Back

The Terry House: Case Study about Donor Conditions

Adolphine Fletcher Terry wedding photo, 1910
Adolphine Fletcher Terry wedding photo, 1910

By RaeAnn Bell

Donations are the lifeblood of many museum collections. Oftentimes, donors stipulate conditions restricting how a museum may use a gift. These restrictions might prevent the sale of an item, direct how a work is to be displayed, or require the performance of regular maintenance. Museums may become burdened when donor conditions are difficult to meet. To avoid this, many museums have gift acceptance policies that reject heavily conditioned items. Museums that accept restricted gifts open themselves up to litigation if they fail to adhere to the donor’s requirements.

The Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts (“AMFA”) and the City of Little Rock are embroiled in litigation concerning a historic house donated in 1977. The property, called the Terry House or the Pike-Fletcher-Terry House, was the childhood home of sisters Adolphine Fletcher Terry and Mary Fletcher Drennan.[1] Terry initially granted the home to AFMA and Little Rock in 1964.[2] The grant stipulated that the city and the museum must maintain the house and its grounds, and that the property can only be used for the advancement of the “cultural, artistic, or educational interests of the community.”[3] If these conditions were not met, the house would revert to the heirs of Terry and Drennan.[4] AMFA and the City of Little Rock took title to the property after Drennan’s death in 1977.[5]

Dear Visitor,

We share your curiosity for art law. Thank you for reading our complimentary articles for the month. To read more free articles, please register for a free account. For even more access and perks, consider becoming a premium member!

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Already a premium member? Sign in

Or, become a premium member for unlimited access

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.