• About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
Center for Art Law
  • About
    About
    • Mission
    • Team
    • Boards
    • Mentions & Testimonials
    • Institutional Recognition
    • Annual Reports
    • Current & Past Sponsors
    • Contact Us
  • Resources
    Resources
    • Article Collection
    • Podcast: Art in Brief
    • AML and the Art Market
    • AI and Art Authentication
    • Newsletter
      Newsletter
      • Subscribe
      • Archives
      • In Brief
    • Art Law Library
    • Movies
    • Nazi-looted Art Restitution Database
    • Global Network
      Global Network
      • Courses and Programs
      • Artists’ Assistance
      • Bar Associations
      • Legal Sources
      • Law Firms
      • Student Societies
      • Research Institutions
    • Additional resources
      Additional resources
      • The “Interview” Project
  • Events
    Events
    • Worldwide Calendar
    • Our Events
      Our Events
      • All Events
      • Annual Conferences
        Annual Conferences
        • 2026 Art Law Conference
        • 2025 Art Law Conference
        • 2024 Art Law Conference
        • 2023 Art Law Conference
        • 2022 Art Law Conference
        • 2015 Art Law Conference
  • Programs
    Programs
    • Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      Visual Artists’ Legal Clinics
      • Art & Copyright Law Clinic
      • Artist-Dealer Relationships Clinic
      • Artist Legacy and Estate Planning Clinic
      • Visual Artists’ Immigration Clinic
    • Summer School
      Summer School
      • 2026
      • 2025
    • Internship and Fellowship
    • Judith Bresler Fellowship
  • Case Law Database
Home image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet Art law image/svg+xml 2021 Timothée Giet The Krater in Her Cupboard: Shelby White and the Grey Side of Private Antiquities Collections
Back

The Krater in Her Cupboard: Shelby White and the Grey Side of Private Antiquities Collections

October 27, 2023

Handover of antiquities to Italy, featuring several pieces seized from Shelby White’s collection. (source: Manhattan DA)

By Roxana Wang

Shelby White is exactly the person you would expect to have invaluable kraters in her cupboard. The 85-year-old investor, philanthropist, collector, and trustee of the Metropolitan Museum of Art was highly invested in antiquities. One of her major contributions to the studies of antiquities is her generosity to the MET: in 1995, she and her husband donated $20 million to the MET for the construction of its Greek and Roman Art gallery.[1]  This is how the gallery, opened in 2007, became “the Leon Levy and Shelby White Court.”[2]

April 2022 Shelby White search Warrant, issued by Supreme Court of the State of New York
April 2022 Shelby White search Warrant, issued by Supreme Court of the State of New York

White’s dazzling public figure was dimmed by the shady side of her private antiquities collection. Between June 2021 and March 2023, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office seized 89 stolen antiquities from White, valued at $69 million and originating from 10 different countries.[3] This is not the first time White’s treasure got into trouble. In 2008, White returned 10 rare Greek and Etruscan pieces to Italy and Greece.[4] The dubious provenance of her loans to the MET also raised doubts as early as 1990. Shelby White’s case is a good setting to discuss the obligation of private antiquities collectors and of the museums embracing their loans and donations.

Good-faith Buyer Turned Enabler, or Vice Versa

In a statement from 2008, Shelby White remarked that her collection “was purchased at public auction and from dealers we believed to be reputable.”[5] White’s attorney also claimed that White purchased “in good faith.”[6] The question thus arises: who were those “reputable” dealers, and how does it matter that a private purchaser like White is in good faith?

White’s dealers were “reputable” until they were found out to be traffickers. For example, in 2008, it was revealed that several pieces returned to Italy by White were linked to the notorious European traffickers Giacomo Medici and Robert Symes. Photos of antiquities freshly excavated and encrusted with dirt were found in a raid on Medici’s warehouse in 1995. White purchased some of those pieces through London dealer Robert Symes.[7] Another controversial piece in her possession was the “Weary Hercules,” which was smuggled out of Turkey in the 1980s.[8] Before that statue’s repatriation to Turkey in 2011, White had for a long time opposed its repatriation, claiming that it was acquired “in good faith.”[9]

It seems that “good faith” is a convenient response to suspicion about White’s collection. Given the global scale of the circulation of antiquities, the concept of “good faith” can be complex, especially since the law applying to transferable properties is the law of its current location (lex situs). Different legal systems differ in their treatment of good-faith purchasers. Civil law countries like Switzerland and France often favor good faith purchasers, allowing purchasers to gain title from anyone, as long as the statute of limitation (which starts when the object is stolen from those countries) has run.[10] On the other hand, common law countries like the US and UK uphold the principle of Nemo dat quod non habet (“no one gives what they do not have”), which means that the purchaser has no more right to a transferred property than the seller. A purchaser, therefore, cannot obtain good title to the stolen property regardless of whether they know about its true provenance.[11] Establishing its legal framework for prosecuting antiquities trafficking, the Manhattan DA’s Office relies on the criminal law principle of “once stolen, always stolen,” which entails that “a good-faith purchase does not render a stolen antiquity legal.”[12] By virtue of her being in New York, White has no legal right to many of her precious antiquities.

The legal concerns aside, even if Shelby White invoked “good faith” to dissociate herself from the shady origin of her collection, it is implausible that a seasoned collector like herself knew nothing about provenance research or export certificates. In fact, one does not need in-depth research to be suspicious about some of her antiquities. In May 2023, the Manhattan DA repatriated to China a funerary platform White loaned to the MET 25 years ago. The funerary platform, which was never formally displayed, was encrusted with dirt, a most obvious sign that it was excavated through unprofessional and most likely illicit means.[13] According to David Gill, honorary professor in the Center for Heritage at the University of Kent, White’s claim is representative of that of wealthy, irresponsible collectors: “I’m sure they would say they’ve acquired things in good faith. But the scale of looting that we know—they needed to have done their due diligence before they acquired it.”[14]

Buyer Turned Lender

The major reason why the provenance of Shelby White’s antiquities could be quickly exposed is that she loved to display her private collection. In 1990, more than 200 antiquities from her and her husband’s collection comprised an exhibition at the MET, called “Glories of the Past: Ancient Art from the Shelby White and Leon Levy Collection.”[15] This exhibition actually showed the public the far-from-glorious past of many antiquities. A study by David Gill and Christopher Chippindale showed that 93% of the antiquities exhibited had no clear provenance.[16] Given the close tie between White and the MET, we should also discuss what museums must do with the antiquities of private collectors.

According to the 1986 ICOM Code of Ethics, which applied to the MET when the “Glories of the Past” exhibition was staged, a museum should not accept or acquire any object unless its officers are certain that a valid title can be obtained.[17] The enforcement of this requirement is up to individual museums, and the MET has a history of not fulfilling this duty. A famous instance of such was the acquisition of the Euphronios Krater in 1972. In 1971, one year after the MET participated in the ICOM discussion on cultural property protection, its acquisition committee adopted a policy of sending letters of inquiry to a country’s ministry of culture when provenance information of an object from that country is insufficient. However, no such caution was taken prior to the acquisition of the krater —the acquisitions committee claimed the provenance “satisfactorily” established based on two letters between the dealers, Robert Hecht and Dikran Sarrafian, in which Sarrafian states that his family had owned the krater for over 50 years.[18][19] The MET thus acquired a three-decade scandal.

Interestingly, Shelby White also owned a Euphronios krater, which, different from the legendary “hotpot” acquired in 1972, depicts Ganymede and Herakles rather than the wounded Greek hero Sarpedon. White acquired this krater at the unprecedented price of $1.76 million at an auction in 1990 and sent it to the MET.[20] The krater was repatriated to Italy in 2010. Responding to the repatriation, the MET commented indifferently that “just as she hasn’t commented on the Met’s discussions with Italy, we can’t comment on the discussion that she may be having.”[21] Given the intimate link between a museum and its trustee, it was curious how the MET lightly shrugged off her troubles.

Shelby White’s Euphronios Krater was repatriated two years after AAMD passed its landmark Guidelines on the Acquisition of Archaeological Material and Ancient Art. The 2008 AAMD Guideline, later revised in 2013, stipulates that antiquities to be donated to a museum must have documented history stretching back past 1970, and that museums should publish online documentation of its acquisitions.[22] The stricter regulation of antiquities acquisition made it harder for private collectors to pitch their unprovenanced collections to major museums. According to a study by the Cultural Policy Research Institute (CPRI) in 2009, immediately after the AAMD guideline’s adoption, over 100,000 privately owned ancient Greek, Roman, and related Classical objects in the United States would be barred from most museums.[23] While the statistics might have shown some improvement in major museums’ integrity, they also hint at the enormous wealth of antiquities in private hands—how much value was lost when unprovenanced antiquities are hidden from public scrutiny?

While the MET is still constantly in trouble with its antiquities in recent years, its acquisition policy has tightened. The MET’s current acquisition guideline clearly emphasizes the necessity to conduct provenance research on antiquities in accordance with the AAMD guideline.[24] Earlier this year, the MET also announced the plan to form a four-person team to investigate suspicious works in its collections.[25]

The Illustrious Target: New Trend in Cracking down Antiquities Crime?

Sympathizers of Shelby White maintain that she did not deserve to be “targeted.” Some compared her to Marion True, the Getty curator of Greek and Roman art who was trialed in Italy for acquired looted antiquities because her fame made her a conspicuous target.[26] In the same way that some say Marion True “sacrificed herself on behalf of other museum directors in America,”[27] Carlos Picon, former ancient art curator of the MET, dismissed White’s critics as “so unworldly and so uninformed that they think that attacking Shelby and making graphs of her acquisitions […] is going to change the field.”[28]

Shelby White cannot be compared with Marion True—she was never prosecuted (maybe thanks to her social status). Her “good faith” excuse, despite its inability to retain her treasure, was sometimes partially recognized by foreign officials: in 2008, the Greek Ministry of Culture acknowledged that White purchased Greek antiquities “in good faith,” though it refused to drop its claims on Shelby’s collections.

However, what happened to White’s collection is reflective of recent trends in the antiquities field—major private antiquities collectors are increasingly scrutinized. In December 2021, retired hedge-fund giant Michael Steinhardt surrendered $70 million worth of stolen antiquities to the Manhattan DA.[29] In 2022, the Lindemann family returned $20 million worth of looted antiquities to Cambodia.[30] The tactic of targeting illustrious collectors might have a sound rationale. Afterall, “the high end of the antiquities market is fairly narrow, with a limited number of dealers selling to a limited number of collectors.”[31]

Conclusion: “Glories of the Past”

Shelby White once wrote that her motivation for collecting antiquities was “not only the joy of possessing a beautiful object but the fascination of discovering the links between that object and its place in history.”[32] This is an elegant articulation of the mentality of many antiquities collectors. As Donna Yates wrote in her recent paper “Crime, Material and Meaning in Art World Desirescapes”, the antiquities market is not just defined by the balance between “supply” and “demand,” but by the entrancing interconnection of objects and how they compel people to act against their rationality.[33] In the past decades, we have repeatedly heard curators and directors of the MET proudly declaring that they have assembled the best collection of antiquities, regardless of their shady provenance. The modest gleam of marble and bronze is enticing, but perhaps more so is the idea that a collector, by gaining an assemblage of antiquities, is piecing together the “glories of the past.” Glories of the past, however, cannot be reconjured with money, so collectors should make a wise choice between taking antiquities home, sending them to museums, or keeping them in their original context.

Suggested Readings:

The MET and trafficked antiquities:

  • Spencer Woodman et al., “More than 1000 artifacts in Metropolitan Museum of Art cataloglinked to alleged looting and trafficking figures,” International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (March 20, 2023), available at  https://www.icij.org/investigations/hidden-treasures/more-than-1000-artifacts-in-metropolitan-museum-of-art-catalog-linked-to-alleged-looting-and-trafficking-figures/

 

  • Spencer Woodman and Malia Politzer, “Flurry of seizures intensify pressure on the Met over artifacts linked to accused traffickers,” International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (August 31, 2022), https://www.icij.org/investigations/hidden-treasures/flurry-of-seizures-intensify-pressure-on-the-met-over-artifacts-linked-to-accused-traffickers/

Policies and law surrounding antiquities collections

  • Robin F. Rhodes, ed., Acquisition and Exhibition of Classical Antiquities: Professional, Legal, and Ethical Perspectives (2008), https://undpress.nd.edu/9780268040277/acquisition-and-exhibition-of-classical-antiquities/

 

  • Phyllis Mauch Messenger, “Ethics of Collecting Cultural Heritage,” Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (2014), available at  https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2_1175#citeas

About the Author

Roxana Wang is a student at the University of California, Berkeley. Her research interests focus on the reception of ancient civilizations and the political complications involved in the preservation of our heritage. Her end goal is to contribute to the better regulation of the antiquities market and the policy-making for world heritage conservation.

Sources:

  1. Hugh Eakin and Randy Kennedy, Doubts on Donors’ Collection Cloud Met Antiquities Project, the New York Times (Dec. 10, 2005), available at:

    https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/10/arts/design/doubts-on-donors-collection-cloud-met-antiquities-project.html ↑

  2. Graham Bowley and Tom Mashberg, At the Met, She Holds Court. At Home, She Held 71 Looted Antiquities, the New York Times (July 18, 2023), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/17/arts/design/shelby-white-the-met-antiquities-investigation.html ↑

  3. D.A. Bragg Returns 12 Antiquities to the Republic of Türkiye, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (March 22, 2023), available at: https://manhattanda.org/d-a-bragg-returns-12-antiquities-to-the-republic-of-turkiye/ ↑

  4. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/arts/18collect.html ↑

  5. Jason Edward Kaufman, New York collector Shelby White returns antiquities to Italy, the Art Newspaper (Jan. 31, 2008), available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2008/02/01/new-york-collector-shelby-white-returns-antiquities-to-italy ↑

  6. Supra note 2 ↑

  7. Elisabetta Povoledo, Collector Returns Art Italy Says Was Looted, the New York Times (Jan. 18, 2008), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/arts/18collect.html ↑

  8. Grace Glueck, Statue in Met show shown to be stolen, the New York Times (Nov. 22, 1990), available at: https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1990/11/22/667690.html?pageNumber=62 ↑

  9. Supra note 2 ↑

  10. Michele Kunitz, Switzerland & the International Trade in Art & Antiquities, 21 Nw. J. Int’l L. & Bus. 519 (2000-2001) ↑

  11. Fincham, Derek, Towards a Rigorous Standard for the Good Faith Acquisition of Antiquities, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, Vol. 37, Issue 1 (2009). ↑

  12. Matthew Bogdanos & Apsara Iyer, Statement of Facts, New York County District Attorney (Dec. 6, 2021), available at:

    https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/292/102693/2021-12-06-Steinhardt-Statement-of-Facts-w-Attachments-Filed.pdf ↑

  13. D.A. Bragg Returns Two 7th Century Antiquities to China, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (May 9, 2023), available at: https://manhattanda.org/d-a-bragg-returns-two-7th-century-antiquities-to-china/ ↑

  14. Claire Voon, Looted antiquities returned to Turkey and Italy were seized from New York home of Met trustee Shelby White, the Art Newspaper (Dec. 2, 2022), available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2022/12/02/looted-antiquities-returned-to-turkey-and-italy-were-seized-from-new-york-home-of-met-trustee-shelby-white ↑

  15. Taylor Dafoe, Authorities Have Confiscated Almost Two Dozen Antiquities From the Collection of Met Trustee Shelby White, artnet news (Dec 5, 2022), available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/met-trustee-shelby-white-have-been-confiscated-by-the-das-office-2223188 ↑

  16. Chippindale, Christopher, and David W. J. Gill. “Material Consequences of Contemporary Classical Collecting.” American Journal of Archaeology 104, no. 3 (2000): 463–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/507226. ↑

  17. International Council of Museums. Code of Professional Ethics. 1990. ↑

  18. Ashton Hawkins, The Euphronios Krater at the Metropolitan Museum: A Question of Provenance, 27 Hastings L.J. 1163 (1976). Available at: https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2463&context=hastings_law_journal; ↑

  19. Neil Brodie, Euphronios (Sarpedon) Krater, Trafficking Culture (Sep. 6, 2012), available at: https://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/case-studies/euphronios-sarpedon-krater/ ↑

  20. Jason Horowitz, How Hot Vase It?, Observer (Feb. 20, 2006), available at: https://observer.com/2006/02/how-hot-vase-it/ ↑

  21. Supra, 19 ↑

  22. American Association of Museum Directors, Introduction to the Revisions to the 2008 Guidelines on the Acquisition of Archaeological Material and Ancient Art (2013), available at: https://aamd.org/sites/default/files/document/AAMD%20Guidelines%202013.pdf ↑

  23. Ralph Blumenthal and Tom Mashberg, The Curse of the Outcase Artifact, the New York Times (July 12, 2012), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/arts/design/antiquity-market-grapples-with-stricter-guidelines-for-gifts.html;

    Richard M. Leventhal & Brian I. Daniels, “Orphaned Objects”, Ethical Standards, and the Acquisition of Antiquities, 23 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 339 (2013) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol23/iss2/3 ↑

  24. Collections Management Policy, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (May 9, 2023), available at: https://www.metmuseum.org/-/media/files/about-the-met/policies-and-documents/collections-management-policy/Collections-Management-Policy-May-2023.pdf ↑

  25. Spencer Woodman, In response to scandals and stolen art seizures, the Met plans to scour its own collections for looted artifacts, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (May 11, 2023), available at: https://www.icij.org/investigations/hidden-treasures/in-response-to-scandals-and-stolen-art-seizures-the-met-plans-to-scour-its-own-collections-for-looted-artifacts/ ↑

  26. Shelby White and the “Why Me?” Antiquities Defense UPDATED, CultureGrrl (Jan. 18, 2008), available at: https://www.artsjournal.com/culturegrrl/2008/01/shelby_white_and_the_why_me_an.html ↑

  27. Elisabetta Povoledo, Rome Trial of Ex-Getty Curator Ends, the New York Times (Oct. 13, 2010), available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/14/arts/design/14true.html ↑

  28. Rebecca Mead, Den of Antiquity: The Met defends its treasures, the New Yorker (April 2, 2007), available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/04/09/den-of-antiquity#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThere%20are%20hundreds%20of%20antiquities,going%20to%20change%20the%20field. ↑

  29. Greg Donahue, Crime of the Centuries Tomb raiders, crooked art dealers, and museum curators fed Michael Steinhardt’s addiction to antiquities. Many were also stolen, Intelligencer (Feb. 15, 2023), available at: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/michael-steinhardt-antiquities-stolen-artifacts.html ↑

  30. Spencer Woodman et al.,, Magazine spread of ‘most beautiful house in America’ conceals allegedly stolen Cambodian relics, International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (Aug 15, 2022), available at: https://www.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/lindemann-cambodia-relics-altered-photo-magazine/ ↑

  31. Laura Gilbert, Tough new scrutiny by district attorney rattles New York antiquities trade, the Art Newspaper (March 8, 2018), available at: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2018/03/09/tough-new-scrutiny-by-district-attorney-rattles-new-york-antiquities-trade ↑

  32. Dietrich von Bothmer, ed. Glories of the Past: Ancient Art from the Shelby White and Leon Levy Collection (1990), available at:

    https://www.metmuseum.org/art/metpublications/glories_of_the_past_ancient_art_from_the_shelby_white_and_leon_levy_collection ↑

  33. Donna Yates, Crime, Material and Meaning in Art World Desirescapes: How Matter Matters for Art Crime (2021), available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-84856-9_8 ↑

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and is not meant to provide legal advice. Readers should not construe or rely on any comment or statement in this article as legal advice. For legal advice, readers should seek a consultation with an attorney.

Post navigation

Previous Preserving Spain’s Cultural Heritage: Challenges and Solutions
Next The Legal, Ethical, and Practical Dimensions of Removing Confederate Monuments

Related Art Law Articles

Center for Art Law MET Opera Chagall
Art law

Creative Financing Ideas: A Potential Sale of the Met Opera’s Chagalls

May 11, 2026
Fleurs en Pot
Art law

The Dorville Case: A Judicial Turn Facilitating the Restitution of Artworks Acquired During the French Occupation

May 7, 2026
The Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding Lauren Stein
Art lawNEA

Endowments for the Arts: Shrinking Legal and Economic Landscape of Federal Arts Funding

May 4, 2026
Center for Art Law
What the Heck is Copyright (2)

What is Copy, Right?

2026 Annual Conference

Let’s explore Visual Art, AI, and the Law in the 21st Century together.

 

Reserve Your Ticket TODAY
Guidelines AI and Art Authentication

AI and Art Authentication

Explore the Guidelines for AI and Art Authentication for the responsible, ethical, and transparent use of artificial intelligence.

Download here
Center for Art Law

Follow us on Instagram for the latest in Art Law!

Look! 2026 Art Law Summer School is in session! Look! 2026 Art Law Summer School is in session!
Today is the day! In conjunction with our Annual A Today is the day! In conjunction with our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 we are hosting a silent auction to support the Center’s ongoing research, programming, and dissemination of information and accessible resources in art and cultural property law. The auction will open 
for bidding tonight (May 15th) at 8:00 PM ET. 

Swipe to preview a selection of the artworks that will be available for purchase through the auction and follow the link in our bio to begin bidding!
New York is the World Capital of Art Law! We know, New York is the World Capital of Art Law! We know, we are experts and we have traveled far and wide. Brooklyn is its heart and we salute you from DUMBO and the Brooklyn Bridge, one and all, art law fans and friends! NYC is playing host to countless art and law experiences and encounters this month. We are pleased to share the wealth with our Summer School students come Monday, and we invite all of you to join us on the 27th of May for the Center's Annual Art Law Conference! 🥯 ☕🥂 

#RSVP #artlaw 🎨⚖️
Don’t miss our recent episode!! Andrea and Paris s Don’t miss our recent episode!! Andrea and Paris speak with Elysia Borowy, Executive Director of the Rema Hort Mann Foundation, Christy Ceriale, founder of the foundation’s Young Collectors Initiative, and Antonio Vidal, one of the recipients of the 2026 Emerging Artist Grant.

Through these three perspectives, they explored the inner workings of one of New York’s most prominent art foundations, hearing firsthand about the realities of running a philanthropic arts organization, building a career as a working artist, and navigating the world of collecting as a young person in the city.

Founded in 1995, the Rema Hort Mann Foundation supports both emerging visual artists and individuals battling cancer, providing grants and resources at pivotal moments in their lives and careers.

🎙️ Click the link in our bio to listen anywhere you get your podcasts!
Yesterday marked the launch of our Art Law Film Se Yesterday marked the launch of our Art Law Film Series! 🎥

The first screening was warmly hosted as part of CineLöwenbraukunst at @lowenbraukunst.zurich, and made possible with the generous support of @prohelvetia and @migros_culture_funding. 

We were thrilled to screen the powerful documentary “Elephants & Squirrels” by director Gregor Brändli @gregor_braendli_3000, which follows Sri Lankan artist @deneth_piumakshi_vedaarachchig Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige on her journey advocating for the restitution of cultural heritage from Swiss museums back to the Wanniyala-Aetto indigenous community in Sri Lanka.

The evening offered insightful discussions, highlighting thoughtful approaches to the complex multi-perspective issues of restitution and colonial legacies.

A big thank you to everyone who joined us in Zurich ❤️
Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion on th Join the Center for Art Law for a discussion on the current state of the Anti-Money Laundering Regulations, and how recent and upcoming changes affect art market participants and transactions.

The speakers will offer an update on the regulatory landscape in the United States, issues with enforcement of the AML provisions as well as discuss considerations for private sector on how to stay compliant and prevent money laundering. Finally, we will share the very latest insights we have gained about regulations and enforcement in the UK as they concern  art market participants.

This is your opportunity to learn about the new edition of the Center's AML study of regulations in the EU and other jurisdictions, brush up on the upcoming changes in the UK and the US to the due diligence requirements, and to ask questions.

The event is offered in conjunction with the 2026 Art Law Summer School. 

This event is in-person at Steptoe, New York @ 1114 Avenue of the Americas AND Online.

🎟️ Click the link in our bio to grab your tickets!

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #artlawyer #legalresearch #aml #artcrime #internationallaw
We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Confere We hope you join us for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026 on May 27, 2026. You can join in-person at Brooklyn Law School or online via Zoom.

The 2026 conference will focus on copyright law as it relates to visual art, artificial intelligence, and the rapidly evolving legal landscape of the 21st century. The program will begin with a keynote address, followed by three substantive panels designed to build on one another throughout the afternoon. In addition, we will host a curated group of exhibitors featuring databases, legal tools, and technology platforms relevant to artists’ rights, copyright, and AI. The program will conclude with a reception, providing time for continued discussion, networking, and engagement among speakers, exhibitors, and attendees.

The opening panel will examine the current state of copyright law in the visual arts and the practical challenges facing artists, galleries, institutions, and practitioners. Subsequent panels will address artificial intelligence, recent legislative and regulatory developments, the role of the U.S. Copyright Office, and emerging questions around licensing, enforcement, and appropriation in a contemporary digital environment.

The conference convenes artists, attorneys, scholars, collectors, arts administrators, students, and policy professionals for in-depth and timely discussion, and will be accompanied by a silent auction and exhibitor networking opportunities. 

Closing Remarks by Lindsay Korotkin, Partner, ArentFox Schiff
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 3: Registration Is Dead? Long Live Licensing?

As copyright enforcement becomes more complex, this panel explores the evolving role of registration and the growing importance of licensing agreements in protecting creative works. Panelists will discuss how artists, rights holders, and legal practitioners navigate enforcement today, examining when registration still matters, how licensing structures are being used strategically, and what effective rights management looks like in a shifting legal and art market landscape.

Moderator: Carol J. Steinberg, Art, Copyright & Entertainment Law Attorney, Faculty, School of Visual Arts

Speakers: Janet Hicks, Vice President and Director of Licensing, Artists Rights Society; Yayoi Shionoiri, art lawyer and Vice President of External Affairs and General Counsel at Powerhouse Arts; Martin Cribbs, Intellectual Property Licensing Strategist

You can join us in-person or online! Grab your tickets using the link in our bio! 🎟️ 

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #copyrightregistration #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your Where does this newsletter find you? Checking your passport and tickets on your way to Venice, or floating toward the Most Serene City on the waves of your imagination? Yes, this newsletter is inspired by the 61st Venice Biennale, entitled In Minor Keys, and by the May flurry of activities. For us the month of May closes books on FY 2026 (thanks to you and our programming, we are ending this year strong and ready for the 2026-2027 encore), and it makes our heads spin with final preparations for the Summer School and Annual Conference, punctuated by the arrival of the summer interns (final count is still a mystery). Please share with us your art law stories and experiences as we strive to do the same in New York, Zurich, London, Venice…

The eyes of the art and law world are on La Serenissima because the world needs serenity instead of sirens and because people love art, it imitates life, art that allows us to experiment with real feelings and overcome the drama. From lessons in artistic advocacy with the “Invisible Pavilion” (2026) to historical echoes of the Biennale del Dissenso [Biennial of Dissent] (1977), this Biennale is giving us a lot to process. Hope and joy, loss and disappointment, reunions and new encounters, memorialization and belonging, realization that different motivations drive us to take to the road. Don’t lose your moral compass or your keys, and remember: even minor movements can lead to major reverberations. 

🔗 Check out our May newsletter, using the link in our bio, to get a curated collection of art law news, our most recent published articles, upcoming events, and much more!!

#centerforartlaw #artlaw #artlawyer #lawyer #artissues #newsletter #may #legalresearch
Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Join us on May 27th at Brooklyn Law School for our Annual Art Law Conference 2026: What is Copy, Right? 

We are very excited to introduce you to the topic and speakers for Panel 2: The Copyright Office Weighs In — Three Reports on AI and the Law

This panel examines the U.S. Copyright Office’s three recent reports on artificial intelligence and copyright, unpacking what they clarify, and what they leave unresolved about authorship, ownership, and protection in the age of AI. Panelists will also situate these reports within the broader legal landscape, touching on emerging litigation and contested issues shaping how AI‑generated and AI‑assisted works are treated under current copyright law.

Moderator: Atreya Mathur, Director of Legal Research, Center for Art Law

Speakers: Miriam Lord, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Public Information and Education; Ben Zhao, Neubauer Professor of Computer Science at University of Chicago and Founder, Nightshade & Glaze; Katherine Wilson-Milne, Partner, Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP 

Reserve your tickets today! 🎟️ 

#artlaw #centerforartlaw #copyrightlaw #copyrightlawandart
Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel wit Round, like a circle in a spiral, like a wheel within a wheel… Case law is fascinating, and litigation is often the only path when disputes over valuable art cannot be resolved through negotiation or ADR. 

As news of the renewed HEAR Act spreads through the restitution community, we invite you to read a case review by two of our legal interns, Donyea James (Fordham Law, JD Candidate 2026) and Lauren Stein (Wake Forest University School of Law, JD Candidate 2027), who spent this semester immersed in the facts and law of "Bennigson et al. v. Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation."

$1,552. That is what a Picasso sold for in 1938 by a Jewish businessman fleeing Nazi Germany. Roughly one-tenth of what he sought just six years earlier. The heirs went to court and two courts said the claim came too late. HEAR Act might very well challenge that conclusion. The case is now pending before New York's highest court. 

🔗 Link in bio.

#ArtLaw #Restitution #HolocaustArt #HEARAct #Guggenheim #Picasso #ProvenanceResearch
Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens wh Whose collections? Whose heritage? What happens when the present confronts colonial memory? Join us in Zurich for a special screening of "Elephants & Squirrels," a documentary following Sri Lankan artist Deneth Piumakshi Veda Arachchige as she traces looted artifacts and human remains of the indigenous Wanniyala-Aetto people, held in Swiss museum collections for over a century, and fights for their return home.

Film director Gregor Brändli and the artist will open the evening with reflections on colonial collecting, cultural heritage, and the ethics of museum stewardship.

📅 May 12, 2026 | 18:00 – 21:00
📍 schwarzescafé | Luma Westbau, Limmatstrasse 270, Zurich

This event is free to attend and is offered as part of the CineLöwenbräukunst series. Link in bio for more information.

#ArtLaw #CulturalHeritage #Restitution #Repatriation #Zurich #FilmScreening #ColonialHistory #MuseumEthics 

#MuseumEthics
  • About the Center
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Upcoming Events
  • Internship
  • Case Law Database
  • Log in
  • Become a Member
  • Donate
DISCLAIMER

Center for Art Law is a New York State non-profit fully qualified under provision 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Center does not provide legal representation. Information available on this website is
purely for educational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

TERMS OF USE AND PRIVACY POLICY

Your use of the Site (as defined below) constitutes your consent to this Agreement. Please
read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy carefully.

© 2026 Center for Art Law

Loading Comments...

You must be logged in to post a comment.