• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Ransomware Attack on Christie’s: A Wake-Up Call for Art World Cybersecurity?
Back

Ransomware Attack on Christie’s: A Wake-Up Call for Art World Cybersecurity?

June 24, 2024

Screen capture of Christie's page mobile post hack.

By Rachel Sundar

On May 27th, 2024, the cyber-extortionist group RansomHub, notorious for their recent attack on Change Healthcare, published a statement on the dark web, taking responsibility for a cyber assault on Christie’s, one of the world’s largest auction houses, with key locations in cities such as New York, London, Paris, Hong Kong, and Dubai.[1] The ransomware attack on Christie’s underscores the vulnerability of digital systems in the art world. As institutions such as auction houses, galleries, and even art databases increasingly rely on digital infrastructures, implementing robust cybersecurity measures and prioritising data protection become paramount in safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining the trust of clientele. Ransomware is a form of malicious software designed to extract data and restrict access to a computer system until a payment is made.[2] In this case, RansomHub was able to breach Christie’s digital security system, encrypt sensitive files and hold them for ransom.[3] In doing so, it forced the auction house to shut down its website during the entirety of the crucial sales week of New York’s marquee auction events, causing significant disruptions to the company’s operations.[4] Not only does Christie’s website serve as a vital tool for pre-auction arrangements––facilitating bidder registration, catalogue browsing, and pre-sale inquiries––but in a post-pandemic world, it has also become indispensable to the auctions themselves.[5] In the past few years, online bidding has emerged as the preferred method of participation for both local and international buyers, ensuring broader market reach and heightened bidding activity. According to Christie’s CEO Guillaume Cerutti in a statement to Vanity Fair, “80% of all bids across sales at the house last year were placed online, up from 45% in 2019.”[6]

Despite the security breach, Christie’s chose not to make an immediate public statement addressing the ransomware attack in an attempt to protect and prioritise upcoming sales.[7] Instead, the auction house referred to the incident as a “technology security issue,” proceeding with all six scheduled 20th/21st Century Art live auctions, achieving the highest total sales of any auction house for the week.[8] This success was largely attributable to “Christie’s Live,” a digital platform for remote bidding, which remained accessible during the incident and allowed registered bidders to participate online.[9] In addition, online catalogues were made available in PDF format on a temporary holding site, providing further convenience and accessibility for potential buyers.[10] Besides online bidding, clients turned to in-person and phone bidding throughout the week.[11] The auctions in question––highlighted by the 20th Century Evening Sale, the 21st Century Evening Sale, and The Rosa de la Cruz Collection Evening Sale––achieved a leading market performance, with a combined total of $640,219,290.[12] While these sales results may suggest a sense of reassurance among clients, the long-term repercussions of the incident on future sales remain uncertain, particularly in light of the recent claims made by RansomHub.

In a post on the dark web on Monday, May 27th, RansomHub claimed to have accessed data on “at least 500,000” Christie’s customers from “all over the world,” including full names, document numbers, nationalities, and birth dates.[13] The hackers have since threatened to release this sensitive data by the end of May, unless Christie’s complies with their ransom demand.[14]Although these claims have not yet been verified, “several cybersecurity experts have said RansomHub was a known ransomware operation and that the claim was plausible”.[15] Should RansomHub’s claims prove accurate, the incident may potentially result in far more profound consequences than initially anticipated by Christie’s clientele. In an interview with the New York Times, Brett Callow, a threat analyst at the New Zealand-based cybersecurity firm, Emsisoft, stated that while many types of cyberattacks can often be recovered from relatively swiftly, ransomware stands as a notable exception.[16]

In a statement released on May 26th, Edward Lewine, a spokesperson for Christie’s, addressed the situation more comprehensively, stating that an internal investigation had confirmed that there had been “unauthorised access by a third party to parts of Christie’s network,”[17] and that “the group behind the incident took some limited amount of personal data relating to some of our clients,”[18] but that “there was no evidence that any financial or transactional records were compromised.”[19]

The auction house has since taken several steps to enhance its cyber-security, including notifying the relevant law enforcement authorities of the incident, such as the FBI and the British police, as well as maintaining communication with clients whose data had been compromised.[20] While the full extent of the stolen data is unclear, this cyberattack highlights the heightened vulnerability of auction houses in a digitised era. Since its foundation in 1766, the world-leading auction house has cultivated a reputation for excellence in the art world, hosting auctions for coveted masterpieces and boasting record-breaking sales. Given the nature of these high-value transactions, the security and confidentiality of their digital infrastructure are paramount. The ramifications of such a breach are far-reaching, endangering not only the privacy and security of individual clients but also undermining a fundamental tenet of the auction industry itself: the imperative of discretion.

Beyond raising concerns about cybersecurity and client confidentiality, this breach has also led to legal repercussions for the auction house, further underscoring the severity of the situation. A class-action lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York on June 3rd.[21] The complaint alleges that the personal information of over 500,000 current and former buyers was left vulnerable due to the company’s failure to implement adequate cybersecurity measures.[22] The exposed data allegedly includes full names, passport numbers, and other sensitive details from passport scans, which, if verified, would leave affected individuals at risk for identity theft and fraud.[23] A pre-trial conference for the case has been scheduled for September 10th.[24] This lawsuit highlights the potential legal and financial fallout that even the most established institutions may be exposed to in the wake of such cybersecurity incidents. Despite its scale and prominence, Christie’s has not been able to avoid this risk. Nonetheless, as a larger institution, it is likely to possess the resources and expertise necessary to address the breach and reinforce its cybersecurity infrastructure. However, the incident also raises broader concerns about the preparedness of smaller auction houses and players in the art market, such as galleries, that may lack the same capabilities to defend against cyber attacks.

Sources:

  1. Zachary Small, Ransomware Group Claims Responsibility for Christie’s Hack, N. Y. Times (May 27, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/27/arts/design/hackers-claim-christies-attack.html. ↑
  2. Info. Comm’r’s Off., Ransomware and Data Protection Compliance, ico., https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/security/a-guide-to-data-security/ransomware-and-data-protection-compliance/, (last visited June 20, 2024). ↑
  3. Small, supra note 1. ↑
  4. Brian Boucher, Ransomware Gang Threatens to Leak Data on Christie’s Clients After Major Hack, Artnet (May 27, 2024), https://news.artnet.com/art-world/ransomhub-christies-hack-2493192. ↑
  5. Place Bids from Anywhere in the World, Christie’s, https://www.christies.com/en/stories/place-bids-from-anywhere-in-the-world-4bfd8c5eb92a4cf1b74b34cfb9f5eb2c (last visited June 20, 2024). ↑
  6. Nate Freeman, Selling Through the Christie’s Cyberattack, Vanity Fair (May 16, 2024), https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/christies-sale-hack. ↑
  7. Zachary Small, Ransomware Group Claims Responsibility for Christie’s Hack, N. Y. Times (May 27, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/27/arts/design/hackers-claim-christies-attack.html. ↑
  8. Daniel Cassady, Hacker Outfit RansomHub Claims Credit for Christie’s Auction Week ‘Technology Security Issue’, Artnews (May 27, 2024, 7:39 PM), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/ransomhub-hack-christies-website-1234707976/. ↑
  9. Christie’s, supra note 4. ↑
  10. Zachary Small, Hobbled by Cyberattack, Christie’s Says Marquee Sales Will Proceed, N. Y. Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/12/arts/design/christies-cyberattack.html (May 14, 2024). ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Achieving $640 Million and Counting, Christie’s 20th/21st Century Art Sales Lead the Market, Christie’s (May 20, 2024), https://www.christies.com/en/stories/20-21-may-2024-marquee-week-sale-results-b4efc2671a484b7f91571852025eaa8b. ↑
  13. Kabir Jhala, Hackers Claim Responsibility for Christie’s Cyberattack and Threaten to Release Client Data, Art Newspaper (May 28, 2024), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2024/05/28/hackers-claim-christies-cyberattack-and-threaten-to-release-client-data. ↑
  14. Id. ↑
  15. Small, supra note 1. ↑
  16. Id. ↑
  17. Id. ↑
  18. Id. ↑
  19. Id. ↑
  20. Zachary Small, After Hack, Christie’s Gives Details of Compromised Client Data, N. Y. Times (May 30, 2024), https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/arts/design/christies-hack-client-data.html. ↑
  21. Karen Ho, Christie’s Hit With Class-Action Lawsuit Over Client Data After Cyberattack Shuts Down Website, Artnews (June 7, 2024, 5:25 PM), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/christies-class-action-lawsuit-client-data-cyberattack-ransomhub-1234708936/. ↑
  22. Id. ↑
  23. Id. ↑
  24. Id. ↑

 

About the Author:

Rachel Sundar, a postgraduate fellow at the Center for Art Law, recently graduated from Sciences Po Paris Law School, where she majored in Economic Law, specialising in Innovation Law. Her primary interest lies in exploring the effects of digital creation and artificial intelligence on the art world, with a particular focus on issues of authorship and copyright protection.

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Case Review: Farmer-Paellmann v Smithsonian Inst.
Next Case Review: Kerson v. Vermont Law School, Inc.

Related Art Law Articles

CfAL photo from Rietberg Museum
Art law

Inspiration and Investment: The Benin Bronzes in Western Art and the Market

September 21, 2026
Italy's Bill 2834 A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish Owned Art
Art lawItalylegislative historyNazi-era looted art

Italy’s Bill 2834: A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish-Owned Art

September 17, 2026
#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation
Art law

#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende: Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation

September 13, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant collections of modern Mexican art, is at the center of an ongoing legal and financial controversy. With works by Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, María Izquierdo, and others, the collection raises complex questions about the protections afforded to National Artistic Monuments under Mexican law. 

Paula Gutierrez de Villasante examines what the collection's uncertain future could mean for Mexico’s cultural heritage. 

📚Read the full article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #MexicanArt #FridaKahlo #ArtFinance
Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what t Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what they are, how they work, and the legal and practical considerations for artists!

Please note, this is a hybrid event. Participants are welcome to attend either in person or online via Zoom..

Join the Center for Art Law for Artist Corporations: A New Legal Framework for Creative Practice, a conversation exploring the Colorado Artist Companies Act and what it could mean for artists, lawyers, policymakers, and the broader creative economy.

In 2025, Colorado enacted Senate Bill 133, creating the Artist Corporation (A-Corp); a first-of-its-kind legal business structure designed specifically to recognize and support artists and creative professionals. The legislation offers a new model for balancing artistic practice with sustainable business and legal protections, raising important questions about how the law can better serve creative communities.

Join us for a discussion featuring Lindsay Korotkin, Yancey Strickler, and Sarah Darlene, who will examine the origins of the Artist Corporation, the legislative process behind its creation, and its practical implications for working artists. Drawing on their respective backgrounds in law, advocacy, entrepreneurship, and artistic practice, the panelists will discuss how this innovative legal framework came to fruition, how artists may benefit from it, and whether similar legislation could shape the future of creative industries beyond Colorado.

Following the panel discussion, attendees will have the opportunity to participate in a live audience Q&A as well as a Networking Reception. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #colorado #artistissues
For more than two decades, thousands of counterfei For more than two decades, thousands of counterfeit works attributed to Canadian Anishinaabe artist Norval Morrisseau circulated through galleries, auctions, and private collections. The resulting forgery scandal has made authenticating Morrisseau’s work increasingly difficult and raised larger questions about protecting artists' legacies and the integrity of the art market. 

In her article, Victoria Cook examines the history of the Morrisseau forgery ring and how emerging technologies could help distinguish genuine works from fakes. 

📚 Read the full article at the link in our bio!

1st 📷: Norval Morrisseau, Observations of the Astral World (c. 1994), acrylic on canvas, 236 x 514 cm, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

#ArtLaw #ArtForgery #NorvalMorrisseau #IndigenousArt #CanadianArt
Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Collo Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Colloquium with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. 

Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law