• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Ballet Costumes and the Art of Copyright
Back

Ballet Costumes and the Art of Copyright

April 18, 2022

The Rehearsal of the Ballet Onstage. ca, 1874 Edgar Degas; Courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

The Rehearsal of the Ballet Onstage. ca, 1874 Edgar Degas; Courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art

By Cielomar Puccio

The image of a ballerina is not complete if it is missing its tutu and pointe shoes. These two images have become icons of what a ballerina should wear to perform the lovely art we call dance. In fact, these icons are so important that little girls take ballet classes dreaming of one day performing in a full theater with pointe shoes and a beautiful tutu.

While pointe shoes have a short life and are a personal item of the ballerina, the tutus and costumes, many times, are created and kept by the dance company for many years to be used by many different dancers. Many dancers look up to wearing a costume worn previously by a praised ballerina or even by a friend making the past “life” of the costume as important as the costume itself.[1]

Intellectual Property In Costume Design

Art, which includes ballet in the more physical side of visual artistry, is an important component of human life. In fact, it is so important that the United States Constitution (“Constitution”) provides for its protection. The Constitution grants Congress the enumerated power “to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”[2] In legal terms, the protection of these creations are named intellectual property (“IP”). There are different types of IP. Some examples are patents, copyright, and trademarks, among others. Each one has a specific definition and is protected by law. [3] When it comes to ballet costumes, it is important to consider all IP laws to figure out what the best method is to protect them.

Trademarks and Patents

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) is an agency of the United States Department of Commerce. Among its many roles, it grants patents for the protection of inventions and registers trademarks.[4] The USPTO defines trademark as “any word, phrase, symbol, design, or a combination of these things that identifies your goods or services.”[5] Examples could be “word, slogan, design, or combination of these. It could even be a sound, a scent, or a color.”[6] An example would be a unique signature color or even a unique color scheme used in the creation of the ballet costumes for a specific performance.

In contrast, a patent for an invention is the grant of a property right to the inventor, issued by the USPTO. There are three types of patents. These are the utility patents, design patents, and plant patents. The design patents may be granted to anyone who invents a new, original, and ornamental design for an article of manufacture.[7] This kind of patent sometimes overlaps with copyright law. For example under the copyright law you cannot protect the way that design elements are identical in shape as another, identical in cut, in dimensions, and/or pieced together in a costume. Nonetheless, you may be able to get protection of this under the design patent protection. A design patent can also prevent others from creating costumes that show any resemblance to your sketch design. Design patents, nonetheless, are very expensive to obtain.

Copyright

The Copyright Act of 1976 (“Act”) protects original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression.[8] An example of how this protection applies to costume can be the sketches. The actual drawings used to create the costumes can be protected by copyright law if original. Besides the sketches of the costume, sometimes even the textile designs, in other words the actual design imprinted in or on the fabric can be protected by copyright law.

Costumes and Copyright Law

Costumes have long been a highly contested copyright law area for many decades. After many litigations[9], the The Copyright Office (“Office”) in 1991 issued a Policy Decision on the Registrability of Costume Designs, in which it stated that fanciful costumes will be treated as useful articles for copyright registration purposes. The Act defines “useful article” as “an article having an intrinsic utilitarian function that is not merely to portray the appearance of the article or to convey information. An article that is normally part of a useful article is considered a ‘useful article’.”[10] An example of a useful article is clothing. Pants are a type of clothing and has a utilitarian function which is to cover the body. So, if a costume is made of something that resembles pants like fabric to cover the lower area of a person in a shape of “birdlike legs”, this will not be protected by copyright law because it is essentially a useful article otherwise known as pants. An exception would be masks. The Office has stated that masks will not be considered as a useful article and can be granted copyright protection.

In conclusion, with this information it could be said that a costume would be copyrightable if it contains artistic works that can be separated from the utilitarian aspect.

Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc.

In Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc., the United States Supreme Court (“the Court”) rendered its most recent decision based on this subject of costumes and the “conceptual separability” of utility and design[11]. The case concerned Varsity Brands, a company which makes cheerleader uniforms and had several copyright registrations on two-dimensional designs. Varsity Brands sued Star Athletica, another company known for creating cheerleader uniforms, for an alleged infringement in their copyright in terms of copying their two-dimensional stripes, colors and other ornamentation on the uniforms that Star Athetlica created.

The Court held that a feature incorporated into the design of a useful article is eligible for copyright protection only if the feature can satisfy two requirements. The first requirement is that the design is a work of art that can be separated from the useful article. The second requirement is that the work of art separated from the useful article would have copyright protection on its own or placed in any other medium.

In this specific case even though the cheerleading uniforms were considered utility articles, the symbolism and insignia portrayed on the outfits were given artistic value and determined to be a design that can be separated from the useful article and that can be given copyright protection.[12]

Conclusion

Costumes, ballet or otherwise, are copyrightable depending on the ability to separate the design elements from the utilitarian costume elements and find that these design elements are original and creative enough to receive independent protection. This is a case-by-case decision that the Office will have to determine each time a costume registration comes along. When protecting the IP of costumes other laws can be considered like trademarks and patents. A protected ballet tutu and costume allow that important piece of cultural relevance to live on for generations and generations to come; granting little girls who come to watch ballet performances the opportunity to be part of that important piece of cultural relevance and identity that will continue to inspire them every day. Nonetheless, of its legal protection, any individual that attends a ballet performance can without a doubt conclude that the costumes worn by the dancers are definitely works of art.

Suggested Readings

Can I use copyright to protect my fashion designs?, Copyright Alliance. Available at: https://copyrightalliance.org/education/qa-headlines/copyright-fashion-designs/.

Caroline Hamilton, Behind the Seams: Ballet Costumes carry an Embodied History, Pointe, (Feb. 18, 2020). Available at: https://pointemagazine.com/ballet-costume-history/.

Compendium of U.S Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition. Available at https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/chap900/ch900-visual-art.pdf

Halloween Costumes and Copyright: 5 things you should know, JD Supra, (Oct. 27, 2017). Available at: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/halloween-costumes-and-copyright-5-87331/.

Katie Scholz, Costumes and Copyrights: Can you afford to wear that?, IPWatchdog, (July 18, 2018). Available at: https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2018/07/18/costumes-copyrights-can-you-afford-to-wear-that/id=99278/.

Sam Behbehani, Supreme Court Hearing Copyright Case on Costumes, LegalMatch: Intellectual Property, (Nov. 17, 2016). Available at: https://legalmatch.typepad.com/intellectualproperty/2016/11/supreme-court-hearing-copyright-case-on-costumes.html

Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1002.

United States House of Representatives, Protection for Fashion Design, Statement of the United States Copyright Office before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, Committee on the Judiciary, (July 27, 2006). Available at: https://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat072706.html#N_11_.

About the Author

Cielomar Puccio is an attorney barred in Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia currently residing in Miami, Florida with a virtual law firm called Brandllet that focuses on Trademark, Copyright, and Artist Immigration for artists, especially ballet dancers. She is also a ballet dancer, lover and advocate of the arts. You can read more about her and her law firm at http://www.brandllet.com.

  1. Caroline Hamilton, Behind the Seams: Ballet Costumes Carry an Embodied History, Pointe, (Feb. 18, 2020). ↑
  2. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 8 ↑
  3. What is Intellectual Property?, World Intellectual Property Organization, https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/ (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  4. General information concerning patents, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/general-information-patents (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  5. What is a trademark?, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/what-trademark (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  6. Trademark Examples, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/trademark-examples (last visited Jan. 24, 2022) ↑
  7. General information concerning patents, United States Patent and Trademark Office, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/general-information-patents (last visited Jan. 24, 2022). ↑
  8. 17 U.S.C. § 102. ↑
  9. Whimsicality, Inc. v. Rubies Costumes Co., Inc., 721 F.Supp. 1566 (1989); Masquerade Novelty, Inc. v. Unique Industries, Inc., 912 F.2d. 633 (3dCir.1990) ↑
  10. 17 U.S.C. § 101. ↑
  11. Star Athletica, LLC, v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1002. ↑
  12. Id. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Art Market Compliance As Seen From Switzerland
Next Dynamic Policies of Deaccessioning and Disposal in American Museums

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
Fleurs en Pot
Art law

The Dorville Case: A Judicial Turn Facilitating the Restitution of Artworks Acquired During the French Occupation

May 7, 2026
The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion on th Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion on the current state of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, and how recent and upcoming changes affect art market participants and transactions.

The speakers will offer an update on the regulatory landscape in the United States, issues with enforcement of the AML provisions as well as discuss considerations for private sector on how to stay compliant and prevent money laundering. Finally, we will share the very latest insights we have gained about regulations and enforcement in the UK as they concern  art market participants.

This is your opportunity to learn about the new edition of the Center's AML study of regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, brush up on the upcoming changes in the UK and the US to the due diligence requirements, and to ask questions.

The event is offered in conjunction with the 2026 Art Law Summer School. 

This event is in-person at Steptoe, New York @ 1114 Avenue of the Americas AND Online.

🎟️ Click the link in our bio to grab your tickets!

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #aml #artcrime #internationallaw
We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Confere We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 on May 27, 2026. You can join in-person at Brooklyn Law School or online via Zoom.

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with a keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees.

The opening panel will examine the current state of copyright law in the visual arts and the practical challenges facing artists, galleries, institutions, and practitioners. Subsequent panels will address artificial intelligence, recent legislative and regulatory developments, the role of the U.S. Copyright Office, and emerging questions around licensing, enforcement, and appropriation in a contemporary digital environment.

The conference convenes artists, attorneys, scholars, collectors, arts administrators, students, and policy professionals for in-depth and timely discussion, and will be accompanied by a silent auction and exhibitor networking opportunities. 

Closing Remarks by Lindsay Korotkin, Partner, ArentFox Schiff
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 3: Registration Is Dead? Long Live Licensing?

As copyright enforcement becomes more complex, this panel explores the evolving role of registration and the growing importance of licensing agreements in protecting creative works. Panelists will discuss how artists, rights holders, and legal practitioners navigate enforcement today, examining when registration still matters, how licensing structures are being used strategically, and what effective rights management looks like in a shifting legal and art market landscape.

Moderator: Carol J. Steinberg, Art, Copyright & Entertainment Law Attorney, Faculty, School of Visual Arts

Speakers: Janet Hicks, Vice President and Director of Licensing, Artists Rights Society; Yayoi Shionoiri, art lawyer and Vice President of External Affairs and General Counsel at Powerhouse Arts; Martin Cribbs, Intellectual Property Licensing Strategist

You can join us in-person or online! Grab your tickets using the link in our bio! 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightregistration #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your passport and tickets on your way to Venice, or floating toward the Most Serene City on the waves of your imagination? Yes, this newsletter is inspired by the 61st Venice Biennale, entitled In Minor Keys, and by the May flurry of activities. For us the month of May closes books on FY 2026 (thanks to you and our programming, we are ending this year strong and ready for the 2026-2027 encore), and it makes our heads spin with final preparations for the Summer School and Annual Conference, punctuated by the arrival of the summer interns (final count is still a mystery). Please share with us your art law stories and experiences as we strive to do the same in New York, Zurich, London, Venice…

The eyes of the art and law world are on La Serenissima because the world needs serenity instead of sirens and because people love art, it imitates life, art that allows us to experiment with real feelings and overcome the drama. From lessons in artistic advocacy with the “Invisible Pavilion” (2026) to historical echoes of the Biennale del Dissenso [Biennial of Dissent] (1977), this Biennale is giving us a lot to process. Hope and joy, loss and disappointment, reunions and new encounters, memorialization and belonging, realization that different motivations drive us to take to the road. Don’t lose your moral compass or your keys, and remember: even minor movements can lead to major reverberations. 

🔗 Check out our May newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #may #legalresearch
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 2: The Copyright Office Weighs In — Three Reports on AI and the Law

This panel examines the U.S. Copyright Office’s three recent reports on artificial intelligence and copyright, unpacking what they clarify, and what they leave unresolved about authorship, ownership, and protection in the age of AI. Panelists will also situate these reports within the broader legal landscape, touching on emerging litigation and contested issues shaping how AI‑generated and AI‑assisted works are treated under current copyright law.

Moderator: Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research, Center for Art Law

Speakers: Miriam Lord, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Public Information and Education; Ben Zhao, Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at University of Chicago and Founder, Nightshade & Glaze; Katherine Wilson-Milne, Partner, Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP 

Reserve your tickets today! 🎟️ 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel wit Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel… Case law is fascinating, and litigation is often the only path when disputes over valuable art cannot be resolved through negotiation or ADR. 

As news of the renewed HEAR Act spreads through the restitution community, we invite you to read a case review by two of our legal interns, Donyea James (Fordham Law, JD Candidate 2026) and Lauren Stein (Wake Forest University School of Law, JD Candidate 2027), who spent this semester immersed in the facts and law of "Bennigson et al. v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation."

$1,552. That is what a Picasso sold for in 1938 by a Jewish businessman fleeing Nazi Germany. Roughly one-tenth of what he sought just six years earlier. The heirs went to court and two courts said the claim came too late. HEAR Act might very well challenge that conclusion. The case is now pending before New York's highest court. 

🔗 Link in bio.

#ArtLaw #Restitution #HolocaustArt #HEARAct #Guggenheim #Picasso #ProvenanceResearch
Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens wh Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens when the present confronts colonial memory? Join us in Zurich for a special screening of "Elephants & Squirrels," a documentary following Sri Lankan artist Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige as she traces looted artifacts and human remains of the indigenous Wanniyala-Aetto people, held in Swiss museum collections for over a century, and fights for their return home.

Film director Gregor Brändli and the artist will open the evening with reflections on colonial collecting, cultural heritage, and the ethics of museum stewardship.

📅 May 12, 2026 | 18:00 – 21:00
📍 schwarzescafé | Luma Westbau, Limmatstrasse 270, Zurich

This event is free to attend and is offered as part of the CineLöwenbräukunst series. Link in bio for more information.

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #Restitution #Repatriation #Zurich #FilmScreening #ColonialHistory #MuseumEthics 

#MuseumEthics
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for, Panel 1: So Inappropriate — Lessons About Copyright Law and Art: First There Was Art, Then Copyright, Then Fair Use… and Now AI?

From early copyright doctrines to contemporary fair use debates, this panel examines how artists and lawyers have navigated questions of ownership, appropriation, and originality in visual art. Panelists will explore key developments in copyright law affecting traditional artistic practices, from borrowing and remixing to transformative use, while also considering how emerging technologies, including AI, are beginning to reshape long‑standing legal frameworks and artistic norms.

Moderator: Irina Tarsis, Founder, Center for Art Law
Speakers: Vivek Jayaram, Founder, Jayaram Law; Vincent Wilcke, Pace Gallery; Greg Allen, Artist and writer 

Reserve your tickets using the link in our bio or by visiting our website itsartlaw.org 🎟️ 
See you soon!
Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been maki Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been making waves and headlines for weeks and the doors have not even opened yet. The jury refused to award prizes and resigned nine days before the opening over geopolitical controversies. Some artists boycott while others show up even if unwelcome. Some pavilions will be empty, some will not be open to the public… Sources of funds, sources of inspiration, so many questions, so much on display for critical eyes. Meanwhile the boats are waiting for anyone lucky enough to find themselves in the floating world.

Help us reflect on the Biennale by sharing your art law stories.

#ArtLaw #Venice #Biennale2026 #ArtWorld #BiennaleofDissent #LaSerenissima #GoldenLion #SeeArtThinkArtLaw
Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law