• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • Institutional Subscription
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • Institutional Subscription
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?
Back

Where will the Parthenon Marbles Go?

November 28, 2023

image from the British museum of Elgin Marbles Parthenon

By Dea Sula

There has been a global trend of restitution and repatriation of cultural objects. Hundreds of items have been repatriated in 2023.[1] Countries are passing laws to make the process more efficient, such as France, which has passed three laws in 2023 to increase the efficiency of restitution.[2] Similarly, other countries are encouraging the return of their cultural objects, such as Poland, which has initiated 130 restitution claims,[3] and Nigeria in its pursuit of the Benin Bronzes.[4] Museum institutions are also taking part. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York launched a new initiative to go through its entire collection to identify any stolen objects.[5]

In contrast, one institution that has been generally resistant to restitution is the British Museum. The Parthenon Marbles, which have been in the museum’s possession since 1816, is a case study of many of the legal issues and constraints that museums face regarding restitution, as well as the international issues that arise from cultural objects that were removed from their place of origin prior to the modern period.[6]

Acquisition

The Parthenon is a temple that was built in ancient Athens, Greece during the 5th century BCE.[7] Over time, the Parthenon changed purpose, becoming a church and a mosque, eventually being used to house weaponry and gunpowder in 1687.[8] By the 1800s the Parthenon was considered a ruin, and half of the sculptures were lost. [9]

During the period of the Parthenon Marbles’ acquisition, Greece was a province in the Ottoman Empire.[10] Thomas Bruce, also known as the Earl of Elgin, was assigned as the British Ambassador to the Ottoman state, and during his tenure, he acquired a set of statutes and friezes from the Parthenon through authorization from the Ottoman government.[11] Elgin was attracted to the historical and artistic merit of the sculptures, a nod to the neoclassical resurgence that was popular in England. Elgin claimed that local people were using the statues as targets for shooting practice, so his acquisition was in an attempt to preserve the sculptures, as well.

The pieces were sent to England, surviving a shipwreck in 1804, and arrived in 1806.[12] Even then, the Marbles were contentious, as there were both supporters and critics of the move. The poet Lord Byron famously wrote The Curse of Minerva in part due to his distaste for what Elgin had done.[13] The House of Commons launched an investigation into the legality of transporting the Marbles, and Elgin published a defense of his actions in 1810.[14] The crown purchased the collection of statues in 1816, which were placed in the British Museum.[15]

From this time, the Parthenon Marbles have continued to be a source of controversy and illustrate international museum legal issues surrounding cultural property.

Movement for Repatriation

The Greek government has been asking for the return of the Parthenon Marbles since its independence in 1835.[16] The first official request was made in 1983. Regarding the issue, the then Greek Minister of Culture Melina Mercouri, in a speech to Oxford University, said,

“You must understand what the Parthenon Marbles mean to us. They are our pride. They are our sacrifices. They are our noblest symbol of excellence. They are a tribute to the democratic philosophy. They are our aspirations and our name. They are the essence of Greekness.”[17]

The requests for repatriation have continued into the current day, often being a topic of discussion when politicians from Greece and England meet; the last talks regarding repatriation occurred in 2021 and 2022.[18][19]

In addition, international bodies and other countries have pressured the British Museum to return the Marbles. For example, UNESCO authorized a committee recommendation to return the Marbles,[20] a suggestion that was soundly rejected.[21] In a later post Brexit trade negotiation, the EU stated that Britain would need to return the Marbles in order to reach a trade deal.[22] Another example is the Chinese president Xi Jinping publicly supporting Greece in their quest for the return of the Marbles.[23]

Greece argues that the Marbles are part of the Greek people’s cultural heritage and should be returned. Now, there is a large modern museum complex dedicated to the Parthenon, and the Greek government argues that the collection of Marbles should be a complete set located in the museum. On the legal side, Greece argues that the permission to remove the Marbles came from an occupying force, not the Greek government, and therefore the consent was not legitimate.[24] The opposing argument is that the Ottoman government was legitimate at the time of the agreement and could therefore grant ownership of the Marbles to Elgin. The “illegal sale” argument is also weakened by the large amount of time between the time of sale and the current claims.[25]

To support keeping the Marbles in London, proponents argue that the Marbles are part of global heritage, where cultural heritage belongs to everyone as part of a universal human history.[26] A spokesperson for the museum argued, “we’re not going to dismantle our great collection as it tells a unique story of our common humanity.”[27] It would be a blow to the museum to lose the Marbles for artistic and historical reasons. Another argument is the long-term care of the Marbles, as the statues that have remained in Athens have been heavily affected by pollution and acid rain.[28] This argument is not as strong since the Marbles can now be housed in the Acropolis Museum.[29] This argument also looks weaker due to the British Museum’s own maintenance issues, such as a roof leak that caused the Marbles enough damage for them to not be displayed for a year.[30]

Legal Issues

A block to potentially returning the Marbles is the legal restraints on the British Museum from the British government. The 1963 Museum Act specifically regulates the British Museum Board on deaccessioning items.[31] The Board of Trustees cannot remove or return any object from the collection unless it is a duplicate, physically damaged, “unfit to be retained the collection,” or no longer of public interest.[32] This policy was approved by the board of trustees in 2018 and is set to be reviewed in 2023.[33]

While the law generally blocks removing items from the collection, the British government has passed laws bypassing the requirement; in 2004 for human remains,[34] and in 2009 for Nazi-looted work.[35] Even with current British law, the 2022 Charities Act might be a way for the museum to return the Marbles.[36] Under the law, trustees have the power to return objects “if there is a compelling moral obligation to do so,” giving trustees the ability to say yes to returning the Marbles if they find it a moral obligation.[37]

Therefore, while the 1965 Act is still in effect, it can be bypassed when there is enough political will to do so or if the trustees find the return of the Marbles a morally compelling issue. The question is if that drive or moral attitude exists and if it is strong enough to counter the political objections regarding the Marbles. An indication that this resolve does not exist is from the 2019 resignation letter of one of the board members, claiming that the museum regarding restitution was “born and bred in empire and colonial practice, [and] is coming under scrutiny. And yet it hardly speaks.”[38]

Ways forward?

One outcome is that the British Museum will not return the Marbles due to legal constraints or lack of desire to do so. Another outcome is if the British government and the board authorize a return of the Marbles through a specific law or through an amendment to the current law, although this is unlikely.

A loan agreement structure has been proposed, as the British Museum Chair of Trustees said the museum is “seeking new positive, long term partnerships with countries and communities around the world, and that of course includes Greece.”[39] The Greek government will likely reject this since it is seeking ownership and would not want the British government to retain an ownership interest.

Even if the British Museum were to return the Marbles, further issues for the British Museum would likely follow since many of the museum’s pieces came from similar circumstances. One restitution could create a snowball effect on the British Museum collection. But if the museum does not change its policies, public opinion may go against the museum, especially in a time where there is a global push for repatriation.

Overall, it appears that the Parthenon Marbles will continue to be contentious objects since no clear resolution is in sight. The British Museum’s stance on the Marbles reflects its position generally against restitution, an increasingly unpopular stance in the art world. The issues the Pantheon Marbles present will persist as repatriation and restitution remain forefront issues regarding cultural property.

 

Suggested Readings

Who Saved the Parthenon?: A New History of the Acropolis Before, During and After the Greek Revolution By William St. Clair

Return or Retain? The Parthenon Marbles Debate

The past, present: The Parthenon Sculptures dispute as an example of the ICPRCP’s role on claims barred by the non-retroactivity of the 1970 UNESCO Convention By Letícia Machado Haertel

After 220 Years, the Fate of the Parthenon Marbles Rests in Secret Talks By Alex Marshall

About the Author

Dea Sula is a current third year law student at Santa Clara University School of Law. She is passionate about Intellectual Property and Art Law. She is the current Center for Art Law Case Law Corner Database project coordinator.

Sources:

  1. Emily Buracke, Is 2023 the Year Looted Art Returns Home?, Town and Country (Sep. 20, 2023),https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a42660309/repatriated-artwork-timeline-2023/. ↑
  2. Francesca Aton, Three Laws Proposed by France’s Ministry of Culture May Lead to Groundbreaking Restitutions, ARTnews (Jan. 18, 2023), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/france-proposed-laws-restitution-african-art-human-remains-1234654048/. ↑
  3. Emily Buracke, Is 2023 the Year Looted Art Returns Home?, Town and Country (Sep. 20, 2023),https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/arts-and-culture/a42660309/repatriated-artwork-timeline-2023/. ↑
  4. Id. ↑
  5. Robin Pogrebin and Graham Bowley, After Seizures, the Met Sets a Plan to Scour Collections for Looted Art, N.Y. Times (May 9, 2023), https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/09/arts/met-museum-looted-art.html. ↑
  6. Historically called the Elgin Marbles. ↑
  7. The Parthenon, Ancient-Greece.org ( https://www.ancient-greece.org/architecture/parthenon.html ↑
  8. The Editors of Encyclopaedia, Elgin Marbles, Encyclopedia Britannica (Sep. 3, 2023), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles. ↑
  9. Id. ↑
  10. Id. ↑
  11. Id. ↑
  12. Id. ↑
  13. Edited by Peter Cochran, The Curse of Minerva, https://petercochran.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/the_curse_of_minerva1.pdf ↑
  14. The Editors of Encyclopaedia, Elgin Marbles, Encyclopedia Britannica (Sep. 3, 2023), https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles. ↑
  15. Id. ↑
  16. Salvatore Settis, History in the making, The Guardian (Jan. 19, 2004), https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2004/jan/19/art.parthenon. ↑
  17. Alison Lindsey Moore, Looted Art: The Case of the Parthenon Sculptures, 34 THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF IDEAS AND INQUIRY (2007), https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ojii_volumes. ↑
  18. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑
  19. Geraldine Kendall Adams, British Museum opens door to Parthenon deal with Greece, Museums Association (Aug. 2, 2022), https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2022/08/british-museum-opens-door-to-parthenon-deal-with-greece/. ↑
  20. Tessa Solomon, UNESCO Advisory Board Urges British Museum to Return the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Oct. 4, 2021), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/unesco-advisory-board-urges-british-museum-to-return-the-parthenon-Marbles-1234605592/. ↑
  21. News Desk, UK GOVERNMENT REJECTS UNESCO PLEA TO READDRESS OWNERSHIP OF PARTHENON MARBLES, Art Forum (Oct. 7, 2021), (https://www.artforum.com/news/uk-government-rejects-unesco-plea-to-readdress-ownership-of-parthenon-Marbles-250760/ ↑
  22. Adam Payne, The EU Will Tell Britain to Give Back the Ancient Parthenon Marbles, Taken from Greece Over 200 Years Ago, If It Wants a Post-Brexit Trade Deal, BUS. INSIDER (Feb. 20, 2020), https://www.businessinsider.com/brexit-eu-to-ask-uk-to-return-elgin-Marbles-to-greece-in-trade-talks2020-2. ↑
  23. Illiani Magra, In Struggle Over Parthenon Marbles, Greece Gets Unexpected Ally: Xi Jinping, N.Y. TIMES (Nov. 13, 2019), https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/13/world/europe/parthenonMarbles-xi-jinping-greece-china.html. ↑
  24. Alison Lindsey Moore, Looted Art: The Case of the Parthenon Sculptures, 34 THE OSPREY JOURNAL OF IDEAS AND INQUIRY (2007), https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=ojii_volumes. ↑
  25. Id. ↑
  26. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑
  27. Id. ↑
  28. John E. Yocom, Air Pollution Damage To Buildings On The Acropolis, 29 Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association 333 (1979), https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00022470.1979.10470796. ↑
  29. The Acropolis Museum https://www.theacropolismuseum.gr/en. ↑
  30. Cristina Ruiz, How British Museum’s maintenance woes have kept Parthenon Marbles off view for a full year, The Art Newspaper (Nov. 2, 2021), https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2021/11/02/how-maintenance-woes-kept-parthenon-Marbles-off-view ↑
  31. Alexandra Tremayne-Pengelly, The UK Has a 60-Year Old Law Prohibiting Repatriation of Art. Is That About to Change?, The Observer (Feb. 11, 2023), https://observer.com/2023/02/the-uk-has-a-60-year-old-law-prohibiting-repatriation-of-art-is-that-about-to-change/#:~:text=Under%20the%20act%2C%20the%20British,to%20the%20museum’s%20deaccessioning%20policy. ↑
  32. The British Museum Board of Trustees, De-accession Policy, The British Museum (Sep. 29, 2018), https://www.britishmuseum.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/De-accession_Policy_Nov2018.pdf. ↑
  33. Id. ↑
  34. Human Tissue Act 2004 (c. 30), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/contents. ↑
  35. Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 (c. 16), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2009/16/section/1. ↑
  36. Charities Act 2022 (c. 6), https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2022/6/contents/enacted. ↑
  37. Duncan Howitt-Marshall, New Charities Act may compel museums to return cultural artifacts, Ekathimerini (Sep. 30, 2022), https://www.ekathimerini.com/culture/1194535/new-charities-act-may-compel-museums-to-return-cultural-artifacts/. ↑
  38. Ahdaf Soueif, On Resigning from the British Museum’s Board of Trustees, London Review of Books Blog (July 15, 2019), https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2019/july/on-resigning-from-the-british-museum-s-board-of-trustees. ↑
  39. Tessa Solomon, The British Museum Has Been in Secret Talks with Greece Over the Return of the Parthenon Marbles, ARTnews (Dec. 5, 2022), https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/british-museum-and-greece-secretly-discuss-return-of-parthenon-Marbles-1234649187/. ↑

 

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The Real Banksy: Anonymity and Authenticity in the Art Market
Next The Terry House: Case Study about Donor Conditions

Related Art Law Articles

Fragment from (1912) EGON SCHIELE (1890-1918) Ich liebe Gegensätze
Art lawrestitution

US Museums Return Schiele artworks to the heirs of Fritz Grünbaum

January 31, 2024
Center for Art Law
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant The Gelman Collection, one of the most significant collections of modern Mexican art, is at the center of an ongoing legal and financial controversy. With works by Frida Kahlo, Diego Rivera, María Izquierdo, and others, the collection raises complex questions about the protections afforded to National Artistic Monuments under Mexican law. 

Paula Gutierrez de Villasante examines what the collection's uncertain future could mean for Mexico’s cultural heritage. 

📚Read the full article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #MexicanArt #FridaKahlo #ArtFinance
Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what t Learn about Artist Corporations-- exploring what they are, how they work, and the legal and practical considerations for artists!

Please note, this is a hybrid event. Participants are welcome to attend either in person or online via Zoom..

Join the Center for Art Law for Artist Corporations: A New Legal Framework for Creative Practice, a conversation exploring the Colorado Artist Companies Act and what it could mean for artists, lawyers, policymakers, and the broader creative economy.

In 2025, Colorado enacted Senate Bill 133, creating the Artist Corporation (A-Corp); a first-of-its-kind legal business structure designed specifically to recognize and support artists and creative professionals. The legislation offers a new model for balancing artistic practice with sustainable business and legal protections, raising important questions about how the law can better serve creative communities.

Join us for a discussion featuring Lindsay Korotkin, Yancey Strickler, and Sarah Darlene, who will examine the origins of the Artist Corporation, the legislative process behind its creation, and its practical implications for working artists. Drawing on their respective backgrounds in law, advocacy, entrepreneurship, and artistic practice, the panelists will discuss how this innovative legal framework came to fruition, how artists may benefit from it, and whether similar legislation could shape the future of creative industries beyond Colorado.

Following the panel discussion, attendees will have the opportunity to participate in a live audience Q&A as well as a Networking Reception. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #colorado #artistissues
For more than two decades, thousands of counterfei For more than two decades, thousands of counterfeit works attributed to Canadian Anishinaabe artist Norval Morrisseau circulated through galleries, auctions, and private collections. The resulting forgery scandal has made authenticating Morrisseau’s work increasingly difficult and raised larger questions about protecting artists' legacies and the integrity of the art market. 

In her article, Victoria Cook examines the history of the Morrisseau forgery ring and how emerging technologies could help distinguish genuine works from fakes. 

📚 Read the full article at the link in our bio!

1st 📷: Norval Morrisseau, Observations of the Astral World (c. 1994), acrylic on canvas, 236 x 514 cm, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

#ArtLaw #ArtForgery #NorvalMorrisseau #IndigenousArt #CanadianArt
Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Collo Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Colloquium with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. 

Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law

Become a Member

Since 2009, the Center for Art Law has organized hundreds of events and published over 1,200 relevant, accessible, and editorially independent articles. As a nonprofit working with artists and students, the Center for Art Law relies on your support to fund our work. Become a premium subscriber and gain access to discounts on events and archives of articles and/or hundreds of case summaries, intended for a worldwide audience of legal professionals, artists, researchers, and students.

Camille Pissarro, Rue St Honoré, apres midi, effet de pluie, 1897

Camille Pissarro, Rue St Honoré, apres midi, effet de pluie, 1897

$70 /per year

Case Law Corner

See All Benefits

Read case law summaries and enjoy unlimited access to our legendary Case Law Corner, now in a new and improved Database with over 700 entries.

Get this subscription
$75 /per year

Artist & Student Membership

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to our Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
Get this subscription
$150 /per year

Annual Subscription

See All Benefits
  • Access to all articles and past-event recordings
  • Access to Case Law Database
  • Free and discounted access to events
  • Discounts to third-party events
Get this subscription