Back

Case Review: United States v. Twenty-Nine Pre-Columbian and Colonial Artifacts, From Peru

By Chris Michaels

Screen shot 2014-10-06 at 12.52.16 PM
An example of a Pre-Columbian Peruvian artifact, which is not related to the above-mentioned case, that is currently for sale at the Artemis Gallery in Colorado is pictured below.
Screen shot 2014-10-06 at 12.51.59 PM

Miami has long operated as a market for stolen cultural objects. The high-profile case of Henri Matisse’s “Odalisque in Red Pants,” which was recovered in Miami in 2012, is a prime example of Miami being one of the top destinations for hot cultural objects. On 11 September 2014, an Order out of the Southern District of Florida addressed a Motion filed in U.S. v. Twenty-Nine Pre-Columbian and Colonial Artifacts From Peru, which shed more light on the illicit cultural heritage trade that pervades South Florida. The recent Order, issued by U.S. District Judge Joan A. Lenard, allowed the United States government to pursue a claim for the forfeiture of artifacts illegally exported from Peru.

Time to upgrade?

Thank you for your continued interest in our work. Support our efforts and become a premium member to enjoy unlimited access to the Center's articles and archived events!

Already a premium member? Sign in

Or, become a premium member for unlimited access

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.