• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • 2025 Year-End Appeal
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • 2025 Year-End Appeal
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Book Review: “Art Law and the Business of Art” (2019)
Back

Book Review: “Art Law and the Business of Art” (2019)

January 7, 2020

By Angela Dimery

Having practiced in multinational law firms in London, before crossing over into the art business as General Counsel at Christie’s London for two decades, Martin Wilson, the now Chief General Counsel at Phillips auction house in London, saw art law go from an unknown concept to a recognized legal field.* A handshake would no longer do and art transactions are increasingly high stakes. According to Wilson, the growth of art law coincided with complex financial transactions underpinning art purchases, publicity of prices renowned artworks commanded, and shifts in public sentiment on the ethics of art dealings. This occurred against an increasingly complex compliance framework. Drawing on his experience with art transactions, observing market and regulatory changes first hand, Wilson has compiled a concise reference text which was published last year by Edward Elgar Publishing under the title of “Art Law and the Business of Art.”Artists, gallerists, dealers, art professionals, and market participants might enjoy its clear and to the point style. Wilson’s publication is poised to become indispensable for students and practical for lawyers. Simply put, Wilson is a natural guide in the art law and art business space.

The book is divided into 18 chapters. Beginning with artists, artworks, and copyright, topics range from auctions, private sales, and ethics, to art institutions, art funds, and investment, taxation, global export, insurance, and transportation of art. Each chapter is helpfully parsed into subheadings, numbered and arranged like a law textbook. This makes it easy to navigate. It can be consulted on a need-or-want to know basis. Read in its entirety, it provides a compelling and clearly written overview of the business of art from a legal perspective. An effective manual, it includes a glossary of art terms, a table of cases, and a table of legislation. There is also compelling history, social, and cultural context. The author uses illustrative examples throughout.

It is important to note that the author focuses on law and practice in the United Kingdom (UK). However, readers from other common law jurisdictions will comfortably follow the doctrines in the UK cases cited. Transactional lawyers and non-lawyers alike should find the notes on drafting and negotiating contracts a useful starting point. Lawyers across common law jurisdictions, will need to factor in the local context, and statutory and case law framework. For non-lawyers, it will inform their negotiating positions.

Chapter Summary

Chapter 1, The Artist and the Artwork, explains why legal protection of artistic works is necessary, what copyright is, and how it applies to the various visual art forms. The author cuts to the enforceability chase, when discussing the internet and social media. As such, this guide is a pragmatic one. It even answers the question, how the UK law deals with artwork by artificial intelligence, illustrating the issue with Christie’s 2018 sale of Portrait of Edmond De Belamy. Fetching $432,500, the AI-created portrait was signed using the algorithm that created it.

In addition, the first chapter offers a discussion of artists’ moral rights, highlighting that this civil law concept has been adopted into common law countries. However, UK differs in its approach to civil law jurisdictions such as France, Italy, and Germany. The author covers artists’ resale rights and royalties extensively, fundamental in France and Germany, and which were eventually incorporated into UK law following an EU Directive. The author points out that the US and Hong Kong, by contrast, have not introduced such resale rights or royalties. The chapter concludes with a discussion of graffiti art.

Chapters 2 through 8 cover auction houses, their historic origins and laws governing auctions. In 2018, auctions represented a $29.1 billion market. The author explains why the chips fall as they do, along with the psychology and theater of auction sales. This rationale lends clarity as Wilson explains the main legal issues, which include fiduciary duties, the duty of skill and care, consumer law and the actors’ respective rights, liabilities, and parties’ ability to contract out of obligations, and/or to pursue claims in tort. Essentially, these chapters clarify where actual loyalties are owed and to whom. Ultimately, sellers and buyers must each realistically understand their commercial and legal positions, irrespective of what the customer experience indicates. The author skillfully highlights the risks that an auction house legal department typically helps manage.

The chapter dedicated to finance and guarantees discusses authenticity and ownership of title in light of auction house responsibilities. It explains why these issues arise in the art market, how risk and responsibility are generally allocated between auction houses, sellers, and bidders, and touches on the role of forensics and science, both in negotiations and in litigation.

Chapter 9 outlines key terms that private sale agreements require. It discusses the role of agents, and the importance of transparency and clarity where subagents are involved. The UK case of Accidia Foundation v. Simon C. Dickinson Ltd[1] highlights the courts’ ability to order the reversal of payments where a subagent is found to have secretly profited in a private sale. Wilson also discusses the allegations against Swiss art dealer Yves Bouvier by Russion billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev. (See our review of the book dedicated to the Bouvier/Rybolovlev Affair.) Wilson uses this example to show the importance of clarifying the extent of an agency, advisor, dealer or arms-length relationship where a profit is made. The chapter concludes with a guide to key terms in agreements between dealers and artists.

Chapter 10 embarks on a narrative tour through history to explain Holocaust restitution claims. It discusses the concomitant 1998 Washington Principles and why Holocaust claims are so rarely litigated in the UK. The author summarizes decisions by the UK’s Spoliation Advisory Panel, established in the year 2000 to consider World War II-era cultural property claims. A full range of ethical questions the art world is grappling with follow. The author discusses patterns of looting in times of conflict, colonial times, and recent restitution efforts. The questions and arguments around the roles, obligations, and rights of cultural institutions, and countries holding cultural objects are given a light touch, covering International UNESCO and UNIDROIT Conventions and frameworks, along with explanations of relevant EU Directives and Regulations, and how these are incorporated (or not) into UK domestic law.

The author comprehensively covers Codes of Practice for the Control of International Trading in Works of Art and the Antiquities Dealers Association Code. After discussion and opinion, the author points out what collectors need to bear in mind in this thorny area. Listed or historic buildings and endangered species are discussed so far as they relate to removable objects and components of cultural works. The chapter concludes with a discussion of freedom of expression and obscenity laws, bearing in mind ever-important context and some cultural analysis, which will interest artists, exhibitors, and lawyers alike. These seemingly unrelated subjects all fall under the art law umbrella and Wilson acknowledges the gamut of subjects.

Chapter 11 lays out UK tax laws in detail. Chapter 12 covers shipping, transport, export licenses, and insurance of art. Chapter 13 is an introductory guide to museums, which as the author notes, warrants a separate book. Ethics arise again here, since Museums which err risk losing accreditation status and all-important access to public funds. The importance of donors and associated tax rules are discussed. The Tate’s annual acquisition budget of £1,000,000 is noted to highlight the importance to museums of loans of artworks and collections. Key loan agreement terms are outlined. Wilson points out the practical implications that museums and collectors are acutely aware of – the marketing value and exposure gained by works on loan at high profile museums.

Chapter 14 unpacks what is meant by the term of ‘art fund.’ Wilson explains other secondary market elements such as liquidity, returns and fee structures. He details how fund managers are selected and underscores the importance of valuation, audit and an appreciation of the investor’s risk profile. Considering the unique nature of art as an asset class, the author appraises the perceived returns and associated research in a balanced way.

Chapter 15 demonstrates how the topics from earlier chapters play out in disputes. These can be over title, condition, price, payment, and saleroom or bidding sequences. Legal proceedings are discussed. The author notes that alternative dispute resolution may work well for art clients who value relationships and are used to commercial negotiation. Further, it permits art specialists familiar with custom and practice to assist in resolving a dispute.

Chapters 16 to 18 cover anti-money laundering, the Bribery Act, privacy and data protection. The majority of the final chapter is devoted to discussion of the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) requirements as they have affected the art trade.

Impressions

Wilson’s “Art Law and the Business of Art” guide (456 pages) is a 360-guide that extensively unpacks the legal framework of the art business. It is written simply and clearly, and includes compelling case illustrations. Perhaps the most beneficial aspect of this book is the author’s neat rationale for various outcomes. Wilson draws on his vast and unique experience to make sense of how legal doctrines are applied in the peculiar commercial context of the art business. In addition to helping readers clarify the roles and relationships of primary and secondary participants in the art world transactions, it provides a solid foundation to get readers thinking about commercial problems and solutions.

About the Book Author: Martin Wilson is an art and cultural property lawyer. Following 10 years of experience as a litigator in leading London firms, he has worked in-house in the legal departments of global auction houses for more than 20 years. Wilson headed the legal and compliance departments at Christie’s in London before coming to lead the legal department at Phillips. As one of the first lawyers to specialize in the global art business from the 1990s, he has participated in the development of art and cultural property law as a discipline, and worked with stakeholder organizations. Wilson’s experience in the legal aspects of art transactions and disputes complements his interest in ethical, political, and cultural questions surrounding the creation and ownership of art.

The eBook version is priced from £22/$31 from Google Play, ebooks.com and other eBook vendors, while in print the book can be ordered from the Edward Elgar Publishing website.


Select References:

  1. Accidia Foundation v. Simon C. Dickinson Ltd [2010] EWHC 3058 (Ch). ↑

About the Author: Angela Dimery is the Center’s 2019-2020 Fellow. An attorney from New Zealand where she practiced in-house and at private firms, Angela holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Contemporary Dance and an Honor’s Degree in Law from the University of Auckland, New Zealand. Angela was admitted to practice in New York in December 2019.

*Acknowledgement: The author would like to thank Mr. Martin Wilson, for his valuable interview about his professional experience, and research and writing of this book, which informed this review.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The “Artist Visa”: Immigration Law Primer and Artists’ Perspectives
Next Art and Restorative Justice: Transformative Healing Through Expression

Related Posts

Federal Judge Issues Restraining Order To Delay Destruction of Public Art at JFK Airport

April 24, 2012
Caravaggio painting men sitting around the table

Dispute over the Estate of Jack Tanzer Centers on Caravaggio Authentication

May 13, 2013

Blurry Instagram Rules: Sinclair and McGucken

July 7, 2020
Center for Art Law
Sofia Tomilenko Let there be light!

A Gift for Us

this Holiday Season

Thank you to Sofia Tomilenko (the artist from Kyiv, Ukraine who made this Lady Liberty for us) and ALL the artists who make our life more meaningful and vibrant this year! Let there be light in 2026!

 

Last Gift of 2025
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the new Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
What happens when culture becomes collateral damag What happens when culture becomes collateral damage in war?
In this episode of Art in Brief, we speak with Patty Gerstenblith, a leading expert on cultural heritage law, about the destruction of cultural sites in recent armed conflicts.

We examine the role of international courts, the limits of accountability, and whether the law can truly protect history in times of war.

We would like to also thank Rebecca Bennett for all of her help on this episode. 

 🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #lawyer #podcast #artpodcast #culturalheritage #armedconflict #internationallaw
Where did you go to recharge your batteries? Where did you go to recharge your batteries?
Let there be light! Center for Art Law is pleased Let there be light! Center for Art Law is pleased to share with you a work of art by Sofia Tomilenko, an illustration artist from Kyiv, Ukraine. This is Sofia's second creation for us and as her Lady Liberty plays tourist in NYC, we wish all of you peace and joy in 2026! 

Light will overcome the darkness. Світло переможе темряву. Das Licht wird die Dunkelheit überwinden. La luz vencerá la oscuridad. 

#artlaw #peace #artpiece #12to12
Writing during the last days and hours of the year Writing during the last days and hours of the year is de rigueur for nonprofits and what do we get?

Subject: Automatic reply: Thanks to Art Law! 

"I am now on leave until January 5th. 
. . .
I will respond as soon as I can upon on my return. For anything urgent you may contact ..."

Well, dear Readers, Students, Artists and Attorneys, we see you when you're working, we know when you're away, and we promise that in 2026 Art Law is coming to Town (again)!

Best wishes for 2026, from your Friends at the Center for Art Law!

#fairenough #snowdays #2026ahead #puttingfunback #fundraising #EYO2025
Less than a week left in December and together we Less than a week left in December and together we have raised nearly $32,000 towards our EOY fundraising $35,000 goal. If we are ever camera shy to speak about our accomplishments or our goals, our work and our annual report speak for themselves. 

Don’t let the humor and the glossy pictures fool you, to reach our full potential and new heights in 2026, we need your vote of confidence. No contribution is too small. What matters most is knowing you are thinking of the Center this holiday season. Thank you, as always, for your support and for being part of this community! 

#artlaw #EOYfundraiser #growingin2026 #AML #restitution #research #artistsright #contracts #copyright #bringfriends
This summer, art dealer James White and appraiser This summer, art dealer James White and appraiser Paul Bremner pleaded guilty for their participation in the third forgery ring of Norval Morisseau works uncovered by Canadian authorities. Their convictions are a key juncture in Canda's largest art fraud scheme, a scandal that has spanned decades and illuminated deep systemic failures within the art market to protect against fraud. 

Both White and Bremner were part of what is referred to as the 'Cowan Group,' spearheaded by art dealer Jeffrey Cowan. Their enterprise relied on Cowan fabricating provenance for the forged works, which he claimed were difficult to authenticate. 

In June, White, 87, pleaded guilty to to creating forged documents and possessing property obtained by crime for the purpose of trafficking. Later, in July, Paul Bremner pleaded guilty to producing and using forged documents and possessing property obtained through crime with the intent of trafficking. While Bremner, White, and Cowan were all supposed to face trial in the Fall, Cowan was the only one to do so and was ultimately found guilty on four counts of fraud. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artfraud #artforgery #canada #artcrime #internationallaw
It's the season! It's the season!
In 2022, former art dealer Inigo Philbrick was sen In 2022, former art dealer Inigo Philbrick was sentenced to seven years in prison for committing what is considered one of the United States' most significant cases of art fraud. With access to Philbrick's personal correspondence, Orlando Whitfield chronicled his friendship with the disgraced dealer in a 2024 memoir, All that Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud, and Fine Art. 

For more insights into the fascinating story of Inigo Philbrick, and those he defrauded, read our recent book review. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #legalresearch #artlaw #artlawyer #lawer #inigophilbrick #bookreview #artfraud
The highly publicized Louvre heist has shocked the The highly publicized Louvre heist has shocked the globe due to its brazen nature. However, beyond its sheer audacity, the heist has exposed systemic security weaknesses throughout the international art world. Since the theft took place on October 19th, the French police have identified the perpetrators, describing them as local Paris residents with records of petty theft. 

In our new article, Sarah Boxer explores parallels between the techniques used by the Louvre heists’ perpetrators and past major art heists, identifying how the theft reveals widespread institutional vulnerability to art crime. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artcrime #theft #louvre #france #arttheft #stolenart
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law