• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Our articles image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet The Krater in Her Cupboard: Shelby White and the Grey Side of Private Antiquities Collections
Back

The Krater in Her Cupboard: Shelby White and the Grey Side of Private Antiquities Collections

October 27, 2023

Handover of antiquities to Italy, featuring several pieces seized from Shelby White’s collection. (source: Manhattan DA)

By Roxana Wang

Shelby White is exactly the person you would expect to have invaluable kraters in her cupboard. The 85-year-old investor, philanthropist, collector, and trustee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art was highly invested in antiquities. One of her major contributions to the studies of antiquities is her generosity to the MET: in 1995, she and her husband donated $20 million to the MET for the construction of its Greek and Roman Art gallery.[1]  This is how the gallery, opened in 2007, became “the Leon Levy and Shelby White Court.”[2]

April 2022 Shelby White search Warrant, issued by Supreme Court of the State of New York
April 2022 Shelby White search Warrant, issued by Supreme Court of the State of New York

White’s dazzling public figure was dimmed by the shady side of her private antiquities collection. Between June 2021 and March 2023, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office seized 89 stolen antiquities from White, valued at $69 million and originating from 10 different countries.[3] This is not the first time White’s treasure got into trouble. In 2008, White returned 10 rare Greek and Etruscan pieces to Italy and Greece.[4] The dubious provenance of her loans to the MET also raised doubts as early as 1990. Shelby White’s case is a good setting to discuss the obligation of private antiquities collectors and of the museums embracing their loans and donations.

Good-faith Buyer Turned Enabler, or Vice Versa

In a statement from 2008, Shelby White remarked that her collection “was purchased at public auction and from dealers we believed to be reputable.”[5] White’s attorney also claimed that White purchased “in good faith.”[6] The question thus arises: who were those “reputable” dealers, and how does it matter that a private purchaser like White is in good faith?

White’s dealers were “reputable” until they were found out to be traffickers. For example, in 2008, it was revealed that several pieces returned to Italy by White were linked to the notorious European traffickers Giacomo Medici and Robert Symes. Photos of antiquities freshly excavated and encrusted with dirt were found in a raid on Medici’s warehouse in 1995. White purchased some of those pieces through London dealer Robert Symes.[7] Another controversial piece in her possession was the “Weary Hercules,” which was smuggled out of Turkey in the 1980s.[8] Before that statue’s repatriation to Turkey in 2011, White had for a long time opposed its repatriation, claiming that it was acquired “in good faith.”[9]

It seems that “good faith” is a convenient response to suspicion about White’s collection. Given the global scale of the circulation of antiquities, the concept of “good faith” can be complex, especially since the law applying to transferable properties is the law of its current location (lex situs). Different legal systems differ in their treatment of good-faith purchasers. Civil law countries like Switzerland and France often favor good faith purchasers, allowing purchasers to gain title from anyone, as long as the statute of limitation (which starts when the object is stolen from those countries) has run.[10] On the other hand, common law countries like the US and UK uphold the principle of Nemo dat quod non habet (“no one gives what they do not have”), which means that the purchaser has no more right to a transferred property than the seller. A purchaser, therefore, cannot obtain good title to the stolen property regardless of whether they know about its true provenance.[11] Establishing its legal framework for prosecuting antiquities trafficking, the Manhattan DA’s Office relies on the criminal law principle of “once stolen, always stolen,” which entails that “a good-faith purchase does not render a stolen antiquity legal.”[12] By virtue of her being in New York, White has no legal right to many of her precious antiquities.

The legal concerns aside, even if Shelby White invoked “good faith” to dissociate herself from the shady origin of her collection, it is implausible that a seasoned collector like herself knew nothing about provenance research or export certificates. In fact, one does not need in-depth research to be suspicious about some of her antiquities. In May 2023, the Manhattan DA repatriated to China a funerary platform White loaned to the MET 25 years ago. The funerary platform, which was never formally displayed, was encrusted with dirt, a most obvious sign that it was excavated through unprofessional and most likely illicit means.[13] According to David Gill, honorary professor in the Center for Heritage at the University of Kent, White’s claim is representative of that of wealthy, irresponsible collectors: “I’m sure they would say they’ve acquired things in good faith. But the scale of looting that we know—they needed to have done their due diligence before they acquired it.”[14]

Buyer Turned Lender

The major reason why the provenance of Shelby White’s antiquities could be quickly exposed is that she loved to display her private collection. In 1990, more than 200 antiquities from her and her husband’s collection comprised an exhibition at the MET, called “Glories of the Past: Ancient Art from the Shelby White and Leon Levy Collection.”[15] This exhibition actually showed the public the far-from-glorious past of many antiquities. A study by David Gill and Christopher Chippindale showed that 93% of the antiquities exhibited had no clear provenance.[16] Given the close tie between White and the MET, we should also discuss what museums must do with the antiquities of private collectors.

According to the 1986 ICOM Code of Ethics, which applied to the MET when the “Glories of the Past” exhibition was staged, a museum should not accept or acquire any object unless its officers are certain that a valid title can be obtained.[17] The enforcement of this requirement is up to individual museums, and the MET has a history of not fulfilling this duty. A famous instance of such was the acquisition of the Euphronios Krater in 1972. In 1971, one year after the MET participated in the ICOM discussion on cultural property protection, its acquisition committee adopted a policy of sending letters of inquiry to a country’s ministry of culture when provenance information of an object from that country is insufficient. However, no such caution was taken prior to the acquisition of the krater —the acquisitions committee claimed the provenance “satisfactorily” established based on two letters between the dealers, Robert Hecht and Dikran Sarrafian, in which Sarrafian states that his family had owned the krater for over 50 years.[18][19] The MET thus acquired a three-decade scandal.

Interestingly, Shelby White also owned a Euphronios krater, which, different from the legendary “hotpot” acquired in 1972, depicts Ganymede and Herakles rather than the wounded Greek hero Sarpedon. White acquired this krater at the unprecedented price of $1.76 million at an auction in 1990 and sent it to the MET.[20] The krater was repatriated to Italy in 2010. Responding to the repatriation, the MET commented indifferently that “just as she hasn’t commented on the Met’s discussions with Italy, we can’t comment on the discussion that she may be having.”[21] Given the intimate link between a museum and its trustee, it was curious how the MET lightly shrugged off her troubles.

Shelby White’s Euphronios Krater was repatriated two years after AAMD passed its landmark Guidelines on the Acquisition of Archaeological Material and Ancient Art. The 2008 AAMD Guideline, later revised in 2013, stipulates that antiquities to be donated to a museum must have documented history stretching back past 1970, and that museums should publish online documentation of its acquisitions.[22] The stricter regulation of antiquities acquisition made it harder for private collectors to pitch their unprovenanced collections to major museums. According to a study by the Cultural Policy Research Institute (CPRI) in 2009, immediately after the AAMD guideline’s adoption, over 100,000 privately owned ancient Greek, Roman, and related Classical objects in the United States would be barred from most museums.[23] While the statistics might have shown some improvement in major museums’ integrity, they also hint at the enormous wealth of antiquities in private hands—how much value was lost when unprovenanced antiquities are hidden from public scrutiny?

While the MET is still constantly in trouble with its antiquities in recent years, its acquisition policy has tightened. The MET’s current acquisition guideline clearly emphasizes the necessity to conduct provenance research on antiquities in accordance with the AAMD guideline.[24] Earlier this year, the MET also announced the plan to form a four-person team to investigate suspicious works in its collections.[25]

The Illustrious Target: New Trend in Cracking down Antiquities Crime?

Sympathizers of Shelby White maintain that she did not deserve to be “targeted.” Some compared her to Marion True, the Getty curator of Greek and Roman art who was trialed in Italy for acquired looted antiquities because her fame made her a conspicuous target.[26] In the same way that some say Marion True “sacrificed herself on behalf of other museum directors in America,”[27] Carlos Picon, former ancient art curator of the MET, dismissed White’s critics as “so unworldly and so uninformed that they think that attacking Shelby and making graphs of her acquisitions […] is going to change the field.”[28]

Shelby White cannot be compared with Marion True—she was never prosecuted (maybe thanks to her social status). Her “good faith” excuse, despite its inability to retain her treasure, was sometimes partially recognized by foreign officials: in 2008, the Greek Ministry of Culture acknowledged that White purchased Greek antiquities “in good faith,” though it refused to drop its claims on Shelby’s collections.

However, what happened to White’s collection is reflective of recent trends in the antiquities field—major private antiquities collectors are increasingly scrutinized. In December 2021, retired hedge-fund giant Michael Steinhardt surrendered $70 million worth of stolen antiquities to the Manhattan DA.[29] In 2022, the Lindemann family returned $20 million worth of looted antiquities to Cambodia.[30] The tactic of targeting illustrious collectors might have a sound rationale. Afterall, “the high end of the antiquities market is fairly narrow, with a limited number of dealers selling to a limited number of collectors.”[31]

Conclusion: “Glories of the Past”

Shelby White once wrote that her motivation for collecting antiquities was “not only the joy of possessing a beautiful object but the fascination of discovering the links between that object and its place in history.”[32] This is an elegant articulation of the mentality of many antiquities collectors. As Donna Yates wrote in her recent paper “Crime, Material and Meaning in Art World Desirescapes”, the antiquities market is not just defined by the balance between “supply” and “demand,” but by the entrancing interconnection of objects and how they compel people to act against their rationality.[33] In the past decades, we have repeatedly heard curators and directors of the MET proudly declaring that they have assembled the best collection of antiquities, regardless of their shady provenance. The modest gleam of marble and bronze is enticing, but perhaps more so is the idea that a collector, by gaining an assemblage of antiquities, is piecing together the “glories of the past.” Glories of the past, however, cannot be reconjured with money, so collectors should make a wise choice between taking antiquities home, sending them to museums, or keeping them in their original context.

Suggested Readings:

The MET and trafficked antiquities:

  • Spencer Woodman et al., “More than 1000 artifacts in Metropolitan Museum of Art cataloglinked to alleged looting and trafficking figures,” International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (March 20, 2023), available at  https://www.icij.org/investigations/hidden-treasures/more-than-1000-artifacts-in-metropolitan-museum-of-art-catalog-linked-to-alleged-looting-and-trafficking-figures/

 

  • Spencer Woodman and Malia Politzer, “Flurry of seizures intensify pressure on the Met over artifacts linked to accused traffickers,” International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (August 31, 2022), https://www.icij.org/investigations/hidden-treasures/flurry-of-seizures-intensify-pressure-on-the-met-over-artifacts-linked-to-accused-traffickers/

Policies and law surrounding antiquities collections

  • Robin F. Rhodes, ed., Acquisition and Exhibition of Classical Antiquities: Professional, Legal, and Ethical Perspectives (2008), https://undpress.nd.edu/9780268040277/acquisition-and-exhibition-of-classical-antiquities/

 

  • Phyllis Mauch Messenger, “Ethics of Collecting Cultural Heritage,” Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (2014), available at  https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1175#citeas

About the Author

Roxana Wang is a student at the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests focus on the reception of ancient civilizations and the political complications involved in the preservation of our heritage. Her end goal is to contribute to the better regulation of the antiquities market and the policy-making for world heritage conservation.

Sources:

  1. Hugh Eakin and Randy Kennedy, Doubts on Donors’ Collection Cloud Met Antiquities Project, the New York Times (Dec. 10, 2005), available at:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/10/arts/design/doubts-on-donors-collection-cloud-met-antiquities-project.html ↑

  2. Graham Bowley and Tom Mashberg, At the Met, She Holds Court. At Home, She Held 71 Looted Antiquities, the New York Times (July 18, 2023), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/arts/design/shelby-white-the-met-antiquities-investigation.html ↑

  3. D.A. Bragg Returns 12 Antiquities to the Republic of Türkiye, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (March 22, 2023), available at: https://manhattanda.org/d-a-bragg-returns-12-antiquities-to-the-republic-of-turkiye/ ↑

  4. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/arts/18collect.html ↑

  5. Jason Edward Kaufman, New York collector Shelby White returns antiquities to Italy, the Art Newspaper (Jan. 31, 2008), available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2008/02/01/new-york-collector-shelby-white-returns-antiquities-to-italy ↑

  6. Supra note 2 ↑

  7. Elisabetta Povoledo, Collector Returns Art Italy Says Was Looted, the New York Times (Jan. 18, 2008), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/arts/18collect.html ↑

  8. Grace Glueck, Statue in Met show shown to be stolen, the New York Times (Nov. 22, 1990), available at: https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1990/11/22/667690.html?pageNumber=62 ↑

  9. Supra note 2 ↑

  10. Michele Kunitz, Switzerland & the International Trade in Art & Antiquities, 21 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 519 (2000-2001) ↑

  11. Fincham, Derek, Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol. 37, Issue 1 (2009). ↑

  12. Matthew Bogdanos & Apsara Iyer, Statement of Facts, New York County District Attorney (Dec. 6, 2021), available at:

    https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/292/102693/2021-12-06-Steinhardt-Statement-of-Facts-w-Attachments-Filed.pdf ↑

  13. D.A. Bragg Returns Two 7th Century Antiquities to China, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (May 9, 2023), available at: https://manhattanda.org/d-a-bragg-returns-two-7th-century-antiquities-to-china/ ↑

  14. Claire Voon, Looted antiquities returned to Turkey and Italy were seized from New York home of Met trustee Shelby White, the Art Newspaper (Dec. 2, 2022), available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/12/02/looted-antiquities-returned-to-turkey-and-italy-were-seized-from-new-york-home-of-met-trustee-shelby-white ↑

  15. Taylor Dafoe, Authorities Have Confiscated Almost Two Dozen Antiquities From the Collection of Met Trustee Shelby White, artnet news (Dec 5, 2022), available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/met-trustee-shelby-white-have-been-confiscated-by-the-das-office-2223188 ↑

  16. Chippindale, Christopher, and David W. J. Gill. “Material Consequences of Contemporary Classical Collecting.” American Journal of Archaeology 104, no. 3 (2000): 463–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/507226. ↑

  17. International Council of Museums. Code of Professional Ethics. 1990. ↑

  18. Ashton Hawkins, The Euphronios Krater at the Metropolitan Museum: A Question of Provenance, 27 Hastings L.J. 1163 (1976). Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2463&context=hastings_law_journal; ↑

  19. Neil Brodie, Euphronios (Sarpedon) Krater, Trafficking Culture (Sep. 6, 2012), available at: https://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/case-studies/euphronios-sarpedon-krater/ ↑

  20. Jason Horowitz, How Hot Vase It?, Observer (Feb. 20, 2006), available at: https://observer.com/2006/02/how-hot-vase-it/ ↑

  21. Supra, 19 ↑

  22. American Association of Museum Directors, Introduction to the Revisions to the 2008 Guidelines on the Acquisition of Archaeological Material and Ancient Art (2013), available at: https://aamd.org/sites/default/files/document/AAMD%20Guidelines%202013.pdf ↑

  23. Ralph Blumenthal and Tom Mashberg, The Curse of the Outcase Artifact, the New York Times (July 12, 2012), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/arts/design/antiquity-market-grapples-with-stricter-guidelines-for-gifts.html;

    Richard M. Leventhal & Brian I. Daniels, “Orphaned Objects”, Ethical Standards, and the Acquisition of Antiquities, 23 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 339 (2013) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol23/iss2/3 ↑

  24. Collections Management Policy, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (May 9, 2023), available at: https://www.metmuseum.org/-/media/files/about-the-met/policies-and-documents/collections-management-policy/Collections-Management-Policy-May-2023.pdf ↑

  25. Spencer Woodman, In response to scandals and stolen art seizures, the Met plans to scour its own collections for looted artifacts, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (May 11, 2023), available at: https://www.icij.org/investigations/hidden-treasures/in-response-to-scandals-and-stolen-art-seizures-the-met-plans-to-scour-its-own-collections-for-looted-artifacts/ ↑

  26. Shelby White and the “Why Me?” Antiquities Defense UPDATED, CultureGrrl (Jan. 18, 2008), available at: https://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/01/shelby_white_and_the_why_me_an.html ↑

  27. Elisabetta Povoledo, Rome Trial of Ex-Getty Curator Ends, the New York Times (Oct. 13, 2010), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/14/arts/design/14true.html ↑

  28. Rebecca Mead, Den of Antiquity: The Met defends its treasures, the New Yorker (April 2, 2007), available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/04/09/den-of-antiquity#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThere%20are%20hundreds%20of%20antiquities,going%20to%20change%20the%20field. ↑

  29. Greg Donahue, Crime of the Centuries Tomb raiders, crooked art dealers, and museum curators fed Michael Steinhardt’s addiction to antiquities. Many were also stolen, Intelligencer (Feb. 15, 2023), available at: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/michael-steinhardt-antiquities-stolen-artifacts.html ↑

  30. Spencer Woodman et al.,, Magazine spread of ‘most beautiful house in America’ conceals allegedly stolen Cambodian relics, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (Aug 15, 2022), available at: https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/lindemann-cambodia-relics-altered-photo-magazine/ ↑

  31. Laura Gilbert, Tough new scrutiny by district attorney rattles New York antiquities trade, the Art Newspaper (March 8, 2018), available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2018/03/09/tough-new-scrutiny-by-district-attorney-rattles-new-york-antiquities-trade ↑

  32. Dietrich von Bothmer, ed. Glories of the Past: Ancient Art from the Shelby White and Leon Levy Collection (1990), available at:

    https://www.metmuseum.org/art/metpublications/glories_of_the_past_ancient_art_from_the_shelby_white_and_leon_levy_collection ↑

  33. Donna Yates, Crime, Material and Meaning in Art World Desirescapes: How Matter Matters for Art Crime (2021), available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_8 ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous The Legal, Ethical, and Practical Dimensions of Removing Confederate Monuments
Next Preserving Spain’s Cultural Heritage: Challenges and Solutions

Related Art Law Articles

Italy's Bill 2834 A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish Owned Art
Art lawItalylegislative historyNazi-era looted art

Italy’s Bill 2834: A Pathway Toward Restituting Jewish-Owned Art

September 17, 2026
#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation
Art law

#MiPatrimonioNoSeVende: Mexico’s New Era of Cultural Repatriation

September 13, 2026
A New Type of Varnish Nightshade Glaze and Artists Battle with AI Image
Art law

A New Type of Varnish: Nightshade, Glaze, and Artists’ Battle with AI

September 12, 2026
Center for Art Law
AML Guide 2025

AML Guide 2025

Explore our updated AML Survey with key insights on how evolving regulations impact the art market.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

For more than two decades, thousands of counterfei For more than two decades, thousands of counterfeit works attributed to Canadian Anishinaabe artist Norval Morrisseau circulated through galleries, auctions, and private collections. The resulting forgery scandal has made authenticating Morrisseau’s work increasingly difficult and raised larger questions about protecting artists' legacies and the integrity of the art market. 

In her article, Victoria Cook examines the history of the Morrisseau forgery ring and how emerging technologies could help distinguish genuine works from fakes. 

📚 Read the full article at the link in our bio!

1st 📷: Norval Morrisseau, Observations of the Astral World (c. 1994), acrylic on canvas, 236 x 514 cm, National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa

#ArtLaw #ArtForgery #NorvalMorrisseau #IndigenousArt #CanadianArt
Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Collo Don't miss grabbing tickets for our upcoming Colloquium with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. 

Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Join the Center for Art Law along with Dr Michail Risvas, Lecturer in Law and Co-Director of the Centre for International Law and Globalisation at the University of Southampton, on the growing role of arbitration in the art and cultural heritage sector. Drawing on his research and practical examples, Professor Risvas will examine how arbitration is being used to resolve a broad range of art-related and cultural heritage disputes. The program will compare arbitration with traditional litigation, exploring the advantages and limitations of each forum.

Through discussion of case examples and emerging trends, participants will gain a practical understanding of when arbitration may offer a more effective path than litigation and how alternative dispute resolution is shaping the future of art and cultural heritage law.

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #artlawyer #lawyer #arbitration #artmarket #artist #culturalheritage
And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an in And just like that, we’ve reached the end of an inaugural ART & LAW INTENSIVE ✨

Five-day program filled with challenging questions, fascinating discussions, new perspectives, and meaningful encounters at the intersection of visual art and law.

Grateful for the conversations, the knowledge shared, and everyone who made this experience so enriching. 

Until the next chapter in February!
Our last (August) newsletter received excellent vi Our last (August) newsletter received excellent viewing (in September). Welcome back from vacations! You may be pleased to know that our ART x LAW INTENSIVE in Zurich went as promised and we were delighted to have shared with and learned from so many wonderful experts, colleagues, and fellow travelers. Special guests came from North and South America, across Europe, even India and UAE. Without skipping a beat, today we onboard our Fall 2026 Interns, students from Cardozo, NYU, Smith College and other schools, and we are pleased to welcome our 2026-2027 Judith Bresler Fellow, Alexander Stanfield.

Please take a look at our SEPTEMBER newsletter and plan to join us this fall for in person or online events. Thank you to all who have reached out and offered to volunteer over the summer and recently. We are humbled by the growing interest and will keep offering learning and hands-on opportunities as the size of our organization permits. Stay calm and … 

📚 Click the link in our bio to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #newsletter #september #legalresearch
What does it take to report and write a story abou What does it take to report and write a story about stolen art, war, and the people caught at the center of it?

In our latest episode of Art in Brief, Andrea and Paris are joined by Matthew Campbell, award-winning reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek and author of The Man Who Stole the Gods, to discuss his years-long investigation into the looting and trafficking of ancient Khmer artifacts from Cambodia.

We talk about Matthew’s research and reporting process, why he chose to center the story around the book’s main characters, and how he approached telling the stories of complicated figures with nuance and empathy.

🎙️ Listen to the latest episode of Art in Brief and find additional resources including a link to Matthew's book at the link in our bio!

#podcast #centerforartlaw #artinbrief #bloomberg #artcrime
What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and in What happens to an artist’s work, archives, and intellectual property after they’re gone? 

Day 2 of the 2026 CPAL Conference brought together lawyers, appraisers, foundation leaders, and arts professionals to tackle the practical realities of preserving artists’ legacies. Topics included estate planning and appraisals, copyright, archives, and the financial realities of running an artist foundation. One message was especially clear: legacy preservation starts long before an artist’s death. 

📚Read Ian Silverstein’s recap of the conference at the link in our bio!

#WYWH #ArtLaw #ArtistEstates #ArtLawConference #ArtAndLaw
Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiducia Don't miss out on our upcoming Workshop on fiduciary duties within artist-dealer relationships with speaker Aaron Haines!

This workshop will explore the fiduciary duties of gallerists toward their clients and will clarify the distinctions between contract-based relationships and the broader fiduciary obligations gallerists owe, including transparency, prudence, and the prohibition of undisclosed profits. It will also examine common conflicts of interest in the art world and how these fiduciary duties come into play. 

🎟️ Grab your tickets today using the link in our bio!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #legal #workshop #artistrights #artist #artdealer
The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington The Wilbur J. Cohen Federal Building in Washington, D.C. houses five murals and four reliefs by artists including Ben Shahn and Philip Guston. 
The building is now among federal properties currently slated for sale as the government accelerates selling federal real estate. 

What happens to artworks that are physically inseparable from the buildings they were created for? And what does their uncertain future mean for America’s cultural landscape?

📚 Read Sam Brady-Myerov’s latest article at the link in our bio!

#ArtLaw #CenterforArtLaw #NewDealArt #PublicArt #CulturalHeritage
Did you know the portrait of George Washington on Did you know the portrait of George Washington on the $1 bill traces back to a painting by Gilbert Stuart? 

As the US celebrates its 250th anniversary, one of our latest articles explores how Stuart fought to control the reproduction of his Washington portraits at a time when U.S. copyright law did not yet protect paintings. 

📚 Read the full article by Hannah Gadway at the link in our bio! 

#ArtLaw #America250 #GilbertStuart #GeorgeWashington #CopyrightLaw
The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artis The culture of dupes is continuing to plague artists. Those like Lauren Horn and Maggie Stephenson have been victims of others creating copycats of their work and selling it as their own.

Read KimberMarie's new article to understand the impact this issue has on artists and other communities along with ways to push back against the problem.

📚 Check out the full article using the link in our bio!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #legal #legalresearch #artlawyer #dupes #counterfeits #artistrights #artists
Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Any interest in volunteering to help work with our Nazi-Era Looted Art Restitution Cases Project? Listen to Natasha describe her work and the cases she's had the chance to study.

📚 Click the link in our bio to learn more about the project and how to join!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #restitution #art #museums #artlawyer #legal #legalresearch
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law
Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.