• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • 2025 Year-End Appeal
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • 2025 Year-End Appeal
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Six of one, half a dozen of the other? Comparing two Art Law Resources
Back

Six of one, half a dozen of the other? Comparing two Art Law Resources

June 14, 2018

By Jennie Nadel

New Kid on the Block

Getting the Deal Through (GTDT) is a London-based website that provides users with updates on laws and regulations, published by Law Business Research and a number of other publications. The website, managed by Law Business Research Limited (http://lbresearch.com/), solicits lawyers and law firms from around the world to synthesize legal information.

Screen Shot 2018-06-14 at 3.58.23 PM

Their research platform can be useful for a variety of audiences including law firms, universities, regulators, and corporate counsel providing assistance to legal query. Currently, GTDT covers information on 150 countries across 90 practice areas with an audience of around 200,000 including in-house and private practice lawyers. The practice areas span a wide variety of topics including acquisition finance, commercial contracts, copyright, intellectual property & antitrust, mergers & acquisitions, patents, and more. The website content is organized by practice area, then jurisdiction. Information is presented as responses to series of Q&A to help users find information and is designed to take complex subjects and strip them down into understandable summaries. Each practice area is developed by a contributing editor and a leading practitioner in the field. The website offers a compare tool that allows users to make comparisons of the same practice area but in different regions of the world, which is especially handy for those interested in the international exchange of art. It also contains updated information and trends for each country at the bottom of the page.

In 2018, GTDT launched a new page for Art Law practice. This resource is edited by Pierre Valentin, partner at Constantine Cannon LLP in charge of the Art & Cultural Property Law Group practice. The Art Law practice area page posits 49 questions with 12 sets of answers available corresponding to 12 countries such as China, Turkey, France, Switzerland, and the United States, including both California and New York. These questions range from the most common subjects surrounding the buying and selling of art to queries of cultural patrimony, museums, auctions, etc. The answers given for “The United States – New York” page are offered by Amelia Brankov, counsel at Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz.

Screen Shot 2018-06-14 at 3.58.13 PM

2nd ed. The Art Collecting Legal Handbook

GTDT’s Art Law Q&A’s are akin to the 2013 and 2016 editions of the “The Art Collecting Legal Handbook” the reference book edited by Bruno Boesch and Massimo Sterpi. The 2013 Handbook was designed to help the collector navigate art collections in an international framework and offered a useful introduction to art law themes for a number of countries including Argentina, Greece, Israel, Japan, and Mexico. While art collecting and preservation has become increasingly transnational, legal frameworks and practices remain fairly local. The book addresses these issues with the aim to provide collectors with knowledge on a wide array of jurisdictions. The United States – New York section of the Handbook was compiled by Ambre Nérinck-Seltzer, attorney at Nerinck Seltzer Law as well as John Charles Thomas, attorney and former Supreme Court Justice of Virginia.

How do the two resources compare?

The 2018 GTDT art law resource is similar to the information provided in the Boesch/Sterpi Handbook. They both use the Q&A style format; however, the 2013 Handbook book includes fewer questions – , only 32 –  and thus fewer answers, while the online resource contains 49. The answers vary in length depending on the nature of the question and its relevance to the country.

Both the GTDT website and 2013 Handbook contain a fair amount of overlap in terms of questions. For example, both explore the need to conduct due diligence on behalf of the seller, laws regarding fakes and forgeries, protection against Holocaust-based claims, copyright, and tax import and export laws. One point of departure is that the 2013 Handbook seems to contain more pointed questions surrounding repatriation of art works and restitution claims. Furthermore, the Handbook helpfully creates subject headings before questions to more easily navigate the various topics including: cultural heritage and the art market, purchase and export, sale, art philanthropy, tax, etc. The Handbook also consists of a list of information and references such as principal laws and regulations, law enforcement authorities, as well as a few collector and trade associations.

Cost/Benefit Analysis

As some of the materials in the 2013 Handbook, now 5 years later, may be outdated, a second edition from 2016 is available. The market value of the original 2013 Handbook retails for $150 on Amazon. The 2nd edition is only $106.55 (plus shiping).

By contrast, the GTDT offers its materials for free during a brief trial period, though this is not available for individual students. Individuals interested in the content long-term need to create a single-user account with a company email address. For companies, organizations, or law schools interested in using the website, price is available upon inquiry. Lastly, for 2-month unlimited access to all content, the price is $850.

Final Thoughts

Overall both the website and the Handbook offer similar information in the Q&A-style format, answering basic art law questions. The pros of GTDT include the comparison tool to quickly contrast the same question from one country to the next and the accessibility of an online format with the inclusion of many other legal practice areas and jurisdictions besides art law. The Handbook requires only a single payment to own the book; however, it cannot be updated like a website can. It might be more cost effective as it retails for $150 rather than a 2-month access available for $850. However, those with a work email can take advantage of GTDT’S free in-house counsel. One of the features available in the Handbook is a list of resources and references to each country’s law and government authorities as well as collector and trade associations relevant to that specific country. Lastly, the Handbook offers legal advice for 21 countries while GTDT only offers 12 (though not all of the 12 countries listed in GTDT are available in the handbook).

* * *

The Center for Art Law is pleased to note that contributors to both of the resources have participated in our past events. Massimo Sterpi, one of the co-editors of the The Art Collecting Legal Handbook, was our distinguished speaker at a program held at Ascent Contemporary Projects on November 15, 2014. Amelia Brankov, one of the contributors to the 2018 GTDT resource, spoke at the Center for Art Law Summer 2017 program on negotiating contracts between artists and galleries.

Resources:

  • Bruno Boesch and Massimo Sterpi, eds., The Art Collecting Legal Handbook (2016), available at on Amazon
  • Bruno Boesch and Massimo Sterpi, eds., The Art Collecting Legal Handbook (2013), available on Amazon
  • Pierre Valentin, ed., Getting the Deal Through: Art Law, available at here.

About the Author: Jennie Nadel is a Summer 2018 intern at the Center for Art Law. She graduated from Johns Hopkins University in 2018 majoring in History of Art with a double minor in Museums & Society and Visual Arts. She will be pursuing her M.A. in Contemporary Art at Sotheby’s Institute in the Fall.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Bull’s-Eye: Making Heads or Tails of the Manhattan DA’s Antiquities Trafficking Unit
Next Leaving a Mark: Artistic Expression, New Media in Protest and Law

Related Posts

Technological Advancements and the Parthenon Marbles: the Potential Role of 3D Printing in the Greek Claim Against the British Museum

August 10, 2022

Legislative Proposal to Cut Funding for the Arts Threatens NEA

February 13, 2011

Case Review: Caterbetti v. Bloomgarden, et al

May 8, 2014
Center for Art Law
Sofia Tomilenko Let there be light!

A Gift for Us

this Holiday Season

Thank you to Sofia Tomilenko (the artist from Kyiv, Ukraine who made this Lady Liberty for us) and ALL the artists who make our life more meaningful and vibrant this year! Let there be light in 2026!

 

Last Gift of 2025
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the new Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the li Our interns do the most. Check out a day in the life of Lauren Stein, a 2L at Wake Forest, as she crushes everything in her path. 

Want to help us foster more great minds? Donate to Center for Art Law.

🔗 Click the link below to donate today!

https://itsartlaw.org/donations/new-years-giving-tree/ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #caselaw #lawyer #art #lawstudent #internships #artlawinternship
Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish Paul Cassier (1871-1926 was an influential Jewish art dealer. He owned and ran an art gallery called Kunstsalon Paul Cassirer along with his cousin. He is known for his role in promoting the work of impressionists and modernists like van Gogh and Cézanne. 

Cassier was seen as a visionary and risk-tasker. He gave many now famous artists their first showings in Germany including van Gogh, Manet, and Gaugin. Cassier was specifically influential to van Gogh's work as this first showing launched van Gogh's European career.

🔗 Learn more about the impact of his career by checking out the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #law #lawyer #artlawyer #artgallery #vangogh
No strike designations for cultural heritage are o No strike designations for cultural heritage are one mechanism by which countries seek to uphold the requirements of the 1954 Hague Convention. As such, they are designed to be key instruments in protecting the listed sites from war crimes. Yet not all countries maintain such inventories of their own whether due to a lack of resources, political views about what should be represented, or the risk of misuse and abuse. This often places the onus on other governments to create lists about cultures other than their own during conflicts. Thus, there may be different lists compiled by different governments in a conflict, creating an unclear legal landscape for determining potential war crimes and raising significant questions about the effectiveness of no strikes as a protection mechanism. 

This presentation discusses current research seeking to empirically evaluate the effectiveness of no strike designations as a protection mechanism against war crimes in Syria. Using data on cultural heritage attacks from the height of the Syrian Conflict (2014-2017) compiled from open sources, a no strike list completed in approximately 2012, and measures of underlying risk, this research asks whether the designations served as a protective factor or a risk factor for a given site and the surrounding area. Results and implications for holding countries accountable for war crimes against cultural heritage are discussed. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #lawyer #culturalheritage #art #protection
What happens when culture becomes collateral damag What happens when culture becomes collateral damage in war?
In this episode of Art in Brief, we speak with Patty Gerstenblith, a leading expert on cultural heritage law, about the destruction of cultural sites in recent armed conflicts.

We examine the role of international courts, the limits of accountability, and whether the law can truly protect history in times of war.

We would like to also thank Rebecca Bennett for all of her help on this episode. 

 🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artlawyer #lawyer #podcast #artpodcast #culturalheritage #armedconflict #internationallaw
Where did you go to recharge your batteries? Where did you go to recharge your batteries?
Let there be light! Center for Art Law is pleased Let there be light! Center for Art Law is pleased to share with you a work of art by Sofia Tomilenko, an illustration artist from Kyiv, Ukraine. This is Sofia's second creation for us and as her Lady Liberty plays tourist in NYC, we wish all of you peace and joy in 2026! 

Light will overcome the darkness. Світло переможе темряву. Das Licht wird die Dunkelheit überwinden. La luz vencerá la oscuridad. 

#artlaw #peace #artpiece #12to12
Writing during the last days and hours of the year Writing during the last days and hours of the year is de rigueur for nonprofits and what do we get?

Subject: Automatic reply: Thanks to Art Law! 

"I am now on leave until January 5th. 
. . .
I will respond as soon as I can upon on my return. For anything urgent you may contact ..."

Well, dear Readers, Students, Artists and Attorneys, we see you when you're working, we know when you're away, and we promise that in 2026 Art Law is coming to Town (again)!

Best wishes for 2026, from your Friends at the Center for Art Law!

#fairenough #snowdays #2026ahead #puttingfunback #fundraising #EYO2025
Less than a week left in December and together we Less than a week left in December and together we have raised nearly $32,000 towards our EOY fundraising $35,000 goal. If we are ever camera shy to speak about our accomplishments or our goals, our work and our annual report speak for themselves. 

Don’t let the humor and the glossy pictures fool you, to reach our full potential and new heights in 2026, we need your vote of confidence. No contribution is too small. What matters most is knowing you are thinking of the Center this holiday season. Thank you, as always, for your support and for being part of this community! 

#artlaw #EOYfundraiser #growingin2026 #AML #restitution #research #artistsright #contracts #copyright #bringfriends
This summer, art dealer James White and appraiser This summer, art dealer James White and appraiser Paul Bremner pleaded guilty for their participation in the third forgery ring of Norval Morisseau works uncovered by Canadian authorities. Their convictions are a key juncture in Canda's largest art fraud scheme, a scandal that has spanned decades and illuminated deep systemic failures within the art market to protect against fraud. 

Both White and Bremner were part of what is referred to as the 'Cowan Group,' spearheaded by art dealer Jeffrey Cowan. Their enterprise relied on Cowan fabricating provenance for the forged works, which he claimed were difficult to authenticate. 

In June, White, 87, pleaded guilty to to creating forged documents and possessing property obtained by crime for the purpose of trafficking. Later, in July, Paul Bremner pleaded guilty to producing and using forged documents and possessing property obtained through crime with the intent of trafficking. While Bremner, White, and Cowan were all supposed to face trial in the Fall, Cowan was the only one to do so and was ultimately found guilty on four counts of fraud. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more.

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artfraud #artforgery #canada #artcrime #internationallaw
It's the season! It's the season!
In 2022, former art dealer Inigo Philbrick was sen In 2022, former art dealer Inigo Philbrick was sentenced to seven years in prison for committing what is considered one of the United States' most significant cases of art fraud. With access to Philbrick's personal correspondence, Orlando Whitfield chronicled his friendship with the disgraced dealer in a 2024 memoir, All that Glitters: A Story of Friendship, Fraud, and Fine Art. 

For more insights into the fascinating story of Inigo Philbrick, and those he defrauded, read our recent book review. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #legalresearch #artlaw #artlawyer #lawer #inigophilbrick #bookreview #artfraud
The highly publicized Louvre heist has shocked the The highly publicized Louvre heist has shocked the globe due to its brazen nature. However, beyond its sheer audacity, the heist has exposed systemic security weaknesses throughout the international art world. Since the theft took place on October 19th, the French police have identified the perpetrators, describing them as local Paris residents with records of petty theft. 

In our new article, Sarah Boxer explores parallels between the techniques used by the Louvre heists’ perpetrators and past major art heists, identifying how the theft reveals widespread institutional vulnerability to art crime. 

🔗 Click the link in our bio to read more!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legalresearch #artcrime #theft #louvre #france #arttheft #stolenart
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.