• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Copyrights: To Register or Not to Register, That is the Question
Back

Copyrights: To Register or Not to Register, That is the Question

March 31, 2016

By Elizabeth Weber, Esq.

Copyright protection is a cornerstone of intellectual property law for those who create expressive works. However, a startling number of artists do not register their copyrights with the U.S. Copyright Office for one reason or another, ranging from a lack of knowledge on how to go about registering a copyright or the unwillingness to register because a work is, technically, protected under copyright law the moment it is created. Whatever the underlying reason, those who do not register their copyrights are at a stark disadvantage for one main reason: an unregistered copyright holder, meaning the individual who owns the unregistered copyright, is precluded from suing an individual who infringes upon the work’s copyright in court. In short, only registered copyright holders may bring actions of copyright infringement against alleged infringers.

With this in mind, Center for Art Law believes that providing some basic information on copyrights and copyright law to our readers would prove beneficial. Please note that this article does not, in any way, shape, or form, constitute legal advice. If our readers have any questions about copyright law, we strongly urge them to consult an attorney.

A Bit of Background Information on U.S. Copyright Law

Modern copyright law stems from the United States Constitution. The Constitution granted Congress the power to issue both patent and copyright protection “[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.” U.S. Const. art. I § 8, cl. 8.

Copyright law aims to achieve two distinct goals: first, to provide authors the exclusive right to benefit from their creative works for a limited duration and, second, to stimulate the creative atmosphere by protecting works from unfettered widespread use. Thus, Congress incentivized the creation of artistic works by imbuing authors with the exclusive right to use and benefit from such works for a set period of time.

What is Copyrightable Subject Matter?

Modern copyright law is codified in Title 17 of the United States Code. 17 U.S.C. § 102 (a) states that “[c]opyright protection subsists . . . in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression” and includes categories like literary, pictorial, and audiovisual works. Both published and unpublished works may qualify for copyright protection. Thus, so long as an artistic work is original and fixed in a tangible medium of expression, it may garner federal copyright protection.

The Code specifically precludes ideas, procedures, processes, systems, methods of operation, concepts, principles, or discoveries from garnering copyright protection. 17 U.S.C. § 102 (b). However, the expression of these precluded subject matters may be protected in some limited circumstances.

Why Register A Copyright?

Once a copyright is infringed, the copyright holder may act to stop the infringer from exploiting the infringed copyright. The damages for infringement depend on whether the work was registered with the Copyright Office before any of the exclusive rights were violated. The amount of possible recovery ranges from $0.00, as actual damages may be nominal, to $150,000.00 per willful infringement if the copyright holder elects to seek statutory damages.  More detail about actual and statutory damages will be provided in the Remedies for Infringement: Actual Damages and Profits versus Statutory Damages section below.

A Copyright Basics Circular provided by the U. S. Copyright Office indicates that copyright registration provides the copyright holder with a number of advantages, including establishing a public record of the claimed copyright, which may dissuade potential infringers from unlawfully using the work; allowing the copyright holder to file a copyright infringement claim in court; establishing prima facie evidence of the copyright’s validity and of the facts set forth in the copyright certificate; and, “[i]f registration is made within three months after publication of the work or prior to an infringement of the work, statutory damages and attorney’s fees will be available to the copyright owner in court actions. Otherwise, only an award of actual damages and profits is available to the copyright owner.”

Accordingly, registering a copyrighted work not only allows a copyright holder to sue an alleged infringer, but it also allows the copyright holder to seek statutory damages and attorney’s fees if the copyright holder registered the copyright within a certain time frame as discussed in 17 U.S.C. § 412. This may lead to a substantially higher damages award, which will be discussed in the Remedies for Infringement: Actual Damages and Profits versus Statutory Damages section below.

How to Register a Copyright

An application to register a copyright must contain three essential elements: 1) a completed application form; 2) a nonrefundable filing fee; and 3) a non-returnable deposit, which is a copy of the work being registered and deposited (hence the name) with the U.S. Copyright Office. These forms are available on the U.S. Copyright Office website. For reference, a step-by-step copyright registration guide is available on pages 7-12 of the Circular mentioned above.

Additionally, an applicant does not need a lawyer to register his or her copyright, so the applicant may fill out the requisite paperwork, send in the filing fee, and deposit a copy of the work with the U.S. Copyright Office at his or her own volition.

Copyright Infringement

A valid copyright issued by the U.S. Copyright Office provides the copyright holder with the exclusive right to use, reproduce, prepare derivative works, and perform the work publicly. If a third party infringes upon these rights and the copyright holder registered his or her copyright, the copyright holder may file a copyright infringement suit against the alleged infringer. The copyright holder may sue for injunctive relief, for the court to impound the infringing articles, and/or for damages stemming from the infringement.

Remedies for Infringement: Injunctive Relief and Impounding Infringing Works

If granted by the court, an injunction forces the infringing party to cease the infringing activities. Also, a copyright holder may move for or the court may order sua sponte the impounding of infringing works as the court deems reasonable. Finally, the copyright holder may seek either actual damages and any additional profits from the infringement or statutory damages.

Remedies for Infringement: Actual Damages and Profits versus Statutory Damages

A copyright infringer is liable for either 1) actual damages and profits stemming from the infringement or 2) statutory damages. A registered copyright holder is entitled to recover the actual damages suffered as a result of the infringement along with any additional profits gained from the infringement.

Alternatively, a registered copyright holder may elect, at any time before a final judgment is rendered, to recover statutory damages in lieu of actual damages and profits. Basically, statutory damages are set forth in the statute itself as opposed to being calculated based upon the harm suffered by the victim. In terms of copyright infringement, amounts vary for statutory damages from no less than $750.00 to no more than $30,000.00 per infringement as the court deems just.

Additionally, if the registered copyright owner proves (and the court finds) that the opposing party willfully infringed upon the copyright, the court may increase a statutory damages award to no more than $150,000.00 per infringement. Statutory damages awards are not always big money, though; if a registered copyright holder elects statutory damages and fails to prove willful infringement, the court may reduce the statutory damages award to no less than $200.00 per infringement.

Accordingly, the election of either actual damages and profits or statutory damages should be considered a strategic litigation decision. Registered copyright holders should consult with their attorneys and carefully consider the pros and cons of electing either set of damage awards.

Conclusion

There are certainly benefits derived from registering a copyrighted work. To summarize, in addition to allowing a copyright holder to file an infringement suit against an alleged infringer, registered copyright holders may also seek statutory damages and attorney’s fees depending upon when the holder registers the copyright – potentially leading to significantly higher damages awards.

However, artists should remember that simply because their works may be copied without permission, they need not take action. There is no requirement to enforce one’s copyright and there may be quantifiable benefits in seeing one’s work appear in another’s creative expression. While it is a good idea to consult an attorney with intellectual property questions and to protect one’s exclusive rights, the ultimate decision regarding these rights is open-ended and subject to the copyright holder’s interpretation.


Sources:

  • U.S. Const. art. I § 8, cl. 8.
  • 17 U.S.C. §§ 101-1332 (2015).
  • Copyright Basics, United States Copyright Office (May 2012), http://copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf.
  • Copyright, Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy, The Department of Commerce Internet Policy Task Force (July 2013), http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/news/publications/copyrightgreenpaper.pdf.
  • Heather Hummel, Photographers, Don’t Think You Need to Register Your Copyrights? Think Again, The Huffington Post (Dec. 17, 2014, 11:58 AM), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heather-hummel/photographers-dont-think-_b_6335800.html.

*About the Author: Elizabeth Weber is a lawyer living in Brooklyn, NY.  She graduated from the University of Florida Levin College of Law where she received her certificate in Intellectual Property Law and served as an active member of the Art Law Society and the Journal of Technology Law and Policy. She is the Spring 2016 Postgraduate Fellow with the Center for Art Law.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. Instead, readers should seek an attorney.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The Latest in Nazi-Era Restitution Efforts
Next Suing Cargo Largo, Pak Mail and UPS in Florida for Art Theft

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law Canada Pledges Resale Royalty
Art lawCanadaresale royalty

Canada pledges an artist’s resale royalty—can the United States follow “suite”?

April 9, 2026
Abraham and Isaac Returned Home Center for Art Law
Art law

Abraham and Isaac: Sculptures returned home after Spanish Supreme Court decision

April 8, 2026
Charities Act 2022 Screenshot
Art law

Changes in U.S. and U.K. Restitution Laws are Afoot, Museums are Worried, Claimants are Cautiously Optimistic, ADR Practitioners are Attentive – Where Does This Leave us?

April 6, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

Annual Conference

2026 edition explores Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century.

 

Early Bird Tickets Available
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Due to decreasing government funding and increasin Due to decreasing government funding and increasing operational costs, philanthropic giving is more essential than ever. Since the current administration took office, one-third of museums nationwide have lost government grants and contracts. These losses have set off a domino effect of difficult decisions, including laying off staff, cancelling public programming, and delaying maintenance and repairs. 

Many art museums are also still recovering from financial losses incurred during the Covid-19 Pandemic. This recent article by Kamée Payton explores how noncash charitable donation alternatives are used by cultural institutions as financing, and how noncash charitable donations can prove mutually beneficial for both donors and recipients—particularly in terms of tax treatment.

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #museumissues #taxes #donations #taxtreatment
Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviation Brief newsletter instead of a list of abbreviations and dates (here is looking at you, AML and KYC, London, NY, Rome). A laconic message that as days are getting longer and we are charmed by sunshine, blooms, and prospects of holidays, the man-made world does not fail to disappoint (don’t believe me? put aside art law and read world news), and all that during the springtime.

On a high note, we are grateful to our Spring Interns who are finishing up their stint with the Center in a couple of weeks, well done! Together we invite you to the upcoming events in person and online. Come FY2027 (a.k.a. June), we will introduce you to the Summer Class and new Advisors. Hang in there through April and May, take notes, don’t forget – we are living in the best of times and the worst of times. Again. 

🔗 Check out our April newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #april #legalresearch
When we take a holiday from talking about art law When we take a holiday from talking about art law in New York City, we talk about art law in other places. Recently our Judith Bresler Fellow, Kamée Payton attended the London Art Fair. Below is a snippet of her experience:

"I had the wonderful opportunity to attend the London Art Fair this past weekend where I met many incredible artists and art market participants. I was proud to represent the Center for Art Law in conversations with other attendees. It was an absolute delight to see what contemporary artists are contributing to the art world."

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #london #artfair #londonartfair #uk #nyc #artlawyer #legalresearch
Check out our recent article by Lauren Stein revie Check out our recent article by Lauren Stein reviewing Amy Werbel’s "Lust on Trial: Censorship and the Rise of American Obscenity in the Age of Anthony Comstock." Werbel's book showcases a portrait of Anthony Comstock, America’s first professional censor, a man obsessed with purity and self-control who regarded masturbation as a sign of moral corruption. 

Read more about this public figure and Werbel's telling of his life including the impact he had on the US's early attempts to curtail desire in the decades before World War I, in Lauren's review. 

 📚 Click the link in our bio to read more! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #bookreview #censorship #artistissues
One of our interns, Jacqueline, stopped by the Mor One of our interns, Jacqueline, stopped by the Morgan after the blizzard to catch their exhibition, “Caravaggio’s Boy with a Basket of Fruit in Focus." In partnership with the Foundation for Italian Art and Culture (FIAC) and on loan from the Galleria Borghese in Rome, this is the first time in decades that Caravaggio's early masterpiece has come to the United States. 

"The Morgan is just two blocks away from my university, the Graduate Center. The library and museum have been a rich resource for me, representing an institution that honors the rich legacy of its collector, while also maintaining exciting rotating exhibitions," Jacqueline said. 

The painting is in conversation with other works by those who influenced Caravaggio and those he subsequently inspired. The exhibition's sparkling 3-month run comes to a close April 19.

📚 Check out more information on the exhibition using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artmuseum #caravaggio #themorgan #nyc #artlawyer #legalresearch
Check out our upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer R Check out our upcoming bootcamp on Artist-Dealer Relations, now available online!!

Center for Art Law’s Art Lawyering Bootcamp: Artist-Dealer Relationships is an in-person, full-day training aimed at preparing lawyers for working with visual artists and dealers, in the unique aspects of their relationship. The bootcamp will be led by veteran attorneys specializing in art law.

This Bootcamp provides participants -- attorneys, law students, law graduates and legal professionals -- with foundational legal knowledge related to the main contracts and regulations governing dealers' and artists' businesses. Through a combination of instructional presentations and mock consultations, participants will gain a solid foundation in the specificities of the law as applied to the visual arts.

Bootcamp participants will be provided with training materials, including presentation slides and an Art Lawyering Bootcamp handbook with additional reading resources.

Art Lawyering Bootcamp participants with CLE tickets will receive New York CLE credits upon successful completion of the training modules. CLE credits pending board approval.

🎟️ Grab tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #research #lawyer #artlawyer #bootcamp #artistdealer #CLE #trainingprogram
Join us on May 27 for the highly anticipated Art L Join us on May 27 for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence.

Our event will feature a series of dynamic panels, each offering invaluable insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law. Together, let’s trace the impact of copyright law on visual arts, examine the U.S. Copyright Office’s landmark reports on AI, and contemplate the future of licensing in a world where registration is no longer enough.

In addition to substantive portion of the day, our conference with feature exhibitors and a silent auction aimed at raising funds to support Center’s Summer Internship program and bolster our efforts to provide accessible and affordable legal resources to the artistic community.

🎟️ Find more information and grab your tickets using the link in our bio! 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #copyrightlaw #artcopyright #copyright #ailaw #artlawconference #nyu
Check out the newly released podcast episode! Andr Check out the newly released podcast episode! Andrea and Paris speak with Elysia Borowy, Executive Director of the Rema Hort Mann Foundation, Christy Ceriale, founder of the foundation’s Young Collectors Initiative, and Antonio Vidal, one of the recipients of the 2026 Emerging Artist Grant.

Through these three perspectives, they explored the inner workings of one of New York’s most prominent art foundations, hearing firsthand about the realities of running a philanthropic arts organization, building a career as a working artist, and navigating the world of collecting as a young person in the city.

Founded in 1995, the Rema Hort Mann Foundation supports both emerging visual artists and individuals battling cancer, providing grants and resources at pivotal moments in their lives and careers. 

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legal #research #podcast #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket
Join the Center for Art Law on April 30th in conve Join the Center for Art Law on April 30th in conversation with author and prosecutor Adena J. Bernstein as she examines the legal and ethical complexities surrounding the restitution of Nazi-looted art. 

Drawing from her book Stolen Legacies: The Fight for Nazi-Looted Art, she explores how different countries have addressed Holocaust-era cultural theft through legislation, litigation, and museum policies. The discussion will review key restitution frameworks, including the Washington Principles, evolving provenance research standards, and the role of courts in resolving ownership disputes decades after the Holocaust. Bernstein also reflects on the human aspect of these cases and why unresolved cultural losses remain an enduring legal and moral legacy of World War II.

🎟️ Get your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #nazilootedart #restitution #stolenart #artcrime #internationallaw
Digital repatriation is a practice being used by m Digital repatriation is a practice being used by museums to "return" a digital version of a work to source communities while retaining the physical object. Digitization itself can increase eduction and access to items, but does a digital version of an object truly act as a sufficient substitute to the heritage contained in the original or does it create a further layer of colonial control through the access to such digital property?

Read out recent article by Afroditi Karatagli to learn more about the impact of digital repatriations and what actions should be taken instead. 

📚 Find the full article using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #legalresearch #digitalrepatriation #digitalart #artmarket #artistissues #museumissues
Join us for a on April 9th for a new colloquium on Join us for a on April 9th for a new colloquium on the legal foundations for restitution of Nazi-looted art. Raymond J. Dowd will discuss his recent article "Taking The Profit Out of War: Why International Law Requires Restitution of Nazi-Looted Art" published in the Fordham Law Review Online. He will delve into the impact of international property law on those looking to bring restitution claims. 

🎟️ Grab you tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlawyer #artlaw #restitution #nazilootedart #lootedart #artcrimes
In January, two Roman bronze statutes of toddlers In January, two Roman bronze statutes of toddlers reaching for partridges, were returned and displayed by the Spanish Museo Arqueológico Nacional. The statues had previously been sold by Christie's in 2012 to a private collector. Christie's had stated the statues came from an unnamed collector, who had gotten them from Giovanni Züst. This was determined to be false. 

After a lengthly journey through the Swiss legal system, due to a Swiss man stating the statues were in his family, before being taken by an Italian man, and then later false documents being prepared prior to the Christie's sale. Later investigators in Spain determined the statues were looted property taken from Spain around 2007. The statues were voluntarily restituted 

📚 Read more using the link in our bio! 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #looting #artcrimes #spain #restitution
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law