• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Is it Strictly Business?: Shifts in the Artist-Dealer Landscape
Back

Is it Strictly Business?: Shifts in the Artist-Dealer Landscape

February 27, 2024

Mock-up draft of the Artist’s Contract by Seth Siegelaub (1971). Source: Museum of Modern Art.

Mock-up draft of the Artist’s Contract by Seth Siegelaub (1971). Source: Museum of Modern Art.

By Patrick K. Lin

The relationship between gallery and artist has long been compared to that of a marriage. Historically, a single dealer nurtured an artist’s career. In exchange, the artist exclusively sold their work with that dealer. For instance, after art dealer Leo Castelli offered artist Jasper Johns his first solo exhibition in 1958, Johns continued to work exclusively with Castelli, even developing a close friendship that endured until Castelli’s passing in 1999.[1] Similarly, painter Wayne Thiebaud met and befriended dealer Allan Stone in 1961, becoming Thiebaud’s sole dealer until Stone’s death in 2006.[2]

However, this traditional power dynamic has been undergoing significant changes. Not only are artists today more promiscuous (that is, showing with multiple galleries), more and more artists are leaving behind gallery representation in favor of going independent or even owning and operating their own galleries.

This trend is perhaps best exemplified by the 2023 ArtReview Power 100 annual rankings, where the top ten positions are occupied exclusively by artists, including Nan Goldin and Simone Leigh, who both changed galleries in the past few years. Compare this with a decade ago, when mega-gallerists Larry Gagosian and David Zwirner competed for the top spot, and it clarifies just how much power in the art market has shifted from dealers to artists in recent years.

To be fair, it has been standard practice for artists to have different dealers in different markets, such as one for Los Angeles and one for New York. Moving from a small gallery to a larger one is also a common occurrence, particularly when an artist’s career advances. Nevertheless, the art world is always abuzz when an artist switches galleries.

In October 2023, Alicja Kwade left König Galerie after 15 years to join Pace Gallery, a mega-gallery whose roster of artists has expanded rapidly over the past few years. Although Kwade’s departure from controversial dealer Johann König made a splash in the press, the star sculptor of the Berlin art scene continues to be represented by New York’s 303 Gallery, Paris’s Mennour gallery, and Reykjavik’s i8 Gallery. Pace will stage a solo show of Kwade’s work at its Los Angeles gallery in May 2024.

David Diao was represented by Postmasters Gallery for nearly 40 years when he left to join Greene Naftali in April 2023. In November 2023, On Barnett Newman, 1991-2023 marked Diao’s debut exhibition at Greene Naftali. Like Kwade, Diao is represented by other dealers, including the Office Baroque gallery in Antwerp and Tanya Leighton in Los Angeles.

There are a multitude of reasons why an artist might change galleries: the appeal of more exposure, association with a different movement or group of artists, access to a different collector base, the list goes on. The reasons for changing galleries have mostly remained the same for decades.[3]

Greener Pastures: Money and Reach

Switching galleries—like jobs—is one of a few surefire ways to get a worthwhile increase in prices. The move often results in greater visibility too.

For example, Elizabeth Peyton, who had exhibited with Gladstone Gallery since 2007, left in March 2023 to join David Zwirner, where her solo exhibition Angel was presented from June to July. Given Peyton’s oil painting Nick with His Eyes Shut (2003) sold for a record-setting $2.5 million with buyer’s fees at Sotheby’s in 2022,[4] it is apparent the move was motivated by her market being on the rise.

In September 2023, sculptor Carol Bove ended her 12-year relationship with mega-gallery Zwirner to join competitor Gagosian for global representation. Commentators speculated that the move is in part motivated by Bove’s underwhelming secondary market track record. In 2022, a solo presentation of new works by Bove, “Carol Bove: Vase/Face,” opened at Zwirner’s Paris gallery just in time for Paris+ and reportedly sold out. Although Bove is considered a premier sculptor working today, her secondary market prices have not kept pace with her skyrocketing primary prices. Bove’s primary prices have jumped from less than $100,000 for a large sculpture in 2007, to about $400,000 a decade later, and not to $1.8 million. In contrast, according to Artnet Price Database, roughly one-third of her 66 lots failed to sell. The highest price Bove’s work has sold for in auction is $329,000 in 2008.[5]

After exhibiting with the Marian Goodman Gallery for five years, Nan Goldin left to join the Gagosian Gallery in March 2023. Despite the recognition and praise, Goldin said that prices for her photography have lagged behind those of her contemporaries. She told The New York Times she hopes a new gallery can increase her profile around the globe and expand her collector base. At the same time, Marian Goodman also withdrew from daily operations of her gallery, resulting in a new management team.[6] Leadership changes can be challenging at galleries, which rely on personal relationships between dealers and artists. Goldin has said her decision to join Gagosian was motivated in part by the move of Andrew Heyward, a former Goodman employee—who has known the artist for nearly 30 years—to the Gagosian Gallery.[7]

Reading the Fine Print: When Artist-Dealer Relations Sour

Although news coverage and media portrayals of the relationship between artists and their galleries are often emotional, the legal relationship between them is transactional: buyer-seller or consignor-consignee.

In a buyer-seller relationship, the gallery buys an artist’s work outright and resells it to its clients. Alternatively, in the consignment context, the artist gives permission to the gallery to take care of a work and retain full ownership of the work for exhibition and sale. In a consignment relationship, title typically remains with the artist until the gallery sells the work and the gallery assumes the role of an agent.

Disputes can arise from these relationships when there is, for example, confusion over ownership of the artwork or disagreement about profit and cost splitting.

In May 2022, Marianne Boesky Gallery lost a lawsuit brought against one of its former artists, sculptor Diana Al-Hadid, whom it alleged owed a “six-figure” amount to the gallery for “fabrication costs, rent for defendant’s studio, framing costs, and crating costs.” Art Works, Inc., the entity that owns the gallery, brought the lawsuit in the New York State Supreme Court. The subject of the lawsuit was a bronze sculpture, which the gallery claimed it had an ownership interest in because it had advanced money for its fabrication. The court issued a ruling in favor of Al-Hadid in large part because of the “unambiguous contractual language of the parties’ agreement,” which was an agreement for consignment; not a transfer of ownership.

However, contracts between artists and dealers are not always so clear cut. Disputes can arise when an agreement does not clearly outline terms related to payment and costs. In May 2023, Jeffrey Gibson, the solo artist set to represent the United States at the 2024 Venice Biennale, sued his former gallery, Kavi Gupta, alleging that it withheld nearly $640,000. According to Gibson’s complaint, in 2018, Gupta and Gibson came to an agreement in which both parties would retain a 50-50 split of the sale of each artwork on consignment; however, “at some point the Gallery fell behind and failed to timely remit Gibson’s full share of sales proceeds.” According to Gupta’s affidavit, Gibson began claiming he was owed money in 2022. The gallery and the artist appear to disagree on which expenses would be reimbursed. Gibson claims he only agreed to repay framing costs to the gallery for unframed works on consignment. On the other hand, Gupta claims the gallery expected to recoup additional costs, such as vendor costs and production expenses, including $57,000 the gallery spent on Gibson’s Aspen Art Museum exhibition, which opened in November 2023.[8]

An Emerging Trend: Artists Striking Out on Their Own—Together

2023 saw an increasing number of artists trading gallery representation for more flexible approaches to creating, marketing, and selling their art. For instance, in February 2023, the now gallery-free Peter Doig left international dealer Michael Werner after 23 years to work independently. Some speculate that Doig was spurred to leave Michael Werner due to “a series of financial slights inflicted by the gallery that he felt constituted breaches of their relationship.” Doig’s wife, Parinaz Mogadassi, who founded and runs Tramps Gallery in New York, confirmed the move to The Art Newspaper, adding, “Ultimately, from an artist’s perspective, the best way to be assured transparency in all dealings, is to be the one directly leading the conversations surrounding one’s work and life.”

The emergence of artist agents have also started to encroach on the dealer market. United Talent Agency (UTA), one of the major talent agencies in the United States, launched its fine arts division in 2015. UTA Fine Arts quickly signed acclaimed artists like Judy Chicago, Isaac Julien, and Billy Al Bengston. Rival entertainment agencies WME (part of Frieze’s parent company, Endeavor) and Creative Artists Agency (CAA) have since built up their own roster of fine artists. Dealers argue they already provide professional representation as well as specialized knowledge of the art world and connections with museums and private collectors. However, as the art world becomes increasingly intertwined with luxury retail, fashion, TV, film, and music, more and more artists may partner with talent agencies.[9]

It is far from a guarantee for an artist to find a foothold in the gallery scene. Alternatively, some artists opt to cultivate a more distinct outsider status in the art world that does not fit the mold of traditional galleries or mainstream art establishments.

Enter artist-led spaces. Galleries owned and operated by artists were first and foremost designed for visibility. Secret Project Robot, an art space co-founded by artists turned gallerists Rachel Nelson and Erik Zajaceskowski, started off as a “D.I.Y. party venue” in the late 1990s, where parties were thrown to encourage people to stay and look at artwork.[10] Today, Secret Project Robot is located in a small house with a storefront converted from a garage, featuring sculptures and paintings. “We’re slightly reformed rebels,” Nelson aptly told The New York Times. “Our first 15 years, we were balking the system but, to be an artist, you can’t reject the art world.”

Other artist-led spaces have also gained popularity, particularly in Europe, Africa, and Asia. In the past several years, artists established institutes and residences in response to cuts to public funding as well as collective desires to create art beyond the demands of mainstream art institutions. Faced with extremely limited public and private support for the arts in their home countries, African and African diaspora artists have had to take matters into their own hands. Established artists like Kaloki Nyamai and Aïda Muluneh launched artist residency programs and online platforms to cultivate a younger generation of artists while connecting their work to a more global audience.[11]

Conclusion

Given the musical-chairs nature of artists changing galleries in 2023, the year ahead will see many of those artists showcase their work at debut exhibitions and gallery shows.

A gallery’s roster of artists and estates is only one barometer of success. It is also the most publicized aspect of commercial galleries. Sales, physical expansion, and staff size are rarely made public but have an impact on the financial health of a gallery as well. Artists also have far more options than ever for showing their work to the world: today’s galleries are taking on more artists; artists have more power to make the jump to other galleries; and artists are reaching a more global audience with online platforms and communities made for and by artists.

2023 ended with what many would consider a shake-up of the status quo. How will the artist-dealer dynamic shake out in 2024?

About the Author

Patrick K. Lin is the Center for Art Law’s 2023-2024 Judith Bresler Fellow and author of Machine See, Machine Do, a book about how public institutions use technology to surveil, police, and make decisions about the public, as well as the historical biases that impact that technology. Patrick is interested in legal issues that exist at the intersection of art and technology, particularly involving artificial intelligence, data privacy, and copyright law.

Suggested Readings

  1. Power 100, AʀᴛRᴇᴠɪᴇᴡ, https://artreview.com/power-100/ (last accessed Jan. 24, 2024).
  2. Anny Shaw, Why Are Ever More Artists Ditching Dealers?, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (Dec. 12, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/12/12/why-ever-more-artists-are-ditching-the-dealers.
  3. Jennifer Wilson, Where the Artists Are Present — and in Charge, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Sept. 27, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/t-magazine/artist-run-galleries-new-york.html.
  4. Alex Greenberger, Daniel Cassady, and Angelica Villa, Why Do Pace, Gagosian, and the Other Mega-Galleries Keep Taking On So Many Artists?, ARTɴᴇᴡs (Apr. 6, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/market/why-pace-gagosian-mega-galleries-artist-rosters-1234663300/.
  5. Margaret Carrigan, Have Gallery Representation and Exclusivity Had Their Day?, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (June 25, 2018), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2018/06/25/have-gallery-representation-and-exclusivity-had-their-day.
  6. Nate Freeman, One-Two Punch: The Rise of Joint Representation Has Dealers Sharing Artists All the Way to the Bank, ARTɴᴇᴡs (Feb. 2, 2016), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/market/one-two-punch-the-rise-of-joint-representation-has-dealers-sharing-artists-all-the-way-to-the-bank-5757/.
  7. John Russell, Leo Castelli, Influential Art Dealer, Dies at 91, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Aug. 23, 1999), https://www.nytimes.com/1999/08/23/arts/leo-castelli-influential-art-dealer-dies-at-91.html. ↑
  8. Wayne Thiebaud, Aᴄᴀᴅᴇᴍʏ ᴏғ Aᴄʜɪᴇᴠᴇᴍᴇɴᴛ, https://achievement.org/achiever/wayne-thiebaud/ (last updated on Dec. 26, 2021). ↑
  9. Annie Armstrong, Why Artists Change Galleries, Aʀᴛsʏ (Jan. 27, 2020), https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-artists-change-galleries. ↑
  10. Nick with His Eyes Shut, Sᴏᴛʜᴇʙʏ’s, https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2022/the-now-evening-auction-5/nick-with-his-eyes-shut (last accessed Jan. 24, 2024). ↑
  11. Katya Kazakina, Sculptor Carol Bove Is in High Demand, Now With a Show at Zwirner’s New Gallery in Paris. So Why Aren’t Her Auction Prices Keeping Up?, Aʀᴛɴᴇᴛ (Oct. 21, 2022), https://news.artnet.com/market/carol-bove-sculptor-has-new-show-at-david-zwirner-in-paris-2196536. ↑
  12. Zachary Small, Nan Goldin is Second Major Artist to Exit Marian Goodman Gallery, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Mar. 30, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/30/arts/design/nan-goldin-marian-goodman-gagosian-gallery.html. ↑
  13. Id. ↑
  14. Alex Greenberger, Artist Jeffrey Gibson Sues Chicago’s Kavi Gupta Gallery, Alleging He Is Owed More than $600,000, ARTɴᴇᴡs (Aug. 7, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/jeffrey-gibson-sues-chicagos-kavi-gupta-gallery-1234676421/. ↑
  15. Anny Shaw, Why Are Ever More Artists Ditching Dealers?, Tʜᴇ Aʀᴛ Nᴇᴡsᴘᴀᴘᴇʀ (Dec. 12, 2023), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2023/12/12/why-ever-more-artists-are-ditching-the-dealers. ↑
  16. Jennifer Wilson, Where the Artists Are Present — and in Charge, Tʜᴇ Nᴇᴡ Yᴏʀᴋ Tɪᴍᴇs (Sept. 27, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/26/t-magazine/artist-run-galleries-new-york.html. ↑
  17. Rebecca Anne Proctor, Artist-Led Spaces Are Proliferating Around the World, Filling a Gap Caused by Dwindling Public Funding and Market Pressures, Aʀᴛɴᴇᴛ (Dec. 26, 2022), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/artist-led-spaces-are-proliferating-around-the-world-filling-a-gap-caused-by-dwindling-public-funding-and-market-pressures-2232925. ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous AI and Artists’ IP: Exploring Copyright Infringement Allegations in Andersen v. Stability AI Ltd.
Next Appropriation or Art? Court Orders Richard Prince to Pay Damages in Highly Anticipated Copyright Lawsuit

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
Fleurs en Pot
Art law

The Dorville Case: A Judicial Turn Facilitating the Restitution of Artworks Acquired During the French Occupation

May 7, 2026
The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 3: Registration Is Dead? Long Live Licensing?

As copyright enforcement becomes more complex, this panel explores the evolving role of registration and the growing importance of licensing agreements in protecting creative works. Panelists will discuss how artists, rights holders, and legal practitioners navigate enforcement today, examining when registration still matters, how licensing structures are being used strategically, and what effective rights management looks like in a shifting legal and art market landscape.

Moderator: Carol J. Steinberg, Art, Copyright & Entertainment Law Attorney, Faculty, School of Visual Arts

Speakers: Janet Hicks, Vice President and Director of Licensing, Artists Rights Society; Yayoi Shionoiri, art lawyer and Vice President of External Affairs and General Counsel at Powerhouse Arts; Martin Cribbs, Intellectual Property Licensing Strategist

You can join us in-person or online! Grab your tickets using the link in our bio! 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightregistration #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your passport and tickets on your way to Venice, or floating toward the Most Serene City on the waves of your imagination? Yes, this newsletter is inspired by the 61st Venice Biennale, entitled In Minor Keys, and by the May flurry of activities. For us the month of May closes books on FY 2026 (thanks to you and our programming, we are ending this year strong and ready for the 2026-2027 encore), and it makes our heads spin with final preparations for the Summer School and Annual Conference, punctuated by the arrival of the summer interns (final count is still a mystery). Please share with us your art law stories and experiences as we strive to do the same in New York, Zurich, London, Venice…

The eyes of the art and law world are on La Serenissima because the world needs serenity instead of sirens and because people love art, it imitates life, art that allows us to experiment with real feelings and overcome the drama. From lessons in artistic advocacy with the “Invisible Pavilion” (2026) to historical echoes of the Biennale del Dissenso [Biennial of Dissent] (1977), this Biennale is giving us a lot to process. Hope and joy, loss and disappointment, reunions and new encounters, memorialization and belonging, realization that different motivations drive us to take to the road. Don’t lose your moral compass or your keys, and remember: even minor movements can lead to major reverberations. 

🔗 Check out our May newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #may #legalresearch
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 2: The Copyright Office Weighs In — Three Reports on AI and the Law

This panel examines the U.S. Copyright Office’s three recent reports on artificial intelligence and copyright, unpacking what they clarify, and what they leave unresolved about authorship, ownership, and protection in the age of AI. Panelists will also situate these reports within the broader legal landscape, touching on emerging litigation and contested issues shaping how AI‑generated and AI‑assisted works are treated under current copyright law.

Moderator: Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research, Center for Art Law

Speakers: Miriam Lord, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Public Information and Education; Ben Zhao, Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at University of Chicago and Founder, Nightshade & Glaze; Katherine Wilson-Milne, Partner, Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP 

Reserve your tickets today! 🎟️ 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel wit Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel… Case law is fascinating, and litigation is often the only path when disputes over valuable art cannot be resolved through negotiation or ADR. 

As news of the renewed HEAR Act spreads through the restitution community, we invite you to read a case review by two of our legal interns, Donyea James (Fordham Law, JD Candidate 2026) and Lauren Stein (Wake Forest University School of Law, JD Candidate 2027), who spent this semester immersed in the facts and law of "Bennigson et al. v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation."

$1,552. That is what a Picasso sold for in 1938 by a Jewish businessman fleeing Nazi Germany. Roughly one-tenth of what he sought just six years earlier. The heirs went to court and two courts said the claim came too late. HEAR Act might very well challenge that conclusion. The case is now pending before New York's highest court. 

🔗 Link in bio.

#ArtLaw #Restitution #HolocaustArt #HEARAct #Guggenheim #Picasso #ProvenanceResearch
Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens wh Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens when the present confronts colonial memory? Join us in Zurich for a special screening of "Elephants & Squirrels," a documentary following Sri Lankan artist Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige as she traces looted artifacts and human remains of the indigenous Wanniyala-Aetto people, held in Swiss museum collections for over a century, and fights for their return home.

Film director Gregor Brändli and the artist will open the evening with reflections on colonial collecting, cultural heritage, and the ethics of museum stewardship.

📅 May 12, 2026 | 18:00 – 21:00
📍 schwarzescafé | Luma Westbau, Limmatstrasse 270, Zurich

This event is free to attend and is offered as part of the CineLöwenbräukunst series. Link in bio for more information.

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #Restitution #Repatriation #Zurich #FilmScreening #ColonialHistory #MuseumEthics 

#MuseumEthics
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for, Panel 1: So Inappropriate — Lessons About Copyright Law and Art: First There Was Art, Then Copyright, Then Fair Use… and Now AI?

From early copyright doctrines to contemporary fair use debates, this panel examines how artists and lawyers have navigated questions of ownership, appropriation, and originality in visual art. Panelists will explore key developments in copyright law affecting traditional artistic practices, from borrowing and remixing to transformative use, while also considering how emerging technologies, including AI, are beginning to reshape long‑standing legal frameworks and artistic norms.

Moderator: Irina Tarsis, Founder, Center for Art Law
Speakers: Vivek Jayaram, Founder, Jayaram Law; Vincent Wilcke, Pace Gallery; Greg Allen, Artist and writer 

Reserve your tickets using the link in our bio or by visiting our website itsartlaw.org 🎟️ 
See you soon!
Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been maki Next stop: Venice. The 61st Biennale has been making waves and headlines for weeks and the doors have not even opened yet. The jury refused to award prizes and resigned nine days before the opening over geopolitical controversies. Some artists boycott while others show up even if unwelcome. Some pavilions will be empty, some will not be open to the public… Sources of funds, sources of inspiration, so many questions, so much on display for critical eyes. Meanwhile the boats are waiting for anyone lucky enough to find themselves in the floating world.

Help us reflect on the Biennale by sharing your art law stories.

#ArtLaw #Venice #Biennale2026 #ArtWorld #BiennaleofDissent #LaSerenissima #GoldenLion #SeeArtThinkArtLaw
Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Prof Center for Art Law is very pleased to welcome Professor Ben Zhao as the Keynote Speaker for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026! 

Ben Zhao is the Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at the University of Chicago where he, and a team of researchers at the university, developed NightShade & Glaze, two data-poisoning tools which protects artists' work from being scraped for AI data training. 

Professor Zhao will discuss tools, such as NightShade, which can assist in defending art in the age of AI. 

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with Professor Zhao's keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees. 

We hope you join us! Reserve your tickets now using the link in our bio 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightlaw
A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speak A huge thank you to our hosts and incredible speakers who made this London panel discussion truly special! 🙏✨ 🇬🇧 🇺🇦 

We were so fortunate to hear from:

🎤 Rakhi Talwar | RTalwar Compliance
🎤 Raminta Dereskeviciute | McDermott Will & Schulte
🎤 Daryna Pidhorna, Lawyer & Analyst | The Raphael Lemkin Society
🎤 Timothy Kompancheko | Bernard, Inc.
🎤 Yuliia Hnat | Museum of Contemporary Art NGO
🎤 Irina Tarsis | Center for Art Law

Your insights, expertise, and passion made this a conversation we won't forget. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge with us! 💫

Bottom Line: the art market has power and responsibility. Our panel "Art, Money, and the Law: Sanctions & AML Enforcement in 2026" tackled the hard questions around money laundering, sanctions compliance, and what's at stake for art market participants in today's regulatory landscape.

⚠️ Regulators are watching and "history has it's eyes on you..." too We don't have to navigate the legal waters alone. Let's keep the conversation going.

What was your biggest takeaway? 

#ArtLaw #AMLCompliance #Sanctions #ArtMarket #ArtAndMoney #Enforcement2026
At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our At the Center for Art Law we are preparing for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026, "What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century", and we hope you are as excited as we are! The event will take place on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School. 

In addition to the panels throughout the day, which will offer insights into the rapidly shifting landscape of art and copyright law, our conference will feature exhibitors showcasing resources for promoting artists' rights, and a silent auction aimed at bolstering the Center's efforts. 

We would like to invite you to take part in and support this year's Annual Art Law Conference by being an exhibitor or sponsor. We express our sincere appreciation to all of our sponsors, exhibitors and you! 

Find more information and reserve your tickets using the link in our bio! See you soon!
In this episode, we speak with art market expert D In this episode, we speak with art market expert Doug Woodham to unpack how Jean-Michel Basquiat became one of the most enduring cultural icons of our time.

Moving beyond his rise in 1980s New York, this episode focuses on what happened after his death. We explore how his estate, led by his father, shaped his legacy through control of supply, copyright, and narrative; how early collectors and market forces drove the value of his work; and how museums and media cemented his place in art history.

Together, we explore the bigger question: is creating great art enough, or does becoming an icon require an entire ecosystem working behind the scenes?

🎙️ Check out the podcast anywhere you get your podcasts using the link in our bio!

Also, please join us on May 27  for the highly anticipated Art Law Conference 2026, held at Brooklyn Law School and Online (Hybrid). Entitled “What is Copy, Right? Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century,” this year’s conference explores the evolving relationship between visual art, copyright law, and artificial intelligence!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #podcast #legal #research #legalresearch #newepisode #artmarket #basquiat
Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective Amy Sherald cancelled her mid-career retrospective, scheduled at the National Portrait Gallery (NPG) in D.C., after a curatorial controversy over the potential removal of her recent work, "Trans Forming Liberty" (2024). Sherald denounced the attempt to remove this work as a blatant and intentional erasure of trans lives. 

This is one of the best examples and the most illustrative examples of the current administration's growing efforts to control the Smithsonian Institution's programming. In this climate of political tension, how do cultural institutions defend themselves against censorship and keep their curatorial independence?

📚 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #legalreserach #artcuration #curatorialindependance #censorship
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law