join us to explore our resources and connect with the tools available to support artists navigating the U.S. immigration landscape. 

🎟️ Get tickets today using the link in our bio!!
Over 100 Benin bronzes housed at Cambridge Univers Over 100 Benin bronzes housed at Cambridge University have officially been returned to Nigeria. As university museums move forward with repatriation initiatives, larger, national institutions are left behind the curve due to statutory restrictions. From domestic legal roadblocks to internal ownership disputes, the road to restitution is rarely straightforward. 

📚 Head to the link in our bio to read The Observer's full breakdown of how Cambridge’s move puts pressure on the rest of the UK cultural sector.

📸: Adam Eastland / Alamy, University of Cambridge
Join us for an informative short lecture and pro b Join us for an informative short lecture and pro bono consultations to understand contracts with galleries and art dealers.

The Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic helps artists and gallerists negotiate effective and mutually-beneficial contracts. By connecting artists and dealers to attorneys, this Clinic looks to forge meaningful relations and to provide a platform for artists and dealers to learn about the laws that govern their relationship, as well as have their questions addressed by experts in the field.

After a short lecture on an artist-dealer relationships topic, attendees with consultation tickets will be paired with one of the Center's volunteer attorneys for a confidential 20-minute consultation. Limited slots are available for the consultation sessions. 

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!!
And finally...here's to our Undergrad Summer 2026 And finally...here's to our Undergrad Summer 2026 interns! 

Dylan Cosgrove is a rising undergraduate senior at the American University of Paris, pursuing a B.A. in Finance with minors in Art History and Economics. Drawing on experiences across fashion, law, and finance - alongside coursework at Sotheby's - her interests sit at the intersection of capital markets, legal frameworks, and cultural value. She has developed a particular interest in art finance and the mechanisms through which law shapes the movement and monetization of art, and looks forward to exploring these themes further as she advances her academic and professional career.

Natasha is an undergraduate student pursuing a BA in History of Art at The Courtauld Institute of Art, with a particular interest in Modern and Contemporary British art. She currently serves as Events Coordinator for The Courtauld’s Art Law Society. Her academic interests include intellectual property and copyright law, restitution, and the protection of architectural heritage. Since November 2025, she has also volunteered with the Centre’s Nazi-Looted Art Restitution Project, and looks forward to continuing her contribution to the project while also working across other areas of the center over the summer. 

Swipe through to learn more about this year's cohort and join us in welcoming them to the Center for Art Law! 👏
Say hello to the Center for Art Law's Summer 2026 Say hello to the Center for Art Law's Summer 2026 interns🗽

Victoria Cook is a second-year law student at Queen's University and a Philosophy graduate from St. Francis Xavier University whose background includes artist advocacy and arts administration. Her interests focus on cultural heritage and restitution, authentication, and copyright. 

@hannahegadway is a rising 2L at Harvard Law School and a Summer 2026 legal intern with the Center for Art Law. She graduated from Harvard College in 2025, where she majored in History & Literature. Hannah is interested in art law-related questions concerning museum provenance and the Internet. 

Ian Silverstein is a dual-degree candidate at Rutgers University, pursuing a J.D. at Rutgers Law School alongside a graduate degree in Cultural Heritage and Preservation Studies, with a certificate in Intellectual Property Law. He is a painter and visual artist and has conducted separate research on emotional and aesthetic responses to art. His museum research has been supported by the NEA, and he holds a certificate in Art as a Global Business from Sotheby's Institute of Art. Ian’s illustrations can be seen in the NYTimes shortlisted book by Andrew Shtulman, titled ‘Scienceblind: Why Our Intuitive Theories about the World Are So Often Wrong’. 

Eleanna Antonatou is an LLM candidate in Art, Business and Law at Queen Mary University of London and a Law LLB graduate from the University of Nottingham. Her experience spans vacation schemes at international law firms across London, Athens, and Geneva. Her interests centre on intellectual property, dispute resolution, and the regulation of cross-border art transactions. 

@rebecca.caitlin is a rising 2L J.D. candidate at New York University School of Law. She completed her undergraduate degree at Middlebury College, where she studied philosophy, English, & American literatures, writing a thesis on contemporary feminist poetry’s power to cultivate moral behaviors in readers. Rebecca is interested in the overlap of human rights and art law, and particularly in cultural heritage/cultural property law, repatriation and restitution of stolen or looted cultural objects, & museum law.
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law

Become a Member

Since 2009, the Center for Art Law has organized hundreds of events and published over 1,200 relevant, accessible, and editorially independent articles. As a nonprofit working with artists and students, the Center for Art Law relies on your support to fund our work. Become a premium subscriber and gain access to discounts on events and archives of articles and/or hundreds of case summaries, intended for a worldwide audience of legal professionals, artists, researchers, and students.

Camille Pissarro, Rue St Honoré, apres midi, effet de pluie, 1897

Camille Pissarro, Rue St Honoré, apres midi, effet de pluie, 1897

$70 /per year

Case Law Corner

See All Benefits

Read case law summaries and enjoy unlimited access to our legendary Case Law Corner, now in a new and improved Database with over 700 entries.

Get this subscription
$75 /per year

Artist & Student Membership

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to our Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
Get this subscription
$150 /per year

Annual Subscription

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
  • Discounts to third-party events
Get this subscription

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.